Biomedical subjects

Philip D Littlefield

Publications and source records attributed to Philip D Littlefield.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Revision BAHA Surgery.

The osseointegrated auditory implant (BAHA) is a system used for hearing rehabilitation through direct bone conduction. Although BAHA surgery is not difficult, the surgeon must observe meticulous technique to prevent complications. Indications for revision BAHA surgery can be divided into (1) failure of fixture osseointegration; (2) bone overgrowth; or (3) skin reaction or skin loss. This article discusses the conditions that might predispose a patient to require BAHA revision, and the steps, if any, that can be taken to prevent these complications. Specific surgical steps for revision of each of these three conditions are also addressed.

Bone Conduction↗

PubMed2006

Acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) revision.

The authors present their experience of more than 25 years, now in excess of 1200 patients, with cerebellopontine angle tumors. This article focuses on the management of planned subtotal resection of acoustic tumors in five subjects, and unexpected "residual" discovered by MRI scanning in 10 cases, which represents, to the best of the authors' knowledge, a residual rate of 1% of operated patients. The rate of residual tumor is as high as 19% in some series and, in part, depends on the surgical approach. For the purpose of this article, the authors did not include their cases of neurofibromatosis, because these tumors behave differently than unilateral sporadic schwannomas.

Follow-Up Studies↗

PubMed2005

Radiofrequency excision versus monopolar electrosurgical excision for tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We previously compared radiofrequency (Evac) tonsillotomy with monopolar electrosurgical (Bovie) tonsillectomy and showed significantly less pain with the Evac. Tonsillotomy leaves a cuff of tonsil behind, the significance of which is unknown. We hypothesize that Evac tonsillectomy also is less painful than Bovie tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We compared Evac (ENTec Evac 70; ArthroCare, Sunnyvale, CA) and Bovie tonsillectomy in a prospective, blinded fashion. Each participant had 1 tonsil removed by each device. We recorded, by side, the surgical time, blood loss, operative difficulty, pain (postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14), and the side that each patient preferred. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 17 patients. They reported significantly less pain with the Evac (P < 0.036, F = 5.87). The Evac was preferred by 12 of 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Evac tonsillectomy is significantly less painful than Bovie tonsillectomy. Patients blinded to treatment preferred the Evac technique. SIGNIFICANCE: The Evac device decreases postoperative pain.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Radiofrequency ablation versus electrocautery in tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the safety, difficulty of removal, and postoperative pain profile of radiofrequency ablation versus standard electrocautery removal of tonsils. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, blinded study was designed to remove 1 tonsil with each of the 2 methods. Time of operation, estimated blood loss, difficulty of operation, postoperative pain, rate of postoperative hemorrhage, and the patient's preferred technique were evaluated. RESULTS: The operating time was significantly longer (P < 0.007) and the patients reported significantly less pain (P < 0.001) with radiofrequency ablation. There were no differences in blood loss, difficulty of operation, or postoperative hemorrhage rates. The patients preferred the radiofrequency ablation technique (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is a viable method to remove tonsillar tissue. Operating time for this procedure will likely decrease with experience. There was significantly less pain reported with radiofrequency ablation compared with standard electrocautery.

Adult↗