PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Philip J Mease

Publications and source records attributed to Philip J Mease.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PsA-1 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor Psoriatic Arthritis-1 (POETYK PsA-1) trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with PsA na&#xef;ve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: Adults with active PsA, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration &#x2265; 3 mg/L, and &#x2265; 1 PsA-related hand and/or foot erosion detectable via radiograph were randomised 1:1 to oral deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily or placebo through week (W) 16. At W16, patients continued receiving deucravacitinib or switched from placebo to deucravacitinib through W52. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in response (ACR20) at W16. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. Efficacy and safety were evaluated through W52. Post hoc rank analysis of covariance was used to evaluate structural damage with no missing data imputation. RESULTS: In 670 patients, a significantly greater proportion of those receiving deucravacitinib vs placebo achieved ACR20 at W16 (54.2% vs 34.1%, P < .001). Responses with deucravacitinib were increased at W52. Patients who switched from placebo to deucravacitinib achieved improvements similar to those in patients who received continuous deucravacitinib. Inhibition of structural damage was observed at W16 and W52. At W16, incidences of serious adverse events (AEs) (deucravacitinib, 1.8%; placebo, 2.4%) and discontinuations due to AEs (2.4%; 1.8%) were low and remained low through W52, without imbalances in cardiovascular events, malignancies, or opportunistic infections. No new safety signals were detected; no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority vs placebo for clinical responses, patient-reported outcomes, and structural damage inhibition in patients with PsA, with favourable tolerability and safety.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of 2 doses of etanercept (50 vs 100 mg) in active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized double blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of etanercept 50 mg administered twice weekly versus 25 mg administered twice weekly as monotherapy in patients with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) blocker-naäve active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with RA were randomized in an unequal allocation (2:1) in a blinded fashion to receive either 50 mg (51 patients) or 25 mg (26 patients) of etanercept twice a week for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The primary outcome measure, the ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks, showed no difference between the 2 dose groups. In addition, there was no difference in ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses or in EULAR response criteria by Week 24. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients with any non-infectious adverse event. The proportion of patients with upper respiratory tract infections was significantly higher in patients receiving 50 mg etanercept compared with those receiving 25 mg (26% vs 4%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Etanercept as a monotherapy at 50 mg twice weekly does not provide increased efficacy when compared to the standard dose of 25 mg twice weekly in TNF-alpha blocker-naäve patients.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Continued inhibition of radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis following 2 years of treatment with etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and radiographic responses were evaluated in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated for up to 2 years with etanercept. METHODS: Patients were previously randomized to receive placebo or etanercept in a double-blind study and chose to participate in the current open-label extension phase. All patients received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly. Radiographic progression was determined at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years using the Sharp method modified to include joints frequently affected in PsA. Arthritis and psoriasis responses were determined using American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement criteria, PsA response criteria (PsARC), and the psoriasis area severity index (PASI). RESULTS: Of 205 patients randomized, 169 entered open-label, and 141 [71 randomized to receive placebo (placebo/etanercept) and 70 randomized to receive etanercept (etanercept/etanercept)] had radiographic data available for analysis at 2 years. ACR20 criteria, PsARC, and PASI 50 criteria were met by 64%, 84%, and 62%, respectively, of etanercept/etanercept patients at the end of the 48-week open-label period. Placebo/etanercept patients achieved comparable results within 12 weeks that were sustained at 48 weeks (63%, 80%, and 73%). Radiographic progression was inhibited in the etanercept/ etanercept patients (mean adjusted change in total Sharp score of -0.38 from baseline to 2 yrs). In placebo/etanercept patients, disease progression was inhibited once patients began receiving etanercept (mean adjusted change of -0.22 from 1 year to 2 years). Adverse event rates were similar to those observed during randomized phase, with only one serious adverse event deemed possibly related to etanercept. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate a sustained benefit of etanercept treatment, including inhibition of radiographic progression, in patients with PsA.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Alefacept in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alefacept in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients were eligible for this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial if they were ages 18-70 years and had active PsA (> or = 3 swollen joints and > or = 3 tender joints) despite treatment with MTX for > or = 3 months (a stable dosage for > or = 4 weeks prior to enrollment). Patients were stratified according to psoriasis body surface area (BSA) involvement (> or = 3% or < 3%). Alefacept (15 mg) or placebo was administered intramuscularly once weekly for 12 weeks in combination with MTX, followed by 12 weeks of observation during which only MTX treatment was continued. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (an ACR20 response) at week 24. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive alefacept plus MTX (n = 123) or placebo plus MTX (n = 62). At week 24, 54% of patients in the alefacept plus MTX group achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 23% of patients in the placebo plus MTX group (P < 0.001). Mean reductions in tender and swollen joint counts in patients receiving alefacept plus MTX were -8.0 and -6.3, respectively. In patients with psoriasis involving > or = 3% BSA (n = 87), a 50% reduction from the baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index at week 14 was achieved by 53% of patients receiving alefacept plus MTX compared with 17% of those receiving placebo plus MTX (P < 0.001). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. In the alefacept plus MTX group, the incidence of serious adverse events was low (1.6%), and no opportunistic infections or malignancies were reported. CONCLUSION: Alefacept in combination with MTX may be an effective and safe treatment for PsA.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Quality-of-life issues in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: outcome measures and therapies from a dermatological perspective.

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are inflammatory immune-mediated skin and joint conditions with major impacts on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Physical manifestations include unsightly, scaly, pruritic plaques and inflamed joints for patients with psoriatic arthritis. These symptoms can severely impair physical functioning and occupational capability and negatively affect psychosocial domains. Consequently, patients often experience feelings of embarrassment, helplessness, and depression. Recent therapies, including the biologics, have been shown to improve not only the physical signs and symptoms of these conditions, but also patients' HRQOL. To accurately assess these improvements, standardized and validated instruments are needed. However, there are currently a limited number of feasible and validated tools available in dermatology for measuring HRQOL and function. Valuable insights can be acquired from the rheumatology field, and refinement of existing outcome measures through a cooperative and consensus building process between dermatologists and rheumatologists will lead to standardization of assessment tools in the years ahead.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2006

Clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis in dermatologists' offices.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the skin and joint disease of patients with psoriatic arthritis being treated in dermatology clinics. METHODS: A total of 1122 patients who had active psoriatic arthritis were enrolled in a Phase 4, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm, 24-week study. They were treated at 108 community and 17 academic dermatology centers. These patients experienced clinically stable, plaque psoriasis involving > or =10% body surface area and joint disease (either > or = two swollen and > or = two tender/painful joints for > or =3 months, or > or = one joint with sacroiliitis or spondylitis). RESULTS: In general, patient demographics and disease characteristics did not appear to differ between academic and community dermatology sites. Based on patient-reported assessments, patients rated the severity of their baseline joint symptoms lower than the severity of their skin disease. Baseline skin and joint disease measures were not correlated. Psoriatic arthritis was newly diagnosed in 23% of the patients. Most had received prior therapy for psoriasis, but only half had received systemic therapy for psoriatic arthritis. CONCLUSION: Assessment for joint disease in psoriasis patients being treated at dermatology clinics may facilitate earlier psoriatic arthritis diagnosis and treatment initiation, which may prevent disability and other negative impacts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Pregabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain and lowered pain threshold. Other prominent symptoms include disordered sleep and fatigue. FMS affects an estimated 2% of the population, predominantly women. This trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin, a novel alpha(2)-delta ligand, for treatment of symptoms associated with FMS. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, 8-week, randomized clinical trial compared the effects of placebo with those of 150, 300, and 450 mg/day pregabalin on pain, sleep, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in 529 patients with FMS. The primary outcome variable was the comparison of end point mean pain scores, derived from daily diary ratings of pain intensity, between each of the pregabalin treatment groups and the placebo group. RESULTS: Pregabalin at 450 mg/day significantly reduced the average severity of pain in the primary analysis compared with placebo (-0.93 on a 0-10 scale) (P </= 0.001), and significantly more patients in this group had >/=50% improvement in pain at the end point (29%, versus 13% in the placebo group; P = 0.003). Pregabalin at 300 and 450 mg/day was associated with significant improvements in sleep quality, fatigue, and global measures of change. Pregabalin at 450 mg/day improved several domains of health-related quality of life. Dizziness and somnolence were the most frequent adverse events. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were similar across all 4 treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin at 450 mg/day was efficacious for the treatment of FMS, reducing symptoms of pain, disturbed sleep, and fatigue compared with placebo. Pregabalin was well tolerated and improved global measures and health-related quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Adalimumab, a fully human, anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area. RESULTS: At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab-treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo-treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was -0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab-treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo-treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.

Adalimumab↗
PubMed2005

Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis vary widely and are usually not determined by population-based studies. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis and the impact of the disease on quality of life in the US population. METHODS: Patients were selected randomly from the US population and were interviewed by telephone. Cases were defined as patients who reported a physician diagnosis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. RESULTS: Interviews of 27,220 persons were conducted; 601 of the interviewees had psoriasis and 71 had psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The prevalence of psoriatic arthritis was 0.25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18%, 0.31%). The prevalence of psoriatic arthritis among patients with psoriasis was 11% (95% CI: 9%, 14%) and varied substantially based on self-reporting of the extent of skin involvement with psoriasis. Thirty-nine percent of patients with psoriatic arthritis indicated that it was a large problem in everyday life. LIMITATIONS: Psoriatic arthritis was classified on the basis of the patient's self-report. CONCLUSION: Psoriatic arthritis affects an estimated 520,000 patients in the US population, and many rate it as a large problem in everyday life. The prevalence varies widely based on the extent of skin involvement, which demonstrates the importance of performing broadly representative studies to measure the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Psoriatic arthritis therapy advances.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper will review the data published in 2004 on the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, which arthritis affects 6 to 39% of all patients with psoriasis. RECENT FINDINGS: New data from placebo-controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab continue to show sustained effectiveness of these therapies in their ability to control the symptoms and signs of both arthritis and psoriasis, improve quality of life and function, and inhibit disease progression as measured by radiologic changes. Medications that inhibit T cells have been approved for the treatment of psoriasis and have been studied in psoriatic arthritis. The effectiveness of one of these agents, efalizumab, did not achieve statistical significance in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The results of a trial with a second agent, alefacept are pending public review. SUMMARY: There has been a persistent increased focus on the diagnosis and treatment of psoriatic arthritis as newer and more effective drugs than traditional disease-modifying agents have become available.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Adalimumab: an anti-TNF agent for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has a central role in the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Adalimumab (Humira, Abbott Laboratories) is the first fully human, recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets human TNF. Adalimumab blocks the interaction of TNF with the p55 and p75 cell surface TNF receptors, thereby neutralising the activity of this cytokine. In clinical trials of patients with PsA, adalimumab significantly reduced both joint and skin symptoms. In addition, structural changes were inhibited, and statistically and clinically significant improvements in measures of disability and quality of life were observed. Adalimumab was generally safe and well tolerated.

Adalimumab↗
PubMed2005

Effects of prasterone on bone mineral density in women with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving chronic glucocorticoid therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of treatment with prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone) on bone mineral density (BMD) in female patients with mild to moderate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving chronic treatment with glucocorticoids. METHODS: Fifty-five female patients with SLE who had received prednisone (or glucocorticoid equivalent) </= 10 mg/day for >/= 6 months were treated for 1 year with either prasterone 200 mg/day (n = 24) or placebo (n = 31) in this randomized, double blind trial. Prasterone or placebo was added to each patient's one or more concomitant standard SLE medications, including glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, antimalarials, methotrexate, azathioprine, and other immunosuppressives, which were to be maintained at fixed doses for the duration of the study. RESULTS: BMD was significantly improved in patients who received prasterone compared to placebo. At the lumbar spine, there was a mean (SEM) gain in BMD of 1.7 +/- 0.8% in the prasterone group compared to a mean loss in BMD of -1.1 +/- 0.5% in the placebo group (p = 0.003 between groups). For the total hip, mean gain was 2.0 +/- 0.9% in the prasterone group vs a mean loss of -0.3 +/- 0.4% in the placebo group (p = 0.013 between groups). In the prasterone treatment group, the mean gains from baseline at both lumbar spine and hip were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Prasterone treatment prevented BMD loss and significantly increased BMD at both the lumbar spine and total hip in female patients with SLE receiving exogenous glucocorticoids.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy of milnacipran in patients with fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by widespread pain, tenderness, and a variety of other somatic symptoms. Current treatments are modestly effective. Arguably, the best studied and most effective compounds are tricyclic antidepressants (TCA). Milnacipran, a nontricyclic compound that inhibits the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine, may provide many of the beneficial effects of TCA with a superior side effect profile. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients with FM were randomly assigned in a 3:3:2 ratio to receive milnacipran twice daily, milnacipran once daily, or placebo for 3 months in a double-blind dose-escalation trial; 92% of twice-daily and 81% of once-daily participants achieved dose escalation to the target milnacipran dose of 200 mg. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reduction of pain. Both the once- and twice-daily groups showed statistically significant improvements in pain, as well as improvements in global well being, fatigue, and other domains. Response rates for patients receiving milnacipran were equal in patients with and without comorbid depression, but placebo response rates were considerably higher in depressed patients, leading to significantly greater overall efficacy in the nondepressed group. CONCLUSION: In this Phase II study, milnacipran led to statistically significant improvements in pain and other symptoms of FM. The effect sizes were equal to those previously found with TCA, and the drug was generally well tolerated.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2005

Outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis.

Recent advances in biologic therapies have provided hope for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, studies have been hampered by the lack of acceptable and validated outcome measures. This article reviews outcome measures used in the assessment of both skin and joints in PsA, and provides a summary of the Psoriatic Arthritis Workshop during OMERACT 7. A set of domains to be included in the assessment of patients with PsA was derived, and a research agenda was developed.

Arthritis, Psoriatic↗
PubMed2005

Fibromyalgia syndrome.

The objectives of the first OMERACT Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FM) Workshop were to identify and prioritize symptom domains that should be consistently evaluated in FM clinical trials, and to identify aspects of domains and outcome measures that should be part of a concerted research agenda of FM researchers. Such an effort will help standardize and improve the quality of outcomes research in FM. A principal assumption in this workshop has been that there exists a clinical syndrome, generally known as FM, characterized by chronic widespread pain typically associated with fatigue, sleep disturbance, mood disturbance, and other symptoms and signs, and considered to be related to central neuromodulatory dysregulation. FM can be diagnosed using 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria. In preparation for the workshop a Delphi exercise involving 23 FM researchers was conducted to establish a preliminary prioritization of domains of inquiry. At the OMERACT meeting, the workshop included presentation of the Delphi results; a review of placebo-controlled trials of FM treatment, with a focus on the outcome measures used and their performance; a panel discussion of the key issues in FM trials, from both an investigator and regulatory agency perspective; and a voting process by the workshop attendees. The results of the workshop were presented in the plenary session on the final day of the meeting. A prioritized list of domains of FM to be investigated was thus developed, key issues and controversies in the field were debated, and consensus on a research agenda on outcome measure development was reached.

Delphi Technique↗
PubMed2004

Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression.

OBJECTIVE: Etanercept has been shown to improve the articular and cutaneous manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this study, we further evaluated the safety, efficacy, and effect on radiographic progression of etanercept in patients with PsA. METHODS: Patients with PsA (n = 205) were randomized to receive placebo or 25 mg etanercept subcutaneously twice weekly for 24 weeks. Patients continued to receive blind-labeled therapy in a maintenance phase until all had completed the 24-week phase, then could receive open-label etanercept in a 48-week extension. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks and at 12-week intervals thereafter. Radiographs of the hands and wrists were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks, at entry to the open-label phase, and after 48 weeks in the study. RESULTS: Etanercept significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of PsA and psoriasis. At 12 weeks, 59% of etanercept patients met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria for joint response, compared with 15% of placebo patients (P < 0.0001), and results were sustained at 24 and 48 weeks. At 24 weeks, 23% of etanercept patients eligible for psoriasis evaluation achieved at least 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, compared with 3% of placebo patients (P = 0.001). Radiographic disease progression was inhibited in the etanercept group at 12 months; the mean annualized rate of change in the modified total Sharp score was -0.03 unit, compared with +1.00 unit in the placebo group (P = 0.0001). Etanercept was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Etanercept reduced joint symptoms, improved psoriatic lesions, inhibited radiographic progression, and was well tolerated in patients with PsA.

Adult↗