PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Philip Mease

Publications and source records attributed to Philip Mease.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effect of infliximab therapy on employment, time lost from work, and productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of infliximab on employment status, time lost from work, and productivity in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Two hundred adult patients with PsA were randomized to intravenous infusions of either infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22, with early escape at Week 16. Employment status, workdays missed, and productivity were assessed at baseline and at Week 14. The effect of PsA on daily productivity was assessed using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: At baseline, similar percentages of patients in both treatment groups were employed and similar percentages missed workdays; the mean productivity score at baseline was similar between groups (roughly 3 on a scale of 0 to 10). At Week 14, median productivity increased significantly in the infliximab group compared with the placebo group (67.5% vs 9.2%; p < 0.0001). Compared with the placebo group, higher proportions of patients in the infliximab group improved employment status from unemployed at baseline to employed at Week 14 (11.5% vs 0%; p = 0.084) and from part-time to full-time employment (30.0% vs 10.0%; p = 0.582). Among patients employed at baseline and Week 14, a lower proportion of patients in the infliximab group than in the placebo group had missed workdays in the 4 weeks prior to Week 14 (p = 0.138). CONCLUSION: After 14 weeks of treatment, infliximab improved productivity in patients with active PsA. There was also a trend toward increased employment and reduced time lost from work for patients treated with infliximab.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of existing classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to construct new criteria from observed data. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from consecutive clinic attendees with PsA and other inflammatory arthropathies. Subjects were classified by each of 7 criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Latent class analysis was used to calculate criteria accuracy in order to confirm the validity of clinical diagnosis as the gold standard definition of "case"-ness. Classification and Regression Trees methodology and logistic regression were used to identify items for new criteria, which were then constructed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Data were collected on 588 cases and 536 controls with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 384), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 72), undifferentiated arthritis (n = 38), connective tissue disorders (n = 14), and other diseases (n = 28). The specificity of each set of criteria was high. The sensitivity of the Vasey and Espinoza method (0.97) was similar to that of the method of McGonagle et al (0.98) and greater than that of the methods of Bennett (0.44), Moll and Wright (0.91), the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (0.74), and Gladman et al (0.91). The CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis) criteria consisted of established inflammatory articular disease with at least 3 points from the following features: current psoriasis (assigned a score of 2; all other features were assigned a score of 1), a history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present), a family history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present or there was a history of psoriasis), dactylitis, juxtaarticular new bone formation, rheumatoid factor negativity, and nail dystrophy. These criteria were more specific (0.987 versus 0.960) but less sensitive (0.914 versus 0.972) than those of Vasey and Espinoza. CONCLUSION: The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Management of psoriatic arthritis: the therapeutic interface between rheumatology and dermatology.

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis, which occurs in up to 30% of individuals with psoriasis. Dermatologists and other physicians treating psoriasis are in an ideal position to screen for the condition, and with rheumatologists, strategize optimal therapy. Mild skin and joint manifestations may be treated effectively with topical agents, ultraviolet light therapy, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. More severe manifestations of the disease, including progressive peripheral joint damage, spine disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, and severe skin changes, require systemic therapy. Traditional systemic agents include methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclosporine. When these agents are not adequate or not tolerated, new biologic agents, particularly anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) compounds, have shown significant and enduring benefit in all disease domains, improvement in quality of life and function, and inhibition of progressive joint damage.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Psoriatic arthritis update.

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis occurring in up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Its clear distinction from rheumatoid arthritis has been described clinically, genetically, and immunohistologically. Updated classification criteria have been recently derived from a large international study. Key pathophysiologic cellular processes are being elucidated, increasing our understanding of potential targets of therapy. Therapies that target cells, such as activated T cells, and proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), are rational to pursue. Outcome measures have been "borrowed" from rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis studies. A variety of domains are assessed including joints, skin, enthesium, dactylitis, spine, function, quality of life, and imaging assessment of disease activity and damage. The performance qualities of outcome measures in these various domains is being evaluated by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), and improved measures are being developed and validated specifically for psoriatic arthritis. Traditional therapies for psoriatic arthritis have included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, oral immunomodulatory drugs, topical creams, and light therapy. These therapies have been helpful in controlling both musculoskeletal and dermatologic aspects of the disease, but they may not be fully effective in all disease domains, may eventually show diminished benefit, and may produce treatment-limiting toxicities. In the past several years, use of biologic agents has generally yielded greater benefit across more domains, yielding significant and enduring benefits for clinical manifestations, function, and quality of life, and especially with the anti-TNF agents, inhibition of structural damage. Adverse effects with these agents can be significant but are usually manageable. Cost is also significant, but cost-effectiveness analysis is demonstrating reasonable trade-off between cost and benefit.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Diagnosis and treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

UNLABELLED: Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic, heterogeneous disease whose pathogenesis is unknown, although genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors play major roles. Psoriatic arthritis can follow an aggressive clinical course, and differentiating it from other arthropathies is sometimes difficult. Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis is based on history, physical examination, the usual absence of rheumatoid factor, and characteristic radiographic features. At least 40% of patients with psoriatic arthritis develop radiographically detectable joint destruction; therefore, proper diagnosis and early treatment can have a significant impact on disease course and outcome. Understanding the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease has led to the use of several biologic agents that work by modulating T-cell signaling or by inhibiting key cytokines involved in inflammation, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF inhibitors have demonstrated excellent efficacy in resolving skin and joint disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis and have been shown to be safe agents in various inflammatory disorders. This article reviews the diagnostic and treatment challenges of psoriatic arthritis as they relate to pathogenesis and burden of disease. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should have acquired a more comprehensive knowledge of our current understanding of the classification, clinical presentation, etiology, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

Arthritis, Psoriatic↗
PubMed2005

Fibromyalgia syndrome: review of clinical presentation, pathogenesis, outcome measures, and treatment.

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is a common chronic pain condition that affects at least 2% of the adult population in the USA and other regions in the world where FM is studied. Prevalence rates in some regions have not been ascertained and may be influenced by differences in cultural norms regarding the definition and attribution of chronic pain states. Chronic, widespread pain is the defining feature of FM, but patients may also exhibit a range of other symptoms, including sleep disturbance, fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, headache, and mood disorders. Although the etiology of FM is not completely understood, the syndrome is thought to arise from influencing factors such as stress, medical illness, and a variety of pain conditions in some, but not all patients, in conjunction with a variety of neurotransmitter and neuroendocrine disturbances. These include reduced levels of biogenic amines, increased concentrations of excitatory neurotransmitters, including substance P, and dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. A unifying hypothesis is that FM results from sensitization of the central nervous system. Establishing diagnosis and evaluating effects of therapy in patients with FM may be difficult because of the multifaceted nature of the syndrome and overlap with other chronically painful conditions. Diagnostic criteria, originally developed for research purposes, have aided our understanding of this patient population in both research and clinical settings, but need further refinement as our knowledge about chronic widespread pain evolves. Outcome measures, borrowed from clinical research in pain, rheumatology, neurology, and psychiatry, are able to distinguish treatment response in specific symptom domains. Further work is necessary to validate these measures in FM. In addition, work is under way to develop composite response criteria, intended to address the multidimensional nature of this syndrome. A range of medical treatments, including antidepressants, opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, sedatives, muscle relaxants, and antiepileptics, have been used to treat FM. Nonpharmaceutical treatment modalities, including exercise, physical therapy, massage, acupuncture, and cognitive behavioral therapy, can be helpful. Few of these approaches have been demonstrated to have clear-cut benefits in randomized controlled trials. However, there is now increased interest as more effective treatments are developed and our ability to accurately measure effect of treatment has improved. The multifaceted nature of FM suggests that multimodal individualized treatment programs may be necessary to achieve optimal outcomes in patients with this syndrome.

Fibromyalgia↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Current treatment options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are limited. Leflunomide, an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is highly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and small studies have suggested similar efficacy in PsA. We undertook this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with PsA and psoriasis. METHODS: One hundred ninety patients with active PsA and psoriasis (at least 3% skin involvement) were randomized to receive leflunomide (100 mg/day loading dose for 3 days followed by 20 mg/day orally) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients classified as responders by the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC). Additional efficacy (joint and skin involvement), safety, and quality-of-life assessments were performed. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, 56 of 95 leflunomide-treated patients (58.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 48.4-68.9) and 27 of 91 placebo-treated patients (29.7% [95% CI 20.6-40.2]) were classified as responders by the PsARC (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in favor of leflunomide were also observed in the proportions of patients achieving modified American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria, improvement in the designated psoriasis target lesion, and mean changes from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores and quality-of-life assessments. Diarrhea and alanine aminotransferase increases occurred at higher rates in the leflunomide group. No cases of serious liver toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION: Leflunomide is an effective treatment for PsA and psoriasis, providing a safe and convenient alternative to current therapies.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: clinical features and disease mechanisms.

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disorder affecting approximately 1% to 3% of the world's population. A considerable proportion of patients with psoriasis will develop a form of inflammatory arthritis known as psoriatic arthritis whose prevalence is poorly defined. Significant advances have been made in determining the pathophysiology of both of these diseases, with recent findings strongly implicating T cells and inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha in their pathogenesis. There exists an increasing array of therapies to benefit both skin and musculoskeletal manifestations. Newer therapies, such as the biologics, are providing more targeted approaches with potentially fewer systemic toxicities, providing control of disease symptoms and inhibiting progressive joint damage in those with arthritis, as well as improving long-term function and quality of life.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗