Biomedical subjects

Philippa H Stokes

Publications and source records attributed to Philippa H Stokes.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Dimerization of CtIP may stabilize in vivo interactions with the Retinoblastoma-pocket domain.

CtIP is a tumor suppressor that interacts with Retinoblastoma protein (Rb) to regulate the G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle. Despite its large size (897 residues) CtIP has few known structured regions. Rather it contains several linear motifs that interact with known binding partners, including an LXCXE motif that binds the pocket domain of Rb-family proteins. This LXCXE motif lies at the C-terminus of the only known structured domain, an N-terminal coiled-coil dimerization domain (DD; residues 45-160). Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) and GST-pulldown analyses showed that CtIP requires the LXCXE motif to bind the Rb-pocket. Although isothermal titration calorimetry data indicates that the LXCXE motif is the sole determinant of binding affinity for the Rb-pocket domain (K(A) approximately 10(6)M(-1)), Y2H data indicates that the DD is required to stabilize the interaction in vivo. Thus dimerization may increase the apparent stability of the proteins and/or the lifetime of the complexes.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2006

Mechanism of allosteric regulation of transglutaminase 2 by GTP.

Allosteric regulation is a fundamental mechanism of biological control. Here, we investigated the allosteric mechanism by which GTP inhibits cross-linking activity of transglutaminase 2 (TG2), a multifunctional protein, with postulated roles in receptor signaling, extracellular matrix assembly, and apoptosis. Our findings indicate that at least two components are involved in functionally coupling the allosteric site and active center of TG2, namely (i) GTP binding to mask a conformationally destabilizing switch residue, Arg-579, and to facilitate interdomain interactions that promote adoption of a compact, catalytically inactive conformation and (ii) stabilization of the inactive conformation by an uncommon H bond between a cysteine (Cys-277, an active center residue) and a tyrosine (Tyr-516, a residue located on a loop of the beta-barrel 1 domain that harbors the GTP-binding site). Although not essential for GTP-mediated inhibition of cross-linking, this H bond enhances the rate of formation of the inactive conformer.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2006

Stabilization of a binary protein complex by intein-mediated cyclization.

The study of protein-protein interactions can be hampered by the instability of one or more of the protein complex components. In this study, we showed that intein-mediated cyclization can be used to engineer an artificial intramolecular cyclic protein complex between two interacting proteins: the largely unstable LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) and an unstructured domain of LIM domain binding protein 1 (ldb1). The X-ray structure of the cyclic complex is identical to noncyclized versions of the complex. Chemical and thermal denaturation assays using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and dynamic light scattering were used to compare the relative stabilities of the cyclized complex, the intermolecular (or free) complex, and two linear versions of the intramolecular complex (in which the interacting domains of LMO4 and ldb1 were fused, via a flexible linker, in either orientation). In terms of resistance to denaturation, the cyclic complex is the most stable variant and the intermolecular complex is the least stable; however, the two linear intramolecular variants show significant differences in stability. These differences appear to be related to the relative contact order (the average distance in sequence between residues that make contacts within a structure) of key binding residues at the interface of the two proteins. Thus, the restriction of the more stable component of a complex may enhance stability to a greater extent than restraining less stable components.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2006

Mutation of a critical arginine in the GTP-binding site of transglutaminase 2 disinhibits intracellular cross-linking activity.

Transglutaminase type 2 (TG2; also known as G(h)) is a multifunctional protein involved in diverse cellular processes. It has two well characterized enzyme activities: receptor-stimulated signaling that requires GTP binding and calcium-activated transamidation or cross-linking that is inhibited by GTP. In addition to the GDP binding residues identified from the human TG2 crystal structure (Liu, S., Cerione, R. A., and Clardy, J. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 2743-2747), we have previously implicated Ser171 in GTP binding, as binding is lost with glutamate substitution (Iismaa, S. E., Wu, M.-J., Nanda, N., Church, W. B., and Graham, R. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18259-18265). Here, we have shown that alanine substitution of homologous residues in rat TG2 (Phe174 in the core domain or Arg476, Arg478, or Arg579 in barrel 1) does not affect TG activity but reduces or abolishes GTP binding and GTPgammaS inhibition of TG activity in vitro, indicating that these residues are important in GTP binding. Alanine substitution of Ser171 does not impair GTP binding, indicating this residue does not interact directly with GTP. Arg579 is particularly important for GTP binding, as isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrated a 100-fold reduction in GTP binding affinity by the R579A mutant. Unlike wild-type TG2 or its S171E or F174A mutants, which are sensitive to both trypsin and mu-calpain digestion, R579A is inherently more resistant to mu-calpain, but not trypsin, digestion, indicating reduced accessibility and/or flexibility of this mutant in the region of the calpain cleavage site(s). Basal TG activity of intact R579A stable SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell transfectants was slightly increased relative to wild-type transfectants and, in contrast to the TG activity of the latter, was further stimulated by muscarinic receptor-activated calcium mobilization. Thus, loss of GTP binding sensitizes TG2 to intracellular calcium concentrations. These findings are consistent with the notion that intracellularly, under physiological conditions, TG2 is maintained largely as a latent enzyme, its calcium-activated cross-linking activity being suppressed allosterically by guanine nucleotide binding.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Dimerization of CtIP, a BRCA1- and CtBP-interacting protein, is mediated by an N-terminal coiled-coil motif.

CtIP is a transcriptional co-regulator that binds a number of proteins involved in cell cycle control and cell development, such as CtBP (C terminus-binding protein), BRCA1 (breast cancer-associated protein-1), and LMO4 (LIM-only protein-4). The only recognizable structural motifs within CtIP are two putative coiled-coil domains located near the N and C termini of the protein. We now show that the N-terminal coiled coil (residues 45-160), but not the C-terminal coiled coil, mediates homodimerization of CtIP in mammalian 293T cells. The N-terminal coiled coil did not facilitate binding to LMO4 and BRCA1 proteins in these cells. A protease-resistant domain (residues 27-168) that minimally encompasses the putative N-terminal coiled coil was identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. This region is predicted to contain two smaller coiled-coil regions. The CtIP-(45-160) dimerization domain is helical and dimeric, indicating that the domain does form a coiled coil. The two smaller domains, CtIP-(45-92) and CtIP-(93-160), also formed dimers of lower binding affinity, but with less helical content than the longer peptide. The hydrodynamic radius of CtIP-(45-160) is the same as those of CtIP-(45-92) and CtIP-(93-160), implying that CtIP-(45-160) does not form a single long coiled coil, but a more compact structure involving homodimerization of the two smaller coiled coils, which fold back as a four-helix bundle or other compact structure. These results suggest a specific model for CtIP homodimerization via its N terminus and contribute to an improved understanding of how this protein might assemble other factors required for its role as a transcriptional corepressor.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗