PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pierfrancesco Agostoni

Publications and source records attributed to Pierfrancesco Agostoni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Acute and mid-term local vascular effects of compliant balloon inflation (GuardWire system) on saphenous vein bypass grafts: an angiographic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The GuardWire distal protection device reduces the incidence of periprocedural complications during percutaneous stenting of diseased saphenous vein grafts. Its mechanism of action is based on the occlusion of the vessel distal to the lesion with an inflated compliant balloon before the intervention, and the aspiration of embolized material after stent implantation. Although no safety issues related to the compliant balloon have been reported in vein graft treatment, concerns related to the potential injury of the balloon on the vessel wall have been raised. We thus evaluated the angiographic outcome of the vein graft segment where the compliant balloon of the GuardWire distal protection device was inflated during percutaneous interventions of diseased vein grafts. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients undergoing vein graft stenting, all with successful delivery of the GuardWire system, were enrolled. All patients underwent 6-months follow-up angiography. Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of the vein graft segment where the balloon was inflated was performed before and after the procedure, as well as at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: No differences in reference vessel diameter, minimal luminal diameter and diameter stenosis were evident between the three measurements. In particular, the difference between post-procedural and follow-up minimal luminal diameter (namely late loss) was 0.003+/-0.19 mm (95% confidence interval: -0.06-0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study supports for the first time the "angiographic safety" of low pressure inflations of a compliant balloon in saphenous vein grafts, suggesting the absence of acute and mid-term effects on the vein graft vessel wall.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare, in a randomized fashion, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis and repeated revascularization in native coronary arteries compared with BMS. However, randomized data in SVG are absent. METHODS: Patients with SVG lesions were randomized to SES or BMS. All were scheduled to undergo 6-month coronary angiography. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis, neointimal volume by intravascular ultrasound and major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion, and vessel revascularization). RESULTS: A total of 75 patients with 96 lesions localized in 80 diseased SVGs were included: 38 patients received 60 SES for 47 lesions, whereas 37 patients received 54 BMS for 49 lesions. In-stent late loss was significantly reduced in SES (0.38 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 0.79 +/- 0.66 mm in BMS, p = 0.001). Binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis were reduced, 11.3% versus 30.6% (relative risk [RR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 to 0.97, p = 0.024) and 13.6% versus 32.6% (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, p = 0.031), respectively. Median neointimal volume was 1 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13) in SES versus 24 (interquartile range 8 to 34) in BMS (p < 0.001). Target lesion and vessel revascularization rates were significantly reduced, 5.3% versus 21.6% (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.0, p = 0.047) and 5.3% versus 27% (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, p = 0.012), respectively. Death and myocardial infarction rates were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce late loss in SVG as opposed to BMS. This is associated with a reduction in restenosis rate and repeated target lesion and vessel revascularization procedures. (The RRISC Study; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show; NCT00263263).

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Meta-analysis of the studies assessing temporal changes in coronary plaque volume using intravascular ultrasound.

To assess the temporal effect of statin therapy on coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we searched PubMed for eligible studies published between 1990 and January 2006. Inclusion criteria for retrieved studies were (1) IVUS volume analysis at baseline and follow-up and (2) statin therapy in > or =1 group of patients. All data of interest were abstracted in prespecified structured collection forms. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 4.2. Random-effect weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as summary statistics for comparison of continuous variables. Nine studies of 985 patients (with 11 statin treatment arms) were selected. After a mean follow-up of 9.8 +/- 4.9 months, we found a significant decrease in coronary plaque volume (WMD -5.77 mm(3), 95% confidence interval -10.36 to -1.17, p = 0.01), with no significant heterogeneity across studies (p = 0.47). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed similar trends. Studies in which the achieved low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was <100 mg/dl showed a trend for plaque regression (WMD -7.88 mm(3), 95% confidence interval -16.31 to 0.55, p = 0.07), whereas studies in which the achieved level of LDL cholesterol was > or =100 mg/dl, the trend was less evident (WMD -4.22 mm(3), 95% confidence interval -10.27 to 1.82, p = 0.17). Plaque volume remained essentially unchanged in patients not treated with statins (WMD 0.13 mm(3), 95% confidence interval -4.42 to 4.68, p = 0.96). In conclusion, statin therapy, particularly when achieving the target LDL level, appears to promote a significant regression of coronary plaque volume as measured by IVUS.

Cholesterol, LDL↗
PubMed2006

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease.

AIMS: The role of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established, yet patients happen to discontinue aspirin according to physician's advice or unsupervised. We thus undertook a systematic review to appraise the hazards inherent to aspirin withdrawal or non-compliance in subjects at risk for or with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were systematically searched (updated January 2006). Study designs, patient characteristics, and outcomes were abstracted. Pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR) were computed according to random-effect methods. From the 612 screened studies, six were selected (50,279 patients). One study (31,750 patients) focused on adherence to aspirin therapy in the secondary prevention of CAD, two studies (2594) on aspirin discontinuation in acute CAD, two studies (13,706) on adherence to aspirin therapy before or shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting, and another (2229) on aspirin discontinuation among patients undergoing drug-eluting stenting. Overall, aspirin non-adherence/withdrawal was associated with three-fold higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (OR=3.14 [1.75-5.61], P=0.0001). This risk was magnified in patients with intracoronary stents, as discontinuation of antiplatelet treatment was associated with an even higher risk of adverse events (OR=89.78 [29.90-269.60]). CONCLUSION: Non-compliance or withdrawal of aspirin treatment has ominous prognostic implication in subjects with or at moderate-to-high risk for CAD. Aspirin discontinuation in such patients should be advocated only when bleeding risk clearly overwhelms that of atherothrombotic events.

Aspirin↗
PubMed2006

Dissimilar relevance given to diseases by medical literature, and the potential to create biases in the clinical decision-making process: the case of late stent thrombosis.

We discuss two cases of non-occlusive sub-acute/late stent thrombosis, one correctly diagnosed (with the help of intravascular ultrasound) 12 days after implantation of a sirolimus eluting stent, the other erroneously non recognized 17 days after implantation of a bare metal stent and evolving 6 weeks later in total thrombotic occlusion of the stent itself. We believe that our clinical judgment, accurate in case of sirolimus eluting stent thrombosis, but wrong in case of bare metal stent thrombosis, was largely influenced by the recent literature giving overwhelming attention, in the drug-eluting stent era, to an issue (late stent thrombosis) that was already present but under-considered, also in the bare metal stent era.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to define the current role of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) using a meta-analytic process. BACKGROUND: Multislice spiral computed tomography has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CA) for the diagnosis of CAD. METHODS: Using Medline, we identified 29 studies (2,024 patients) evaluating CAD by means of both MSCT (> or =16 slices) and conventional CA before July 2006. After data extraction the analysis was performed according to a random-effects model. RESULTS: The per-segment analysis pooled the results from 27 studies corresponding to a cumulative number of 22,798 segments. Among unassessable segments, 4.2% were excluded from the analysis and 6.4% were classified at the discretion of the investigators, underscoring the shortcomings of MSCT. With this major limitation, the per-segment sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72% to 89%) and 93% (95% CI 90% to 97%), respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 21.5 (95% CI 13.1 to 35.5) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.21), respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 67.8% (95% CI 57.6% to 78.0%) and 96.5% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), respectively. As expected, the per-patient analysis has shown an increased sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%) but a decreased specificity of 74% (95% CI 65% to 84%). CONCLUSIONS: Multislice spiral computed tomography has shortcomings difficult to overcome in daily practice and, at the more clinically relevant per-patient analysis, continues to have moderate specificity in patients with high prevalence of CAD. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of the newest generation of MSCT, including patients with low to moderate CAD prevalence, will be critical in establishing the clinical role of this emerging technology as an alternative to CA.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2006

Macroscopic assessment of porcine coronary vessel wall trauma after percutaneous cardiac catheterization and intervention.

A macroscopic pathological assessment of the coronary arteries of a pig's heart, in which stent implantation and intra-vascular ultrasound and thermography pullbacks were performed, shows that during percutaneous coronary catheterization and intervention, one of the major vessel traumas occurs in the very proximal part of the coronary arteries, where the guiding catheter tip is manipulated to adequately engage the vessels.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Testing prospectively the effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stents in over 1000 very high-risk patients: design, baseline characteristics, procedural data and in-hospital outcomes of the multicenter Taxus in Real-life Usage Evaluation (TRUE) Study.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) have been proved effective in randomized trials enrolling highly selected patients. Yet, given the uncertainty concerning results of PES implantation in very high-risk patients and lesions, we designed a prospective multicenter registry, the Taxus in Real-life Usage Evaluation (TRUE) Study. STUDY DESIGN, PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND IN-HOSPITAL OUTCOMES: Consecutive patients undergoing PES implantation were enrolled provided that the target lesion treated with PES was an unprotected left main (ULM), a true bifurcation, a chronic total occlusion (CTO), a long lesion (>28 mm), located in a small vessel (<2.75 mm), or the patient had diabetes mellitus. Clinical events will be adjudicated at 1, 7 and 12 months, with 4- to 8-month angiographic follow-up. The primary end-point will be the 7-month occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, i.e. the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] and percutaneous target vessel revascularization [TVR]). To date, patient enrollment has been completed reaching the target of 1065 subjects. These included 322 (30.2%) diabetics, 115 (10.8%) subjects undergoing PES implantation for ULM, 229 (21.5%) in a bifurcation, 191 (17.9%) in a CTO, 430 (40.4%) in a small vessel, and 289 (27.1%) in a long lesion. An average of 1.5+/-0.6 vessels and 2.0+/-1.0 lesions were treated per patient, with 2.0+/-1.2 PES implanted per patient, and a 46+/-30 mm total PES length per patient. In-hospital MACE occurred in 39 (3.7%) patients, with 2 (0.2%) cardiac deaths, 32 (3.0%) MI, 5 (0.5%) TVR, no CABG, and 4 (0.4%) acute stent thromboses. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the availability of randomized trials, only carefully designed and prospective registries can provide timely and accurate assessment of the risk-benefit profile of PES in very high-risk patients. Indeed, the TRUE Study, including as much as 115 ULM and 229 bifurcation interventions, should give important insights into the outcome of PES in such an unprecedented and challenging context.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of ticlopidine vs. clopidogrel in addition to aspirin after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from the TRUE (Taxusin Real-life Usage Evaluation) Study.

Thienopyridines and aspirin are beneficial in patients undergoing bare-metal stent implantation, and aspirin and clopidogrel treatment have also been proved effective after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, despite the common substitution of clopidogrel with ticlopidine because of cost or patient intolerance, there are no data on the comparison of ticlopidine vs. clopidogrel after DES implantation. We hereby compare ticlopidine vs. clopidogrel after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in subjects enrolled in the prospective multicenter Taxus in Real-life Usage Evaluation (TRUE) Study. Across the 505 analyzed patients (112 treated with ticlopidine and 393 with clopidogrel), similar rates of early and mid-term (7 months) adverse thrombotic events were found with either antiplatelet regimen, with the notable exception of 2 cases of late stent thrombosis in patients who had prematurely withdrawn ticlopidine treatment just 3 months after the procedure. These findings thus support the overall safety and effectiveness of ticlopidine after DES implantation, and also confirm the increased risk of late thrombosis when premature withdrawal of thienopyridines occurs.

Aspirin↗
PubMed2006

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

OBJECTIVE: To appraise multiple systematic reviews on the same clinical topic, focusing on predictors and correlates of quality of reporting of meta-analysis (QUOROM) scores. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Reviews providing at least individual quantitative estimates on role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the database of abstracts of reviews of effects, and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (updated March 2005). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Funding, compliance with the QUOROM checklist, scores on the Oxman and Guyatt quality index, and authors' recommendations. RESULTS: 10 systematic reviews, published August 2003 to March 2005, were included. Nine pooled events despite heterogeneity and five recommended routine use of acetylcysteine, whereas the remaining studies called for further research. Compliance with the 18 items on the QUOROM checklist was relatively high (median 16, range 11 to 17), although shorter manuscripts had significantly lower scores (R = 0.73; P = 0.016). Reviewers who reported previous not for profit funding were more likely to score higher on the Oxman and Guyatt quality index. No association was found between QUOROM and Oxman and Guyatt scores (R = -0.06; P = 0.86), mainly because of greater emphasis of the Oxman and Guyatt scores on the appraisal of bias in selection and validity assessment (inadequate in five reviews). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple systematic reviews on the same clinical topic varied in quality of reporting and recommendations. Longer manuscripts and previous not for profit funding were associated with higher quality.

Acetylcysteine↗
PubMed2006

Is late luminal loss an accurate predictor of the clinical effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in the coronary arteries?

Late luminal loss after percutaneous coronary intervention, although not normally distributed, has been shown to be monotonically correlated with the probability of binary angiographic restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. A recently proposed method has been shown to predict the restenosis rate after sirolimus-eluting stent and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation using a power transformation of the value of late loss obtained after implantation of the 2 stent types. We used the same method to compute and compare restenosis rates from late loss values observed in the "head-to-head" randomized sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent comparisons available thus far. Our results showed that the model proposed has a poor overall ability to predict the real incidence and relative risk of restenosis because the use of late loss as an end point tended to overestimate the difference in restenosis, and the derived effect estimate of 1 stent compared with that of the other seemed to be overemphasized with respect to the real risk. We thus believe that further investigations are needed to appraise the real clinical effect of late loss and its reliability as an end point in direct comparative drug-eluting stent trials before its use can be recommended as a clinical surrogate.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation↗
PubMed2006

Mastering the antegrade femoral artery access in patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia: learning curve, complications, and technical tips and tricks.

BACKGROUND: Antegrade femoral access is fraught by technical challenges and steeper learning curve, in comparison with retrograde contralateral femoral access. We appraised learning curve, complications, and technical aspects inherent in the adoption of antegrade approach. METHODS: Consecutive cases in which antegrade access was attempted by a cardiologist experienced in retrograde access, but inexperienced in antegrade, under supervision of an operator with anterograde expertise, were collected. The primary end-point was the occurrence of antegrade access failure or local complications. Major complications were defined as those life-threatening, requiring transfusion, percutaneous, or surgical repair. RESULTS: Anterograde access was attempted in 120 patients. The primary end-point occurred in 14 (11.6%) cases, but according to the learning curve, in 12 (20%) for first 60 cases vs 2 (3.3%) for the last 60 cases (P = 0.008). Access failure in the hands of the in-training operator was similarly found in all cases but one during the first 60 cases. No major complications occurred, while minor complications were found in 9 (7.5%) patients, again with all but two of them occurring in the first 60 cases. These included peri-adventitial extravasation in 8 patients (6.7%), and perforation of a small branch in one (0.8%); all these complications were conservatively and successfully managed. Obesity was the only significant predictor of access failure/complication (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This work, the first to report on the learning curve of the antegrade approach, supports the feasibility and safety of this access site even for an in-training operator, if supervised. A minimum caseload of 60 procedures is likely needed to master this technique.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Clinical effectiveness of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in total coronary occlusions: insights from a systematic overview of randomized trials in light of the drug-eluting stent era.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare, using meta-analytic techniques, bare-metal stent versus balloon angioplasty in the percutaneous treatment of total coronary occlusions by means of a quantitative systematic review and to indicate new avenues for future treatments. METHODS: MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched. Inclusion criteria were random allocation, prospective comparison, and intention to treat. Random-effect odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeated revascularization, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and angiographic restenosis and reocclusion were computed. RESULTS: Nine trials (1409 patients) were included. Death rate was not different in the 2 groups, 0.4% after stenting versus 0.7% after balloon angioplasty (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.21-2.50). MI rate was significantly increased after stenting (6.7% vs 3.4%, OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.22-3.46), mainly because of a higher rate of periprocedural non-Q-wave MI. By contrast, the risk of repeated revascularization was significantly reduced by stenting (17% vs 32%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.53). This yielded to an overall reduction in the rate of MACE after stenting (23.2% vs 35.4%, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.68). Angiographic restenosis and reocclusion were also decreased by stent (41.1% vs 60.9%, OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.57; 6.8% vs 16%, OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.22-0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In total coronary occlusions, stenting yields an important benefit over balloon angioplasty in reduction of MACE, repeated revascularizations, and angiographic restenosis and reocclusion. However, these events remain frequent. Moreover, the finding of an increased rate of periprocedural minor myocardial damage after stenting casts caution. New strategies aimed to reduce the need of repeated revascularizations and periprocedural MIs should be further investigated.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Safety of percutaneous left heart catheterization directly performed by cardiology fellows: a cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: No previous study has analyzed the possible responsibility of fellows-in-training in terms of the risk of complications during cardiac catheterization. Thus, we sought to identify possible risk factors for access site complications following cardiac catheterization procedures, with particular attention to the role of cardiology fellows. METHODS: A total of 1,288 left heart catheterization procedures (both diagnostic and interventional), performed over a 1-year period at a university hospital, were retrospectively evaluated to determine the incidence of local complications (pseudoaneurysm, arterio-venous fistula, major hematoma or bleeding, vascular dissection). Several clinical (age, gender, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, indication to the exam) and procedural (procedure performed by the fellow, access site, type of procedure, urgent setting, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, simultaneous right heart catheterization, use of closure devices) covariables were considered. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event) were also assessed. RESULTS: The overall access site complication rate was 2.6%. On multivariate regression analysis, the only two predictors of local complications were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-6.5) and femoral approach (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.1). The rate of MACCE was 1.2%, mainly after percutaneous coronary interventions, with only 1 death overall (0.07%). Procedures performed by cardiology fellows were not associated with an increased incidence of either complication. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiology fellows can safely perform cardiac catheterization procedures without an increase in the rate of local and major cardiovascular complications. Of course, the presence and watchful supervision of an attending physician is still essential to ensure both patient safety and optimal training.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents across 5854 patients.

There is ongoing debate to identify the most effective, safe and cost-beneficial drug-eluting stent, between the two currently approved and used devices, i.e. sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). To date, head-to-head comparison studies of SES vs PES have been however limited by relatively small sample sizes and the low number of events typically associated with these highly effective coronary devices. To overcome the drawbacks of single trials, direct and indirect comparison meta-analyses have been designed and conducted to thoroughly compare sirolimus- vs paclitaxel eluting-stents. This article provides results of a pooled analysis of such indirect and direct comparisons, definitively demonstrating across 5854 patients the superiority of SES in comparison to PES (odds ratio 0.62 [95% confidence interval 0.50-0.75], p<0.0001 for binary angiographic restenosis, and odds ratio 0.66 [0.52-0.84], p=0.0008 for target lesion revascularization). Indeed, such combination of direct and indirect comparisons should also be envisaged to soundly and timely appraise the next generation of drug-eluting stents.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗