PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Piero L Olliaro

Publications and source records attributed to Piero L Olliaro.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Treatment options for visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review of clinical studies done in India, 1980-2004.

The state of Bihar in India carries the largest share of the world's burden of antimony-resistant visceral leishmaniasis. We analysed clinical studies done in Bihar with different treatments between 1980 and 2004. Overall, 53 studies were included (all but one published), of which 15 were comparative (randomised, quasi-randomised, or non-randomised), 23 dose-finding, and 15 non-comparative. Data from comparative studies were pooled when appropriate for meta-analysis. Overall, these studies enrolled 7263 patients in 123 treatment arms. Adequacy of methods used to do the studies and report on them varied. Unresponsiveness to antimony has developed steadily in the past to such an extent that antimony must now be replaced, despite attempts to stop its progression by increasing dose and duration of therapy. The classic second-line treatments are unsuited: pentamidine is toxic and its efficacy has also declined, and amphotericin B deoxycholate is effective but requires hospitalisation for long periods and toxicity is common. Liposomal amphotericin B is very effective and safe but currently unaffordable because of its high price. Miltefosine-the first oral drug for visceral leishmaniasis-is now registered and marketed in India and is effective, but should be used under supervision to prevent misuse. Paromomycin (or aminosidine) is effective and safe, and although not yet available, a regulatory submission is due soon. To preserve the limited armamentarium of drugs to treat visceral leishmaniasis, drugs should not be deployed unprotected; combinations can make drugs last longer, improve treatment, and reduce costs to households and health systems. India, Bangladesh, and Nepal agreed recently to undertake measures towards the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis. The lessons learnt in Bihar could help inform policy decisions both regionally and elsewhere.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Antimalarial compounds: from bench to bedside.

The emergence and spread of drug-resistant malaria parasites is the major threat to effective malaria control. So far, malaria control has relied heavily on a restricted number of chemically related drugs belonging to either the quinoline or the antifolate groups. Only recently have the artemisinin-type compounds been used widely, predominantly in Southeast Asia. Experience has shown that resistance eventually curtails the life span of antimalarial drugs. If measures are not applied to contain resistance, the investment put into the development of new drugs will be squandered. Current efforts focus, on the one hand, on research into novel compounds with mechanisms of action that are different to the traditionally used drugs, and, on the other hand, on measures to prevent or delay resistance when drugs are introduced. Drug discovery and development are long, risky and expensive ventures. Whilst very few new antimalarial drugs were developed in the last quarter of the 20th century (only four of the nearly 1,400 drugs registered worldwide during 1975-1999), various private and public institutions are at work to discover and develop new compounds. Today, the antimalarial pipeline is relatively healthy. Projects are underway at different stages of drug development, from pre-development to registration. However, there is relatively little novelty, as current development projects still rely upon the traditional quinoline, antifolate and, in particular, artemisinin compounds. New structures are expected from the more upstream discovery efforts but it will take time before they become drugs. Therefore, whilst waiting for the drugs of tomorrow, there is a pressing need for immediately available, effective and affordable drugs that will have long life spans. Drug combinations that have independent modes of action are seen as a way of enhancing efficacy while ensuring mutual protection against resistance. Most research work has focussed on the use of artesunate combined with currently used standard drugs, namely mefloquine, amodiaquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and chloroquine. There is clear evidence that combinations improve efficacy without increasing toxicity. However, the absolute cure rates that are achieved by combinations vary widely and are dependent on the level of resistance of the standard drug. From these studies, further work is underway to produce fixed dose combinations that will be packaged in blister packs. Malaria control programmes need efficacious drugs that can be used with ease by the populations of endemic countries. This review will summarise current antimalarial drug developments and outline recent clinical research that aims to bring artemisinin-based combinations to those that need them most.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Drug resistant falciparum malaria and the use of artesunate-based combinations: focus on clinical trials sponsored by TDR.

Antimalarial drug resistance has now become a serious global challenge and is the principal reason for the decline in antimalarial drug efficacy. Malaria endemic countries need inexpensive and efficacious drugs. Preserving the life spans of antimalarial drugs is a key part of the strategy for rolling back malaria. Artemisinin-based combinations offer a new and potentially highly effective way to counter drug resistance. Clinical trials conducted in African children have attested to the good tolerability of oral artesunate when combined with standard antimalarial drugs. The cure rates of the different combinations were generally dependent on the degree of resistance to the companion drug. They were high for amodiaquine-artesunate, variable for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine-artesunate, and poor for chloroquine-artesunate.

Africa↗