Biomedical subjects

Pierre Albaladejo

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Albaladejo.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Influence of sex on the relation between heart rate and aortic stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) are both cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex on the heart rate-PWV relationship in two populations of normotensive and hypertensive men and women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a first study, steady-state data describing the heart rate-PWV relationship were determined in 558 normotensive men, 308 normotensive women, 323 hypertensive men and 93 hypertensive women. In a second study, the changes in blood pressure and PWV under atrial pacing at 60, 80 and 100 beats/min were investigated in 15 men and 15 women who were either normotensive or hypertensive. RESULTS: In women in study 1, 26.8% of PWV variance in normotensive patients and 15.4% of PWV variance in hypertensive patients was explained by a multiple regression including only age and systolic blood pressure as covariates. In men in study 1, 27% of PWV variance in normotensive patients and 28.5% of PWV variance in hypertensive patients was explained by a multiple regression including age, systolic blood pressure, weight, and also heart rate, as covariates. In study 2, atrial pacing in the overall population tended to decrease mean blood pressure (P = 0.05) and increase pulse pressure (P = 0.003), with no substantial change in PWV. However, when heart rate increased, PWV tended to decrease in women and to increase in men (interaction: P = 0.07).CONCLUSION Accelerated heart rate influences PWV in both normotensive and hypertensive men and, through this mechanism, could influence cardiovascular risk. However, heart rate does not influence PWV in women.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The hemodynamic effects of pediatric caudal anesthesia assessed by esophageal Doppler.

UNLABELLED: Pediatric caudal anesthesia is an effective method with an infrequent complication rate. However, little is known about its cardiovascular consequences. Transesophageal Doppler, a noninvasive method, provides the opportunity for a reappraisal of the hemodynamic effects of this technique. After parental informed consent, we studied 10 children aged 2 mo to 5 yr who were scheduled for lower abdominal surgery. General anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane and was followed by the insertion of a transesophageal Doppler probe. Caudal anesthesia was performed using 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine. Hemodynamic variables were collected before and after caudal anesthesia. No complications arose during insertion of the probe. The mean time between the two sets of measurements was 15 min. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were not modified by caudal anesthesia. Descending aortic blood flow increased significantly from 1.14 to 1.92 L/min. (P = 0.0002). Aortic ejection volume increased from 8.5 to 14.5 mL (P = 0.0002). Aortic vascular resistances decreased from 6279 to 3901 dynes. s(-1) x m(-5) (P = 0.005). Caudal anesthesia did not affect heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure but induced a significant increase in descending aortic blood flow. IMPLICATIONS: Although pediatric caudal anesthesia does not alter heart rate nor arterial blood pressure, significant changes occur in regional blood flow distribution. Descending aortic blood flow increases significantly after caudal anesthesia, whereas lower body vascular resistances decrease.

Anesthesia, Caudal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bilateral lower limb hypoesthesia after radical prostatectomy in the hyperlordotic position under general anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To report a case of postoperative bilateral lower limb hypoesthesia occurring after surgery under general anesthesia in the hyperlordotic position for radical prostatectomy. The possible pathophysiologic mechanisms are discussed. CLINICAL FEATURES: This 52-yr-old patient was slightly overweight and was on fenofibrate for hypercholesterolemia. He had no history of cardiovascular disease. Arterial blood pressure was overall well maintained except for a very transient hypotension at surgical incision. Blood loss was moderate and did not require transfusion. Soon after recovery, the patient complained of paresthesia in both legs and neurological examination revealed bilateral lower limb hypoesthesia, compatible with an incomplete medullar syndrome at the level of T12-L1. On postoperative day one, a plain magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrated a hyperintense signal in the spinal cord from T8 to T9 on T2-weighted images consistent with ischemia of the spinal cord whereas the heterogeneous aspect of the spinal cord was due to an unusually high fat content of the epidural space. Neurological signs improved progressively and one week later the patient had recovered normal sensory functions of both lower limbs. CONCLUSION: Although arterial ischemia is the most common cause of postoperative spinal cord injury, other mechanisms may be invoked. We raise the possibility that a combination of intraoperative risk factors (hypotension, excessive postural changes) with anatomic predispositions (increased epidural venous pressure or fat content, previous bone disease) can produce arterial and/or venous ischemia of the spinal cord.

Humans↗