PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pierre Bey

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Bey.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Conformity index: a review.

We present a critical analysis of the conformity indices described in the literature and an evaluation of their field of application. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, with or without intensity modulation, is based on medical imaging techniques, three-dimensional dosimetry software, compression accessories, and verification procedures. It consists of delineating target volumes and critical healthy tissues to select the best combination of beams. This approach allows better adaptation of the isodose to the tumor volume, while limiting irradiation of healthy tissues. Tools must be developed to evaluate the quality of proposed treatment plans. Dosimetry software provides the dose distribution in each CT section and dose-volume histograms without really indicating the degree of conformity. The conformity index is a complementary tool that attributes a score to a treatment plan or that can compare several treatment plans for the same patient. The future of conformal index in everyday practice therefore remains unclear.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

[Rectal cancer Information dedicated to cancer patients and relatives].

In response to the evolution of the information-seeking behaviour of patients and concerns from health professionals regarding cancer patient information, the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) introduced, in 1998, an information and education program dedicated to patients and relatives, the SOR SAVOIR PATIENT program. The methodology of this program adheres to established quality criteria regarding the elaboration of patient information. Cancer patient information, developed in this program, is based on clinical practice guidelines produced by the FNCLCC and the twenty French regional cancer centres, the National League against Cancer, The National Cancer Institute, the French Hospital Federation, the National Oncology Federation of Regional and University Hospitals, the French Oncology Federation of General Hospitals, many learned societies, as well as an active participation of patients, former patients and caregivers. The handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding rectal cancer is an adapted version of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) Standards, Options and Recommendations for rectal cancer. It is meant to provide a basis for the explanation of the disease and treatments and to facilitate discussions with the healthcare team. It is available from the FNCLCC (101, rue de Tolbiac, 75013 Paris, Tel. (0033) 1 44 23 04 68, www.fnclcc.fr). This document has been validated at the end of 2004 and published in 2005. SOR SAVOIR PATIENT guides are systematically updated when new research becomes available. Information leaflets, extracted from the handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding rectal cancer and published in this edition of the Bulletin du cancer, allow patients to better understand colonoscopy and colostomy, which represent an important patient information need. These articles are meant to inform patients and relatives about the disease and its treatments. It also offers health professionals a synthetic evidence-based patient information source which facilitates discussions with the patient.

Colonoscopy↗
PubMed2006

[Oncolor: a comprehensive cancer network in the Lorraine Region of France].

Legislation governing patients' rights and health care quality (March 2002) provided for the creation of healthcare networks intended to improve the management of patients with complex and/or chronic diseases. As defined in the Cancer Plan, activated in March 2003, an oncological healthcare network covers a particular French region, with the aim of offering patients equal access to the best available care and accompaniment, based on caregiver coordination, shared multidisciplinary tools, and communication. ONCOLOR, the regional cancer network launched in the Lorraine region in 1993, complies with these objectives. Nevertheless, its future development depends on continued dynamism, durable financial support, and regular evaluation of the benefits for patients and caregivers. The key words are professionalism and consensus.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2005

Use of a decision analysis model to assess the cost-effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the management of metachronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Few data exist on the medicoeconomic usefulness of PET in the management of metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer. This study was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PET in the diagnosis and staging of patients with metachronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer using a decision analysis model. METHODS: Two alternatives were compared: CT and CT associated with PET (CT+PET). Transition probabilities were estimated from published data and consultations with experts. Survival data were provided by the Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry (France). Costs of imaging techniques and treatments were assessed using reimbursements from the French health care insurance for the year 2004. Evaluation criteria included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and the proportion of unnecessary operations avoided in patients without metachronous liver metastases. RESULTS: CT+PET was the most cost-effective strategy, presenting an expected incremental cost saving of 2,671 (approximately $3,213) per patient, for the same level of expected effectiveness as CT alone (1.88-y life expectancy per patient). Sensitivity analyses performed on epidemiologic and economic parameters showed that this model was robust. The model also suggested that CT+PET could avoid exploratory surgery for 6.1% of patients-that is, 88.4% risk reduction compared with CT alone. CONCLUSION: PET for diagnosis and staging does not generate additional survival effectiveness compared with CT alone. However cost savings associated with its use and the improvement of therapeutic management therefore justify its generalization in clinical practice.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

The GETUG 70 Gy vs. 80 Gy randomized trial for localized prostate cancer: feasibility and acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: To describe treatments and acute tolerance in a randomized trial comparing 70 Gy and 80 Gy to the prostate in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1999 and February 2002, 306 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (153 patients) or 80 Gy (153 patients) in 17 institutions. Patients exhibited intermediate-prognosis tumors. If the risk of node involvement was greater than 10%, surgical staging was required. Previous prostatectomy was excluded, and androgen deprivation was not admitted. The treatment was delivered in two steps. PTV1-including seminal vesicles, prostate, and a 1-0.5-cm margin-received 46 Gy given with a 4-field conformal technique. PTV2, reduced to prostate with the same margins, irradiated with at least 5 fields. Dose was prescribed according to ICRU recommendations in the 70 Gy group, but adapted at the 80 Gy level. RESULTS: All patients but one in the 80 Gy arm completed the treatment. In the 70 Gy arm, the mean dose to the PTV2 was 69.5 Gy. In the 80 Gy arm, the mean dose in the PTV2 was 78.5 Gy. Acute toxicity according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale during treatment was reported in 306 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms: 12% had no toxicity, 80% complained of bladder toxicity, and 70% complained of rectal symptoms. Two months after the end of treatment, 43% of the 70 Gy level and 48% of the 80 Gy level complained of side effects, including 24% and 20% of sexual disorders. There was 6% and 2% of Grade 3 urinary and rectal toxicity. Five patients required a 10-29-day suspension of the treatment. Acute Grade 2 and 3 side effects were related to PTV and CTV1 size, which was the only independent predictive factor in multivariate analysis. Toxicity was not related to the center, age, arm of treatment, or selected data from dose-volume histogram of organ at risk. CONCLUSION: Treatments were completed in respect to constraints. Acute toxicity was acceptable. Intensity of toxicity depended on target volumes.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and morbidity of arc-therapy radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a comparison with the natural history.

PURPOSE: To report the results of arc-therapy radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and to compare the adverse event rate with the rate expected from the natural history. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective study of our 118 first patients with a mean follow-up of 46 months (range, 5-105 months). The AVMs had features indicating a poor prognosis at initial presentation and had already been treated by previous embolizations in 88% of patients. The mean volume of the targets was 7.4 cm3 (range, 0.3-28.3 cm3). The mean minimal and maximal dose was 17.7 Gy (range, 10-25 Gy) and 24.5 Gy (range, 17-36 Gy), respectively. RESULTS: The crude and 5-year actuarial rate of cure (total obstruction of the AVM shunt at angiography) was 54% (60 of 112) and 77%, respectively. The only independent prognostic factor of cure was the AVM volume (crude cure rate 67% for <7 cm3 vs. 35% for > or =7 cm3; p = 0.001). No patient died. Transient and permanent complications and hemorrhage occurred in 5%, 1.7%, and 6% of patients, respectively. The annual risk of an adverse event (hemorrhage or complication) was 3.9%. CONCLUSION: The results of our series showed that radiosurgery, performed alone or after prior shrinkage of the AVM by embolization, is both effective and well tolerated, with a rate of adverse events comparable to that expected from the natural history.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Clinical practice guidelines in cancerology: comparative study of three decision support-systems for breast and prostate cancer in Lorraine french region].

Oncolor, the French regional cancer network of Lorraine, proposes clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, the treatment and the follow-up of cancers. In addition to paper documents, two computerized supports, a web site and the Kasimir software have been developed to make the use of these guidelines and their updating easier. This study aims at evaluating these three tools in breast and prostate cancer and to determine if computerized supports provide an additional help and an added value. From May to July 2001, 25 physicians of the Oncolor network have analysed, by consulting the guidelines on each of the 3 supports, 23 clinical cases of breast cancer and 22 cases of prostate cancer, i.e. in total 1,293 cases. We observe for breast cancer a response rate consistent with the guideline significantly higher with the Kasimir software compared to paper (87.1% versus 77.8%) or to Internet (87.1% versus 75.8%), an optimisation of the recourse to a specialised physician or a pluridisciplinary committee and globally a good satisfaction of the users. These results induce us to continue with the Kasimir experiment, to develop it for other cancers, especially those with a complex management and to evaluate its impact on medical practices.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

[How to improve the initial management of adult patients with tumors of bone and soft tissues: the experience of a multidisciplinary committee from the Oncolor network before the distribution of regional guidelines].

Tumors of bone and soft tissues in adults are rare accounting in France for 2000 to 2500 new cases per year. These tumors are heterogenous and their diagnosis is made after first surgery. Therefore, an early pluridisciplinary approach, by physicians who have acquired an expertise in this field, is advised before any biopsy or surgical resection and at all the further step in the subfrequent management. This paper describes the experience of a pluridisciplinary committee, specialized in malignant tumors of bone and soft tissues in adults, with a highly specialized team which is part of a network in the treatment of cancer in Lorraine, the Oncolor network, before the distribution of regional guidelines. After a description of the organisation of this committee, we made a retrospective analysis of all the cases submitted to these experts advice for the first time, between January and December 2000. This study reveals an insufficient pluridisciplinary coordination at the initial management, which has been done by making regional referentials available, and therefore some errors which lead in some cases to inadapted treatment. It underlines therefore the necessity to implement more actively the present data of science, and to develop the management in multidisciplinary committees. Oncolor aims to harmonize this pluridisciplinary approach as well as to diffuse standard recommendations.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Training of pharmacy personnel in the management of a centralized unit: the Oncolor network experience].

The network of cancer care units in Lorraine area (Oncolor) developed management training for people working in chemotherapy units, and cytotoxic drug preparation. The programme was framed both for staff of executives (pharmacists), and technicians. Firstly, comparison between practices and theoretical recommendations lead to the elaboration of standardized operating procedures. Secondly, we elaborated a specific handbook for this education programme. A series of four-days independent sessions were organized for pharmacists and technicians. Each session combined theoretical and technical teaching for preparing antineoplastic drugs. Participants passing a successful final examination received a certificate from the Oncolor's network attesting their capacity to manage a chemotherapy unit. Four sessions were performed, with 35 participants. Only 31 passed at final examination. This preliminary experience will be enlarged to all members of the network and regularly brought up to date.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

[Cancer networks].

The complexity of legislation and the obstacle race run by all promoters in search of approval and funding for their projects could have greatly hindered the development of healthcare networks in France, or at least discouraged many promoter. Yet social and health professionals, along with certain healthcare service staff, considered these networks highly useful for decompartmentalising the French healthcare system. They would favour patient-oriented projects. It is not a surprise that the number of networks in the field of oncology is expanding rapidly, with more than 60 projects registered by public authorities by the end of 1999. Cancers are chronic diseases which often bring into play the patient's vital prognosis, as well as psychological and social consequences - sometimes dreadful - for patients and their relatives. Cancer patient management calls for a multidisciplinary approach in elaborating the therapeutic project and providing psychological support. Continuity and consistency of care require a partnership between different care providers from different specialities, with different medical practice and environments - hospital or home care, public or private practice. Though so much information has become available in the medical literature, quality of care demands that each healthcare professional keeps fully aware of the latest diagnostic or therapeutic findings and techniques in his/her field. Certain cancer networks have become a place where care providers and establishments can share methods and medical practice. Network promoters and members have thus been able to regain control over the functioning and the future of their profession. Patients have also obtained a place in decisions concerning their own health. Setting up healthcare networks will certainly shake up the tranquil system which the WHO has reported as the world's best health care system at the dawn of this century. However, this will also probably contribute to maintaining this excellence.

Ethics↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Oncolor is ten years old: the age of discretion for the Lorraine network in oncology].

Oncolor, network in oncology in Lorraine, was born ten years ago, from a group of professionals in the field of oncology who worked closed together with regional administrative authorities. Oncolor was created with respect of equilibrium between the different regional partners avoiding struggle for power. Oncolor was conducting different actions: recognition of hospital sites according to three levels based on technical and humans means at disposal (highly specialised sites, specialised sites, and associated sites); the definition of good practice for hospital pharmacies leading to the generalization of centralized preparation of chemotherapy under responsibility of a pharmacist; the organization of multidisciplinary practice through the written and implementation of clinical guidelines accessible on the web site of the network (www.oncolor.org) even by the patients (86 guidelines on line today); creation and access to a software to help physicians for decision called Kasimir; the formalization of multidisciplinary meetings with a common process. All these tools help physicians in their relationship with the patient. The web site was opened to professionals but also to patients in December 2001. Oncolor was also implicated in different training programs for physicians, pharmacists, nurses and other professionals. The annual budget increased from 47,000 euros in 1998 up to more than 700,000 euros in 2002. To conclude, to build a network in oncology is an exciting task. It must become more professional, keeping in mind the original objective: every patient, whatever his place of consultation is, have to benefit of the best treatment adapted to his personal situation.

France↗