PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pierre Bouche

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Bouche.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Proposed revised electrophysiological criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Electrophysiological criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) were proposed by an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) in 1991. Only 60% of CIDP patients fulfilled these criteria, which therefore appear poorly sensitive. We therefore sought to revise the electrophysiological criteria. We selected 40 CIDP patients and compared them with 35 patients with axonal polyneuropathy, 116 patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) disease, and 66 patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy. The proposed electrophysiological criteria identified 90% of the CIDP patients, although 3% of patients with axonal polyneuropathy were falsely identified. For the CIDP patients, sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 97%, respectively. Of the patients with IgM monoclonal gammaglobulin of undetermined significance (MGUS) and CMT1A, 100% fulfilled these new criteria, whereas 90% and 97%, respectively, fulfilled the AAN criteria. These results suggest that the AAN criteria are more appropriate for IgM MGUS and CMT1A patients than for CIDP patients. We therefore propose new electrophysiological criteria for CIDP that appear to have better sensitivity.

Adult↗

A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy.

This multicentre randomised double blind crossover trial tested the short term efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 2.0 g/kg given over 24 or 48 hours in patients with paraproteinaemic demyelinating neuropathy (PDN). Twenty-two patients were randomised and completed the trial. After 2 weeks, the overall disability grade decreased during both IVIg treatment and placebo but neither change was significant nor was the mean difference between the treatment effects. After 4 weeks the overall disability decreased by a mean of 0.55 [0.67] grades during the IVIg period (p = 0.001) while it was substantially unmodified during the placebo period. The mean difference between the treatment effects was significant (p = 0.05). Overall during the IVIg period 10 patients improved and 11 were stable and one got worse. During the placebo period 4 patients improved, 4 deteriorated and 14 were stable. Many secondary outcome measures, including Rankin scale, time to walk 10 metres, grip strength, sensory symptoms score were significantly better during IVIg treatment. Two serious adverse events occurred during the trial, both during placebo treatment. In conclusion the trial showed some short-term benefit of IVIg in about half of the patients confirming previous observation.

Aged↗

Incidence and risk factors for thalidomide neuropathy: a prospective study of 135 dermatologic patients.

Thalidomide is effective in several cutaneous diseases. Peripheral neuropathy is the most important adverse event limiting its use. Its incidence rate and its relation to thalidomide doses remain unclear. We prospectively monitored 135 patients treated with thalidomide for various dermatologic diseases for 2 y in order to estimate the annual incidence rate and risk factors for neuropathy. Patients underwent standardized neurologic examination and nerve conduction studies prior to, and regularly during treatment. Risk factors for neuropathy were assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Clinical and electrophysiologic evidence of a thalidomide-induced neuropathy were present in 25.2% of the patients; however, when considering all potential cases, this rate reached 55.6%. The incidence rate was maximal during the first year of treatment (20%). The risk of neuropathy was related to the daily dose whatever the duration of treatment (p<10-3). Considering a daily dose < or =50 mg per day as reference, the relative risk for thalidomide neuropathy was 8.2 for a daily dose comprised between 50 and 75 mg per day and 20.2 for a daily dose >75 mg per day (p<10-3). No neuropathy occurred for daily doses < or =25 mg per day. The neuropathy was subclinical in nearly a quarter of patients with such an adverse event. These data confirm the high rate of thalidomide neuropathy and identify the daily dose as the main risk factor. The risk of neuropathy seems to be negligible for doses less than 25 mg per day, whatever the duration of therapy.

Adult↗