Biomedical subjects

Pierre Celsis

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre Celsis.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Deficit of verb generation in nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease.

Clinical and neuroimaging studies have shown that verb processing suggests a preferential participation of a prefrontal network, which is dysfunctional in Parkinson's disease (PD). To assess a verb processing deficit in PD, we compared noun- and verb-generation tasks for 34 nondemented PD patients (according to the Dementia Rating Scale) with 34 matched normal subjects, using two intracategory tasks (noun/noun and verb/verb generation) and two intercategory tasks (noun/verb and verb/noun generation). PD patients were significantly impaired in the two tasks involving verb production, i.e., verb/verb and noun/verb generation, whereas their performance was similar to those of controls in the two tasks requiring noun production. For the two impaired tasks, we assessed 1) the influence of lexical competition that corresponds to the presence of several candidate words for a given stimulus; 2) the influence of slight cognitive dysfunction; and 3) the influence of motor deficit. Significant correlations were found between DRS scores and performance on the noun/verb task, and no significant correlations were found between lexical competition or motor deficit and performance. The specific deficit for verb production in PD patients is discussed in relation to deficits affecting either action or grammatical representations.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

PubMed2003

Neural timing of visual implicit categorization.

Most of the neuroimaging studies that have shown visual category-specific activations or categorization effects have been based on a subtractive approach. In the present study, we investigated, by means of EEG, not only the net result of the categorization but also the dynamics of the process. Subjects had to perform a target detection task throughout an image set of distractors belonging to six categories: letters, geometrical figures, faces, tools, structured textures and Asiatic characters. Multivariate analyses were performed on the responses to the non-target stimuli according to their category. Categorical neural responses were only obtained on P2 latencies and N2 amplitudes. This result suggests that there are no differences in the first stage of the implicit categorization of the distractors (visual analysis and proximal stimulus representation elaboration from 100 to 220 ms) and that differences appear between 220 and 280 ms (matching to structural representations). Over-learned stimuli (e.g. letters) elicited the shortest P2 latency, contrasting with unknown categories (e.g. Asiatic characters) that revealed the longest P2 latencies and flattened N2 waves. Categorical differences indicate that the more a subject knows about an object, the less cognitive resources are used. In conclusion, our results suggest that a reduction in neural activity could reflect an improved accuracy in cognitive and cortical processing.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

A single dose of the serotonin neurotransmission agonist paroxetine enhances motor output: double-blind, placebo-controlled, fMRI study in healthy subjects.

Since serotonin (5-HT) stimulates motor function, pharmacological potentiation of 5-HT neurotransmission may improve motor function in healthy subjects and, possibly, recovery in post-stroke patients. Indeed, fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), increased activation in executive motor areas of healthy subjects as fenozolone, a releaser of monoamines (including noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin) from intracellular stores. This study is intended to test the hypothesis that paroxetine can likewise modulate brain motor activity in a dose-dependent manner in healthy subjects. In a double-blind counterbalanced study, six subjects underwent functional MRI examinations on three sessions 1 week apart (E1, E2, and E3) at the time of peak plasma concentrations (5 h after drug intake, i.e., either 20 or 60 mg of paroxetine or placebo) with a complex sequential opposition task. Rest and activation alternated in a block design. During activation, subjects performed, with the right hand, a 1-Hz-paced task that alternated two fist closings with a sequential opposition task. Paroxetine elicited effects similar to those reported for fluoxetine; notable changes were hyperactivation in the contralateral S1/M1, and posterior SMA and widespread hypoactivation of basal ganglia and cerebellum. There was an inverse correlation between dose and effect: significantly greater effects were observed with the 20-mg dose compared with 60 mg. Paroxetine dose-dependently modulates activation of the entire motor pathway in a way that favors motor output. Thus, a single dose of the SSRI paroxetine reorganized motor processing.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine modulates motor behavior through practice. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-dose study in healthy subjects.

We hypothesized that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could modulate motor activity in healthy subjects in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of a single dose of paroxetine were tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Six randomized and counterbalanced subjects performed behavioral tests in three sessions 1 week apart (E1, E2 and E3) at peak plasma concentration (5 h after drug intake). Each subject was given 20 mg or 60 mg of the drug, or a placebo. Tasks were the Nine Peg Hole test (three trials), Moede dexteritymeter (two trials), and compatible and incompatible reaction time tasks. The results show that at the first trials, performance did not differ after placebo or paroxetine intake. However, 20 and 60 mg of paroxetine improved performance significantly at the third trial of the Nine Peg Hole test and subjects receiving the drug performed 7% faster than those under placebo. An amount of 20 mg, but not 60 mg, of paroxetine improved dexterity significantly at the second trial of the Moede test and subjects performed 30% faster. Conversely, the drug did not affect reaction time for the compatible task and subjects were 11% slower under 20 mg with the incompatible task. Thus, paroxetine decreased the ability to inhibit automatism. Thus, it was concluded that a single dose of paroxetine improved motor performance through practice. But negative effects occurred on tasks including the inhibition of an automatism. Paroxetine enhanced brain motor output (motor activity in S1M1) [NeuroImage, 15 (2002) 26]. This S1M1 hyperactivation is likely to be responsible for the better performance. The brain effect and motor improvement were dose dependent. For both, 20 mg was the optimal dose.

Aged↗