PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pierre De Meyts

Publications and source records attributed to Pierre De Meyts.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

How insulin binds: the B-chain alpha-helix contacts the L1 beta-helix of the insulin receptor.

Binding of insulin to the insulin receptor plays a central role in the hormonal control of metabolism. Here, we investigate possible contact sites between the receptor and the conserved non-polar surface of the B-chain. Evidence is presented that two contiguous sites in an alpha-helix, Val(B12) and Tyr(B16), contact the receptor. Chemical synthesis is exploited to obtain non-standard substitutions in an engineered monomer (DKP-insulin). Substitution of Tyr(B16) by an isosteric photo-activatable derivative (para-azido-phenylalanine) enables efficient cross-linking to the receptor. Such cross-linking is specific and maps to the L1 beta-helix of the alpha-subunit. Because substitution of Val(B12) by larger side-chains markedly impairs receptor binding, cross-linking studies at B12 were not undertaken. Structure-function relationships are instead probed by side-chains of similar or smaller volume: respective substitution of Val(B12) by alanine, threonine, and alpha-aminobutyric acid leads to activities of 1(+/-0.1)%, 13(+/-6)%, and 14(+/-5)% (relative to DKP-insulin) without disproportionate changes in negative cooperativity. NMR structures are essentially identical with native insulin. The absence of transmitted structural changes suggests that the low activities of B12 analogues reflect local perturbation of a "high-affinity" hormone-receptor contact. By contrast, because position B16 tolerates alanine substitution (relative activity 34(+/-10)%), the contribution of this neighboring interaction is smaller. Together, our results support a model in which the B-chain alpha-helix, functioning as an essential recognition element, docks against the L1 beta-helix of the insulin receptor.

Alanine↗
PubMed2004

Insulin and its receptor: structure, function and evolution.

I present here a personal perspective on more than three decades of research into the structural biology of the insulin-receptor interaction. The solution of the three-dimensional structure of insulin in 1969 provided a detailed understanding of the insulin surfaces involved in self-assembly. In subsequent years, hundreds of insulin analogues were prepared by insulin chemists and molecular biologists, with the goal of relating the structure to the biological function of the molecule. The design of methods for direct receptor-binding studies in the 1970s, and the cloning of the receptor in the mid 1980s, provided the required tools for detailed structure-function studies. In the absence of a full three-dimensional structure of the insulin-receptor complex, I attempt to assemble the existing pieces of the puzzle generated by our and other laboratories, in order to generate a plausible mechanistic model of the insulin-receptor interaction that explains its kinetics and negative cooperativity.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Structural biology of insulin and IGF-1 receptors.

The insulin and IGF-1 receptors are members of the superfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Many of these have been implicated in human cancers due to amplification, overexpression or somatic mutations of the gene. Congenital mutations of the RTKs are implicated in a growing number of inherited syndromes. Unlike most RTKs that are single-chain monomeric transmembrane polypeptides, the insulin and IGF-1 receptors are dimers made of two extracellular alpha subunits and two transmembrane beta subunits containing the tyrosine kinase domain. The alpha subunits contain the ligand binding sites, of which at least three subdomains have been mapped by photoaffinity cross-linking, alanine-scanning mutagenesis or minimized receptor constructs. All RTKs are dimeric or oligomeric in the ligand-activated form, a mechanism that allows for transphosphorylation of the kinase domains and triggers the signalling cascade. The residues of insulin involved in receptor binding have been mapped by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. They form at least two major epitopes that partially overlap with the dimer- and hexamer-forming surfaces of the insulin molecule, and we propose that insulin is using those surfaces to cross-link the receptor alpha subunits. This mechanism provides a structural basis for negative cooperativity in binding, and probably also operates in the IGF-receptor interaction.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A highly sensitive and specific assay for determination of IGF-I bioactivity in human serum.

At present, the circulating bioactivity of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is estimated by immunological measurements of IGF-I levels. However, immunoassays ignore the modifying effects of the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) on the interaction between IGF-I and the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR). Therefore, we developed an IGF-I kinase receptor activation assay (KIRA) based on cells transfected with the human IGF-IR gene. The bioassay was sensitive (detection limit 0.08 microg/l), specific (cross-reactivity of insulin, insulin analogs, and proinsulin was <1%; IGF-II cross-reactivity was 12%), and accurate (within- and between-assay coefficients of variation <7 and <15%). The operational range of the assay (0.25-10.0 microg/l) allowed for determination of IGF-I bioactivity in serum from patients with, for example, growth hormone deficiency, type 1 diabetes, and acromegaly. Addition of IGFBPs dose dependently reduced the KIRA signal, whereas addition of IGF-II to preformed complexes (1:1 molar ratio) of IGF-I and IGFBP dose dependently increased IGF-I bioactivity by displacement of bound IGF-I. In conclusion, the KIRA will enable us to compare IGF-I bioactivity with existing immunological measurements of IGF-I in serum and, hopefully, to elucidate the factors that determine IGF-I bioactivity in vivo.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed2003

IRS-4 mediated mitogenic signalling by insulin and growth hormone in LB cells, a murine T-cell lymphoma devoid of IGF-I receptors.

Insulin and growth hormone (GH) induce mitogenic and metabolic signals in cells, GH either directly or indirectly via IGF-I production. We have studied a spontaneous murine T-cell lymphoma (LB cells) devoid of IGF-1 receptors in which proliferation is maintained by insulin [Int. J. Cancer 50 (1992) 80], and show that GH is more potent than insulin, with both GH and insulin dose-response curves for thymidine incorporation being bell-shaped. Binding showed somatogenic rather than lactogenic GH receptors. Insulin stimulated phosphorylation of the insulin receptor and of a 160-kDa protein, identified as the IRS-4 protein. This phosphorylated IRS-4 associated with PI3-kinase, which was activated along with the downstream p70(S6) kinase, whereas the Ras-MAPK pathway was not. Using selective inhibitors, the PI3-kinase, but not p70(S6) kinase or MEK, was found to be involved in insulin-stimulated DNA synthesis. GH induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-4 and nuclear translocation of STAT5. The LB cells constitute a new model for studying GH and insulin signalling without interference of IGF-1 receptors.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2002

Preparation and expression of biologically active prolactin and growth hormone receptors and suppressor of cytokine signaling proteins 1, 2, 3, and 6 tagged with cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins.

To prepare reagents for a study of the interactions of prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) receptors (Rs) with suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins in living cells by fluorescence resonance energy transfer methodology, the respective proteins were tagged with cyan (CFP) or yellow (YFP) fluorescent protein. Constructs encoding ovine (o)PRLR-YFP, oPRLR-CFP, oGHR-YFP, and oGHR-CFP tagged downstream of the receptor DNA were prepared in the plasmid pcDNA plasmid and tested for biological activity in HEK 293T cells transiently cotransfected with those constructs and the reporter gene encoding luciferase. All four constructs were biologically active and as potent as their untagged counterparts. Cells transfected with those proteins exhibited fluorescence in the cytoplasm and the membrane. Constructs encoding DNA tagged with YFP or CFP upstream of SOCS1, SOCS2, SOCS3, and SOCS6 were prepared in pECFP-C1 and pEYFP-C1 plasmids. The biological activities of SOCS1 and SOCS3 tagged at their amino termini were assayed by their ability to inhibit placental lactogen (PL)- or GH-induced activation of JAK2/STAT5-mediated luciferase transcription in HEK 293T cells; the activity of SOCS2 was assayed by its ability to abolish SOCS1-induced inhibition. The tagged proteins exhibited biological activity that was equal to or even more potent than their untagged counterparts. The biological activities of CFP-SOCS2 and YFP-SOCS2 were also assayed using GST-GHR binding assay. Their interaction with the cytosolic domain of GHR was equivalent to their respective untagged counterparts. The biological activity of the construct encoding SOCS6 was not tested because of lack of a suitable assay. Cells transfected with eight of these tagged constructs expressed the fluorescent proteins in both the nucleus and cytosol; the tagged SOCS2 was localized mostly in the latter compartment.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Structural biology of insulin and IGF1 receptors: implications for drug design.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus -- in which the body produces insufficient amounts of insulin or the insulin that is produced does not function properly to control blood glucose -- is an increasingly common disorder. Prospective clinical studies have proven the benefits of tighter glucose control in reducing the frequency and severity of complications of the disease, leading to the advocation of earlier and more aggressive use of insulin therapy. Given the reluctance of patients with type 2 diabetes to inject themselves with insulin, orally active insulin mimetics would be a major therapeutic advance. Here, we discuss recent progress in understanding the structure-function relationships of the insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) receptors, their mechanism of activation and their implications for the design of insulin-receptor agonists for diabetes therapy and IGF1-receptor antagonists for cancer therapy.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Role of histone and transcription factor acetylation in diabetes pathogenesis.

Globally, diabetes (and, in particular, type 2 diabetes) represents a major challenge to world health. Currently in the United States, the costs of treating diabetes and its associated complications exceed 100 billion US dollars annually, and this figure is expected to soar in the near future. Despite decades of intense research efforts, the genetic basis of the events involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes is still poorly understood. Diabetes is a complex multigenic syndrome primarily due to beta-cell dysfunction associated with a variable degree of insulin resistance. Recent advances have led to exciting new developments with regard to our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate insulin transcription. These include data that implicate chromatin as a critical regulator of this event. The 'Histone Code' is a widely accepted hypothesis, whereby sequential modifications to the histones in chromatin lead to regulated transcription of genes. One of the modifications used in the histone code is acetylation. This is probably the best characterized modification of histones, which is carried out under the control of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). These enzymes also regulate the activity of a number of transcription factors through acetylation. Increasing evidence links possible dysregulation of these mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetes, with important therapeutic implications.

Acetylation↗