PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Prabhat K Chand

Publications and source records attributed to Prabhat K Chand.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Dissociative and conversion disorders: defining boundaries.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although dissociative disorders have been described and diagnosed for some time, their aetiology, pathogenesis, phenomenology and management continues to arouse debate. It is only in recent times that researchers have made some progress by integrating trauma related theories with more contemporary cognitive theories and neurobiology. RECENT FINDINGS: Dissociation as a phenomenon is reported to occur in a variety of disorders. This widespread occurrence has contributed to a better understanding of dissociation. An expansion of this concept may have contributed to the loss of its original significance. Recent studies in the field of dissociation that pertain to its aetiology, pathophysiology, neurobiology and management are critically reviewed. SUMMARY: Dissociative disorder is conceptually a difficult disorder to study. Apart from exposure to trauma, certain primary personality attributes may contribute to the propensity to develop dissociative disorder. Recent advances in functional neuroimaging facilitated by enhanced knowledge in the neural representation of body state have helped to improve our understanding of dissociation. There is confusion over the use of various terms such as sexual abuse and physical abuse in explaining causality. Current classificatory systems have not been found suitable when applied across cultures. In spite of all of these limitations, there has been recent progress toward a better understanding of dissociative disorders.

Conversion Disorder↗

Quality of life and its correlates in patients with bipolar disorder stabilized on lithium prophylaxis.

The quality of life (QOL) of 50 bipolar disorder patients in remission (stabilized on lithium prophylaxis) was assessed and compared with that of clinically stable patients with schizophrenia (n = 20) and healthy subjects (n = 20). World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-BREF) and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) were used to assess QOL in the three groups of subjects. The factors that contribute or influence QOL (i.e. stressful life events, social support, daily hassles) were also studied using standardized instruments in the study group. It was found that, compared to schizophrenia group, the bipolar group had significantly better QOL in all the domains of Q-LES-Q and the domains of general well-being, physical health and psychological health of the WHOQOL-Bref. The bipolar group had similar QOL scores in all other domains and higher scores in leisure time activity domain of Q-LES-Q, in comparison to the healthy group. The QOL in the bipolar group was better in patients who were younger and had a lesser severity of daily hassle. The present findings suggest that euthymic patients with bipolar disorder have a QOL that is comparable to that of healthy subjects. In contrast, patients with clinically stable schizophrenia have a poorer QOL. Occurrence of daily hassles contributes significantly to QOL in patients with bipolar disorder. However, the relatively limited variance explained by the independent variables included in the study, suggests the need to examine other (perhaps non-clinical) factors that may affect QOL.

Adult↗