PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Priscilla A Winchester

Publications and source records attributed to Priscilla A Winchester.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the phenomena and causes for undesired venous signal in the distal station of bolus chase 3D MRA. METHODS: Consecutive patients (in 8 months) undergoing peripheral MRA consisting of 2D projection MRA of the tibial trifurcation and 3D bolus chase MRA were retrospectively evaluated. Venous contamination in mid-calf in bolus chase 3D MRA was correlated to the arterial phase duration, the time between the contrast bolus arrival and venous return measured on time resolved 2D images. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the clinical parameters indicative of venous contamination. RESULTS: The arterial phase durations at the mid-calf were 49 +/- 8 seconds on 101 legs without venous signal in the bolus chase 3D MRA, 35 +/- 9 seconds on 13 legs with moderate venous signal, and 20 +/- 4 seconds on 40 legs with substantial venous signal; the differences were significant among different venous signal levels (P < 0.001 for all pairs). Legs with cellulitis had shorter arterial phase and more venous contamination than legs without cellulitis (P < 0.05). Patients with myocardial infarction had longer arterial phase and less venous contamination than patients without myocardial infarction (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Venous signal in the distal calf station of bolus chase 3D peripheral MRA is caused by fast arterial-venous transit. It is worse in legs with cellulitis and less in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.

Aged↗

Postprocessing techniques for time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

The purpose of this study was to improve dynamic two-dimensional projection magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography by using remasking and filtering postprocessing techniques. Four methods were evaluated in 50 patients: default mask subtraction, remasked subtraction, filtering based on the SD, and linear filtering. The results demonstrated that postprocessing techniques such as linear filtering can reduce background motion artifacts and improve arterial contrast-to-noise ratio.

Adult↗

Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning.

PURPOSE: To compare combined three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with x-ray angiography for planning treatment of peripheral vascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed the pretreatment x-ray angiographic and MR angiographic studies obtained in 30 consecutive patients: 15 patients (15 limbs) evaluated for limb salvage and 15 patients (20 limbs) evaluated because of claudication. MR angiography included acquisition of 2D contrast-enhanced MR digital subtraction angiograms of the area from the adductor canal to the feet and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled-echo bolus chase MR angiograms obtained in three stations from the aorta to the middle portion of the calf. Each reader reviewed the x-ray and MR angiograms to determine the inflow and outflow segments for a hypothetical bypass graft placement. RESULTS: The three readers selected identical segments for inflow at MR angiography and x-ray angiography in 32, 32, and 35 of the 35 limbs evaluated (mean percentages of agreement [95% CI ]: 91% [77%, 98%], 91% [77%, 98%], and 95% [90%, 100%], respectively). The readers selected identical segments for outflow in 32, 32, and 34 of the 35 limbs evaluated (mean percentages of agreement [95% CI]: 91% [77%, 98%], 91% [77%, 98%], and 97% [85%, 100%], respectively). CONCLUSION: Preliminary data support the combining of 2D MR digital subtraction angiography with 3D bolus chase MR angiography to extend the utility of 3D MR angiography in treatment planning to include patients being evaluated for limb salvage, as well as those being evaluated for claudication.

Adult↗

Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review time-resolved two-dimensional projection magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic data to characterize the passage of gadolinium-based contrast material down the leg arteries in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 87 consecutive standardized peripheral MR angiographic examinations were retrospectively reviewed to determine contrast material arrival times to the common femoral artery (CFA), the popliteal and tibial arteries, and the corresponding veins. Travel times were correlated with clinical data obtained with retrospective chart review and predictive multiparameter models developed with stepwise linear regression. RESULTS: The mean travel time of contrast material to the CFA was 24 seconds +/- 6 (SD), with additional 5 seconds +/- 2 to reach the popliteal artery and 7 seconds +/- 4 to reach the ankle artery. The mean time window of arterial enhancement was 49 seconds +/- 10 in the pelvis, 45 seconds +/- 10 in the thigh, and 35 seconds +/- 14 in the calf. The travel time to CFA was correlated with aortic aneurysm (r = 0.41; P <.001), increasing age (r = 0.31; P =.003), male sex (r = 0.3; P =.005), myocardial infarction (r = 0.26; P =.016), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (r = -0.22; P =.041). Predicted travel time to CFA was 10.6 seconds, plus 0.143 seconds times patient age, plus 4.8 seconds if aneurysm was present, plus 3.8 seconds if male sex, plus 2.8 seconds if history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Contrast material injected intravenously traveled rapidly down the peripheral arteries at approximately 6 seconds per station, but a long arterial phase time window allowed bolus-chase peripheral MR angiography to function with slower table stepping. Patient-to-patient variations in contrast material kinetics may be anticipated on the basis of age, sex, and clinical parameters.

Adult↗