PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Qing-Xiang Guo

Publications and source records attributed to Qing-Xiang Guo.

30 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Accurate calculation, prediction, and assignment of 3He NMR chemical shifts of helium-3-encapsulated fullerenes and fullerene derivatives.

Helium-3 NMR chemical shifts of various (3)He-encapsulated fullerenes ((3)He@C(n)()) and their derivatives have been calculated at the GIAO-B3LYP/3-21G and GIAO-HF/3-21G levels with AM1 and PM3 optimized structures. A good linear relationship between the computed (3)He NMR chemical shifts and the experimental data has been determined. Comparisons of the calculation methods of (3)He NMR chemical shifts show that GIAO-B3LYP/3-21G with AM1-optimized structures yields the best results. The corrected (3)He NMR chemical shifts were calculated from the correction equation that is obtained through linear regression fitting of the experimental and calculated (3)He NMR chemical shifts over a wide range of (3)He-encapsulated fullerene compounds. The corrected (3)He NMR chemical shifts match the experimental data very well. The current computational method can serve as a prediction tool and can be applied to the assignments and reassignments of the (3)He NMR chemical shifts of (3)He@C(n)() and their derivatives.

Journal Article↗

Studies on the extraction of phenol in wastewater.

A novel extraction procedure has been developed for treating phenolic wastewater. Alcohols, amines, and organic acids were applied as extractants in separation of phenol from the wastewater containing 6000 mg/l phenol and 5% salts discharged by chemical plants, >99% phenol was recovered by extracting with octanol. The interactions of phenol with alcohols, amines, and organic acids were studied by a theoretical calculation with GAUSSIAN 98. The extraction efficiency is strongly dependent on the intermolecular interactions between the phenol and extractants. Based on the experimental and theoretical studies, a pilot-scale LLES was set-up and worked well.

Conservation of Natural Resources↗

Remote substituent effects on homolytic bond dissociation energies.

In the study we tried to answer two questions. First, does X-Z homolytic bond dissociation energy (BDE) of Y-C6H4-X-Z obey the Hammett relationship? Second, if it does what factors determine the magnitude and sign of the slope (rho+) of Hammett regression against substituent sigma(p)(+) constants? We collected a large number of X-Z BDEs for over one-thousand Y-C6H4-X-Z systems using the RMP2/6-311++G**//UB3LYP/6-31G* method. We found that remote substituent effects on X-Z BDEs are determined by both the ground effect (i.e. stabilization/destabilization of X-Z by the substituents) and the radical effect (i.e. stabilization/destabilization of X. by the substituents). The ground or radical effect is determined by the electron demand of X-Z or X. in the same way as the deprotonation enthalpy of HOOC-C6H4-X-Z or HOOC-C6H4-X. is affected by X-Z or X. . As a result, rho+ (BDE) for X-Z bond homolysis can be quantitatively predicted by using the change in deprotonation enthalpy from HOOC-C6H4-X-Z to HOOC-C6H4-X. .

Journal Article↗

Effects of alpha-ammonium, alpha-phosphonium, and alpha-sulfonium groups on C-H bond dissociation energies.

C-H bond dissociation energies of alpha-ammonium-, alpha-phosphonium-, or alpha-sulfonium-substituted methanes and toluenes were calculated to a precision of 1-2 kcal/mol. It was found that alpha-ammonium, alpha-phosphonium, and alpha-sulfonium groups all destabilize a methyl radical. alpha-Ammonium also destabilizes a benzyl radical, whereas alpha-phosphonium and alpha-sulfonium either slightly stabilize or destabilize a benzyl radical depending on their alkylation state.

Journal Article↗

Remote substituent effects on N-X (X = H, F, Cl, CH3, Li) bond dissociation energies in para-substituted anilines.

UB3LYP/6-311++g**//UB3LYP/6-31+g* and ROMP2/6-311++g**//UB3LYP/6-31+g* methods were used to calculate (i) N-X bond dissociation energies (BDE) in 4-YC6H4NH-X and (ii) N-H BDEs in 4-YC6H4NU-H, where Y = H, Me, OCH3, SMe, NH2, NMe2, SiMe3, F, Cl, CN, COOH, CF3, and NO2, X = H, CH3, F, Cl, and Li, and U = H, F, and CH(3). It was found that N-H BDEs of 4-YC6H4NH2 have a positive correlation with the substituent sigma(p+) constants. The slope (rho+) is about 3.0-4.3 kcal/mol, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. It was also found that the substituent effects on N-X BDEs of 4-YC6H4NH-X change considerably when X changes. rho(+)values for N-CH3, N-F, N-Cl, and N-Li BDEs were calculated to be 3.1-4.6, 1.3-1.9, 1.8-2.6, and 4.9-6.8 kcal/mol, respectively. The reason for the variation of substituent effects was proposed to be the ground-state effect, i.e., the interaction between the intact NH-X moiety and the parasubstituents. Finally, alpha-substitution was found to be able to significantly change the substituent effects. rho(+)values for N-H BDEs of 4-C6H4NCH3(-)H and 4-C6H4NF-H are 2.5-4.0 and 1.7-1.9 kcal/mol, respectively.

Journal Article↗

Remote substituent effects on bond dissociation energies of para-substituted aromatic silanes.

UB3LYP/6-31G(d) and ROMP2/6-311++G(d,2p) methods were used to calculate the Si-X bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of a number of para-substituted aromatic silanes (4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)X, where X = H, F, Cl, or Li). It was found that the substituent effect on the Si-H BDE of 4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(3) was small, as the slope (rho(+)()) of the BDE- regression was only 0.09 kJ/mol. In comparison, the substituent effect on the Si-F BDE of 4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)F was much stronger, whose rho(+ )()value was -2.34 kJ/mol. The substituent effect on the Si-Cl BDE of 4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)Cl was also found to be strong with a rho(+)() value of -1.70 kJ/mol. However, the substituent effect on the Si-Li BDE of 4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)Li was found to have a large and positive slope (+9.12 kJ/mol) against. The origin of the above remarkably different substituent effects on the Si-X BDEs was found to be associated with the ability of the substituent to stabilize or destabilize the starting material (4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)X) as well as the product (4-Y-C(6)H(4)-SiH(2)* radical) of the homolysis. Therefore, the direction and magnitude of the effects of Y-substituents on the Z-X BDEs in compounds such as 4-YC(6)H(4)Z-X should have some important dependence on the polarity of the Z-X bond undergoing homolysis. This conclusion was in agreement with that from earlier studies (for example, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9363). However, it indicated that the proposal from a recent work (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5518) was unfortunately not justified.

Journal Article↗

Photoinduced electron transfer in a supramolecular species building of mono-6-p-nitrobenzoyl-beta-cyclodextrin with naphthalene derivatives.

Photoinduced electron transfer was observed in the supramolecular complexes of p-nitrobenzoyl-beta-cyclodextrin (NBCD) with a number of naphthalene derivatives, which were stabilized clearly via hydrophobic interactions in aqueous solution. Both steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements were conducted, which revealed that there were two routes of electron transfer, i.e., electron transfer between the free donor and free acceptor in solution and electron transfer between the donor and acceptor bound in a supramolecular assembly. The evidence collected demonstrates that the latter route was very efficient. As a result, the rate and quantum yield of the fluorescence quenching in the present supramolecular system were appreciably large.

Cyclodextrins↗

The nonpolar resonance effects and the non-Hammett behaviors.

In the study we tried to unify the observed non-Hammett behaviors in various fields by proposing the nonpolar resonance effect. This effect was shown to be important not only for carbon radicals but also for some closed-shell systems. Therefore, the odd electron or spin is not the essential cause of the effect. The real origin of the non-Hammett effect should be the HOMO(reaction-center)-LUMO(acceptor) and LUMO(reaction-center)-HOMO(donor) interactions. This means that the nonpolar resonance effect is a universal effect. However, we found that the nonpolar resonance effect could not be well exhibited in many systems because of the serious competition from the polar Hammett effect. Finally, we showed that our proposal of the nonpolar resonance effect was valuable from a practical point of view, because using it we could perform much better correlation studies on some "tough" problems such as radical and multiple bond stabilities, UV and IR spectra, and molecular structures.

Journal Article↗

Assessment of experimental bond dissociation energies using composite ab initio methods and evaluation of the performances of density functional methods in the calculation of bond dissociation energies.

Composite ab initio CBS-Q and G3 methods were used to calculate the bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of over 200 compounds listed in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (2002 ed.). It was found that these two methods agree with each other excellently in the calculation of BDEs, and they can predict BDEs within 10 kJ/mol of the experimental values. Using these two methods, it was found that among the examined compounds 161 experimental BDEs are valid because the standard deviation between the experimental and theoretical values for them is only 8.6 kJ/mol. Nevertheless, 40 BDEs listed in the Handbook may be highly inaccurate as the experimental and theoretical values for them differ by over 20 kJ/mol. Furthermore, 11 BDEs listed in the Handbook may be seriously flawed as the experimental and theoretical values for them differ by over 40 kJ/mol. Using the 161 cautiously validated experimental BDEs, we then assessed the performances of the standard density functional (DFT) methods including B3LYP, B3P86, B3PW91, and BH&HLYP in the calculation of BDEs. It was found that the BH&HLYP method performed poorly for the BDE calculations. B3LYP, B3P86, and B3PW91, however, performed reasonably well for the calculation of BDEs with standard deviations of about 12.1-18.0 kJ/mol. Nonetheless, all the DFT methods underestimated the BDEs by 4-17 kJ/mol in average. Sometimes, the underestimation by the DFT methods could be as high as 40-60 kJ/mol. Therefore, the DFT methods were more reliable for relative BDE calculations than for absolute BDE calculations. Finally, it was observed that the basis set effects on the BDEs calculated by the DFT methods were usually small except for the heteroatom-hydrogen BDEs.

Journal Article↗

Hammett equation and generalized Pauling's electronegativity equation.

Substituent interaction energy (SIE) was defined as the energy change of the isodesmic reaction X-spacer-Y + H-spacer-H --> X-spacer-H + H-spacer-Y. It was found that this SIE followed a simple equation, SIE(X,Y) = -ksigma(X)sigma(Y), where k was a constant dependent on the system and sigma was a certain scale of electronic substituent constant. It was demonstrated that the equation was applicable to disubstituted bicyclo[2.2.2]octanes, benzenes, ethylenes, butadienes, and hexatrienes. It was also demonstrated that Hammett's equation was a derivative form of the above equation. Furthermore, it was found that when spacer = nil the above equation was mathematically the same as Pauling's electronegativity equation. Thus it was shown that Hammett's equation was a derivative form of the generalized Pauling's electronegativity equation and that a generalized Pauling's electronegativity equation could be utilized for diverse X-spacer-Y systems. In addition, the total electronic substituent effects were successfully separated into field/inductive and resonance effects in the equation SIE(X,Y) = -k(1)F(X)F(Y) - k(2)R(X)R(Y) - k(3)(F(X)R(Y) + R(X)F(Y)). The existence of the cross term (i.e., F(X)R(Y) and R(X)F(Y)) suggested that the field/inductive effect was not orthogonal to the resonance effect because the field/inductive effect from one substituent interacted with the resonance effect from the other. Further studies on multi-substituted systems suggested that the electronic substituent effects should be pairwise and additive. Hence, the SIE in a multi-substituted system could be described using the equation SIE(X1, X2, ..., Xn) = Sigma(n-1)(i=1)Sigma(n)(j=i+1)k(ij)sigma(X)isigma(X)j.

Journal Article↗