PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R A Gerber

Publications and source records attributed to R A Gerber.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Does rapid transition to insulin therapy in subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus benefit glycaemic control and diabetes-related complications? A German population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether earlier transition to insulin in subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes improves glycaemic control and reduces diabetes-related complications. METHODS: Subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and 2 or more recorded glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values, were identified from the Mediplus Germany database between June 1993 and May 2001. Subjects were stratified by treatment group: diet and exercise, sulfonylurea drugs, antihyperglycaemic drugs, insulin, or insulin plus sulfonylurea or antihyperglycaemic drugs. Treatment modifications were tracked over time and a rapid transition to insulin recorded if insulin was the initial therapy administered or the immediate treatment after diet and exercise. The area under the curve (AUC) for HbA1c was calculated and a linear regression model used to explain AUC as a function of rapid transitioning to insulin. A Cox proportional hazard model assessed the relationship between the time to first complication and AUC, rapid transition to insulin, and the number of treatment modifications. RESULTS: Of the 3136 subjects who met the study entry criteria, just 151 (4.8%) were initiated on insulin; after 5 years only 811 (25.9%) subjects had received insulin therapy. In the regression model explaining AUC, rapid transition to insulin significantly improved glycaemic control (-0.20, p=0.03). The Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated that the time to first complication was negatively related to AUC (-0.05, p<0.01) and the rapid use of insulin (-0.27, p<0.01), and positively related to the number of treatment modifications (0.07, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using actual real world clinical practice data, the present study found that the immediate use of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes improved blood glucose control as measured by the AUC for HbA1c readings. This, in turn, reduced the risk of diabetes-related complications. In contrast, we observed that a stepwise transition treatment pattern (switching from diet and exercise to sulfonylureas and then perhaps to antihyperglycaemic agents and finally insulin) increased the risk of diabetes-related complications. Greater effort is required to remove some of the barriers currently preventing earlier initiation of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Adolescent↗

Treatment satisfaction with inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with type 1 diabetes, glycemic control can be achieved as effectively with an inhaled insulin regimen, comprising preprandial inhaled intrapulmonary insulin plus a bedtime ultralente injection, as with a conventional subcutaneous insulin regimen involving two to three injections per day. Our objective was to compare patient satisfaction between inhaled insulin and subcutaneous insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 1 diabetes participated in a 12-week open-label trial and were randomized to either an inhaled insulin regimen or a subcutaneous insulin regimen. Subjects (n = 69) were asked to complete a 15-item self-administered satisfaction questionnaire, the Patient Satisfaction with Insulin Therapy (PSIT) Questionnaire, at baseline and week 12. Outcomes included mean percentage changes in global (overall) satisfaction and two subscales: convenience/ease of use and social comfort. RESULTS: The mean percentage improvement in overall satisfaction with inhaled insulin (35.1%, 95% CI 18.0-52.2) was greater than with subcutaneous insulin (10.6%, 4.7-16.5) (P < 0.01), as was the improvement in convenience/ease of use: inhaled insulin 41.3% (22.9-59.6) versus subcutaneous insulin 11.2% (4.1-18.3; P < 0.01). Improvement in social comfort was greater with inhaled insulin but was not statistically significant. The 12-week change in HbA(1c) was associated with improved overall satisfaction (r = -0.27, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled insulin may offer the first practical, noninvasive alternative to insulin injections. For patients with type 1 diabetes, inhaled insulin maintains glycemic control and provides greater overall satisfaction and convenience/ease of use than subcutaneous insulin.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-administered questionnaire to address alternative delivery routes of insulin and to investigate aspects of patient satisfaction that may be useful for subsequent assessment and comparison of an inhaled insulin regimen and a subcutaneous insulin regimen. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Attributes of patient treatment satisfaction with both inhaled and injected insulin therapy were derived from five qualitative research studies to arrive at a 15-item questionnaire. Each item was analyzed on a five-point Likert scale so that higher item scores indicated a more favorable attitude. There were 69 subjects with type 1 diabetes previously taking injected insulin therapy who were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. Their baseline responses on the questionnaire were evaluated and subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. Meaningful factors were retained and interpreted based on their psychometric properties. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution accounting for 66 and 20% of the variance, respectively. The first factor contained 10 reliable items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) relating to convenience and ease of use, and the second contained 5 reliable items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) relating to social comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 1 diabetes, this analysis highlighted and quantified two key factors contributing to patient satisfaction: convenience/ease of use and social comfort. The questionnaire underwent rigorous development, had reliable properties, and an interpretable and rich factor structure. This report is intended to help advance, in subsequent investigations, the understanding and measurement of treatment satisfaction with novel and existing forms of insulin delivery.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Impact of pharmacist consultations provided to patients with diabetes on healthcare costs in a health maintenance organization.

We conducted a study to assess the impact on healthcare utilization and costs of pharmacist consultations provided to patients with diabetes. Data for this study were derived from a larger study conducted by Kaiser Permanente and the University of Southern California that evaluated three alternative models of pharmacist consultations (control, state, and Kaiser). Computerized data were available for patient demographic characteristics and healthcare utilization. We used medication data to classify patient cohorts as insulin only or oral antidiabetics +/- insulin. We estimated hospitalization costs based on diagnostic related group and medication costs based on average wholesale price; office visits were estimated at $70 each. In the insulin only cohort, total costs for patients who had their prescriptions filled at a state model pharmacy were 7.8% less than those for patients filling prescriptions at a control model pharmacy (P = 0.008). In the oral +/- insulin cohort, total costs for patients filling new prescriptions at a Kaiser model pharmacy were 21.9% less than those for patients using a control model pharmacy (P = 0.0001). The state model also was negatively correlated (beta coefficient, -0.0997) with total costs (P = 0.0001). These data suggest that pharmacist consultations provided to patients with diabetes can decrease total healthcare costs in a health maintenance organization.

Adult↗

Methodological issues in evaluating HIV prevention community planning.

To be effective, HIV prevention programs should be planned in partnership with affected communities and should be built on a solid scientific foundation. In 1994, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its prevention partners implemented HIV prevention community planning to achieve primarily these two objectives. In order to manage the community planning process effectively, extensive evaluation activities were employed at both the grantee and national level. This paper describes the first year evaluation goals and methods in detail. Throughout, reasons for collecting specific types of information and for using particular methodologies are highlighted.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Concurrent bilateral hypernephroma. Successful diagnosis and treatment of one patient.

Clinically unsuspected, bilateral concurrent clear cell cancers of each kidney were identified in a patient during evaluation for acute pancreatitis. A right renal lesion was demonstrated by computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan. Promptly thereafter percutaneous transfemoral aortography was performed, identifying separate, bilateral kidney neoplasms. The surgical outcome at nineteen months postoperatively has been satisfactory.

Adenocarcinoma↗