PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R A Hughes

Publications and source records attributed to R A Hughes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Current strategies for modulating lymphangiogenesis signalling pathways in human disease.

The recent discovery that members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of secreted glycoproteins can mediate lymphatic vessel growth (lymphangiogenesis) via cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases expressed on endothelial cells has opened the way for therapeutic intervention for pathologies involving dysregulated lymphatic vessel function. At least two members of this family, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, have been shown to induce lymphangiogenesis in vivo. Lymphatic vessels and their specific growth factors have been directly implicated in a number of significant human pathologies. In cancer, VEGF-C and VEGF-D appear to correlate with tumor metastasis and poor patient outcome in a range of prevalent human cancers. Experimental studies have demonstrated that expression of the lymphangiogenic growth factors in tumor models induces increased lymphangiogenesis and results in spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics. In contrast, conditions such as lymphedema, where lymphatic vessels fail to clear fluid from interstitial spaces, are opportunities for which the application of growth factors to generate new lymphatic vessels may be a viable therapeutic option. The list of molecules that control lymphangiogenesis is now expanding, allowing more opportunities for the development of drugs with which to manipulate the relevant signalling pathways. Modulating these pathways and other molecules with specificity to the lymphatic endothelium could offer alternative treatments for a number of important clinical conditions.

Disease↗

Rotational spectrum, inversion, and geometry of 2,5-dihydrofuran...ethyne and a generalization about Z...H-C hydrogen bonds.

The ground-state rotational spectra of nine isotopomers of a complex formed between 2,5-dihydrofuran and ethyne were recorded with a pulsed-jet, Fourier-transform microwave spectrometer. Rotational and centrifugal distortion constants were obtained for C4H6O...HCCH, C4H6O...DCCH, C4H6O...HCCD, C4H6O...DCCD, [3,4-D2]-C4H6O...HCCH, C4H6O...H13CCH, C4H6O...HC13CH, , and [3(13C]-C4H6O...HCCH. The substituted species were studied in their natural abundances. For the more abundant isotopomers, weak c-type transitions as well as strong a-type transitions were observed. The primary intermolecular binding was shown to consist of a hydrogen bond formed by the ethyne subunit acting as the proton donor and the O atom of 2,5-dihydrofuran as the proton acceptor. The complex has a plane of symmetry that includes the O atom and the ethyne subunit, with a pyramidal configuration at oxygen. A fit of the principal moments of inertia of all nine isotopomers under the assumption of unperturbed 2,5-dihydrofuran and ethyne geometries yielded the values r(O...H)=2.127(8) A, phi=57.8(18) degrees , and theta=16.2(32) degrees, where phi is the angle made by the HCCH subunit at O and theta is the angular deviation of the O...H-C nuclei from collinearity. This geometry is compared with those obtained by ab initio calculations conducted with a range of basis sets and with electron correlation taken into account at the MP2 (Møller-Plesset second order) level of theory. A small inversion doubling (approximately equal to 20-30 kHz) of c-type transitions, well resolved only for the parent isotopomer and [3HCCH, was attributed to a vibrational motion that inverts the configuration at oxygen. A one-dimensional model for this motion was used with a double minimum potential energy function of the type V(phi)=alphaphi(4)+betaphi(2) to estimate the observed separation DeltaE(01) of the lowest pair (v=0 and v=1) of associated energy levels. The predicted DeltaE(01) had the same magnitude as that deduced from the inversion doubling of the c-type transitions. The geometry of C4H6O...HCCH is compared with those other B...HCCH, where B is vinyl fluoride, oxirane, and thiirane. A rationalization of the angular geometries of various B...HX, where X=F, Cl, Br, or CCH, is presented.

Journal Article↗

Folate supplementation and methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a review.

OBJECTIVES: The folate antagonist methotrexate (MTX) has become established as the most commonly used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but is commonly discontinued due to adverse effects. Adverse effects are thought to be mediated via folate antagonism. In this paper we summarize the current data on the use of folates as a supplement to MTX use in RA for the prevention of adverse effects and as a potential modulator of cardiovascular risk, and propose guidelines for standard practice. METHODS: A Medline search was performed using the search terms "methotrexate", "folic acid", "folinic acid", "folate" and "homocysteine". Literature relevant to the use of folates as a supplement to MTX in the treatment of RA was reviewed and other papers referred to as references were explored. RESULTS: The use of supplemental folates, including folic and folinic acid, in RA patients treated with MTX has been shown to improve continuation rates by reducing the incidence of liver function test abnormalities and gastrointestinal intolerance. Folate supplements do not appear to significantly reduce the effectiveness of MTX in the treatment of RA. Furthermore, supplemental folic acid offsets the elevation in plasma homocysteine associated with the use of MTX. This may in turn reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is over-represented amongst patients with RA, and for which hyperhomocysteinaemia is now recognized as an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that folic acid supplements be prescribed routinely to all patients receiving MTX for the treatment of RA. We recommend a pragmatic dosing schedule of 5 mg of oral folic acid given on the morning following the day of MTX administration.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Molecular targeting of lymphatics for therapy.

The dysfunction or proliferation of lymphatic vessels (lymphangiogenesis) is linked to a number of pathological conditions including lymphedema and cancer. The recent discovery and characterisation of the lymphangiogenic growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and VEGF-D and of their receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells, VEGFR-3, has provided an understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling the growth of lymphatic vessels. In addition, other genes and protein markers have been identified with specificity for lymphatic endothelium that have enhanced the characterization and isolation of lymphatic endothelial cells. Our growing understanding of the molecules that control lymphangiogenesis allows us to design more specific drugs with which to manipulate the relevant signalling pathways. Modulating these pathways and other molecules with specificity to the lymphatic system could offer alternative treatments for a number of important clinical conditions.

Animals↗

Cytotoxic drugs and interferons for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is a disease causing progressive or relapsing and remitting weakness and numbness. It is probably due to an autoimmune inflammatory process. Immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs would be expected to be beneficial. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to review systematically the evidence from randomised trials concerning cytotoxic drugs and interferons for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register (searched December 2001), MEDLINE (searched January 1977 to December 2001), EMBASE (January 1980 to December 2001), CINAHL (searched January 1982 to December 2001) and LILACS (searched January 1982 to December 2001). We contacted the authors of the trials identified and other disease experts seeking other published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised and quasi-randomised trials of all immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab and all immunomodulatory agents such as alpha interferon and beta interferon in participants fulfilling standard diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two of us independently selected the trials which met our criteria, judged their methodological quality and extracted the data onto specially designed forms. We wanted to measure the change in disability after one year as our primary outcome measure. MAIN RESULTS: We found one parallel group open trial of azathioprine for nine months involving 27 participants and another of interferon beta involving 10 participants in a double blind crossover trial with each treatment period lasting 12 weeks. Neither trial provided our primary outcome measure and neither showed a significant beneficial effect on any of the outcome measures selected by the authors or ourselves in the protocol for this review. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is inadequate to decide whether azathioprine, interferon beta or any other immunosuppressive drug or interferon is beneficial in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Immunosuppressive treatment for multifocal motor neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The pathognomonic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review. OBJECTIVES: To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register was searched for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinized for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Humans↗

Review of the function of a telephone helpline in the treatment of outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the role, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of a telephone helpline organised and run by specialist nurses in a district general hospital outpatient rheumatology department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients accessed the telephone helpline by leaving a taped message on an answer phone with a 24 hour response time. Assessment included an audit of the nature and outcome of helpline calls, patient satisfaction with the helpline, and a health economic analysis of the helpline operation. A postal questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction; this was sent to the 87 patients who called the helpline during one month, and overall satisfaction with the helpline was assessed. The nature and outcome of all calls was analysed retrospectively using a helpline record book for February and October of one year and February of the following year. From the results of the retrospective analysis and an estimate of the number of general practitioner consultations avoided by provision of the helpline, the cost effectiveness of the helpline was calculated. RESULTS: Of those returning questionnaires, 61/63 (97%) were satisfied with the response time, 63/63 (100%) with the courtesy, and 60/63 (95%) felt that their questions were answered directly and to their satisfaction in 62 (98%) of cases. Had the helpline not been available, 38/63 (60%) patients would have made an appointment with their GP. When these figures were extrapolated to an annual estimation, a basic cost analysis showed that the helpline produced a cost saving to the NHS, largely as a result of GP consultations avoided. CONCLUSION: Clinical advice and support can be provided by a rheumatology helpline set up as an adjunct to a standard outpatient service. The results of a postal questionnaire suggested more than 95% satisfaction with all aspects of the helpline service and that 99% of callers would call the helpline again. The provision of the helpline service contributes to the quality of care provided by an outpatient department and provides benefit to the NHS.

Adolescent↗

Guillain-Barré syndrome serum and anti-Campylobacter antibody do not exacerbate experimental autoimmune neuritis.

To investigate whether antibodies are pathogenic in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), we injected pre-treatment serum from 11 GBS patients intraperitoneally into rats in which the blood-nerve barrier had been opened by induction of mild adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune neuritis. There was no significant clinical, neurophysiological or pathological difference between rats receiving GBS serum compared with those receiving control serum, except that GBS serum caused minor excess weight loss. Murine monoclonal antibody to Campylobacter jejuni and gangliosides also did not exacerbate disease. This experiment failed to show antibody-mediated disease exacerbation and so does not support an antibody-mediated mechanism in GBS.

Animals↗

Clinical predictors of prolonged delay in return of the international normalized ratio to within the therapeutic range after excessive anticoagulation with warfarin.

BACKGROUND: An elevated international normalized ratio (INR) increases the risk for major hemorrhage during warfarin therapy. Optimal management of patients with asymptomatic elevations in INR is hampered by the lack of understanding of the time course of INR decay after cessation of warfarin therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of the rate of INR normalization after excessive anticoagulation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient anticoagulant therapy unit. PATIENTS: Outpatients with an INR greater than 6.0 were identified from August 1993 to September 1998. Patients in whom two doses of warfarin were withheld and a follow-up INR was obtained on the second calendar day were enrolled. No patient received vitamin K(1). MEASUREMENTS: The INR was measured 2 days after an INR greater than 6.0 was recorded. RESULTS: Of 633 study patients with an initial INR greater than 6.0, 232 (37%) still had an INR of 4.0 or greater after two doses of warfarin were withheld. Patients who required larger weekly maintenance doses of warfarin were less likely to have an INR of 4.0 or greater on day 2 (adjusted odds ratio per 10 mg of warfarin, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.97]). Other risk factors for having an INR of 4.0 or greater on day 2 included age (odds ratio per decade of life, 1.18 [CI, 1.01 to 1.38]), index INR (odds ratio per unit, 1.25 [CI, 1.14 to 1.37]), decompensated congestive heart failure (odds ratio, 2.79 [CI, 1.30 to 5.98]), and active cancer (odds ratio, 2.48 [CI, 1.11 to 5.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state warfarin dose, advanced age, and extreme elevation in INR are risk factors for prolonged delay in return of the INR to within the therapeutic range. Decompensated congestive heart failure and active cancer greatly increase this risk.

Age Factors↗

Preceding infections, immune factors, and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that different preceding infections influence the neurophysiologic classification and clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). METHODS: We tested pretreatment sera, 7 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) days from onset, from 229 patients with GBS in a multicenter trial of plasma exchange and immunoglobulin, for serological markers of infection, adhesion molecules, and cytokine receptors, and compared these with neurophysiologic and clinical features. RESULTS: Recent infection by Campylobacter jejuni was found in 53 patients (23%), cytomegalovirus in 19 (8%), and Epstein-Barr virus in four (2%). Patients with C. jejuni infection were more likely than others to have neurophysiologic criteria of axonal neuropathy or inexcitable nerves, antiganglioside GM(1) antibodies, pure motor GBS, lower CSF protein, and worse outcome. Patients with cytomegalovirus infection were younger and more likely than others to have raised serum concentrations of molecules important in T lymphocyte activation and migration, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble leukocyte selectin, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Concentrations of sICAM-1 and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor were higher in patients with inexcitable nerves than those with demyelinating neurophysiology. Logistic regression analysis showed death or inability to walk unaided at 48 weeks were associated with diarrhea, inexcitable nerves, severe arm weakness, age over 50, raised sIL-2R concentration and absence of immunoglobulin (Ig) M antiganglioside GM(1) antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Subtypes of GBS defined by preceding infections were only approximately associated with different patterns of clinical, neurophysiologic, and immunologic features. A single infectious agent caused more than one type of pathology in GBS, implying interaction with additional host factors. Most patients had no identified infection.

Antibodies↗

Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome is an acute symmetric usually ascending and usually paralysing illness due to inflammation of peripheral nerves. It is thought to be caused by autoimmune factors, such as antibodies. Plasma exchange removes antibodies and other potentially injurious factors from the blood stream. It involves connecting the patient's blood circulation to a machine which exchanges the plasma for a substitute solution, usually albumin. Several studies have evaluated plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence concerning the efficacy of plasma exchange for treating Guillain-Barré syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Trial Register for randomised trials concerning plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome, search of the bibliographies of identified papers and enquiry from the authors of the papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of plasma exchange versus sham exchange or supportive treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Potentially relevant papers were scrutinised by two reviewers and the selection of eligible studies was agreed by them and a third reviewer. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Some missing data were obtained from the authors of studies. MAIN RESULTS: Six eligible trials concerning 649 patients were identified, all comparing plasma exchange versus supportive treatment alone. Primary outcome measures ~Bullet~Time to recover walking with aid In the only two trials for which this measure was reported the median time to recover this ability was faster in the plasma exchange than the control group. ~Bullet~Time to onset of motor recovery in mildly affected patients In the one trial for which this measure was available the time was significantly shortened in the plasma exchange group. Secondary outcome measures ~Bullet~Improvement in disability grade at 4 weeks In five trials, there were significantly more patients who had improved by one disability grade or more in the plasma exchange group as compared to the control group. Patients treated with plasma exchange fared significantly better in the following secondary outcome measures: time to recover walking without aid, percentage of patients requiring artificial ventilation, duration of ventilation, full muscle strength recovery after one year, and severe sequelae after one year. There were less patients with infectious events and cardiac arrhythmias in the plasma exchange than the control group. Subgroup analyses Plasma exchange was beneficial in patients with mild, moderate and severe (needing ventilation) Guillain-Barré syndrome. It was beneficial in patients with a disease duration of seven or less days and also in those with disease lasting more than seven days. However, in the only trial that enrolled patients up to 30 days from disease onset, the benefit of plasma exchange in patients treated after seven days was less apparent. Type of treatment Single studies showed that two plasma exchanges were significantly superior to none for mild Guillain-Barré syndrome and four to two for moderate Guillain-Barré syndrome but that six were not superior to four for severe Guillain-Barré syndrome requiring ventilation. One study suggested that continuous flow plasma exchange was significantly superior to intermittent flow. Another study found no significant difference between the two techniques. The same study found a significantly higher rate of adverse events with fresh frozen plasma as the replacement fluid than albumin. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Plasma exchange is the first and only treatment that has been proven to be superior to supportive treatment alone in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Consequently, plasma exchange should be regarded as the treatment against which new treatments, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, should be judged. In mild Guillain-Barré syndrome two sessions of plasma exchange are superior to none. In moderate Guillain-Barré syndrome four sessions are superior to two. In severe Guillain-Barré syndrome six sessions are no better than four. Continuous flow plasma exchange machines may be superior to intermittent flow machines and albumin to fresh frozen plasma as the exchange fluid. Plasma exchange is more beneficial when started within seven days after disease onset rather than later, but was still beneficial in patients treated up to 30 days after disease onset. The value of plasma exchange in children less than 12 years old is not known.

Guillain-Barre Syndrome↗

Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is an autoimmune peripheral neuropathy and would be expected to benefit from corticosteroids. Non-randomised studies suggest that corticosteroids are often beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register for randomised trials of corticosteroids treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and enquiry from subject experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials Types of participants: All patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy who were diagnosed by an internationally accepted definition. Types of interventions: Treatment with any form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotropic hormone. Types of outcome measures: PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in disability 12 weeks after randomisation. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 1. Change in impairment 12 weeks after randomisation. 2. Change in maximum motor nerve conduction velocity or compound muscle action potential amplitude after 12 weeks. 3. Side effects of corticosteroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author extracted the data and the other checked them. MAIN RESULTS: We identified one randomised controlled trial, an open study in which 19 corticosteroid treated patients showed more improvement in impairment than 16 untreated controls after 12 weeks. Experience from large non-randomised studies suggests that steroids are beneficial. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A single randomised controlled trial with 35 participants provided weak evidence to support the common opinion derived from non-randomised studies that oral corticosteroids reduce impairment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Corticosteroids are known to have serious long term side effects. The long term risks and benefits have not been adequately studied.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome is a potentially serious, acute, paralysing, probably autoimmune disease caused by inflammation of the peripheral nerves. Recovery has been shown to be speeded by plasma exchange which replaces the patient's own plasma with a plasma substitute. Intravenous immunoglobulin purified from donated blood is beneficial in other autoimmune diseases and is easier to administer. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in comparison with no treatment or other treatments for treating Guillain-Barré syndrome and to determine the most efficacious dose. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register using Guillain-Barré syndrome and acute polyradiculoneuritis as the search terms, bibliographies of trials and contact with their authors and other experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers examined the titles and abstracts of all the papers retrieved by the search, extracted the data onto forms designed for this review, and independently assessed the quality of the trials. MAIN RESULTS: The only trial comparing intravenous immunoglobulin with supportive treatment was inadequate to establish its value. Another Cochrane systematic review has shown that plasma exchange (PE) hastens recovery. Plasma exchange has become the gold standard against which other treatments need to be compared. We found three randomised trials that compared intravenous immunoglobulin with PE. We were able to combine the results of the two largest trials in a metaanalysis involving 398 patients. The primary outcome measure in this review was the change in a 7 grade disability scale four weeks after randomisation. The weighted mean difference of this measure was not significant, being only 0.11 (95% CI -0.14 to 0.37) of a disability grade more improvement in the intravenous immunoglobulin group than the PE group. There were also no significant differences in other outcome measures, including time to walk unaided, mortality, and proportion of patients unable to walk without aid after a year but some of these outcome measures were only available for one trial. We also reviewed one trial involving 249 patients which compared PE followed by intravenous immunoglobulin with PE alone and another involving 37 patients which compared immunoabsorption followed by intravenous immunoglobulin with immunoabsorption alone. Neither revealed any significant differences between the regimens with and without intravenous immunoglobulin. We did not discover any dose ranging studies of intravenous immunoglobulin except for one that is ongoing. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are no adequate trials to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin is more beneficial than placebo. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange have a similar ability to speed the recovery from Guillain-Barré syndrome. Giving intravenous immunoglobulin after plasma exchange is not significantly better than plasma exchange alone. Randomised trials are needed to decide whether intravenous immunoglobulin helps in mild Guillain-Barré syndrome or in disease which has lasted more than two weeks. Randomised trials also need to establish the optimal dose.

Child↗

Guidance for the preparation of neurological management guidelines by EFNS scientific task forces.

The aim of an EFNS neurological management guideline is to provide guidance for clinical neurologists, other health care professionals and health care providers about important aspects of management of neurological disease. It represents the view of an expert task force appointed by the chairperson of the scientific committee with the agreement of the chairperson of a Scientist Panel. It will be a peer-reviewed statement of minimum desirable standards for the guidance of practice based on the best available evidence. It is not intended to have legally binding implications in individual cases.

Humans↗