Biomedical subjects

R A Kohn

Publications and source records attributed to R A Kohn.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Salvage of blood urea nitrogen in sheep is highly dependent on plasma urea concentration and the efficiency of capture within the digestive tract.

The aims of this study were 1) to determine whether transfer of blood urea to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the efficiency of capture of urea N within the GIT is more limiting for urea N salvage, and 2) to establish the relationship between plasma urea concentration and recycling of urea N to the GIT. We used an i.v. urea infusion model in sheep to elevate the urea entry rate and plasma concentrations, thus avoiding direct manipulation of the rumen environment that otherwise occurs when feeding additional N. Four growing sheep (28.1 +/- 0.6 kg of BW) were fed a low-protein (6.8% CP, DM basis) diet and assigned to 4 rates of i.v. urea infusion (0, 3.8, 7.5, or 11.3 g of urea N/d; 10-d periods) in a balanced 4 x 4 Latin square design. Nitrogen retention (d 6 to 9), urea kinetics([(15)N2]urea infusion over 80 h), and plasma AA were determined. Urea infusion increased apparent total tract digestibility of N (29.9 to 41.3%) and DM (47.5 to 58.9%), and N retention (1.45 to 5.46 g/d). The plasma urea N entry rate increased (5.1 to 21.8 g/d) with urea infusion, as did the amount of urea N entering the GIT (4.1 to 13.2 g/d). Urea N transfer to the GIT increased with plasma urea concentration, but the increases were smaller at greater concentrations of plasma urea. Anabolic use of urea N within the GIT also increased with urea infusion (1.43 to 2.98 g/d; P = 0.003), but anabolic use as a proportion of GIT entry was low and decreased (35 to 22%; P = 0.003) with urea infusions. Consequently, much (44 to 67%) of the urea N transferred to the GIT returned to the liver for resynthesis of urea (1.8 to 9.2 g/d; P < 0.05). The present results suggest that transfer of blood urea to the GIT is 1) highly related to blood urea concentration, and 2) less limiting for N retention than is the efficiency of capture of recycled urea N by microbes within the GIT.

Amino Acids↗

PubMed2006

Milk production of dairy cows fed differing concentrations of rumen-degraded protein.

Thirty-two multiparous and 16 primiparous Holstein cows in midlactation averaging 126 d in milk were used to determine the effects of rumen-degraded protein (RDP) concentration on lactation performance. Cows were assigned to diets in a repeated Latin square design with 3-wk experimental periods. Diets were formulated to provide 4 concentrations of dietary RDP [6.8, 8.2, 9.6, and 11.0% of dry matter (DM)] while rumen-undegraded protein remained constant (5.8% of DM). Diets contained 50% corn silage and 50% concentrate (DM basis). Ingredients within diets were equal across treatments except for ground corn, soybean meal, and ruminally protected soybean meal. Dry matter intake was not affected by treatment. Milk yield, fat yield, and protein yield all increased linearly when cows were fed diets with greater RDP. Milk fat and protein concentration each increased by 0.16 percentage units for cows fed 11% RDP compared with 6.8% RDP. Milk protein yield increased by 0.19 g/d for every 1 g/d increase in crude protein supplied mainly as RDP. As RDP increased, the efficiency of N use declined linearly. Milk urea N increased linearly when cows were fed increasing amounts of RDP, indicating increased losses of N via urine. Feeding deficient RDP diets to dairy cows can decrease nitrogen excretion, but it also decreases lactation performance. These data show an environmental benefit from underfeeding RDP to dairy cows according to National Research Council requirements, but at a financial cost to the dairy producer.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Using blood urea nitrogen to predict nitrogen excretion and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle, sheep, goats, horses, pigs, and rats.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential for using blood urea N concentration to predict urinary N excretion rate, and to develop a mathematical model to estimate important variables of N utilization for several different species of farm animals and for rats. Treatment means (n = 251) from 41 research publications were used to develop mathematical relationships. There was a strong linear relationship between blood urea N concentration (mg/100 mL) and rate of N excretion (g x d(-1) x kg BW(-1)) for all animal species investigated. The N clearance rate of the kidney (L of blood cleared of urea x d(-1) x kg BW(-1)) was greater for pigs and rats than for herbivores (cattle, sheep, goats, horses). A model was developed to estimate parameters of N utilization. Driving variables for the model included blood urea N concentration (mg/100 mL), BW (kg), milk production rate (kg/d), and ADG (kg/d), and response variables included urinary N excretion rate (g/d), fecal N excretion rate (g/d), rate of N intake (g/d), and N utilization efficiency (N in milk and gain per unit of N intake). Prediction errors varied widely depending on the variable and species of animal, with most of the variation attributed to study differences. Blood urea N concentration (mg/100 mL) can be used to predict relative differences in urinary N excretion rate (g/d) for animals of a similar type and stage of production within a study, but is less reliable across animal types or studies. Blood urea N concentration (mg/100 mL) can be further integrated with estimates of N digestibility (g/g) and N retention (g/d) to predict fecal N (g/d), N intake (g/d), and N utilization efficiency (grams of N in milk and meat per gram of N intake). Target values of blood urea N concentration (mg/100 mL) can be backcalculated from required dietary N (g/d) and expected protein digestibility. Blood urea N can be used in various animal species to quantify N utilization and excretion rates.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of analytical methods and the influence of milk components on milk urea nitrogen recovery.

The objectives of this study were to compare analytical instruments used in independent laboratories to measure milk urea nitrogen (MUN) and determine whether any components in milk affect the recovery of MUN. Milk samples were collected from 100 Holstein cows fed one ration in a commercial dairy herd with a rolling herd average of 9500 kg. Half of each sample was spiked with 4 mg/dL of urea N, while the other half was not, to determine recovery. Both milk samples (spiked and not spiked) were sent to 14 independent laboratories involved in the MUN Quality Control Program through National Dairy Herd Improvement Association and analyzed for MUN, fat, protein, lactose, somatic cell count (SCC), and total solids. The laboratories analyzed MUN using CL-10 (n = 3), Skalar (n = 2), Bentley (n = 3), Foss 4000 (n = 3) or Foss 6000 (n = 3) systems. When recovery of MUN was evaluated among the 5 analytical methods, the mean recoveries for the Bentley, Foss 6000, and Skalar systems were 92.1 (SE = 2.76%), 95.4 (SE = 10.1%), and 95.1% (SE = 7.61%), respectively, and did not differ from each other. However, MUN recovery was 85.0% (SE = 2.8%) for the CL-10 system and 47.1% (SE = 9.9%) for the Foss 4000 system, both of which differed from the other 3 systems. Recoveries from Foss 4000, Foss 6000, and Skalar varied among laboratories using the same instrument. As initial MUN concentration increased, recovery decreased using the Bentley and CL-10 systems. Increasing milk fat resulted in a decrease in recovery using the Foss 6000 system. For 4 of the 5 methods, recovery of MUN was not associated with specific milk components. Recovery of MUN was inconsistent for laboratories using the Foss 4000 and the Foss 6000 method and using these systems may result in an overestimation or underestimation of MUN.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

A comparison of instruments and laboratories used to measure milk urea nitrogen in bulk-tank milk samples.

The objective of this study was to compare the instruments and laboratories that are currently used for analysis of milk urea nitrogen (MUN) for bulk-tank milk samples. Two replicate samples from each bulk tank on 10 different dairy farms were sent to 12 Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) laboratories throughout the US for MUN analysis. Two laboratories used 2 different methods for MUN analysis for a total of 14 analyses on 20 samples (n = 280). Values of MUN were analyzed using a random effects model with farm, laboratory, and farm x laboratory variance components. Greater than 98% of the variance in measured MUN was attributed to farm-to-farm variance for analysis of MUN by the Bentley, CL 10, Foss 6000, and Skalar instruments. However, for the laboratories using the Foss 4000 system, <60% of the variance in MUN was attributed to farm-to-farm variance. Laboratories using the Bentley, CL 10, Foss 6000, and Skalar instruments provided slightly different results for MUN analysis, but >95% of sample measurements fell within 1.75 mg/ dL of each other. The laboratories using Foss 4000 differed from each other, and 95% of samples fell within 5 mg/dL of the CL 10 measurement. Laboratories using the Foss 4000 instrument did not consistently provide measurements of MUN that were similar to each other or to the measurements of the other instruments.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Effects of milk urea nitrogen and other factors on probability of conception of dairy cows.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships between milk urea nitrogen (MUN) and other factors and the probability of conception in dairy cows. Data were retrieved from the Lancaster Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA). A total of 713 dairy herds and 10,271 dairy cows were included in the study. Logistic regression was used to determine the within-herd effects of MUN, milk production, lactation number, and breeding season on the probability of conception for each of 3 services. Within herds, MUN displayed a slight negative association with probability of conception at first service. For example, there was a 2- to 4-percentage unit decrease in conception rate at first service with a 10-mg/dL increase in MUN. In among-herd regression analysis, there was no effect of MUN on probability of conception. These results suggest that MUN may be related to conditions affecting reproduction of individual cows within a herd. Diet formulation usually would affect MUN equally among all cows at a similar stage of lactation in a herd. Because there was no effect of MUN among herds, diet formulation did not appear to affect conception rate.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Whole-farm phosphorus balance on western dairy farms.

Environmental concerns have focused attention on animal agriculture and its contribution to P accumulation in soils and runoff to surface waters. Monitoring P inputs and outputs on farms is a means of calculating the potential P build-up in farm soils. The objective of this study was to determine whole-farm P balance and the relative importance of the farm components (herd, manure storage, cropping systems) that contribute to it in dairies of the western United States. Whole-farm balances were computed for 41 commercial dairies in Utah and Idaho using the Maryland Nutrient Balancer. The average whole-farm P balance in the study was 6.6 tonne/yr with an average herd size of 466 cows. Imported feed made up 85.4% of the total P inputs and exported animal products (milk and meat), and manure and compost made up 53.1 and 45.9%, respectively, of the total P outputs. Farms were divided into those that grew crops and those that did not. Whole-farm balance (kg of P balance per animal) for farms that grew crops had more unaccounted for P (difference between P inputs and output) than farms that grew no crops. They also had more imported fertilizer and less imported feed and exported manure and compost. Multiple regression analysis of the relative effects of herd management, manure storage, and cropping system on whole-farm balance per product found that herd P utilization efficiency was the most important factor in determining whole-farm P balance on farms where crops were grown. Crop uptake of available P was the only other subsystem important for these farms. Increased conversion of feed P to P in product is an important way to decrease whole-farm P balance.

Agriculture↗

PubMed2003

Phosphorus feeding levels and critical control points on dairy farms.

A viable and cost-effective approach to managing P on dairy farms is to minimize excess P in diets, which in turn leads to less excretion of P in manure without impairing animal performance. A questionnaire survey was conducted, coupled with on-site feed and fecal sample collection and analysis on dairy farms in New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. The purpose was to assess dietary P levels and to identify critical control points pertaining to P feeding management. Survey responses, 612 out of 2500 randomly selected farms, revealed a wide range of dietary P concentrations for lactating cows, from 3.6 to 7.0 g/kg of feed DM. The mean was 4.4 g/kg, which was 34% above the level recommended by the NRC for 27.9 kg milk/d, the mean milk yield in the survey. Higher P concentrations in diets were not associated with higher milk yields (n = 98, R2 = 0.057 for the survey farms; n = 92, R2 = 0.043 for farms selected for on-site sampling). However, higher dietary P led to higher P excretion in feces (n = 75, R2 = 0.429), with much of the increased fecal P being water soluble. Phosphorus concentrations in diet samples matched closely with P concentrations in formulated rations, with 67% of the feed samples deviating <10% from the formulations. On 84% of the survey farms, ration formulation was provided by professionals rather than producers themselves. Most producers were feeding more P than cows needed because it was recommended in the rations by these consultants. In conclusion, P fed to lactating cows averaged 34% above NRC recommendations; to reduce excess dietary P, ration formulation is the critical control point.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed2003

Whole-farm nitrogen balance on western dairy farms.

Environmental legislation has made it necessary for livestock producers to be able to quantify and adjust the N balance on their farms. Whole-farm N balance and efficiencies were computed for 41 commercial dairies in Utah and Idaho using the University of Maryland Nutrient Balancer. The average N balance, or unaccounted for N, was 81 tonnes per year for the average herd size of 466 cows with 35.8% of the inputs accounted for in the outputs. The major inputs for farms that grew crops (n = 23, herd size = 284 total cows) were imported feed (57.4% of all inputs) and nitrogen fixation (30% of inputs). The major outputs were animal products (primarily milk and some meat, 80% of outputs). For farms that grew no crops (n = 18, herd size = 700 total cows), 98% of the inputs were from imported feed. Of the outputs, 57% of the N was in animal products and 42.9% in manure and compost. Whole-farm balance per product for those farms that grew crops was most affected by herd N utilization efficiency (kg feed N per kg product N), crop N utilization efficiency, and availability of manure N applied to crops, while manure N storage efficiency was of lesser importance. For farms that grew no crops, whole-farm N balance per product was most affected by herd N utilization efficiency and manure N storage efficiency. Maximizing conversion of feed N to product N was the best way to reduce whole-farm N balance.

Agriculture↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of models to estimate urinary nitrogen and expected milk urea nitrogen.

Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) has been introduced as a means to estimate urinary nitrogen (N) excretion and protein status of dairy cattle. For Holstein cows, the amount of urinary N excreted (g/d) was originally reported to be 12.54 x MUN (mg/dl), but recently urinary N (g/d) was reported to equal 17.64 x MUN (mg/dl). The objectives of the present study were to evaluate models to predict urinary N and expected MUN, by using older and newer data sets, and to quantify changes that may have occurred in MUN measurements over time. Two data sets were used for model evaluation. Data set 1 was from the spring of 1998 and data set 2 was from the spring of 1999. Similar cows and diets were used in both studies. By using data set 1, the newer model underestimated MUN by an average of 3.8 mg/dl, whereas the older model was accurate. By using data set 2, the older model overestimated MUN by 4.8 mg/ dl, but the newer model was accurate. In the period between the two studies, the MUN measured appeared to decrease by an average of 4.0 mg/dl. By using current wet chemistry methods to analyze for MUN, urinary N (mg/dl) can be predicted as 0.026 x MUN (mg/dl) x body weight (kg). Because of changes in methodology that occurred in the fall of 1998, target MUN concentrations have decreased to 8.5 to 11.5 mg/dl for most dairy herds compared with previous target concentrations of 12 to 16 mg/dl.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Use of milk urea nitrogen to improve dairy cow diets.

The hypothesis of this field study was that providing farmers with information regarding their herd's milk urea nitrogen (MUN) would result in more accurate feed management and a change in MUN toward target values. All dairy herd bulk tanks (n = 1156) in the Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers' Cooperative were tested for MUN each month for six months ending in May 1999. Farmers (n = 454) who returned a survey were provided with the results of their MUN analysis each month along with interpretive information. Survey results indicated that most (89.5%) dairy farmers did not routinely use MUN prior to participating in the project, but most (88%) extension agents and nutritionists in the region recommended it. The average MUN across all farms in the study increased in the spring, but the increase was 0.52 mg/dl lower for farmers receiving MUN results than for those who did not participate in the program. Farmers who indicated they increased dietary crude protein (CP) due to low MUN started with MUN values that were 3 mg/dl below target but ended with target values. Farmers who indicated that they decreased CP due to high MUN began the project with high MUN but decreased it by 1 mg/dl compared to non-participating farmers. At the end of the project, 30% of farmers responding to a follow-up survey indicated they would use MUN analysis in the future. Providing MUN results and interpretive information to farmers was documented to change feeding practices and subsequent MUN results.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed2002

Dairy herd management practices that impact nitrogen utilization efficiency.

Improving the efficiency of feed N utilization by dairy cattle is the most effective means to reduce nutrient losses from dairy farms. The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of different management strategies on the efficiency of feed N utilization for dairy farms in the Chesapeake Bay Drainage Basin. A confidential mail survey was completed in December 1998 by 454 dairy farmers in PA, MD, VA, WV, and DE. Nitrogen intake, urinary and fecal N, and efficiency of feed N utilization was estimated from survey data and milk analysis for each herd. Average efficiency of feed N utilization for milk production by lactating dairy cows (N in milk/N in feed x 100) was 28.4% (SD = 3.9). On average, farmers fed 6.6% more N than recommended by the National Research Council, resulting in a 16% increase in urinary N and a 2.7% increase in fecal N. Use of monthly milk yield and component testing, administration of bovine somatotropin (bST), and extending photoperiod with artificial light each increased efficiency of feed N utilization by 4.2 to 6.9%, while use of a complete feed decreased efficiency by 5.6%. Increased frequency of ration balancing and more frequent forage nutrient testing were associated with higher milk production, but not increased N utilization efficiency. Feeding protein closer to recommendations and increasing production per cow both contributed to improving efficiency of feed N utilization.

Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena↗

PubMed2001

Using milk urea nitrogen to evaluate diet formulation and environmental impact on dairy farms.

Reducing nitrogen (N) excretion by dairy cattle is the most effective means to reduce N losses (runoff, volatilization, and leaching) from dairy farms. The objectives of this review are to examine the use of milk urea nitrogen (MUN) to measure N excretion and utilization efficiency in lactating dairy cows and to examine impacts of overfeeding N to dairy cows in the Chesapeake Bay drainage basin. A mathematical model was developed and evaluated with an independent literature data set to integrate MUN and milk composition to predict urinary and fecal excretion, intake, and utilization efficiency for N in lactating dairy cows. This model was subsequently used to develop target MUN concentrations for lactating dairy cattle fed according to National Research Council (NRC) recommendations. Target values calculated in this manner were 8 to 14 mg/dl for a typical lactation and were most sensitive to change in milk production and crude protein intake. Routine use of MUN to monitor dairy cattle diets was introduced to dairy farms (n = 1156) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Participating farmers (n = 454) were provided with the results of their MUN analyses and interpretive information monthly for a period of 6 months. The average MUN across all farms in the study increased in the spring, but the increase was 0.52 mg/dl lower for farmers receiving MUN results compared to those who did not participate in the program. This change indicated that participating farmers reduced N feeding compared to nonparticipants. Average efficiency of feed N utilization (N in milk / N in feed x 100) was 24.5% (SD = 4.5). On average, farmers fed 6.6% more N than recommended by the NRC, resulting in a 16% increase in urinary N and a 2.7% increase in fecal N compared to feeding to requirement. N loading to the Chesapeake Bay from overfeeding protein to lactating dairy cattle was estimated to be 7.6 million kg/year. MUN is a useful tool to measure diet adequacy and environmental impact from dairy farms.

Agriculture↗

PubMed2000

Compartmental modeling with nitrogen-15 to determine effects of degree of fat saturation on intraruminal N recycling.

Two- and three-compartment models were developed to describe N kinetics within the rumen using three Holstein heifers and one nonlactating Holstein cow fitted with ruminal and duodenal cannulas. A 4 x 4 Latin square design included a control diet containing no supplemental fat and diets containing 4.85% of diet dry matter as partially hydrogenated tallow (iodine value = 13), tallow (iodine value = 51), or animal-vegetable fat (iodine value = 110). Effects of fat on intraruminal N recycling and relationships between intraruminal N recycling and ruminal protozoa concentration or the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis were determined. A pulse dose of 15(NH4)2SO4 was introduced into the ruminal NH3 N pool, and samples were taken over time from the ruminal NH3 N and nonammonia N pools. For the three-compartment model, precipitates of nonammonia N after trichloroacetic acid and ethanol extraction were defined as slowly turning over nonammonia N; rapidly turning over nonammonia N was determined by difference. Curves of 15N enrichment were fit to models with two (NH3 N and nonammonia N) or three (NH3 N, rapidly turning over nonammonia N, and slowly turning over nonammonia N) compartments using the software SAAM II. Because the three-compartment model did not remove a small systematic bias or improve the fit of the data, the two-compartment model was used to provide measurements of intraruminal N recycling. Intraruminal NH3 N recycling (45% for control) decreased linearly as fat unsaturation increased (50.2, 43.0, and 41.7% for partially hydrogenated tallow, tallow, and animal-vegetable fat, respectively). Intraruminal nitrogen recycling was not correlated with efficiency of microbial protein synthesis or ruminal protozoa counts.

Ammonium Sulfate↗

PubMed2000

The impact of somatotropin, milking frequency, and photoperiod on dairy farm nutrient flows.

Three technologies that increase milk production per cow and that are available to dairy producers are bovine somatotropin, three times daily milking, and extended daily photoperiod. Dairy herds fed according to National Research Council requirements were simulated to predict the impact of these technologies on N losses to manure and to water resources. Because Dairy Herd Improvement Association total lactation records (n = 93,080) revealed a positive linear relationship between 305-d milk production and calving interval, calving intervals were predicted to increase with the use of technologies and to result in a change in the ratio of lactating cows to growing heifers in a herd. Compared with a herd using no technologies, the use of bovine somatotropin, three times daily milking, or extended photoperiod were predicted to reduce herd N excretion per unit of milk by 7.8, 7.0, and 3.6%, respectively. When the use of all three technologies was simulated, N losses to manure were decreased by 15.7% when assuming calving interval increases from the technologies or 15.4% without accounting for calving interval increases. Reductions in feed N requirements and manure N losses with these three technologies were predicted to reduce environmental N loading by up to 16%.

Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena↗

PubMed2000

Diets deficient in rumen undegraded protein did not depress milk production.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the National Research Council's recommendations for feeding levels of rumen undegraded protein (RUP) for cows fed a one-group total mixed ration. Sixty Holstein cows were paired by parity (1 to 6) and DIM (23 to 315) and were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. Diets contained alfalfa silage (30% diet DM) and corn silage (26% diet DM), and were isonitrogenous (16% CP) and isocaloric (1.71 Mcal/kg). Soybean meal, protected soybean meal (Soy Best), and urea were used to make ration protein fractions that were predicted to be 35 or 29% RUP. The 35% RUP diet was formulated to provide 98 and 105% of the average requirement for RUP and rumen degraded protein (RDP), respectively. The ration containing 29% RUP provided 79 and 117% of average required RUP and RDP, respectively. All cows were group-fed the high RUP diet during a 2-wk pretreatment period, and then were fed one ration for 4 wk followed by the other for 4 wk according to their assigned treatment sequence. Data were collected in the last wk of each period. Mean milk production, milk fat, and milk protein were 32.6 kg/d, 4.35%, and 3.36%, respectively, with no treatment differences. Treatment response was not affected by degree of predicted RUP deficiency. National Research Council requirements for RUP may be too high for cows fed diets similar in energy to a one-group total mixed ration. Alternatively, estimates of RUP content of feedstuffs may be low.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed2000

Effects of amount and source of fat on the rates of lipolysis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids in ruminal contents.

Because the percentage loss of unsaturated fatty acids across the rumen has varied considerably in previous in vivo studies, we conducted five experiments to identify potential factors that might affect the in vitro rates of lipid lipolysis and biohydrogenation in ruminal contents. The factors examined included the amount of fat added to the substrate, the source of added fat, the diet fed to the donor fistulated cow, and the time of collection of inoculum from the donor cow. Lipolysis and biohydrogenation were expressed as the rates of disappearance of neutral lipid and unsaturated fatty acids, respectively, from the culture contents over time using a first-order model. The rate of lipolysis of soybean oil declined from 44%/h to less than 30%/h as the percentage of soybean oil in the culture substrate increased from 2 to 10%. The overall rate of biohydrogenation of C18:2 was 14.3%/h, but declined 1.2%/h for each percentage unit increase in C18:2 added to the substrate. Compared with C18:2, the rates of biohydrogenation of C18:1 were generally lower (averaged 3.6 %/h) for all fat sources. The rate of biohydrogenation of C18:2 in soybean oil was not affected by the amount of grain or fat fed to the donor cow, or the time after feeding that ruminal inoculum was collected. Based on these findings, high linoleic acid concentrations in the diet would possibly reduce biohydrogenation and increase the postruminal flow of this unsaturated fatty acid. Also, lipolysis may vary considerably due to amount and source of lipid added to the diet, but this has little influence on the initial disappearance rates of linoleic or oleic acids from ruminal contents.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed1999

Effects of dietary crude protein concentration and degradability on milk production responses of early, mid, and late lactation diary cows.

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of crude protein (CP) concentration and ruminally undegraded protein (RUP) concentration on milk production and composition of dairy cows at three different stages of lactation. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 using 39, 40, and 39 Holstein cows were conducted for cows in early (wk 4 to 14 postpartum), mid (wk 19 to 29), and late (wk 34 to 44) lactation, respectively. Cows were assigned to one of four corn-based diets: high CP, medium RUP (control); low CP, low RUP; low CP, medium RUP; and low CP, high RUP. Percentages of CP in the high and low CP diets were, respectively, 17.4 and 15.2 for Experiment 1, 15.3 and 13.3 for Experiment 2, and 14.2 and 12.6 for Experiment 3. The RUP concentrations (percentages of CP) for low, medium, and high diets averaged 35.5, 41.4, and 46.5%, respectively. For Experiment 1, production of milk, 4% fat-corrected milk, milk fat, and milk protein was increased by the high protein diets versus the low protein diets. Production of milk and fat-corrected milk increased linearly as RUP in the diet increased. During Experiment 2, lactational responses were not affected by treatment. During Experiment 3, dry matter intake, body weight, and body weight change increased for cows fed the high protein diets versus those same measurements for cows fed the low protein diets. Milk fat and milk protein percentage decreased linearly as RUP in the diet increased. Because there was no effect of diet on milk production, decreasing CP in diets fed to cows in mid or late lactation can reduce the cost of the diet and waste N excreted from the cow.

Animals↗