PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

R A Shlofmitz

Publications and source records attributed to R A Shlofmitz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Importance of balloon size in coronary angioplasty.

The effect of balloon size on the success of coronary angioplasty was studied to develop quantitative criteria for optimal selection of balloon size. Coronary dimensions of 165 stenotic lesions were measured by computer-assisted cinevideodensitometry in 120 patients who had undergone angioplasty with a balloon selected by visual estimates. Cross-sectional areas and diameters of normal and stenotic arterial segments were measured before and after angioplasty by a previously validated cinevideodensitometric technique. The diameter of the inflated balloon compared with that of the normal arterial segment was expressed as a ratio for sizing balloons. Oversized balloons with a ratio greater than 1.3 (n = 35) caused a high (37%) incidence of dissection, with three severely compromised arterial lumens. Undersized balloons with a ratio less than 0.9 (n = 29) often resulted in significant (greater than 50% diameter stenosis) residual stenotic lesions (21%) and a significantly (p less than 0.05) higher rate of repeat angioplasty for restenosis. Selection of balloon sizes with ratios in the 0.9 to 1.3 range (n = 101) resulted in a low (4%) incidence of dissection with few patients (3%) having significant residual stenosis. Mean residual stenosis (percent diameter reduction) was most severe for undersized (35.0 +/- 18%) or oversized (23.1 +/- 19%) balloons and least severe for balloons with a ratio of 0.9 to 1.3 (18.7 +/- 14%) (p less than 0.001). Repeat angioplasty for restenosis was more frequently required (p less than 0.05) for lesions dilated with undersized balloons. Thus, selection of angioplasty balloons that approximate or slightly exceed the diameter of the normal arterial diameter yields optimal angiographic results with minimal dissections and minimal residual stenotic lesions.

Angioplasty, Balloon

New-onset atrial fibrillation: is there need for emergent hospitalization?

Patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation are often hospitalized emergently. To determine whether this is necessary, the authors retrospectively reviewed the care of 97 consecutive patients with this illness. No reason for the atrial fibrillation in 43 patients could be identified. Hypertension, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease were the most commonly associated conditions; myocardial infarction occurred in one patient. In 82% of patients, atrial fibrillation reverted to normal sinus rhythm during hospitalization. Three patients needed emergent hospitalization irrespective of the presence of atrial fibrillation. In the remainder, admission was based solely on the diagnosis of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Ninety-eight per cent had an uncomplicated hospital course. It is concluded that hospitalization is not necessary for all patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Those in whom reversion to normal sinus rhythm occurs rapidly during digoxin therapy can be discharged. Where no major medical illness is evident patients can be admitted to a bed outside the intensive care unit until reversion to normal sinus rhythm or rate control is achieved.

Adult

ECG challenge.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Electrocardiography