PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R A Villegas

Publications and source records attributed to R A Villegas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

[Diet, smoking and reproductive history as risk factor for cervical cancer].

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have suggested that smoking, nutrition and sexual patterns are major risk factors for cervical cancer. AIM: To study the association between food consumption patterns, smoking and sexual behavior and the risk of cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A matched case control study of 170 cases and 340 controls. Food and nutrient intakes were assessed by a food frequency questionnaire considering 58 antioxidant rich food items. Median daily intake of vegetables, fruits, antioxidant vitamins and fiber was calculated. A conditional logistic regression model was used to determine odds ratios associated with variations in nutritional intake and no nutritional factors (age at first delivery, parity, body mass index, family history of cancer and smoking). RESULTS: High intakes of vegetables, fruits, beta carotene, vitamin C, E and fiber were associated with a lower risk of cervical cancer (Odds ratios ranging from 0.56 to 0.78). The risk for cancer was inversely associated with the age at first delivery and directly associated with the total number of pregnancies and smoking. Multivariate analysis model showed a protective effect for vegetable and vitamin E consumption (odds ratio of 0.6 with confidence intervals of 0.5 to 0.8 p < 0.001) and a higher risk associated to smoking (odds ratio 2.8, confidence intervals 1.5-5.5 p < 0.002) and a younger age at the first delivery (odds ratio 3.37 confidence intervals 2-5.3 p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer is associated with reproductive and food consumption behaviors. A higher intake of vegetables and foods rich in vitamin E can reduce its risk.

Adult↗

[Alcoholic liver disease: nutritional evaluation methods].

Nutritional evaluation is required to treat patients with hepatic disease. A significant correlation was demonstrated between real body weights lean body mass (LMB) with arm muscular area (AMA) (P less than 0.001); LBM of patients with ascites Vs without ascites showed significant differences (P less than 0.02). No significant differences (P greater than 0.1) was demonstrated, when we used the AMA between patients with Vs without ascites. Albumin values showed slight depletion on 20%; 12% had moderate and 4% had very severe depletion, but 64% of patients had normal values. Albumin-transferrin showed very good correlation (P less than 0.001); but there was no correlation between albumin-AMA, transferrin-AMA, transferrin-MMM and albumin-MMM (P greater than 0.05). The lymphocytic count on 53.33% was normal, 37.67% showed light depletion and 9% had moderate; PPDs was greater than 10mm in 60.86%; normal in 17.36%, and not reactive in 21.75%. AMA is a real and ideal nutritional evaluation method, because it is able to correct the errors due to the presence of ascites.

Adult↗