PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R B Lipton

Publications and source records attributed to R B Lipton.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is frequently associated with nonheadache symptoms before, during, and after the headache. Premonitory symptoms occurring before the attack have not been rigorously studied. Should these symptoms accurately predict headache, there are considerable implications for the pathophysiology and management of migraine. METHODS: Electronic diaries were used in a 3-month multicenter study to record nonheadache symptoms before, during, and after migraine. The authors recruited subjects who reported nonheadache symptoms in at least two of three attacks that they believed predicted headache. Symptoms were entered in the diaries by patient initiation and through prompted entries at random times daily. Entries could not be altered retrospectively. Data recorded included nonheadache symptoms occurring during all three phases of the migraine, prediction of the attack from premonitory symptoms, general state of health, and action taken to prevent the headache. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were recruited: 97 provided usable data. Patients correctly predicted migraine headaches from 72% of diary entries with premonitory symptoms. A range of cognitive and physical symptoms was reported at a similar rate through all three phases of the migraine. The most common premonitory symptoms were feeling tired and weary (72% of attacks with warning features), having difficulty concentrating (51%), and a stiff neck (50%). Subjects who functioned poorly in the premonitory phase were the most likely to correctly predict headache. CONCLUSIONS: Using an electronic diary system, the authors show that migraineurs who report premonitory symptoms can accurately predict the full-blown headache.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patterns of medical consultation, diagnosis, and medication use in representative samples of adults with migraine in England and the United States. METHODS: Validated computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted in the United Kingdom (n = 4,007) and the United States (n = 4,376). Individuals who reported six or more headaches per year meeting the criteria for migraine were interviewed. RESULTS: Patients with migraine in the United Kingdom were more likely to have consulted a doctor for headache at least once in their lifetime (86% vs 69%, p < 0.0001), but also were more likely to have lapsed from medical care (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001). In the United States, patients with migraine who had consulted made more office visits for headache and were more likely to see a specialist. In the United States, but not in the United Kingdom, women with migraine were more likely than men to consult doctors for headache. Patients with migraine in the United Kingdom were more likely to receive a medical diagnosis of migraine (UK 67%, US 56%; p < 0.05). Patterns of medication use were similar in both countries, with most people treating with over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Substantial disability occurred in a high proportion of those who never consulted (UK 60%, US 68%), never received a correct medical diagnosis (UK 64%, US 77%), and treated only with OTC medication (UK 72%, US 70%). CONCLUSION: Medically unrecognized migraine remains an important health problem both in the United States and the United Kingdom. Furthermore, there may be barriers to consultation for men in the United States that do not operate in the United Kingdom.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Epilepsy and migraine.

Migraine and epilepsy are both chronic disorders characterized by recurrent neurologic attacks variously accompanied by headache as well as by gastrointestinal, autonomic, and psychologic features. Migraine and epilepsy are linked by their symptom profiles, comorbidity, and treatment. The presence of one disorder increases the likelihood that the other is also present. In addition, a number of migraine syndromes can be confused with epilepsy. The diagnosis and treatment of each disorder must take into account the potential presence of the other. Herein, we review the relationship between migraine and epilepsy. We discuss the diagnosis of migraine using the International Headache Society criteria, emphasizing the variants of migraine most frequently mistaken for epilepsy. We summarize the epidemiologic evidence that migraine and epilepsy are associated and discuss specific interrelationships between migraine and epilepsy.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2003

Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study.

The etiology and prognosis of chronic daily headache (CDH) are not well understood. The aim of this study is to describe factors that predict CDH onset or remission in an adult population. Potential cases (180+ headaches per year, n=1134) and controls (two to 104 headaches per year, n=798) were interviewed two times over an average 11 months of follow-up. Factors associated with CDH prevalence at baseline were evaluated. The incidence of CDH and risk factors for onset were assessed in controls whose headache frequency increased to 180+ per year at follow-up. Prognostic factors were assessed in CDH cases whose headache frequency fell at follow-up. CDH was more common in women, in whites, and those of less education. CDH cases were more likely to be previously married (divorced, widowed, separated), obese, and report a physician diagnosis of diabetes or arthritis. At follow-up, 3% of the controls reported 180 or more headaches per year. Obesity and baseline headache frequency were significantly associated with new onset CDH. In CDH cases, the projected 1-year remission rate to less than one headache per week was 14% and to less than 180 headaches per year was 57%. A better prognosis was associated with higher education, non-white race, being married, and with diagnosed diabetes. Individuals with less than a high-school education, whites, and those who were previously married had a higher risk of CDH at baseline and reduced likelihood of remission at follow-up. New onset CDH was associated with baseline headache frequency and obesity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Placebo response in clinical randomized trials of analgesics in migraine.

The objective was to assess the placebo response in randomized clinical trials of analgesics in the treatment of migraine attacks. We included placebo-controlled studies that used the criteria of the International Headache Society for the diagnosis of migraine and headache response as the primary efficacy parameter. In the 11 studies that qualified for inclusion, headache response occurred after placebo treatment in 7-50% of the migraineurs with an average placebo response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval (CI) 23-36). Two hours after treatment with placebo an average of 9% (95% CI 7-12, range 7-17%) of the patients were found to be pain free. In conclusion, the average headache response rate to placebo was 30% in randomized clinical trials of analgesics in migraine with a tremendous variation among studies. Placebo response rates vary with the choice of primary efficacy measure as well as patient characteristics and study design.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2003

The family impact of migraine: population-based studies in the USA and UK.

Despite an extensive body of research on the individual burden of migraine, few studies have examined its impact on the family. We aimed to assess the impact of migraine on family life both from the perspective of those with migraine and from the perspective of their partners. A validated computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) identified 574 people with migraine from a population sample of 4007 in mainland England, and 568 from 4376 in Philadelphia County, in the USA. Migraine cases with six or more migraine attacks per year and living as married with partners were asked, along with their partners, to participate in this study. In a follow-up interview, questions were asked of the proband (i.e. subject identified with migraine in the survey) about the impact of migraine. Similar questions were also asked of the probands' partners regarding the impact of the proband's migraine on their participation in social, family and leisure activities and on family relationships. The samples from the two countries showed similar characteristics, and were combined. Of 389 people with migraine living with a household partner, 85% reported substantial reductions in their ability to do household work and chores, 45% missed family social and leisure activities, and 32% avoided making plans for fear of cancellation due to headaches. One half believed that, because of their migraine, they were more likely to argue with their partners (50%) and children (52%), while majorities (52-73%) reported other adverse consequences for their relationships with their partner and children, and at work. A third (36%) believed they would be better partners but for their headaches. Participating partners (n = 100) partly confirmed these findings: 29% felt that arguments were more common because of headaches and 20-60% reported other negative effects on relationships at home. Compared with subjects who did not have migraine regarding their work performance, a statistically significantly higher proportion of migraine partners were unsatisfied with work demands placed on them (P = 0.02), with their level or responsibilities and duties (P = 0.02), and with their ability to perform (P = 0.001). Results from this study show that the impact of migraine extends to household partners and other family members.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Migraine headache disability and health-related quality-of-life: a population-based case-control study from England.

The aims of this study were: (i) to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) in a population sample of migraine headache sufferers and controls without migraine; (ii) to assess the relationship of HRQoL and work-related disability attributed to headache in a population sample. The study was conducted in two phases. First, a population-based, telephone interview survey of 5769 residents of greater London, England was conducted to identify individuals with migraine headache (cases) and controls without migraine. In the second stage, in-person interviews were conducted in a matched sample of 200 migraine cases and 200 controls selected from survey respondents. At the beginning of the in-person interview, participants were asked to complete the SF-36. In addition, a work-related disability score based on the telephone interview was defined as the number of lost work days or days when usual activity was reduced by 50% or more over the previous year. The disability score was trichotomized as mild (n = 98), moderate (n = 49), and severe disability (n = 49). Compared with controls, individuals with migraine headache scored significantly lower in eight of the nine domains of the SF-36 as well as in the overall Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Further, among migraine sufferers, each of the disability groups scored significantly lower in seven of the nine domains and in the summary scales. Scores showed greater reductions in HRQoL for the moderate and severe disability groups vs. the mild disability group in five of nine scales and in the Total Physical Summary score. We conclude that, in a population-based sample of migraine headache sufferers, individuals with migraine headache have lower HRQoL scores compared with controls. Moreover, among individuals with migraine headache, work-related disability is associated with lower HRQoL scores. Specifically, individuals classified with moderate to severe work-related disability had lower HRQoL scores than those classified with low disability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The prevalence and disability burden of adult migraine in England and their relationships to age, gender and ethnicity.

This study estimates the 1-year prevalence of migraine in adults in England in relation to the major demographic variables of age, gender and ethnicity, and describes some of its features, including aspects of consequential disability. A telephone survey was conducted of a random sample (n = 4007) of the population aged 16-65 years of mainland England using a previously validated diagnostic interview. The response rate was 76.5%. Overall, 7.6% of males and 18.3% of females reported migraine with or without aura within the last year meeting diagnostic criteria closely approximate to those of the International Headache Society. Prevalence of migraine varied with age, rising through early adult life and declining in the late 40s and early 50s. Prevalence was higher in Caucasians than in other races. Attack rates were > or = 1/month in most migraineurs, and most experienced interference with daily activities in > or = 50% of their attacks. On average, an estimated 5.7 working days were lost per year for every working or student migraineur, although the most disabled 10% accounted for 85% of the total. Results were in keeping with those from surveys in other countries. If these findings in mainland England are projected to the entire UK population, we estimate that 5.85 million people aged 16-65 years experience 190 000 migraine attacks every day and lose 25 million days from work or school each year because of them. Migraine is an important public health problem in the UK, associated with very substantial costs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Diagnostic lessons from the spectrum study.

Article abstract Migraine is a heterogeneous condition that causes symptoms that vary both among individuals and within individuals from attack to attack. We examined and reviewed several important lessons on the diagnosis of migraine learned from the distribution of headache types and patterns of treatment response in the Spectrum Study, including recruitment and diagnostic issues. The accuracy of an initial diagnosis, assigned by a clinician in the context of a clinical trial, was compared with the results of a final diagnosis, assigned by a neurologist, reviewing the initial evaluation as well as headache diaries for up to 10 attacks. Several lessons can be learned from the Spectrum Study. Recruitment difficulties teach us that disabling tension-type headache is difficult to find, suggesting that it is rare. Examination of the final diagnosis given after diary evaluations suggests that a diagnosis of migraine can usually be confirmed for patients with disabling headache. After reclassification of the final sample of 432 subjects, 24/75 (32%) patients initially clinically classified as having disabling episodic tension-type headache proved to have migraine or migrainous headache after a diary review. Among study participants, 90% of subjects with disabling headache (HIMQ score >250) had a migraine-related disorder. Treatment response suggests that, in migraineurs, tension-type headaches may have a pathophysiology similar to that of migraine. The diary data show that mild headaches in patients with disabling migraine often evolve into full-blown migraine. The Spectrum Study supports the view that, for patients with disabling episodic headache, migraine is often the correct diagnosis. In clinical practice, the suspicion of migraine should be high for patients experiencing episodic disabling headache. Assessment of headache-related disability may assist practitioners in making a diagnosis of migraine.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2002

Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and distribution of migraine in the United States as well as current patterns of health care use. METHODS: A random-digit-dial, computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) survey was conducted in Philadelphia County, PA, in 1998. The CATI identifies individuals with migraine (categories 1.1 and 1.2) as defined by the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society with high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%). Interviews were completed in 4,376 subjects to identify 568 with migraine. Those with 6 or more attacks per year (n = 410) were invited to participate in a follow-up interview about health care utilization and family impact of migraine; 246 (60.0%) participated. RESULTS: The 1-year prevalence of migraine was 17.2% in females and 6.0% in males. Prevalence was highest between the ages of 30 and 49. Whereas 48% of migraine sufferers had seen a doctor for headache within the last year (current consulters), 31% had never done so in their lifetimes and 21% had not seen a doctor for headache for at least 1 year (lapsed consulters). Of current or lapsed consulters, 73% reported a physician-made diagnosis of migraine; treatments varied. Of all migraine sufferers, 49% were treated with over-the-counter medications only, 23% with prescription medication only, 23% with both, and 5% with no medications at all. CONCLUSION: Relative to prior cross-sectional surveys, epidemiologic profiles for migraine have remained stable in the United States over the last decade. Self-reported rates of current medical consultation have more than doubled. Moderate increases were seen in the percentage of migraine sufferers who use prescription medications and in the likelihood of receiving a physician diagnosis of migraine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population: correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache.

The International Headache Society (IHS) has been criticized for its approach to classification of chronic daily headache (CDH); Silberstein and Lipton criteria provide an alternative to this approach. The aim of this study is to apply the alternative diagnostic approaches to a sample of CDH patients consulting in specialty care. Our sample consisted of 638 patients with CDH. Patients were classified according to both classification systems. Patients were predominantly female (65.0%), with ages ranging from 11 to 88 years. According to the Silberstein and Lipton classification, we found eight different diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine (87.4%), followed by new daily persistent headache (10.8%). Just six patients had chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Applying the IHS criteria we found 14 different diagnoses. Migraine was found in 576 (90.2%) patients. CTTH occurred in 621 (97.3%), with only 10 (1.57%) having this as the sole diagnosis. We conclude that both systems allow for the classification of most patients with CDH when daily headache diaries are available. The main difference is that the IHS classification is cumbersome and requires multiple diagnoses. The Silberstein and Lipton system is easier to apply, and more parsimonious. These findings support revision of the IHS classification system to include chronic migraine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials.

The triptans, selective serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists, are very effective acute migraine drugs. Soon, seven different triptans will be clinically available at 13 different oral doses, making evidence-based selection guidelines necessary. Triptan trials have similar designs, facilitating meta-analysis. We wished to provide an evidence-based foundation for using triptans in clinical practice, and to review the methodological issues surrounding triptan trials. We asked pharmaceutical companies and the principal investigators of company-independent trials for the 'raw patient data' of all double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trials with oral triptans in migraine. All data were cross-checked with published or presented data. We calculated summary estimates across studies for important efficacy and tolerability parameters, and compared these with those from direct, head-to-head, comparator trials. Out of 76 eligible clinical trials, 53 (12 not yet published) involving 24089 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Mean results (and 95% confidence intervals) for sumatriptan 100 mg, the first available and most widely prescribed oral triptan, are 59% (57-60) for 2 h headache response (improvement from moderate or severe to mild or no pain); 29% (27-30) for 2 h pain free (improvement to no pain); 20% (18-21) for sustained pain free (pain free by 2 h and no headache recurrence or use of rescue medication 2-24 h post-dose), and 67% (63-70) for consistency (response in at least two out of three treated attacks); placebo-subtracted proportions for patients with at least one adverse event (AE) are 13% (8-18), for at least one central nervous system AE 6% (3-9), and for at least one chest AE 1.9% (1.0-2.7). Compared with these data: rizatriptan 10 mg shows better efficacy and consistency, and similar tolerability; eletriptan 80 mg shows better efficacy, similar consistency, but lower tolerability; almotriptan 12.5 mg shows similar efficacy at 2 h but better sustained pain-free response, consistency, and tolerability; sumatriptan 25 mg, naratriptan 2.5 mg and eletriptan 20 mg show lower efficacy and better tolerability; zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, and rizatriptan 5 mg show very similar results. The results of the 22 trials that directly compared triptans show the same overall pattern. We received no data on frovatriptan, but publicly available data suggest substantially lower efficacy. The major methodological issues involve the choice of the primary endpoint, consistency over multiple attacks, how to evaluate headache recurrence, use of placebo-subtracted proportions to control for across-study differences, and the difference between tolerability and safety. In addition, there are a number of methodological issues specific for direct comparator trials, including encapsulation and patient selection. At marketed doses, all oral triptans are effective and well tolerated. Differences among them are in general relatively small, but clinically relevant for individual patients. Rizatriptan 10 mg, eletriptan 80 mg and almotriptan 12.5 mg provide the highest likelihood of consistent success. Sumatriptan features the longest clinical experience and the widest range of formulations. All triptans are contra-indicated in the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Estimation of bivariate measurements having different change points, with application to cognitive ageing.

Longitudinal studies of ageing make repeated observations of multiple measurements on each subject. Change point models are often used to model longitudinal data. We demonstrate the use of Bayesian and profile likelihood methods to simultaneously estimate different change points in the longitudinal course of two different measurements of cognitive function in subjects in the Bronx Aging Study who developed Alzheimer's disease (AD). Analyses show that accelerated memory decline, as measured by Buschke Selective Reminding, begins between seven and eight years before diagnosis of AD, while decline in performance on speeded tasks as measured by WAIS Performance IQ begins slightly more than two years before diagnosis, significantly after the decline in memory.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials.

BACKGROUND: The triptans, selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists, are very effective acute migraine drugs with a well- developed scientific rationale. Seven different triptans will soon be clinically available, making evidence-based selection guidelines necessary. Triptan trials have similar designs, facilitating meta-analysis; this will provide a foundation for using triptans in clinical practice. METHOD: We asked pharmaceutical companies and the principal investigators of company-independent trials for raw patient data of all double-blind, randomised, controlled, clinical trials of oral triptans in migraine. We calculated summary estimates across studies for important efficacy and tolerability parameters, and separately summarised direct comparator trials. RESULTS: 53 clinical trials (12 unpublished) involving 24089 patients, met the criteria for inclusion. Mean results for 100 mg sumatriptan were 59% (95% CI 57-60) for 2 h headache response (improvement from moderate or severe to mild or no pain); 29% (27-30) for 2 h pain free (improvement to no pain); 20% (18-21) for sustained pain free (pain free by 2 h and no headache recurrence or use of rescue medication 2-24 h post dose); and 67% (63-70) for consistency (response in at least two of three treated attacks); placebo-subtracted proportions for patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were 13% (8-18), for at least one central nervous system AE 6% (3-9), and for at least one chest AE 1.9% (1.0-2.7). Compared with these data, 10 mg rizatriptan showed better efficacy and consistency, and similar tolerability; 80 mg eletriptan showed better efficacy, similar consistency, but lower tolerability; 12.5 mg almotriptan showed similar efficacy at 2 h but better other results; 2.5 mg naratriptan and 20 mg eletriptan showed lower efficacy and (the first two) better tolerability; 2.5 mg and 5 mg zolmitriptan, 40 mg eletriptan, and 5 mg rizatriptan showed very similar results. The results of the 22 trials that directly compared triptans show the same overall pattern. We received no data on frovatriptan, but publicly available data suggest lower efficacy. INTERPRETATION: At marketed doses, all oral triptans were effective and well tolerated. 10 mg rizatriptan, 80 mg eletriptan, and 12.5 mg almotriptan provide the highest likelihood of consistent success.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oral rizatriptan 10 mg with oral doses of sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan was directly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 772), 50 mg (n = 1116), 25 mg (n = 1183), naratriptan 2.5 mg (n = 413), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (n = 580) for the acute treatment of a moderate or severe migraine attack. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours, symptom-free at 2 hours (no pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, vomiting, or functional disability), 24-hour sustained pain-free (no headache at 2 hours, no recurrence, and no additional antimigraine medications for 24 hours). RESULTS: More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were pain-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (40% vs 33%, p = 0.019), sumatriptan 50 mg (40% vs 35%, p = 0.009), sumatriptan 25 mg (38% vs 27%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (45% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (43% vs 36%, p = 0.041). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were symptom-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (31% vs 22%, p = 0.002), sumatriptan 50 mg (33% vs 28%, p = 0.003), sumatriptan 25 mg (33% vs 24%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (30% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (31% vs 24%, p = 0.042). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg had a 24-hour sustained pain-free response than did patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (27% vs 23%, p = 0.112), sumatriptan 50 mg (30% vs 26%, p = 0.015), sumatriptan 25 mg (27% vs 20%, p = 0.005), naratriptan 2.5 mg (29% vs 17%, p = 0.004), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (32% vs 24%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Oral rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures of pain-free response at 2 hours, symptom-free response at 2 hours, and 24-hour sustained pain-free response.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Epidemiology of migraine.

Migraine is a highly prevalent headache disorder that has a substantial impact on the individual and society. Over the past decade, substantial advances in research have increased understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, epidemiology, and treatment of the disorder. This article reviews data on the epidemiology and impact of migraine. It also highlights the increased awareness of migraine, citing examples from the popular media and the Internet.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Cluster and related headaches.

The disorders described in this article are relatively rare, but probably are more common than previously thought. Because these disorders cause significant pain and disability and treatment response differs from that of migraine, tension-type, and cluster headaches, recognition is essential. Table 1 lists the important clinical features of these syndromes and contrasts them with cluster headache, the disorder for which they are often confused.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗