PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R B Weiskopf

Publications and source records attributed to R B Weiskopf.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Human cardiovascular and metabolic response to acute, severe isovolemic anemia.

CONTEXT: Although concern over the risks of red blood cell transfusion has resulted in several practice guidelines for transfusion, lack of data regarding the physiological effects of anemia in humans has caused uncertainty regarding the blood hemoglobin (Hb) concentration requiring treatment. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that acute isovolemic reduction of blood Hb concentration to 50 g/L in healthy resting humans would produce inadequate cardiovascular compensation and result in tissue hypoxia secondary to inadequate oxygen transport. DESIGN: Before and after interventional study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Conscious healthy patients (n =11) prior to anesthesia and surgery and volunteers not undergoing surgery (n=21). INTERVENTIONS: Aliquots of blood (450-900 mL) were removed to reduce blood Hb concentration from 131 (2) g/L to 50 (1) g/L [mean (SE)]. Isovolemia was maintained with 5% human albumin and/or autologous plasma. Cardiovascular parameters, arterial and mixed venous oxygen content, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and arterial blood lactate were measured before and after removal of each aliquot of blood. Electrocardiogram and, in a subset, Holter monitor were monitored continuously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: "Critical" oxygen delivery (TO2) as assessed by oxygen consumption (VO2), plasma lactate concentration, and ST changes on electrocardiogram. RESULTS: Acute, isovolemic reduction of Hb concentration decreased systemic vascular resistance and TO2 and increased heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac index (each P<.001). We did not find evidence of inadequate oxygenation: VO2 increased slightly from a mean (SD) of 3.07 (0.44) mL of oxygen per kilogram per minute (mL O2 x kg(-1) x min[-1]) to 3.42 (0.54) mL O2 x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P<.001) and plasma lactate concentration did not change (0.81 [0.11] mmol/L to 0.62 [0.19] mmol/L; P=.09). Two subjects developed significant ST changes on Holter monitor: one apparently related to body position or activity, the other to an increase in heart rate (at an Hb concentration of 46-53 g/L); both occurred in young women and resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Acute isovolemic reduction of blood Hb concentration to 50 g/L in conscious healthy resting humans does not produce evidence of inadequate systemic TO2, as assessed by lack of change of VO2 and plasma lactate concentration. Analysis of Holter readings suggests that at this Hb concentration in this resting healthy population, myocardial ischemia would occur infrequently.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

In rats breathing from a nonrebreathing system, substitution of desflurane for isoflurane toward the end of anesthesia incompletely restores the time of recovery toward that of desflurane.

UNLABELLED: The lower solubility of desflurane allows a more rapid emergence from anesthesia than after anesthesia with the more soluble but less expensive anesthetic, isoflurane. Some practitioners use isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia, crossing over to desflurane later in maintenance in an attempt to combine the cost-effectiveness of isoflurane with the rapid emergence from desflurane. We hypothesized that this maneuver would not accomplish its goals. Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats received 1.2 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane for the final 15, 30, or 60 min of a 2-h, 1.2-MAC isoflurane anesthetic in a nonrebreathing anesthesia system. We measured the time from cessation of anesthetic administration to the time each rat righted himself twice. Immediately after righting for the second time, we tested each rat's ability to remain atop a rotating rod (Rota-Rod) for 60 s continuously. Early (righting reflex) and late (Rota-Rod) recovery occurred more rapidly (P < 0.001) after 120 min of anesthesia with desflurane alone than after 120 min of anesthesia with isoflurane alone. A cross-over period of 30 min or longer produced a righting reflex time that did not differ from that found with desflurane alone, but a 15-min cross-over did not. Progressively longer cross-over periods led to proportionally better Rota-Rod performance, but no cross-over duration produced the rapidity of recovery seen with desflurane alone. We concluded that in a nonrebreathing system, switching to desflurane during the last 30 min of anesthesia substantially improved early recovery but produced a much smaller improvement in later recovery. IMPLICATIONS: The newer inhaled anesthetics offer the advantage of lower solubility, and thus more rapid emergence from anesthesia, than do the older inhaled anesthetics. However, they can be more expensive to use. This study demonstrates that substituting the newer anesthetic, desflurane, toward the end of anesthesia for an older anesthetic of greater solubility, isoflurane, does not produce recovery comparable to that of desflurane alone. Furthermore, this technique can be more costly than using desflurane throughout anesthesia.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

The effect of anesthetic duration on kinetic and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane, and on the kinetic characteristics of compound A, in volunteers.

UNLABELLED: This study documents the differences in kinetics of 2 h (n = 7) and 4 h (n = 9) of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane (9.0%) versus (on a separate occasion) sevoflurane (3.0%), both administered in a fresh gas inflow of 2 L/min. These data are extensions of our previous 8-h (n = 7) studies of these anesthetics. By 10 min of anesthetic administration, average inspired (F(I)) and end-tidal concentration (F(A)) (F(I)/F(A); the inverse of the more commonly used F(A)/F(I)) decreased to less than 1.15 for both anesthetics, with the difference from 1.0 nearly twice as great for sevoflurane as for desflurane. During all sevoflurane administrations, F(A)/F(I) for Compound A [CH2F-O-C(=CF2) (CF3); a vinyl ether resulting from the degradation of sevoflurane by Baralyme] equaled approximately 0.8, and the average inspired concentration equaled approximately 40 ppm. Compound A is of interest because at approximately 150 ppm-h, it can induce biochemical and histological evidence of glomerular and tubular injury in rats and humans. During elimination, F(A)/F(A0) for Compound A (F(A0) is the last end-tidal concentration during anesthetic administration) decreased abruptly to 0 after 2 h and 4 h of anesthesia and to approximately 0.1 (F(A) approximately 3 ppm) after 8 h of anesthesia. In contrast, F(A)/F(A0) for desflurane and sevoflurane decreased in a conventional, multiexponential manner, the decrease being increasingly delayed with increasing duration of anesthetic administration. F(A)/F(A0) for sevoflurane exceeded that for desflurane for any given duration of anesthesia, and objective and subjective measures indicated a faster recovery with desflurane. Times (mean +/- SD) to initial response to command (2 h 10.9 +/- 1.2 vs 17.8 +/- 5.1 min, 4 h 11.3 +/- 2.1 vs 20.8 +/- 4.8 min, 8 h 14 +/- 4 vs 28 +/- 8 min) and orientation (2 h 12.7 +/- 1.6 vs 21.2 +/- 4.6 min, 4 h 14.8 +/- 3.1 vs 25.3 +/- 6.5 min, 8 h 19 +/- 4 vs 33 +/- 9 min) were shorter with desflurane. Recovery as defined by the digit symbol substitution test, P-deletion test, and Trieger test results was more rapid with desflurane. The incidence of vomiting was greater with sevoflurane after 8 h of anesthesia but not after shorter durations. We conclude that for each anesthetic duration, F(I) more closely approximates F(A) with desflurane during anesthetic administration, F(A)/F(A0) decreases more rapidly after anesthesia with desflurane, and objective measures indicate more rapid recovery with desflurane. Finally, it seems that after 2-h and 4-h administrations, all Compound A taken up is bound within the body. IMPLICATIONS: Regardless of the duration of anesthesia, elimination is faster and recovery is quicker for the inhaled anesthetic desflurane than for the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane. The toxic degradation product of sevoflurane, Compound A, seems to bind irreversibly to proteins in the body.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Fentanyl augments the blockade of the sympathetic response to incision (MAC-BAR) produced by desflurane and isoflurane: desflurane and isoflurane MAC-BAR without and with fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) or mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) may increase in response to incision despite the absence of a motor response. The authors hypothesized that the MAC-BAR (minimum alveolar concentration of an anesthetic that blocks adrenergic response to incision) for isoflurane would exceed that for desflurane, and that fentanyl would decrease the MAC-BAR for each anesthetic in a dose-dependent manner. METHODS: Seventy-one patients were randomly allocated to one of six groups: desflurane or isoflurane without fentanyl or with 1.5 or 3 microg/kg fentanyl given intravenously 5 min before surgical incision. Anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol given intravenously, and tracheal intubation facilitated with 0.1 mg/kg given intravenously. The first patient in each group received 1 MAC (end-tidal) of the inhaled anesthetic in 60% nitrous oxide (0.55 MAC), balance oxygen, maintained for at least 10 min before incision. The response was considered positive if the HR or MAP increased 15% or more. If the response was positive, the end-tidal concentration given to the next patient was 0.3 MAC greater; if the response was negative, the end-tidal concentration was 0.3 MAC less. The MAC-BAR level was calculated as the mean of four independent cross-over responses in each group. RESULTS: Desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia with 60% nitrous oxide did not change HR (P > 0.05) and decreased MAP (P < 0.05) before incision. Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations after anesthesia and before incision were normal in all groups. The MAC-BAR level, without fentanyl, did not differ (P > 0.05) between desflurane (1.30 +/- 0.34 MAC [mean +/- SD]) and isoflurane (1.30 +/- 0.18 MAC). Fentanyl given at 1.5 microg/kg intravenously equivalently (P > 0.05) reduced the MAC-BAR for desflurane (to 0.40 +/- 0.18 MAC; P < 0.05) and isoflurane (to 0.55 +/- 0.00 MAC; P < 0.05), but a further increase in fentanyl to 3 microg/kg caused no greater decrease in the MAC-BAR for desflurane (0.48 +/- 0.16 MAC) and isoflurane (0.40 +/- 0.30 MAC). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically attainable doses of desflurane and isoflurane, in 60% nitrous oxide (0.55 MAC), block the cardiovascular response to surgical incision at 1.3 MAC. Fentanyl given at 1.5 microg/kg decreases the MAC-BAR for each agent with no further decrease produced by 3 microg/kg fentanyl.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Changing from isoflurane to desflurane toward the end of anesthesia does not accelerate recovery in humans.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to combine the advantage of the lower solubilities of new inhaled anesthetics with the lesser cost of older anesthetics, some clinicians substitute the former for the latter toward the end of anesthesia. The authors tried to determine whether substituting desflurane for isoflurane in the last 30 min of a 120-min anesthetic would accelerate recovery. METHODS: Five volunteers were anesthetized three times for 2 h using a fresh gas inflow of 2 l/min: 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane, 1.25 MAC isoflurane, and 1.25 MAC isoflurane for 90 min followed by 30 min of desflurane concentrations sufficient to achieve a total of 1.25 MAC equivalent ("crossover"). Recovery from anesthesia was assessed by the time to respond to commands, by orientation, and by tests of cognitive function. RESULTS: Compared with isoflurane, the crossover technique did not accelerate early or late recovery (P > 0.05). Recovery from isoflurane or the crossover anesthetic was significantly longer than after desflurane (P < 0.05). Times to response to commands for isoflurane, the crossover anesthetic, and desflurane were 23 +/- 5 min (mean +/- SD), 21 +/- 5 min, and 11 +/- 1 min, respectively, and to orientation the times were 27 +/- 7 min, 25 +/- 5 min, and 13 +/- 2 min, respectively. Cognitive test performance returned to reference values 15-30 min sooner after desflurane than after isoflurane or the crossover anesthetic. Isoflurane cognitive test performance did not differ from that with the crossover anesthetic at any time. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting desflurane for isoflurane during the latter part of anesthesia does not improve recovery, in part because partial rebreathing through a semiclosed circuit limits elimination of isoflurane during the crossover period. Although higher fresh gas flow during the crossover period would speed isoflurane elimination, the amount of desflurane used and, therefore, the cost would increase.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Nephrotoxicity of sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

Present package labeling for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more when delivering anesthesia with sevoflurane. This recommendation resulted from a concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of a degradation product of sevoflurane, "Compound A," produced by the action of carbon dioxide absorbents on sevoflurane. To assess the adequacy of this recommendation, we compared the nephrotoxicity of 8 h of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane (n = 10) versus desflurane (n = 9) in fluid-restricted (i.e., nothing by mouth overnight) volunteers when the anesthetic was given in a standard circle absorber anesthetic system at 2 L/min. Subjects were tested for markers of renal injury (urinary albumin, glucose, alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [GST], and pi-GST; and serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen [BUN]) before and 1, 2, 3, and/or 5-7 days after anesthesia. Desflurane did not produce renal injury. Rebreathing of sevoflurane produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 41 +/- 3 ppm (mean +/- SD). Sevoflurane was associated with transient injury to: 1) the glomerulus, as revealed by postanesthetic albuminuria; 2) the proximal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic glucosuria and increased urinary alpha-GST; and 3) the distal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic increased urinary pi-GST. These effects varied greatly (e.g., on postanesthesia Day 3, the 24-h albumin excretion was < 0.03 g (normal) for one volunteer; 0.03-1 g for five others; 1-2 g for two others; 2.1 g for one volunteer; and 4.4 g for another volunteer). Neither anesthetic affected serum creatinine or BUN, nor changed the ability of the kidney to concentrate urine in response to vasopressin, 5 U/70 kg subcutaneously (i.e., these measures failed to reveal the injury produced). In addition, sevoflurane, but not desflurane, caused small postanesthetic increases in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), suggesting mild, transient hepatic injury.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Baralyme dehydration increases and soda lime dehydration decreases the concentration of compound A resulting from sevoflurane degradation in a standard anesthetic circuit.

UNLABELLED: Soda lime and Baralyme brand carbon dioxide absorbents degrade sevoflurane to CF2 = C(CF3)OCH2F, a potentially nephrotoxic vinyl ether called Compound A. Dehydration of these absorbents increases both the degradation of sevoflurane to Compound A and the degradation of Compound A. The balance between sevoflurane degradation and Compound A degradation determines the concentration of Compound A issuing from the absorbent (the net production of Compound A). We studied the effect of dehydration on the net production of Compound A in a simulated anesthetic circuit. Mimicking continuing oxygen delivery for 1, 2, or 3 days after completion of an anesthetic, we directed a "conditioning" fresh gas flow of 5 L/min or 10 L/min retrograde through fresh absorbent in situ in a standard absorbent system for 16, 40, and/or 64 h. The conditioned absorbent was subsequently used (without mixing of the granules) in a standard anesthetic circuit in which a 3-L rebreathing bag substituted for the lung. Metabolism was mimicked by introducing 250 mL/min carbon dioxide into the "lung," and the lung was ventilated with a minute ventilation of 10 L/ min. At the same time, we introduced sevoflurane in a fresh gas inflow of 2 L/min at a concentration sufficient to produce an inspired concentration of 3.2%. Because of increased sevoflurane destruction by the absorbent, progressively longer periods of conditioning (dehydration) and/or higher inflow rates increased the delivered (vaporizer) concentration of sevoflurane required to sustain a 3.2% concentration. Dehydration of Baralyme increased the inspired concentration of Compound A by up to sevenfold, whereas dehydration of soda lime markedly decreased the inspired concentration of Compound A. IMPLICATIONS: Economical delivery of modern inhaled anesthetics requires rebreathing of exhaled gases after removal of carbon dioxide. However, carbon dioxide absorbents (Baralyme/soda lime) may degrade anesthetics to toxic substances. Baralyme dehydration increases, and soda lime dehydration decreases, degradation of the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane to the toxic substance, Compound A.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

Dose-related biochemical markers of renal injury after sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

UNLABELLED: Sevoflurane (CH2F-O-CH[CF3]2) reacts with carbon dioxide absorbents to produce Compound A (CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3]). Because of concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of Compound A, the United States package label (but not that of several other countries) for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more. We previously demonstrated in humans that a 2-L/min flow rate delivery of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane for 8 h can injure glomeruli (i.e., produce albuminuria) and proximal tubules (i.e., produce glucosuria and urinary excretion of alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [alpha-GST]). The present report extends this investigation to fasting volunteers given 4 h (n = 9) or 2 h (n = 7) of 1.25 MAC sevoflurane versus desflurane at 2 L/min via a standard circle absorber anesthetic system (all subjects given both anesthetics). Markers of renal injury (urinary creatinine, albumin, glucose, alpha-GST, and blood urea nitrogen) did not reveal significant injury after anesthesia with desflurane. Sevoflurane degradation with a 2-L/min fresh gas inflow rate produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 40 +/- 4 ppm (mean +/- SD, 8-h exposure [data from previous study]), 42 +/- 2 ppm (4 h), and 40 +/- 5 ppm (2 h). Relative to desflurane, sevoflurane given for 4 h caused statistically significant transient injury to glomeruli (slightly increased urinary albumin and serum creatinine) and to proximal tubules (increased urinary alpha-GST). Other measures of injury did not differ significantly between anesthetics. Neither anesthetic given for 2 h at 1.25 MAC produced injury. We conclude that 1.25 MAC sevoflurane plus Compound A produces dose-related glomerular and tubular injury with a threshold between 80 and 168 ppm/h of exposure to Compound A. This threshold for renal injury in normal humans approximates that found previously in normal rats. IMPLICATIONS: Human (and rat) kidneys are injured by a reactive compound (Compound A) produced by degradation of the clinical inhaled anesthetic, sevoflurane. Injury increases with increasing duration of exposure to a given concentration of Compound A. The response to Compound A has several implications, as discussed in the article.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Quantitative differences in the production and toxicity of CF2=BrCl versus CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3) (compound A): the safety of halothane does not indicate the safety of sevoflurane.

UNLABELLED: Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade both halothane and sevoflurane to toxic unsaturated compounds (CF2=CBrCl and CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3] [i.e., Compound A], respectively). Given the long history of safe administration of halothane, comparable toxicities of these degradation products would imply a similar safety of sevoflurane. We therefore examined CF2=CBrCl in the context of four issues relevant to previous studies of the toxicity of Compound A: 1) reactivity of the degradation product in vitro; 2) rate of its production in vitro; 3) its in vivo toxicity; 4) importance of the beta-lyase pathway to the toxicity in vivo. We found the following. 1) CF2=CBrCl is less reactive than Compound A, degrading in human serum albumin at one-fifth the rate of Compound A. 2) Over a 3-h period of "anesthesia," a standard circle system containing Baralyme (Allied Healthcare Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO) produces 30 times as much Compound A from a minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) concentration of sevoflurane as CF2=CBrCl from a MAC concentration of halothane; with soda lime, the difference is 60-fold. Correcting for differences in uptake of halothane versus sevoflurane decreases the differences to 20-40 times. 3) For a 3-h administration to rats, the partial pressure of Compound A causing minimal renal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells exceeds the partial pressure of CF2=CBrCl causing minimal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells by a factor of approximately 4-6. Thus, the ratio of production (Item 2 above) to the partial pressure causing injury with CF2=CBrCl is approximately a quarter of that ratio for Compound A. 4) Compounds that block the beta-lyase pathway either do not change (acivicin) or decrease (aminooxyacetic acid; AOAA) renal injury from CF2=CBrCl in rats, whereas these compounds increase (acivicin) or do not change (AOAA) injury from Compound A. We conclude that the safety of halothane cannot be used to support the safety of sevoflurane. IMPLICATIONS: Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade halothane and sevoflurane to unsaturated compounds nephrotoxic to rats. Relative to sevoflurane's degradation product, halothane's degradation product has less toxicity relative to production, less reactivity, and a different mechanism of injury. The clinical absence of halothane nephrotoxicity does not necessarily indicate a similar absence for sevoflurane.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

Dehydration of Baralyme increases compound A resulting from sevoflurane degradation in a standard anesthetic circuit used to anesthetize swine.

UNLABELLED: In a model anesthetic circuit, dehydration of Baralyme brand carbon dioxide absorbent increases degradation of sevoflurane to CF2=C(CF3)OCH2F, a nephrotoxic vinyl ether called Compound A. In the present study, we quantified this increase using "conditioned" Baralyme in a circle absorbent system to deliver sevoflurane anesthesia to swine. Mimicking continuing oxygen delivery for 2 days after completion of an anesthetic, we directed a conditioning fresh gas flow of 5 L/min retrograde through fresh absorbent in situ in a standard absorbent system for 40 h. The conditioned absorbent was subsequently used (without mixing of the granules) in a standard anesthetic circuit to deliver sevoflurane to swine weighing 78 +/- 2 kg. The initial inflow rate of fresh gas flow was set at 10 L/min with the vaporizer at 8% to achieve the target end-tidal concentration of 3.0%-3.2% sevoflurane in approximately 20 min. The flow was later decreased to 2 L/min, and the vaporizer concentration was decreased to sustain the 3.0%-3.2% value for a total of 2 h (three pigs) or 4 h (eight pigs). Inspired Compound A increased over the first 30 +/- 60 min to a peak concentration of 357 +/- 49 ppm (mean +/- SD), slowly decreasing thereafter to 74 +/- 6 ppm at 4 h. The average concentration over 2 h was 208 +/- 25 ppm, and the average concentration over 4 h was 153 +/- 19 ppm. Pigs were killed 1 or 4 days after anesthesia. The kidneys from pigs anesthetized for both 2 h and 4 h showed mild inflammation but little or no tubular necrosis. These results suggest that dehydration of Baralyme may produce concentrations of Compound A that would have nephrotoxic effects in humans in a shorter time than would be the case with normally hydrated Baralyme. IMPLICATIONS: The vapor known as Compound A can injure the kidney. Dehydration of Baralyme, a standard absorbent of carbon dioxide in inhaled anesthetic delivery systems, can cause a 5- to 10-fold increase in Compound A concentrations produced from the inhaled anesthetic, sevoflurane, given at anesthetizing concentrations in a conventional anesthetic system.

Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit↗
PubMed1997

Recombinant human hemoglobin does not affect renal function in humans: analysis of safety and pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human hemoglobin (OptroD; rHb1.1) is a genetically engineered protein produced in Escherichia coli. The two alpha-globin polypeptides are genetically joined, resulting in a stable tetramer that does not dissociate into dimers or monomers. Historically, infusion in humans of acellular hemoglobin preparations has resulted in renal toxicity. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of rHb1.1 when infused in humans. METHODS: After giving informed consent, 48 healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive either 0.015-0.32 g/kg 5% rHb1.1 (n = 34) or an equivalent amount of 5% human serum albumin (HSA; n = 14) infused intravenously over 0.8-1.9 h. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, urine N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase, and serum rHb1.1 concentrations were measured before and at timed intervals after infusion. RESULTS: Postinfusion urine N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase activity did not exceed preinfusion values at any interval in either group. Serum creatinine did not differ from preinfusion values at 1 day, 2-3 days, or 7 days after infusion for either group. Creatinine clearance increased significantly for the HSA group 12 h after infusion (138 +/- 16 ml/min, means +/- SE) and in the rHb1.1 group 1 day after infusion (112 +/- 5 ml/min; P < 0.05). Values for creatinine clearance did not differ from preinfusion values for either group at any other postinfusion interval; serum creatinine and creatinine clearance did not differ between groups at any time. The amount of hemoglobin excreted in the urine did not exceed approximately 0.04% of the administered rHb1.1 dose in any volunteer. Plasma clearance of rHb1.1 decreased and half-life increased as a function of increasing plasma concentration (e.g., the half-life was 2.8 h at a plasma concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and 12 h at 5 mg/ml). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms, fever, and chills was greater after infusion of rHb1.1 than after HSA (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence for rHb1.1-mediated nephrotoxicity was observed in volunteers given doses of rHb1.1 as large as 0.32 g/kg. Because the clearance of rHb1.1 varies inversely with its concentration, additional studies with larger doses are necessary to determine the half-life expected in clinical use. Administration of rHb1.1 to conscious humans is associated with some side effects, such as gastrointestinal upset, fever, chills, headache, and backache.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Recovery and kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in volunteers after 8-h exposure, including kinetics of degradation products.

BACKGROUND: Desflurane and sevoflurane permit speedier changes in anesthetic partial pressures than do older halogenated anesthetics. The authors determined the kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane and those of compound A [CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3)], a nephrotoxic degradation product of sevoflurane. METHODS: Volunteers received 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane or sevoflurane, each administered for 8 h in a fresh gas inflow of 2 l/min. Inspired (F(I)) and end-tidal (F(A)) concentrations of anesthetic and compound A were measured during administration, and F(A) relative to F(A0) (the last end-tidal concentration during administration) during elimination. The indices of recovery were also measured. RESULTS: The ratio F(I)/F(A) rapidly approached 1.0, with values greater for sevoflurane (desflurane 1.06 +/- 0.01 vs. sevoflurane 1.11 +/- 0.02, mean +/- SD). The ratio F(A)/F(I) for compound A was approximately 0.8. The F(A)/F(A0) ratio decreased slightly more rapidly with desflurane than with sevoflurane, and objective measures indicated faster recovery with desflurane: The initial response to command (14 +/- 4 min vs. 28 +/- 8 min [means +/- SD]) and orientation (19 +/- 4 vs. 33 +/- 9 min) was quicker, and recovery was faster as defined by results of the Digit Symbol Substitution, P-deletion, and Trieger tests. Desflurane produced less vomiting (1 [0.5, 3]; median [quartiles] episodes) than did sevoflurane (5 [2.5, 7.5] episodes). The F(A)/F(A0) ratio for compound A decreased within 5 min to a constant value of 0.1. CONCLUSIONS: These anesthetics have kinetics consistent with their solubilities. Sevoflurane's greater biodegradation probably increases F(I)/F(A) differences during anesthetic administration and decreases F(A)/F(A0) differences during elimination. The F(A) for compound A differs from F(I) by 20% (F(A)/F(I) = 0.8) because of substantial degradation. Recovery from anesthesia proceeds nearly twice as fast with desflurane than with sevoflurane. Differences in ventilation, or alveolar or tissue elimination, do not completely explain the slower recovery with sevoflurane.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

Compound A: solubility in saline and olive oil; destruction by blood.

Compound A is a degradation product of sevoflurane. Knowledge of the solubility of Compound A, CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3), in blood and other solvents would aid in the definition of its kinetics. Accordingly, we determined solvent/gas partition coefficients of Compound A for saline (0.166 +/- 0.002 [mean +/- SD; n = 4]) and olive oil (20.1 +/- 1.1 [n = 4]). Measurement of solubility in blood was confounded by degradation of Compound A in blood and blood components. If a mixture of 99.3% saline and 0.7% oil provides the solubility equivalent to that possessed by blood (as it does for the parent compound, sevoflurane), then blood solubility and solubility in plasma, albumin, red blood cells, or pure hemoglobin is approximately 0.31. The order of Compound A degradation was human plasma = rat blood > whole human blood >5% human serum albumin = washed human red blood cells (hematocrit 50%) = 5% pure hemoglobin. Presuming a solvent/gas partition coefficient of 0.31, respective approximate times for 50% degradation equaled 2.7, 2.8, 4.6, 9.9, 11.0, and 12 min. The accuracy of these approximations was limited by the need to estimate, rather than determine, the solubility of Compound A in such solvents. Pasteurization (heating to 60 degrees C for 12 h) or pretreatment with N-ethylmaleimide (a compound that reversibly binds to sulfhydryl groups) decreased the degradation rate in plasma. These results suggest that degradation arises, at least in part, from reaction of Compound A with proteins in blood, possibly from covalent reaction of Compound A with protein and/or from an enzymatically mediated reaction. The products of degradation, the binding sites, and the clinical implications of such binding and degradation remain to be determined.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

Propofol fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to rapid increases in desflurane concentration.

BACKGROUND: A rapid increase in desflurane concentration to greater than 1 MAC transiently increases heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and circulating catecholamine concentration. Because propofol decreases sympathetic outflow, it was hypothesized that propofol would blunt these responses. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, five healthy male volunteers were studied three times. After induction of anesthesia with 2 mg.kg-1 propofol, anesthesia was maintained with 4% end-tidal desflurane in oxygen (0.55 MAC) via an endotracheal tube for 32 min. On separate occasions, in random order, either no propofol or 2 mg.kg-1 propofol was administered either 2 or 5 min before increasing end-tidal desflurane concentration from 4% to 8%. RESULTS: Without propofol pretreatment, the increase to 8% desflurane transiently increased heart rate (from 63 +/- 3 beats/min to 108 +/- 5 beats/min, mean +/- SEM; P < 0.01), mean arterial pressure (from 73 +/- 1 mmHg to 118 +/- 6 mmHg; P < 0.01), and epinephrine concentration (from 14 +/- 1 pg.ml-1 to 279 +/- 51 pg.ml-1; P < 0.05). There was no significant change in norepinephrine concentration (from 198 +/- 37 pg.ml-1 to 277 +/- 46 pg.ml-1). The peak plasma epinephrine concentration was attenuated by each propofol pretreatment (158 +/- 35 pg.ml-1, propofol given 2 min before, and 146 + 41 pg.ml-1, propofol given 5 min before; P < 0.05), but neither propofol pretreatment modified the cardiovascular or norepinephrine responses. CONCLUSIONS: Although able to blunt the increase in epinephrine concentration, propofol 2 mg.kg-1 propofol does no attenuate the transient cardiovascular response to a rapid increase in desflurane concentration to greater than 1 MAC.

Adult↗