PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Battmer

Publications and source records attributed to R Battmer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Normative auditory brainstem response data for hearing threshold in the rabbit.

In an experimental study, we determined the physiological hearing threshold of the rabbit in order to use these data as normative values for further experimental investigations. The aim was to use different acoustic stimuli (click and tone-pip stimuli) with different frequency spectra for air and bone conduction (BC) in order to obtain further information about the optimal form of stimulus when recording auditory evoked potentials in the rabbit. For the investigation, we used 46 female New Zealand rabbits weighing 3.2-4.4 kg and aged 6 months. The equipment used to record brainstem auditory evoked potentials was the Nicolet Viking IV P System (Nicolet Biomedical, Inc.). In accordance with the experimental set-up, the measurements took place under intubation anesthesia, with a total of four repeat measurements performed on each ear at different times. Tone-pip and click stimuli with varying intensities of stimulus, transmitted via air conduction and BC, were applied. The I-IV waves proved the most stable for both stimulus modalities. They were registrable in 98.7% of cases, whereas only 30.2% of the V waves could be recorded. Values averaged from all measurements made throughout the study yielded a potential threshold of 34.8 dB peak equivalent (p.e.) SPL for the click stimulus, 13.8 dB p.e. SPL for the tone-pip stimulus at 8 kHz and 34.2 dB p.e. SPL for the click stimulus transmitted via BC. With regard to latencies, the results indicated a good reproducibility through different stimuli with acceptable standard deviations. The values for physiological hearing threshold obtained here can serve as normative data in subsequent experimental animal studies.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the compatibility of the Clarion 1.2 magnet-containing cochlear implant with a 1.5-tesla (T) and 0.3-T magnetic resonance imager. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants restore functional hearing to patients with sensorineural deafness. With the rapidly increasing number of patients with cochlear implants, there is a need to investigate the implant's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility. METHODS: The authors tested the potential torque and force on the metallic components of the implant, heating of the implant and surrounding tissue, unintentional output, implant damage, and image distortion. Tests were performed in both a 1.5-T and 0.3-T MRI. RESULTS: The torque experienced by the implant in the 1.5-T MRI (0.19 nm) was large enough that it could potentially cause implant movement in some patients. An acceptable amount of torque (0.04 nm) was found in the 0.3-T MRI. Image distortion occurred in the area directly around the implant with a radius of up to 60 mm in the 1.5-T MRI and 100 mm in the 0.3-T MRI. In both MRI units, there was no detectable temperature increase or unintentional output. There was no implant damage except that with worst-case conditions, the internal magnet was demagnetized by 78.5% with the 1.5-T unit and 3.36% with the 0.3-T unit. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend patients with cochlear implants avoid imaging in a 1.5-T MRI. The results suggest that the 0.3-T MRI poses little or no risks to patients with cochlear implants.

Cochlear Implantation↗