PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Baughman

Publications and source records attributed to R Baughman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Cystic fibrosis and the National Institutes of Health consensus statement: are obstetrician-gynecologists ready to comply?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if obstetrician-gynecologists are ready to comply with the April 1997 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus statement regarding carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. METHODS: A multiple-choice questionnaire was mailed to all active North Carolina nonfederal physicians with a primary specialty of obstetrics and gynecology. Ten questions surveyed the participants' knowledge about cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six surveys were returned for a response rate of 30.4%. The respondents differed in their knowledge base depending on their specialty, age, and number of years of experience as a physician. The youngest physicians and the least experienced yielded the highest percentage correct. The questions most frequently answered correctly dealt primarily with clinical information about cystic fibrosis, whereas the questions most often answered incorrectly dealt with carrier frequency and testing information. CONCLUSION: The obstetrics-gynecology community is not yet prepared to comply with the NIH Consensus Statement to offer cystic fibrosis carrier screening to couples preconceptionally or prenatally. Further education is necessary before obstetrician-gynecologists can counsel patients adequately.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Oral low-molecular weight heparin and delivery agent prevents jugular venous thrombosis in the rat.

PURPOSE: Sodium N-[10-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino]decanoate (SNAD) is a novel carrier that allows the gastrointestinal absorption of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate oral LMWH with SNAD for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. METHODS: Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were equally assigned to five experimental groups: group 1 (control), oral saline solution; group 2, oral LMWH (15 mg/kg); group 3, oral SNAD (300 mg/kg); group 4, subcutaneous LMWH (5 mg/kg); and group 5, oral LMWH (15 mg/kg) and SNAD (300 mg/kg). After treatment, the jugular vein was isolated, occluded, and bathed in an ethanol and formalin solution for 2 minutes. Two hours later, the vessel was examined for patency, presence of thrombus, and thrombus weight. Serum measurement of anti-factor Xa activity was performed in a separate set of 30 rats, which were placed into the following four groups: group A, LMWH (5 mg/kg); group B, oral LMWH (15 mg/kg) and SNAD (300 mg/kg); group C, oral LMWH (15 mg/kg); and group D, SNAD (300 mg/kg). RESULTS: The animals that underwent oral LMWH/SNAD therapy had a statistically significant decrease in visible thrombi. The thrombus weight of the oral LMWH/SNAD group was significantly less than the weights of all other groups, except the subcutaneous LMWH group. Anti-factor Xa levels were significantly elevated in the LMWH/SNAD group. There was no statistically significant difference between the data for the oral LMWH/SNAD group and the subcutaneous LMWH group. CONCLUSION: The combination of oral LMWH and SNAD prevented deep venous thrombosis. The oral LMWH and SNAD therapy effected an increase in levels of anti-factor Xa.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Multicenter clinical trial of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I in patients with acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute renal failure (ARF) have high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly if they have serious comorbid conditions. Several studies indicate that in rats with ARF caused by ischemia or certain nephrotoxins, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) enhances the recovery of renal function and suppresses protein catabolism. METHODS: Our objective was to determine whether injections of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) would enhance the recovery of renal function and is safe in patients with ARF. The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in intensive care units in 20 teaching hospitals. Seventy-two patients with ARF were randomized to receive rhIGF-I (35 patients) or placebo (37 patients). The most common causes of ARF in the rhIGF-I and placebo groups were, respectively, sepsis (37 and 35% of patients) and hypotension or hemodynamic shock (42 and 27% of patients). At baseline, the mean (+/- SD) APACHE II scores in the rhIGF-I and placebo-treated groups were 24 +/- 5 and 25 +/- 8, respectively. In the rhIGF-I and placebo groups, the mean (median) urine volume and urinary iothalamate clearances (glomerular filtration rate) were 1116 +/- 1037 (887) and 1402 +/- 1183 (1430) ml/24 hr and 6.4 +/- 5.9 (4.3) and 8.7 +/- 7.2 (4.4) ml/min and did not differ between the two groups. Patients were injected subcutaneously every 12 hours with rhIGF-I, 100 microgram/kg desirable body weight, or placebo for up to 14 days. Injections were started within six days of the onset of ARF. The primary end-point was a change in glomerular filtration rate from baseline. Other end points included changes from baseline in urine volume, creatinine clearance and serum urea, creatinine, albumin and transferrin, frequency of hemodialysis or ultrafiltration, and mortality rate. RESULTS: During the treatment period, which averaged 10.7 +/- 4.1 and 10.6 +/- 4.5 days in the rhIGF-I and placebo groups, there were no differences in the changes from baseline values of the glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, daily urine volume, or serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin or transferrin. In patients who did not receive renal replacement therapy, there was also no significant difference in serum creatinine and urea between the two groups. Twenty patients in the rhIGF-I group and 17 placebo-treated patients underwent dialysis or ultrafiltration. Twelve rhIGF-I-treated patients and 12 placebo-treated patients died during the 28 days after the onset of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: rhIGF-I does not accelerate the recovery of renal function in ARF patients with substantial comorbidity.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1999

Liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. TLC C-53 ARDS Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravenous liposomal dispersion of prostaglandin E1 as TLC C-53 in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial. SETTING: Forty-seven community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 350 patients with ARDS were enrolled in this clinical trial. INTERVENTION: Patients were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either liposomal prostaglandin E1 or placebo. The study drug was infused intravenously for 60 mins every 6 hrs for 7 days starting with a dosage of 0.15 microg/kg/hr. The dose was increased every 12 hrs until the maximal dose (3.6 microg/kg/hr) was attained or intolerance to further increases developed. Patients received standard aggressive medical/surgical care during the infusion period. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the time it took to wean the patient from the ventilator. Secondary end points included time to improvement of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (defined as first PaO2/FIO2 > 300 mm Hg), day 28 mortality, ventilator dependence at day 8, changes in PaO2/FIO2, incidence of and time to development/resolution of organ failure other than ARDS. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients could be evaluated for efficacy. The distribution of variables at baseline describing gender, lung injury scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, PaO2/FIO2, pulmonary compliance, and time from onset of ARDS or from institution of mechanical ventilation to the first dose of study drug was similar among patients in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 (n = 177) and the placebo (n = 171) treatment arms. There was no significant difference in the number of days to the discontinuation of ventilation in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 group compared with the placebo group (median number of days to off mechanical ventilation, 16.9 in patients receiving liposomal prostaglandin E1 and 19.6 in those administered placebo; p = .94). Similarly, mortality at day 28 was not significantly different in the two groups (day 28 mortality, 57 of 176 (32%) in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 group and 50 of 170 (29%) in patients receiving placebo; p = .55). In contrast, treatment with liposomal prostaglandin E1 was associated with a significantly shorter time to reach a PaO2/FIO2 ratio of >300 mm Hg (median number of days to reaching a PaO2/FIO2 ratio >300 mm Hg: 9.8 days in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 group and 13.7 days in patients receiving the placebo; p = .02). Among the subgroups examined, time to off mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced in patients who received at least 85% of a full dose (i.e., > 45.9 microg/kg) of liposomal prostaglandin E1 (median number of days to discontinuation of ventilation, 10.3 in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 group and 16.3 days in patients receiving placebo; p = .05). The overall incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different in the liposomal prostaglandin E1 (40%) or placebo-treated (37%) groups. Drug-related adverse events of all kinds were reported in 69% of the patients receiving liposomal prostaglandin E1 compared with 33% of the placebo group, with hypotension and hypoxia (occurring in 52% and 24% of the liposomal prostaglandin E1-treated patients, respectively, and 17% and 5% of the placebo-treated patients, respectively) being noted most frequently. CONCLUSIONS: In the intent-to-treat population of patients with ARDS, treatment with liposomal prostaglandin E1 accelerated improvement in indexes of oxygenation but did not decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation and did not improve day 28 survival.

Adult↗