PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Blamey

Publications and source records attributed to R Blamey.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Should women be advised to take prophylactic endocrine treatment outside of a clinical trial setting?

Epidemiological, experimental and clinical data strongly support the possibility that breast cancer can be prevented by using anti-estrogenic interventions in healthy women. Four trials involving over 25,000 women have so far been reported using tamoxifen 20 mg/day or placebo in healthy women to chemoprevent breast cancer, and several trials utilizing raloxifene or aromatase inhibitors are underway. Interim analyses of the Royal Marsden tamoxifen trial and the Italian national trial showed no effect on the early incidence of breast cancer. The NSABP-P1 showed a 49% reduction in early incidence of breast cancer. This was associated with a reduction in osteoporotic fractures but increases in the risks of endometrial cancer, cataract and thromboembolism. The IBIS trial showed a 32% reduction with a two-fold increase in endometrial cancer and in thromboembolic events. Mortality rates of breast cancer in women receiving tamoxifen prophylactically should be monitored and further follow-up of these trials is needed to determine whether tamoxifen provides an overall health benefit or increase specific or overall survival of breast cancer. High-risk women should not be advised to take anti-estrogens outside of a clinical trial setting.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2003

Bone mineral density in premenopausal women treated for node-positive early breast cancer with 2 years of goserelin or 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).

The purpose of this study was to compare changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal patients with node-positive early breast cancer treated with goserelin (Zoladex) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients ( n=1640) were randomized to goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days for 2 years) or CMF (sixx28-day cycles) treatment. In a protocoled sub-study involving 96 patients from eight centers (goserelin: n=53; CMF: n=43), lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck BMD were assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and then annually for 3 years. At the end of the 2-year goserelin-treatment period, mean BMD losses for goserelin-treated and CMF-treated patients were -10.5% and -6.5% ( P=0.0005) for lumbar spine and -6.4% and -4.5% ( P=0.04) for femoral neck, respectively. At 3 years, partial recovery of BMD was observed in goserelin recipients. In contrast, mean BMD losses for the CMF group indicated persistent BMD loss. No significant differences in BMD were observed between groups at the 3-year assessment of the spine or femoral neck. In the CMF group, based on amenorrhea status at 48 weeks, BMD losses at the lumbar spine were greater for amenorrheic than non-amenorrheic patients. Ovarian suppression resulting in amenorrhea was closely related to BMD loss in both treatment groups. Overall, patients who received CMF did not show recovery of BMD throughout follow-up, whereas partial recovery was observed 1 year after cessation of goserelin therapy, associated with the return of ovarian function in the majority of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Survival analyses from the ZEBRA study. goserelin (Zoladex) versus CMF in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer.

The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association (ZEBRA) trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of goserelin (Zoladex) with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal women with node-positive early breast cancer. The results of disease-free survival (DFS) analyses have already been published. Here we present an update including data on overall survival (OS) from the ZEBRA trial at a median follow-up of 7.3 years. In patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumours, non-inferiority of goserelin versus CMF for OS was shown; goserelin was again shown to be equivalent to CMF for DFS. This updated analysis has demonstrated that the two treatments are also equivalent for distant disease-free survival (DDFS). In patients with ER-negative disease, goserelin was inferior to CMF for DFS, DDFS and OS. This follow-up analysis confirms the previously reported outcomes from the ZEBRA trial and demonstrates that goserelin offers an effective alternative to CMF chemotherapy for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive early breast cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Study.

PURPOSE: Current adjuvant therapies have improved survival for premenopausal patients with breast cancer but may have short-term toxic effects and long-term effects associated with premature menopause. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days for 2 years; n = 817) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy (six 28-day cycles; n = 823) for adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. RESULTS: Analysis was performed when 684 events had been achieved, and the median follow-up was 6 years. A significant interaction between treatment and estrogen receptor (ER) status was found (P =.0016). In ER-positive patients (approximately 74%), goserelin was equivalent to CMF for disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.20). In ER-negative patients, goserelin was inferior to CMF for DFS (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.44). Amenorrhea occurred in more than 95% of goserelin patients by 6 months versus 58.6% of CMF patients. Menses returned in most goserelin patients after therapy stopped, whereas amenorrhea was generally permanent in CMF patients (22.6% v 76.9% amenorrheic at 3 years). Chemotherapy-related side effects such as nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and infection were higher with CMF than with goserelin during CMF treatment. Side effects related to estrogen suppression were initially higher with goserelin, but when goserelin treatment stopped, reduced to a level below that observed in the CMF group. CONCLUSION: Goserelin offers an effective, well-tolerated alternative to CMF in premenopausal patients with ER-positive and node-positive early breast cancer.

Amenorrhea↗
PubMed2001

Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary retrospective data suggest it is possible to identify impalpable breast cancer in women presenting with a family history of breast cancer under the age of 50, by using regular mammography. In consequence, this service is offered in a number of centres in the UK. The effectiveness of such a service, however, has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: We propose to perform such an evaluation in a cohort of 20000 women under the age of 50 with a significant family history of breast cancer, given regular mammographic surveillance over 5 years. Comparison of surgical and pathological data with completed and ongoing population screening trials using analysis techniques of varying complexity will be performed to obtain an accurate prediction of future breast-cancer mortality reduction. The formal aims are: i) to estimate the difference in breast-cancer mortality in women under the age of 50 with a significant family history of breast cancer having regular mammography, compared with those not being screened; ii) to estimate the cost-effectiveness of regular mammography in this group of women, compared with no screening. The increase in health service resource use attributable to such a policy will be compared with no screening, and costed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of implementing the standardised mammography strategy compared with no screening will be presented in terms of the additional cost per cancer detected, per life saved and per life-year saved.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The primary use of endocrine therapies.

Primary endocrine therapy is potentially superior to primary chemotherapy in patients with ER-positive tumors. The ability to give endocrine therapy perioperatively may be a better test than chemotherapy of the hypothesis that the events accompanying surgery affect prognosis. However, a major problem in all studies of primary endocrine therapy is that there has been no clear experimental test of preoperative versus postoperative therapy. This is because the major thrust of treatment has been in the elderly with the purpose of determining whether surgery can be avoided altogether. The fact that in ER-positive tumors primary endocrine therapy is associated with similar response rates to chemotherapy make it an attractive therapy for older women. This is the group where adjuvant chemotherapy has not been adequately tested (> or = 70 years of age). In contradistinction, adjuvant endocrine therapy shows marked survival benefits in patients with ER-positive tumors in these age groups (Table 1). It appears likely that primary endocrine therapy will allow breast conservation and prognostic information as is seen with chemotherapy. A major question which requires answering is whether primary endocrine therapy will improve survival more than adjuvant therapy alone. Although ER status is a good marker of responsiveness, its specificity, in particular, is not optimal. The ability to assess the dynamic effects of primary endocrine therapy by sequential biopsy and measurement of biological responses to oestrogen deprivation may allow us to predict precisely the patients likely to benefit from treatment. This clinical scenario allows us to use other potentially useful assessments such as the non-invasive estimation of angiogenesis using quantitative imaging techniques of blood flow. The newer anti-estrogens and aromatase inhibitors appear ideally suited to primary therapy since they have rapid and profound inhibitory activities, few or no agonist effects, and low side effect profiles. A preoperative trial of Faslodex is planned by the EORTC and another with Arimidex is under consideration by the ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen and combined) Trialist Group (Fig. 7). The precise design of these studies will require considerable thought.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

DNA fingerprinting of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Paired blood and breast tissue samples from 96 patients undergoing surgical excision of a breast lesion were subjected to DNA fingerprint analysis using the minisatellite probes 33.6 and 33.15. The 'fingerprints' of the blood and breast DNA were compared. DNA fingerprint changes seen were classified as band additions, band deletions or changes in band intensity. Significantly more DNA fingerprint changes were seen in malignant than in benign lesions (probe 33.6, P<0.01; probe 33.15, P=0.01; both probes, P = 0.04). The frequency of the changes detected in the breast cancers was unrelated to tumour grade or the presence of invasion. DNA ploidy was measured in 70 of the breast carcinomas. DNA fingerprint changes were seen in 41 of these, but flow cytometry detected aneuploidy in only 29 tumours (P=0.04). The DNA fingerprinting technique is unlikely to be useful in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions as changes were detected in one of the fibroadenomas studied. However, it may be a useful technique in screening tumour DNA for abnormalities suitable for more detailed analysis.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed1995

Response to a specific antioestrogen (ICI 182780) in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.

We treated 19 patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to tamoxifen with a new specific antioestrogen (ICI 182780) which, in animal studies, has no agonist activity. 13 (69%) patients responded (7 had partial responses and 6 showed no change) to monthly intramuscular injections of ICI 182780 after progression on tamoxifen, for a median duration of 18 months with minimum side effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that the agent is without effects on the liver or the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. ICI 182780 appears to be a promising new agent for treatment of advanced and early breast cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Place and training of the surgeon in breast cancer screening.

The screening service needs to function efficiently and fulfil its objectives with the minimum of disturbance to the woman screened; for this to happen the full involvement of specialists with extra expertise in the subject is required. The surgeon should be involved in the interests of the programme, of the women screened and of surgery as a whole; if surgeons do not become involved they could find themselves bypassed by screening units referring to radiation oncologists, which would be to the great detriment of the patients. Local issues as to who should become the involved surgeon and with regard to the general practitioners' standing must be resolved. It would indeed be a damning indictment of medical ethics if these issues of self-interest were to stand in the way of lowering mortality rates due to breast cancer.

Biopsy↗