Methotrexate and postoperative complications.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Buchbinder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the intrarater and interrater reliability among rheumatologists of a standardised protocol for measurement of shoulder movements using a gravity inclinometer. METHODS: After instruction, six rheumatologists independently assessed eight movements of the shoulder, including total and glenohumeral flexion, total and glenohumeral abduction, external rotation in neutral and in abduction, internal rotation in abduction and hand behind back, in random order in six patients with shoulder pain and stiffness according to a 6x6 Latin square design using a standardised protocol. These assessments were then repeated. Analysis of variance was used to partition total variability into components of variance in order to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The intrarater and interrater reliability of different shoulder movements varied widely. The movement of hand behind back and total shoulder flexion yielded the highest ICC scores for both intrarater reliability (0.91 and 0.83, respectively) and interrater reliability (0.80 and 0.72, respectively). Low ICC scores were found for the movements of glenohumeral abduction, external rotation in abduction, and internal rotation in abduction (intrarater ICCs 0.35, 0.43, and 0.32, respectively), and external rotation in neutral, external rotation in abduction, and internal rotation in abduction (interrater ICCs 0.29, 0.11, and 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of shoulder movements using a standardised protocol by rheumatologists produced variable intrarater and interrater reliability. Reasonable reliability was obtained only for the movement of hand behind back and total shoulder flexion.
STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, nonrandomized, nonequivalent, parallel group-controlled study involving before and after telephone surveys of the general population and postal surveys of general practitioners was conducted, with an adjacent state used as a control group. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a population-based intervention designed to alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and workers' compensation-related costs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A multimedia campaign begun during 1997 in Victoria, Australia, positively advised patients with back pain to stay active and exercise, not to rest for prolonged periods, and to remain at work. METHODS: The campaign's impact on population beliefs about back pain and fear-avoidance beliefs was measured in telephone surveys, and the effect of the campaign on the potential management of low back pain by general practitioners was assessed by eliciting their likely approach to two hypothetical scenarios in mailed surveys. Demographically identical population groups in Victoria and the control state, New South Wales, were surveyed at three times: before, during, and after intervention in Victoria. RESULTS: The studies were completed by 4730 individuals in the general population and 2556 general practitioners. There were large statistically significant improvements in back pain beliefs over time in Victoria (mean scores on the Back Beliefs Questionnaire, 26.5, 28.4, and 29.7), but not in New South Wales (26.3, 26.2, and 26.3, respectively). Among those who reported back pain during the previous year, fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity improved significantly in Victoria (mean scores on the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire for physical activity, 14, 12.5, and 11.6), but not in New South Wales (13.3, 13.6, and 12.7, respectively). General practitioners in Victoria reported significant improvements over time in beliefs about back pain management, as compared with their interstate colleagues. There were statistically significant interactions between state and time for 7 of 10 responses on management of acute low back pain, and for 6 of 10 responses on management of subacute low back pain. CONCLUSION: A population-based strategy of providing positive messages about back pain improves the beliefs of the general population and general practitioners about back pain and appears to influence medical management.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a population based, state-wide public health intervention designed to alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and costs of compensation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, non-randomised, non-equivalent, before and after telephone surveys of the general population and postal surveys of general practitioners with an adjacent state as control group and descriptive analysis of claims database. SETTING: Two states in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 4730 members of general population before and two and two and a half years after campaign started, in a ratio of 2:1:1; 2556 general practitioners before and two years after campaign onset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Back beliefs questionnaire, knowledge and attitude statements about back pain, incidence of workers' financial compensation claims for back problems, rate of days compensated, and medical payments for claims related to back pain and other claims. RESULTS: In the intervention state beliefs about back pain became more positive between successive surveys (mean improvement in questionnaire score 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5), P<0.001 and 3.2 (2.6 to 3.9), P<0.001, between baseline and the second and third survey, respectively). Beliefs about back pain also improved among doctors. There was a clear decline in number of claims for back pain, rates of days compensated, and medical payments for claims for back pain over the duration of the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: A population based strategy of provision of positive messages about back pain improves population and general practitioner beliefs about back pain and seems to influence medical management and reduce disability and workers' compensation costs related to back pain.
BACKGROUND: The validity and magnitude of an association between myositis and malignant disease continue to be debated. Such issues as the legitimacy of a myositis diagnosis and distinction among myositis subgroups in previous population-based studies remain unresolved. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk for malignant disease in patients with biopsy-proven inflammatory myopathies. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Victoria, Australia. PATIENTS: 537 patients in whom a biopsy-positive idiopathic inflammatory myopathy was first diagnosed from 1981 through 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to compare the incidence of malignant disease in patients with inflammatory myopathy and the general population. RESULTS: A total of 116 cases of malignant disease were found in 104 patients. Seventy-four cases were identified concurrently with (within 7 days) or after diagnosis of myositis. The highest risk for malignant disease was associated with dermatomyositis (standardized incidence ratio, 6.2 [95% CI, 3.9 to 10.0]). The risk was also increased in polymyositis (standardized incidence ratio, 2.0 [CI, 1.4 to 2.7]), although the relative risk for malignant disease in dermatomyositis compared with polymyositis was 2.4 (CI, 1.3 to 4.2). An increased risk for malignant disease was also found in inclusion-body myositis (standardized incidence ratio, 2.4 [CI, 1.2 to 4.9]). The excess risk for malignant disease diminished with time (standardized incidence ratio, 4.4 [CI, 2.7 to 7.1] in the first year; 3.4 [CI, 2.3 to 5.1] between 1 and 3 years; 2.2 [CI, 1.3 to 3.9] between 3 and 5 years; and 1.6 [CI, 1.0 to 2.6] beyond 5 years [ P for trend, 0.002]). CONCLUSION: The risk for malignant disease is increased in biopsy-proven dermatomyositis and polymyositis and also appears to be increased in inclusion-body myositis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the readability and content of supplementary written drug information currently being given to patients by rheumatologists in Australia. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Blinded standardised review by two independent reviewers of supplementary written drug information routinely provided to patients by the 195 fully registered members of the Australian Rheumatology Association (ARA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FOG and SMOG readability scores to estimate readability; critical appraisal of content according to predetermined criteria. RESULTS: 84 rheumatologists responded (43%), 45 of whom reported providing copies of written drug information to patients. Overall, 91 different documents were reviewed. Drugs most commonly considered were methotrexate (17), gold (16), sulfasalazine (10), penicillamine (10) and prednisolone (8). Level of agreement between reviewers for FOG and SMOG scores was fair to good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.61 and 0.51, respectively). Mean (95% CI) FOG and SMOG scores were 12.6 (12.2-12.9) and 11 (10.7-11.2), respectively (implying that half of those in Year 12 [or aged 17 years] and Year 11 [or aged 16 years] according to the FOG and SMOG mean scores, respectively, will comprehend half of the text or more). For the same medication, there was a wide variation in the information provided, including which side effects were discussed. While 98% included some information about side effects, fewer considered dose (74%), drug interactions if applicable (70%), purpose of drug (67%), how and when to take the drug (62%), expected time to improvement (54%), what to do in the event of side effects (44%), the expected duration of therapy (18%) and what to do if a dose was missed (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The reading level required to understand supplementary written drug information used by Australian rheumatologists is much higher than the average reading ability of the Australian population (estimated at Year 8 level). The content of this information varies widely and often omits important information.
BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is a frequently reported condition. A wide variety of treatment strategies has been described. As of yet, no optimal strategy has been identified. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of orthotic devices for treatment of tennis elbow. SEARCH STRATEGY: An electronic database search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cinahl, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, Current Contents and reference lists from all retrieved articles. Experts on the subjects were approached for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised clinical trials (RCT) describing individuals with diagnosed lateral epicondylitis and comparing the use of an orthotic device as a treatment strategy were evaluated for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the validity of the included trials and extracted data on relevant outcome measures. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as Relative Risks (RRs) and continuous outcomes as Standardised Mean Differences (SMD), both with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical pooling and subgroup analyses were intended MAIN RESULTS: Five small-size RCTs (N per group 7-49) were included. Validity score ranged from 3-9 positive items out of 11. Subgroup analyses were not performed due to the small number of trials. The limited number of included trials present few outcome measures and limited long-term results. Pooling was not possible due to large heterogeneity amongst trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No definitive conclusions can be drawn concerning effectiveness of orthotic devices for lateral epicondylitis. More well-designed and well-conducted RCTs of sufficient power are warranted.
Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is af requently reported condition. A wide variety of treatment strategies has been described. Asy et, no optimal strategy has been identified. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of orthotic devices for treatment of tennis elbow. An electronic database search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register Current Contents, and reference listsf rom all retrieved articles. Experts on the subjects were approachedfor additional trials. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) descrbiing individuals with diagnosed lateral epicondylitis and assessing the use of an orthotic device as a treatment strategy were evaluatedfor inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed the validity of the included trials and extracted data on relevant outcome measures. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as relative risks and continuous outcomes as standardised mean differences, both with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Statistical pooling and subgroup analyses were intended. Five small-size RCTs (n = 7-49 per group) were included the validity score ranged from three to nine positive items out of 11. Subgroup analyses were not performed owing to the small number of trials. The limited number of included trials present few outcome measures and limited long-term results. Pooling was not possible owing to the high level of heterogeneity of the trials. No definitive conclusions can be drawn concerning effectiveness of orthotic devices for lateral epicondylitis. More well-designed and well-conducted RCTs of sufficient power are warranted.
OBJECTIVES: To review the efficacy of common interventions for shoulder pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group trials register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Science Citation Index) up to May 1998, and hand searched major textbooks, bibliographies of relevant literature, the fugitive literature, and the subject indices of relevant journals including: American College of Rheumatology;British College of Rheumatologists; the Biennial Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapy Association of Australia;International Federation of Manual Therapists conference proceedings; British Orthopaedic Association;and American Orthopaedic Association. SELECTION CRITERIA: Each identified study was assessed for possible inclusion by two independent reviewers based on the blinded methods sections. The determinants for inclusion were that the trial include an intervention of interest (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular or subacromial glucocorticosteroid injection, oral glucocorticosteroid treatment, physiotherapy, manipulation under anaesthesia, hydrodilatation, or surgery); that treatment allocation was randomized; and that the outcome assessment was blinded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was assessed by two independent, blinded reviewers. Data relating to selection criteria, outcome measurement and treatment effect was extracted from the blinded trials. Range of motion scores were entered as degrees of restriction to movement, and all pain and overall effect scores were transformed to 100 point scales. For continuous outcome measures, where standard deviation was not reported it was either calculated from the raw data or converted from standard error of the mean. If neither of these were reported, authors were contacted in an effort to obtain the missing values. Effect sizes were calculated and combined in a pooled analysis if study population, endpoint and intervention were comparable. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty one trials met inclusion criteria. Mean methodological quality score was 16.8 (9.5 - 22) out of possible score of 40. Selection criteria varied widely even for the same diagnostic label. There was no uniformity in outcome measures used and their measurement properties were rarely reported. Effect sizes for individual trials were small (-1.4 to 3. 0). The results of only three studies investigating rotator cuff tendonitis could be pooled. Benefit of subacromial steroid injection over placebo for improving range of abduction (weighted difference between means (WMD) 35 degrees, 95% CI 14 to 55) was the only positive finding. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence to support or refute the efficacy of common interventions for shoulder pain. As well as, the need for further well designed clinical trials, more research is needed to establish a uniform method of defining shoulder disorders and developing outcome measures which are valid, reliable and responsive in these study populations.
A case-control study was performed to describe the clinical course and identify risk factors predisposing to the development of tiaprofenic acid associated cystitis. Cases were identified from reports to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee and a two-year (1995-1996) national surveillance programme. Definition of a case was onset of symptoms of cystitis while taking tiaprofenic acid with pyuria (>10 WBC/microl) and/or hematuria (>10 RBC/microl), and no evidence of urinary tract infection. Definitions of "prescriber-matched" and "unmatched" controls were those who had been prescribed tiaprofenic acid by the same prescriber within 12 months of the case without developing cystitis or were identified from the databases of local pharmacies of the cases respectively. 81 of 109 identified cases and 109 of 184 potential controls completed a standardised interviewer-administered questionnaire. Median time between the commencement of tiaprofenic acid and symptom onset was 6. 3 months (range 0.1-47.1 months). Median interval between presentation to doctor and drug cessation was 3.0 months (range 0-24. 5 months). In half the patients, symptoms resolved within 14 days of ceasing therapy. Increasing age was a risk factor for the development of tiaprofenic-acid associated cystitis, age >70 years-odds ratio 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.3-7.9) compared with age <55 years. Patients taking aspirin had a reduced risk (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9). Dose and amount of fluid consumed per day were not related to the risk of cystitis. Earlier recognition of tiaprofenic acid associated cystitis can potentially reduce the morbidity related to this condition. Apart from an increased risk among older patients, it is likely that this condition represents a drug reaction that cannot be predicted from clinical variables.
OBJECTIVE: To extend our observations on the longterm tolerability of methotrexate (MTX) and reasons for discontinuation in a cohort of 460 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied all patients with RA who started MTX before June 1986 and attended the community based private practices of 6 rheumatologists in Melbourne. Information to at least April 1, 1995, or within one year of death was updated from the patient's medical records to include MTX discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation. Addition of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) concomitant with MTX was noted. Survival analyses based upon life table methods were used with MTX discontinuation as the observable endpoint. Three different definitions of MTX discontinuation were used (1) according to whether the patient was taking the drug at last followup irrespective of any periods of temporary discontinuation; (2) MTX discontinuation for > 3 months considered to be a treatment endpoint; and (3) addition of concomitant DMARD considered to be only partial success of MTX (as a need for additional therapy to meet treatment goals). RESULTS: At 12 years, 53% of patients were continuing to take MTX (irrespective of any periods of temporary discontinuation). If discontinuation of the drug for 3 or more months was considered a treatment termination then 38% were still taking the drug at 12 years, and if addition of concomitant DMARD was regarded as a treatment endpoint only 17% of patients were continuing MTX at 12 years. Withdrawal for gastrointestinal toxicity declined over time but the risk of other adverse effects appeared to persist over time. CONCLUSION: MTX in RA is well tolerated over the longer term, with > 50% of patients starting MTX in a community based rheumatology private practice continuing to take it 12 years later. However, a substantial number of patients had 2nd line therapies added over this time. Monitoring for toxicity should continue throughout the course of therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) in Victoria, Australia, and look for evidence of space-time or spatial clustering. METHODS: Cases of IIM diagnosed between 1989 and 1991 were identified by muscle biopsy and hospital discharge diagnosis review. Diagnosis was verified by medical record review and included if Bohan and Peter criteria for definite or probable disease were met. The pair-wise Euclidean distances between cases' residences were computed using grid references, and temporal distances were calculated between biopsy dates. The Mantel test for space-time clustering was computed. Each patient was also characterized by statistical local area (SLA) according to place of residence. For each SLA, the expected annual incidence of IIM was calculated, based upon its population distribution, and these were compared to the observed annual incidence. Confidence intervals for the true rate ratio (RR) for each SLA were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution, and the level of heterogeneity in the data was examined by calculation of a chi-squared for homogeneity. RESULTS: Ninety-four cases met inclusion criteria for an annual incidence of 7.4 (95% CI 6.0-9.0) per million person-years. No space-time clustering was found (z = -0.434, p = 0.665), but there was evidence of spatial clustering. A total of 67 observed cases were distributed among 58 urban SLA. Four SLA had a greater than expected incidence of myositis (95% Poisson based CI excluded 1), accounting for 20 of the observed cases. CONCLUSION: The incidence of IIM in Australia is higher than most previous population based estimates. The finding of spatial clustering supports the hypothesis that environmental factors may be important in the pathogenesis of these diseases.
This is the initial report of the generic health OMERACT study concerned with the sensitivity to change of generic quality of life (QOL) measures. Our objective was to determine which QOL instrument is best able to show a statistically significant improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrating relevant improvement in a core set of disease activity and disease-specific disability measures. A multicenter controlled trial of a single group with repeated measurements at 0 (baseline), 3, and 6 months was conducted. All participating centers recruited 10 patients with RA who were about to start methotrexate therapy for the first time because of active disease. Assessments included disease activity measures, disease-specific disability measures, and generic QOL measures. To date, 40 patients have been recruited from 4 centers for the study. After 6 months of treatment many of the generic QOL measures showed a 20% improvement from baseline and medium standardized response means around 0.5. In particular, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQOL) measures had the largest percentage improvement (22 and 29%, respectively) and standardized response means (both with 0.54). Early results on the sensitivity of generic health QOL measures are promising, in particular for the NHP and RAQOL measures.
BACKGROUND: In Canada, primary care physicians manage most musculoskeletal problems. However, their training in this area is limited, and some aspects of management may be suboptimal. This study was conducted to examine primary care physicians' management of 3 common musculoskeletal problems, ascertain the determinants of management and compare management with that recommended by a current practice panel. METHODS: A stratified computer-generated random sample of 798 Ontario members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada received a self-administered questionnaire by mail. Respondents selected various items in the management of 3 hypothetical patients: a 77-year-old woman with a shoulder problem, a 64-year-old man with osteoarthritis of the knee and a 30-year-old man with an acutely hot, swollen knee. Scores reflecting the proportion of recommended investigations, interventions and referrals selected for each scenario were calculated and examined for their association with physician and practice characteristics and physician attitudes. RESULTS: The response rate was 68.3% (529/775 eligible physicians). For the shoulder problem, all of the recommended items were chosen by the majority of respondents. However, of the items not recommended, ordering blood tests was selected by almost half (242 [45.7%]) as was prescribing an NSAID (236 [44.7%]). For the knee osteoarthritis the majority of respondents chose the recommended items except exercise (selected by only 175 [33.1%]). Of the items not recommended, tests were chosen by about half of the respondents and inappropriate referrals (chiefly for orthopedic surgery) were chosen by a quarter. For the acutely hot knee, the majority of physicians chose all of the recommended items except use of ice or heat (selected by only 188 [35.6%]). Although most (415 [78.5%]) of the respondents selected the recommended joint aspiration for this scenario, 84 (15.9%) omitted this investigation or referral to a specialist. The selection of recommended items was strongly associated with training in musculoskeletal specialties during medical school and residency. INTERPRETATION: Primary care physicians' management of 3 common musculoskeletal problems was for the most part in accord with panel recommendations. However, the unnecessary use of diagnostic tests, inappropriate prescribing of NSAIDs, low use of patient-centred options such as exercise, and lack of diagnostic suspicion of infectious arthritis are cause for concern. The results point to the need for increased exposure to musculoskeletal problems during undergraduate and residency training and in continuing medical education.
OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of common interventions for shoulder pain. DESIGN: All randomised controlled trials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular and subacromial glucocorticosteroid injection, oral glucocorticosteroid treatment, physiotherapy, manipulation under anaesthesia, hydrodilatation, and surgery for shoulder pain that were identified by computerised and hand searches of the literature and had a blinded assessment of outcome were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological quality (score out of 40), selection criteria, and outcome measures. Effect sizes were calculated and combined in a pooled analysis if study population, end point, and intervention were comparable. RESULTS: Thirty one trials met inclusion criteria. Mean methodological quality score was 16.8 (9.5-22). Selection criteria varied widely, even for the same diagnostic label. There was no uniformity in the outcome measures used, and their measurement properties were rarely reported. Effect sizes for individual trials were small (range -1.4 to 3.0). The results of only three studies investigating "rotator cuff tendinitis" could be pooled. The only positive finding was that subacromial steroid injection is better than placebo in improving the range of abduction (weighted difference between means 35 degrees (95% confidence interval 14 to 55)). CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence to support or refute the efficacy of common interventions for shoulder pain. As well as the need for further well designed clinical trials, more research is needed to establish a uniform method of defining shoulder disorders and developing outcome measures which are valid, reliable, and responsive in affected people.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized protocol for measurement of shoulder movements using a gravity inclinometer designed for use in clinical trials, and to assess its intra- and interrater reliability in a group of manipulative physiotherapists. METHODS: After instruction, 6 manipulative physiotherapists independently assessed 8 movements of the shoulder, including total and glenohumeral flexion (TF, GHF), total and glenohumeral abduction (TA, GHA), external rotation in neutral (ERN) and abduction (ERA), internal rotation in abduction (IRA), and hand behind back (HBB), in random order in 6 patients with shoulder pain and stiffness according to a 6 x 6 Latin square design using the standardized protocol. The assessments were then repeated. Analysis of variance was used to partition total variability into components of variance in order to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The intra- and interrater reliability of the different movements varied widely. Reliability was higher for TF and TA than for the corresponding glenohumeral movements (e.g., intrarater ICCs: TF = 0.80, GHF = 0.65, TA = 0.75, GHA = 0.62). Interrater reliability was higher in the second round suggesting a practice effect (e.g., round 1, 2 interrater ICCs TF = 0.62, 0.82; TA = 0.62, 0.88; ERN = 0.85, 0.95). CONCLUSION: The measurement of the active range of TF, TA, ERN, and HBB, measured by manipulative physiotherapists following the standardized protocol, has intra- and interrater reliability acceptable for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials assessing interventions for shoulder pain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in a large female cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to determine the role of steroids and disease related variables. METHODS: All females with SLE managed by rheumatologists affiliated with a single center were invited to undergo BMD measurement of the lumbar spine and left femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), standardized examination, and medical record review. RESULTS: Ninety-seven females with a mean (SD) age of 44.2 (14.9) years were studied. Low bone mass [defined as BMD > 1 standard deviation (SD) below young adult mean] was present in 44.3 and 42.1% at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. Osteoporosis (defined as BMD > 2.5 SD below young adult mean) was present in 13.4 and 6.3% at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. Steroid usage showed a strong inverse relationship with BMD in the lumbar spine, but a less strong relationship in the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: The findings of high prevalence of reduced BMD and association with steroid therapy have important implications for the routine management of SLE.