PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Buquicchio

Publications and source records attributed to R Buquicchio.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Intestinal permeability in patients with adverse reactions to food.

BACKGROUND: An abnormal intestinal permeability could contribute to establish an altered sensitivity to food-allergen. AIM: To evaluate the intestinal permeability in subjects with adverse reactions to food on allergen-free diet. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one patients with food allergy and 20 with food hypersensitivity on allergen-free diet were enrolled and divided in four groups according to the seriousness of their referred clinical symptoms when they were on a free diet. METHODS: Intestinal permeability was evaluated by Lactulose/Mannitol ratio urinary detection determined by anion-exchange chromatography. RESULTS: Statistically significant different Lactulose/Mannitol ratio was evidenced in subjects with food allergy (p=0.003) or hypersensitivity (p=0.0008) compared to control patients. The correlation between Lactulose/Mannitol ratio and the seriousness of clinical symptoms, by using Spearman test, was statistically significant for food allergy (p=0.0195) and hypersensitivity (p=0.005) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present data demonstrate that impaired intestinal permeability, measured in our conditions, is present in all subjects with adverse reactions to food. In addition, for the first time, we report a statistically significant association between the severity of referred clinical symptoms and the increasing of Intestinal Permeability Index. These data reveal that intestinal permeability is not strictly dependent on IgE-mediated processes but could better be related to other mechanisms involved in early food sensitisation, as breast-feeding, or microbial environment that influence the development of oral tolerance in early infancy.

Adolescent↗

Cross-reactivity in cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids.

In the last few decades, glucocorticoids have received increasing attention for their capability of provoking systemic hypersensitivity reactions, when administered orally, parenterally, or intralesionally, as well as allergic skin and mucosal symptoms, when applied locally to the skin in patients with contact dermatitis or to the mucosa in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis. However, because of their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties, glucocorticoids are often not suspected of such hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, because glucocorticoids retain their anti-inflammatory potential, even if they act as sensitizers, the signs and symptoms of allergic reactions are not always obvious, particularly when they overlap with those caused by the very diseases glucocorticoids are used to treat. Moreover, interpretation of diagnostic tests, specifically that of patch-test reactions, can be difficult. In this review, particular attention is addressed to the problem of allergenic cross-reactivity among topical and systemic glucocorticoids. We also look at the clinical and practical aspects of both cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to glucocorticoids and their consequences on anti-inflammatory therapeutic choices.

Cross Reactions↗

Hypersensitivity reactions to ophthalmic products.

Adverse reactions after administration of ophthalmic products have frequently been observed. These reactions can be provoked by both active principles and excipients. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been suggested for such reactions, including immunologic ones. Basophils and mast cells participate in IgE-mediated reactions through the release of mediators like histamine and tryptase, whereas a T-cell-mediated pathogenic mechanism is involved in most delayed reactions, particularly conjunctival ones and eyelid dermatitis. Prick tests and immediate-reading intradermal tests are carried out to diagnose immediate hypersensitivity reactions, while patch tests are usually performed to evaluate delayed reactions. Other diagnostic tests, such as serum-specific IgE assays in immediate reactions, as well as delayed-reading intradermal tests and/or lymphocyte transformation tests in delayed ones, are rarely performed. In this review, particular attention is addressed to the clinical and practical aspects of both cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to ophthalmic products.

Administration, Topical↗

Alternative glucocorticoids for use in cases of adverse reaction to systemic glucocorticoids: a study on 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: Reactions to systemically administered corticosteroids are rare, despite their widespread use. OBJECTIVES: To identify alternative glucocorticoids for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to systemic glucocorticoids. METHODS: Ten patients were identified as having adverse reactions after the use of systemic corticosteroids. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP), and intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone, were performed in all patients, and oral challenge tests to betamethasone (n=10) and deflazacort (n=6). RESULTS: Skin prick tests were negative in all patients, whereas intradermal tests to HC and MP were positive in eight; two patients showed only an isolated cutaneous sensitivity to MP. Intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone were negative, and oral challenge tests were negative in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the possibility of an IgE-mediated mechanism for allergic reactions to HC and MP, probably due, at least in part, to a steroid-glyoxal. We suggest that betamethasone and deflazacort could be reserved for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to other corticosteroids.

Adult↗

Eyedrop-induced allergy: clinical evaluation and diagnostic protocol.

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, adverse reactions to mydriatic eyedrops have been investigated. However, is not still available a standardized protocol, capable of identify the pathogenetic mechanism. In the light of these findings we have evaluated the reliability of a protocol with well established concentration of specific allergens. METHODS: The diagnostic method includes the application of patch test series Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali (GIRDCA), medicaments, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, main eyedrops' excipients, pure active principles and extemporaneous preparations with mydriatic eyewashes. At the same time, skin prick test with a solution of atropine sulfate at 1 per thousand and an intradermal test with injection of atropine at 0.01 per thousand were carried out. RESULTS: After patch tests were removed, we detected seven positiveness to the phenylephrine, two to the benzalkonium chloride, one to thiomersal, one to the ethylendiamine and one to the atropine sulfate 1 per thousand. With intradermal tests we obtained three positiveness in patients who reported adverse reactions to atropine. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that phenylephrine is frequently responsible for allergic conjunctivitis (53.8%). In the case of atropine, even though the limited number of patients suggests to perform more extensive studies, it emerges that our diagnostic protocol is safe and might be able to screen allergic reactions in the field of ophthalmopathies.

Adolescent↗

Allergic and pseudoallergic reactions induced by glucocorticoids: a review.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the most effective treatment for autoimmune and allergic diseases, even if collateral effects are not rare, especially endocrine and immunosuppressive manifestations. Moreover, these drugs can develop adverse immunological reactions of I, III or IV type. Though immediate adverse reactions caused by systemic therapy with GCs are not very frequent, the possible beginning of anaphylactic and pseudo-anaphylactic manifestations in patients undergoing therapy with these drugs has to be considered. It has been observed that immediate adverse reactions usually are happened in asthmatic patients and in patients obliged to assume GCs again and again because of their pathology (e.g, kidney transplant). Other risk factors resulted to be female sex and hypersensibility to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Both in the cases of pseudo-allergic and allergic reactions, the pharmacological principle is hardly the responsible agent for the reaction; instead the excipients in drugs are often implicated (succinate salt, sulphites and carboxy-methyl-cellulose). It is possible that the IgE-response is highly specific for a fixed GC molecule as well depending on the way of administration and its salification. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that in patients with a first type allergic reaction to GCs there is a fourth type, sensitization to GCs, which is not usually diagnosed and even comes before IgE sensitization. Third type hypersensibility reactions may occur, too. Since GCs are large-scale drugs, also in emergency medicine and reanimation, allergic sensitization towards them, although infrequent, gives many interventionist problems. In the light of this feature, it seems of crucial importance to verify the tolerance toward other GC molecules. And in particular, it has been noted that patients presenting immediate reactions to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP) could tolerate prednisone and prednisolone per os and second-generation GCs, such as desamathazone and betamethazone. Nevertheless, second-generation GCs must not be considered safe; in fact, the beginning of allergic manifestations has been pointed out even towards them.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Latex allergy and sensitization in cities: a survey in a population at risk.

The constant increase in allergic diseases in western countries is correlated with changes in lifestyle and with the deterioration of the air inhaled by the inhabitants because of the growing concentrations of pollutant substances present. Within a population at risk, i.e., the inhabitants of cities, a group of subjects at even higher risk was selected, whose job exposes them to automobile exhaust fumes for many hours a day. All the study subjects underwent allergological screening and spirometry. The results obtained show an overall increase of respiratory allergic diseases but no increased sensitisation to latex. It therefore seems plausible that, besides social and lifestyle changes, the deterioration of the quality of the air could be considered responsible, at least in part, for the growing numbers of allergic subjects. This study offers an opportunity to reconsider the validity of the hygiene hypothesis as an explanation for the increase of allergic disease in western countries, although recent reports have indicated that a sedentary lifestyle may also contribute, together with environmental degradation, to the notably increased prevalence of allergic diseases in large cities in industrialized nations.

Adult↗

Risk factors for sensitization to AnisakiS simplex: a multivariate statistical evaluation.

Anisakis simplex is a nematode belonging to the Anisakidae family. The ingestion of third stage larvae in uncooked or undercooked seafood may cause human diseases known as anisakiasis and anisakidosis. A total of 400 (159 atopic and 241 non-atopic) subjects living in an area of southern Italy (Bari district) were consecutively evaluated to identify the association of some factors (sex, age, atopy, consumption of uncooked seafood and sensitization to dust mites) with the risk of Anisakis simplex sensitization. Patients were investigated on history of atopy and allergic diseases and were skin prick tested with commercial allergen extracts of Anisakis simplex, Acarus siro, Lepidoglyphus destructor, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Glycyphagus domesticus, Euroglyphus maynei, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae. Our results suggest that atopic subjects have a lower risk of Anisakis allergy than non-atopic subjects and show the association of Anisakis simplex sensitization with the consumption of uncooked seafood (anchovies and squid), increasing age and sensitization to Glycyphagus domesticus.

Animals↗