PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Bilger

Publications and source records attributed to R C Bilger.

35 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Auditory prostheses in perspective.

The results of the evaluation of subjects presently fitted with internal auditory prostheses are summarized. Based on these results, the role of single-channel prostheses as a treatment for acquired deafness is discussed in terms of the auditory expectation for a single channel and of subject selection.

Cochlea↗

Present audiologic status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.

Audiological testing indicated that all of the subjects had profound sensorineural hearing losses. In 12 of the 13 subjects, this profound hearing loss was bilateral. The 13th subject, however, had useable hearing in his unimplanted ear. Tympanometric testing gave no evidence that implant surgery had disrupted middle ear function.

Audiometry↗

Electroacoustic measures of present prostheses.

To determine the electrical nature of the signals delivered to the electrode implanted in scala tympani, extensive electroacoustic measures were made on a House-Urban stimulator, both in a closed, acoustic system (hearing-aid box) and in the sound field. For these measures, the external coil was separated from the internal coil by plexiglass, and the internal coil was loaded resistively. Illustrations of the signal delivered to the electrode are provided.

Cochlea↗

Hearing performance with the auditory prosthesis.

With their prostheses activated 12 of 13 subjects were able to respond to sound (bands of noise) at intensities (35-65 dB SPL) that typically arise in the normal acoustic environment. While this "hearing" did allow them to be aware of speech, it did not permit them to understand speech. On the other hand, this "hearing" does seem to help them with identification of common environmental sounds and with lipreading, within the context that those abilities were tested here.

Audiometry↗

Subject acceptance of implanted auditory prosthesis.

Each of the 13 subjects was interviewed, in a structured context, to determine their estimate of the value of the prosthesis to their daily life. The subjects who used their prostheses eight or more hours a day reported it to be more valuable in their daily living than did those who used it less than eight hours a day. The fulltime users reported that the prosthesis is most helpful to them as an adjunct to lipreading. All of them thought the prosthesis valuable in terms of "hearing" environmental sounds. While all of them reported noisy environments to be bothersome, the fulltime users did not turn off their stimulators in noise. Only two subjects, both infrequent users of their prostheses, reported that they would not undergo implant surgery again.

Cochlea↗

Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.

A battery of psychoacoustic tests, designed to specify auditory discriminations possible with present, single-channel auditory prostheses, was administered successfully to 12 of the 13 subjects. While no subject was able to perform all discriminations required by this battery of tests, there was no discrimination that at least one subject did not perform successfully. The typical subject could 1) discriminate intensity differences within normal limits for frequencies below 1000 Hz; 2) discriminate frequency differences quite normally at 125 and 250 Hz, but not at all at 1000 or 2000 Hz; 3) discriminate differences in signal duration, temporal patterning (rhythm), and spectrum (e.g., tone vs narrow-band noise); and 4) discriminate between pairs of synthesized vowel-like sounds. The results of masking experiments could only be interpreted in terms of intensity discrimination. Several subjects were able to relate stimulus intensity to loudness for low-frequency sounds; and they could relate stimulus frequency to pitch for signals below 25 Hz. The intelligibility of the subjects' speech was found to improve when their prostheses were activated.

Auditory Threshold↗