PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

R C Forney

Publications and source records attributed to R C Forney.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of an in-line bipolar polyurethane ventricular pacing lead.

A study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the Medtronic 4012 polyurethane in-line bipolar pacing electrode. One hundred twenty six patients implanted with the 4012 lead were followed by our clinic with 116 of these leads implanted at our institution. Patients were followed a minimum of every 4 months. Testing included the performance of stimulation thresholds, sensing thresholds, and provocative maneuvers to evaluate for myopotential inhibition testing a minimum of every eight months. There were 12 documented lead failures of the total 126 patients. Further analysis was limited to the ten failures occurring in the 116 leads implanted at our center. All ten failed leads utilized the suture anchoring sleeve. Six of the leads were left cephalic implants, three were right cephalic, and one was right subclavian. Manifestations of failure included: seven oversensing abnormalities, three undersensing, four loss of ventricular capture, one premature end of service, four lead impedance decreases to < 250 omega and some presentations in combination. No leads were explanted for evaluation. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate the time to lead failure. The probability of not experiencing a lead failure within the first 4 years of implant is estimated to be 0.9103 (SE = 0.0338). Pacemaker dependent patients implanted with the 4012 lead should be given special consideration for prophylactic replacement.

Actuarial Analysis

Activation times for "emergency back-up" programs.

A bench study was performed on 34 different pulse generators to evaluate the time necessary to actuate an "emergency back-up" (EBU) program. Pacemakers were programmed to loss of capture before the EBU was activated. Two pauses were measured that included the total pause from captured beat to captured beat and the time from the first pacing artifact showing loss of capture to the first captured beat resulting from EBU activation. Special features for threshold testing such as temporary pacing, auto threshold, Vario, and an alternating pulse ventricular threshold test were also evaluated. Activation times of the EBU ranged from 1.8 to 11.1 seconds with total pauses of 2.7 to 13.2 seconds, respectively. There were considerable variations in EBU times even within a single manufacturers' pulse generators. The special features for threshold testing resulted in pauses measuring 0.6 to 3.0 seconds with total pauses of 1.2 to 4.0 seconds, respectively, and in all cases were faster than using the EBU. Utilization of the EBU to regain capture during threshold testing in pacemaker dependent patients may result in prolonged pauses and syncope or near syncopal episodes.

Electrocardiography

Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing.

A study was undertaken to evaluate exercise performance in 18 dual chamber pacemaker patients believed to be chronotropically incompetent. All patients were paced in a DDD AV synchronous mode at 80 beats per minute (beats/min) as well as an externally triggered, activity responsive VVIR mode. Patients underwent two single blind, randomized symptom-limited treadmill tests (Sheffield protocol). Four of the 18 patients achieved intrinsic rates greater than 100 beats/min and were deleted from the primary study. It was noted that all four of these patients performed best with intrinsic rate response and AV synchrony. Thirteen of the remaining 14 patients demonstrated improved exercise tolerance in the VVIR mode. Average exercise time in the VVIR mode (7:25 +/- 3:12 min) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the DDD mode (6:01 +/- 2:27 min). Work performed was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the VVIR mode (4.77 +/- 1.97 METS) than in the DDD mode (3.78 +/- 0.77 METS). Maximum heart rates were 83.86 +/- 5.11 beats/min in DDD mode versus 116.00 +/- 10.56 beats/min in VVIR mode. The results demonstrated that improved exercise tolerance can be achieved with single chamber rate variable pacing compared to DDD pacing in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, potential symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony should be ruled out.

Adult

Crosstalk during bipolar pacing.

Bipolar sensing pulse generators were thought to have eliminated crosstalk problems evident in unipolar systems. Crosstalk has been observed in the Model 284-02 bipolar sensing pacemakers. These intermittent problems were resolved by decreasing atrial output, decreasing ventricular sensitivity or increasing the ventricular blanking period. Three patients had pacemaker crosstalk, two experienced symptoms analogous to pacemaker syndrome.

Aged