PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Yoder

Publications and source records attributed to R C Yoder.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

The use of computerised glow curve analysis will optimise personal thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements. Opposing the proposition.

Referring to the proposition for this debate, it is necessary to consider what is meant by 'optimise personal thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements'. Much research has been performed on the thermoluminescence glow curves that can be used to determine absorbed dose, and much of the knowledge gained from this research has been put into practice. Thermoluminescence dosemeters are capable of measuring an extremely wide range of doses and dose rates. Nearly all types of radiation can be measured, and some TL dosemeters have been designed to function as elementary spectrometers. More recently, the microdosimetric properties of TL dosemeters have been investigated. TL dosemeters are worn by a large proportion of radiation workers worldwide. But, can we conclude that thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements are at an optimum level? Perhaps that is not a fair question because it may be impossible to say when anything is truly optimum. Although the techniques pointed out by our debaters may not yet be used by all large, personal dosimetry services, as with many recent innovations, implementation may be as near as the next computer chip upgrade.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of dose histories for U.S. nuclear power plant workers, based on records held by a major dosimetry service company and on the NRC REIRS database.

In order to conduct valid epidemiological studies of nuclear power plant workers, good information on the workers' radiation dose histories is essential. Dose records held by a major dosimetry service company and on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Radiation Exposure Information and Recording System have been compared for a sample of 99 workers. About half of the workers in the sample had no records on the Radiation Exposure Information and Recording System, since they had not terminated employment at a Nuclear Regulatory Commission-licensed facility; accordingly, their career doses (as recorded by the service company) were generally higher than those for workers on the Radiation Exposure Information and Recording System. For nearly half of the workers with records on both databases, the total dose recorded for terminated employments at nuclear power plants differed by at least a factor of 5 between the databases. In absolute terms, these differences were of the order of 100 mSv or more. An approach that utilized both the Radiation Exposure Information and Recording System and the dosimetry service company's records might be of value in constructing dose histories for a large epidemiological study. However, the comparisons presented here support the initiatives of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to request licensees to report voluntarily career doses for current employees. These data are essential if a large and valid epidemiological study of nuclear plant workers is to be conducted in the foreseeable future.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

Criteria for performing multiple dosimetry.

When radiation fields vary spatially as a result of job- or location-specific conditions, the use of more than one dosimeter may be necessary for a variety of radiation protection purposes. This paper contains a methodology for when and how to use multiple dosimeters under conditions incident to routine activities in the presence of ionizing radiation. It also describes a methodology for determining the effective dose equivalent when the use of multiple dosimeters has been deemed necessary by radiation protection professionals. The methodology is based upon application of compartments and compartment factors. Included herein are examples demonstrating when multiple dosimeters should be used and how effective dose equivalent should be calculated using the compartment factors.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

A health survey of radiologic technologists.

A health survey of more than 143,000 radiologic technologists is described. The population was identified from the 1982 computerized files of the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists, which was established in 1926. Inactive members were traced to obtain current addresses or death notifications. More than 6000 technologists were reported to have died. For all registrants who were alive when located, a detailed 16-page questionnaire was sent, covering occupational histories, medical conditions, and other personal and lifestyle characteristics. Nonrespondents were contacted by telephone to complete an abbreviated questionnaire. More than 104,000 responses were obtained. The overall response rate was 79%. Most technologists were female (76%), white (93%), and employed for an average of 12 years; 37% attended college, and approximately 50% never smoked cigarettes. Radiation exposure information was sought from employer records and commercial dosimetry companies. Technologists employed for the longest times had the highest estimated cumulative exposures, with approximately 9% with exposures greater than 5 cGy. There was a high correlation between cumulative occupational exposure and personal exposure to medical radiographs, related, in part, to the association of both factors with attained age. It is interesting that 10% of all technologists allowed others to practice taking radiographs on them during their training. Nearly 4% of the respondents reported having some type of cancer, mainly of the skin (1517), breast (665), and cervix (726). Prospective surveys will monitor cancer mortality rates through use of the National Death Index and cancer incidence through periodic mailings of questionnaires. This is the only occupational study of radiation employees who are primarily women and should provide new information on the possible risks associated with relatively low levels of exposure.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Observations on personnel dosimetry for radiotherapy personnel operating high-energy LINACs.

A series of measurements were conducted to determine the cause of a sudden increase in personnel radiation exposures. One objective of the measurements was to determine if the increases were related to changing from film dosimeters exchanged monthly to TLD-100 dosimeters exchanged quarterly. While small increases were observed in the dose equivalents of most employees, the dose equivalents of personnel operating medical electron linear accelerators with energies greater than 20 MV doubled coincidentally with the change in the personnel dosimeter program. The measurements indicated a small thermal neutron radiation component around the accelerators operated by these personnel. This component caused the doses measured with the TLD-100 dosimeters to be overstated. Therefore, the increase in these personnel dose equivalents was not due to changes in work habits or radiation environments. Either film or TLD-700 dosimeters would be suitable for personnel monitoring around high-energy linear accelerators. The final choice would depend on economics and personal preference.

Film Dosimetry↗