PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Cursio

Publications and source records attributed to R Cursio.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Port-Site Recurrence of Cancer Associated With Laparoscopic Diagnosis and Resection: The European Experience.

Port-site recurrences of cancer have drawn attention to the potential risks of laparoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of digestive cancers. The first observations concerned unsuspected gallbladder cancers shown by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for lithiasis. Seventeen cases in patients with advanced or early colon cancer followed. It eventually became clear that all cancers could be the origin of such recurrences, which present as apparently isolated nodules embedded in the wall. These parietal recurrences were well known in open surgery, having been reported for most cancers, but they drew little attention because they usually occur in the context of carcinosis. It must be remembered that digestive cancers in general have a high potential for dissemination and that nearly 30% of patients have micrometastases in the bloodstream, the lymph nodes, the peritoneum, or even the bone marrow. The mechanism of tumor implantation is analogous to development of an inflammatory reaction. Under these conditions, laparoscopic surgery is susceptible to cause neoplastic dissemination for a number of mechanical reasons: CO2 insufflation, tumor manipulation, failure to isolate the tumor, forceful extraction of the surgical specimen, and exsufflation. Multiinstitutional trials of well-defined laparoscopic protocols based on the same oncologic principles as in open surgery should reduce the frequency of tumor cell dissemination and the incidence of port-site recurrences.

Journal Article↗

[The biocompatibility of suture materials used in colon surgery. An experimental study in the rat].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this experimental study was to compare the tissue behavior of biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) with other synthetic materials used in colonic surgery. METHODS: Thirty-three rats were divided into four groups: group 1, sham-operated control animals without material implanted; group 2, with fragments of polypropylene monofilament implanted extraperitoneally in abdominal wound, between musculature and peritoneum; group 3, with metal clips implanted extraperitoneally in abdominal wound, between musculature and peritoneum and group 4, with fragments of biofragmentable anastomotic ring implanted extraperitoneally in abdominal wound, between musculature and peritoneum. Animals were sacrificed 30 days after the operation. Macroscopic and histological criteria were used to characterize the resistance of the wound and the tolerance of the host to the foreign material. RESULTS: The inflammatory cell reaction of host tissue was significantly greater in group 4 compared with other groups (p < 0.05). In three cases, in group 4, we observed the adhesion of implanted fragment to epiploa. The enumeration of giant cells and the degree of fibrotic reaction was similar in all groups with material implanted, but no significant difference between the groups was observed. Our findings showed the greater biocompatibility of polypropylene and metallic clips, compared to the biofragmentable ring anastomosis. The strong inflammatory reaction in the host tissue caused by biofragmentable anastomotic ring may explain partially clinical postoperative complications (anastomotic wound infection and/or dehiscence and/or stricture). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the choice of suture materials should be based not only on the mechanical properties, but also on their biological interactions between host and suture materials and on the evaluation of their effective cost/benefit.

Animals↗