Biomedical subjects

R D Seidler

Publications and source records attributed to R D Seidler.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning.

The issue of whether the cerebellum contributes to motor skill learning is controversial, principally because of the difficulty of separating the effects of motor learning from changes in performance. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation during an implicit, motor sequence-learning task that was designed to separate these two processes. During the sequence-encoding phase, human participants performed a concurrent distractor task that served to suppress the performance changes associated with learning. Upon removal of the distractor, participants showed evidence of having learned. No cerebellar activation was associated with the learning phase, despite extensive involvement of other cortical and subcortical regions. There was, however, significant cerebellar activation during the expression of learning; thus, the cerebellum does not contribute to learning of the motor skill itself but is engaged primarily in the modification of performance.

Brain↗

PubMed2001

Patterns of transfer of adaptation among body segments.

Two experiments were conducted in order to determine the patterns of transfer of visuomotor adaptation between arm and head pointing. An altered gain of display of pointing movements was used to induce a conflict between visual and somatosensory representations. Two subject groups participated in Experiment 1: group 1 adapted shoulder pointing movements, and group 2 adapted wrist pointing movements to a 0.5 gain of display. Following the adaptation regimen, subjects performed a transfer test in which the shoulder group performed wrist movements and the wrist group performed shoulder movements. The results demonstrated that both groups displayed typical adaptation curves, initially undershooting the target followed by a return to baseline performance. Transfer tests revealed that both groups had high transfer of the acquired adaptation to the other joint. Experiment 2 followed a similar design except that group 1 adapted head pointing movements and group 2 adapted arm pointing movements. The arm adaptation had high transfer to head pointing while the head adaptation had very little transfer to arm pointing. These results imply that, while the arm segments may share a common target representation for goal-directed actions, individual but functionally dependent target representations may exist for the control of head and arm movements.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2001

Context-dependent arm pointing adaptation.

We sought to determine the effectiveness of head posture as a contextual cue to facilitate adaptive transitions in manual control during visuomotor distortions. Subjects performed arm pointing movements by drawing on a digitizing tablet, with targets and movement trajectories displayed in real time on a computer monitor. Adaptation was induced by presenting the trajectories in an altered gain format on the monitor. The subjects were shown visual displays of their movements that corresponded to either 0.5 or 1.5 scaling of the movements made. Subjects were assigned to three groups: the head orientation group tilted the head towards the right shoulder when drawing under a 0.5 gain of display and towards the left shoulder when drawing under a 1.5 gain of display; the target orientation group had the home and target positions rotated counterclockwise when drawing under the 0.5 gain and clockwise for the 1.5 gain; the arm posture group changed the elbow angle of the arm they were not drawing with from full flexion to full extension with 0.5 and 1.5 gain display changes. To determine if contextual cues were associated with display alternations, the gain changes were returned to the standard (1.0) display. Aftereffects were assessed to determine the efficacy of the head orientation contextual cue compared to the two control cues. The head orientation cue was effectively associated with the multiple gains. The target orientation cue also demonstrated some effectiveness while the arm posture cue did not. The results demonstrate that contextual cues can be used to switch between multiple adaptive states. These data provide support for the idea that static head orientation information is a crucial component to the arm adaptation process. These data further define the functional linkage between head posture and arm pointing movements.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Multijoint movement control in Parkinson's disease.

Impairments in the performance of complex actions in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are well documented. The aim of the present study was to investigate potential mechanisms that may be contributing to impaired movement performance in PD patients. PD patients and age-matched control subjects performed rapid pointing movements to a series of four tabletop targets. The height of the table was adjusted until the targets could be achieved with arm movements in the horizontal plane. The targets were arranged such that target 1 required elbow extension only and targets 2-4 required increasing amounts of horizontal shoulder flexion in addition to the elbow extension. While the control subjects accelerated and decelerated the elbow and shoulder joints simultaneously regardless of the target location, the PD patients decomposed motion during the acceleration phase by accelerating first the shoulder and then the elbow joint. For PD patients this decomposition of arm segments was associated with greater coactivation of the muscles about the elbow when elbow extension and shoulder flexion were simultaneously required (targets 2-4), in contrast to the single joint action. The control subjects decreased elbow joint coactivation while the patients increased it across the four targets. The resulting peak interaction torques at both the elbow and shoulder joints occurred relatively later for the PD patients. The coactivation patterns observed in PD patients may reduce the ability to take advantage of interaction torques and may also contribute to joint motion decomposition.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Trunk-assisted prehension: specification of body segments with imposed temporal constraints.

The authors used a trunk-assisted prehension task to examine intersegment coordination. Participants (N = 7) reached to grasp an object placed beyond full arm extension, thus requiring trunk flexion to achieve the target object, under 4 varying temporal constraints. Kinematic analyses were performed in which the motions of the arm, the trunk, and the endpoint were characterized. The spatial trajectories and the segments' peak velocity data revealed that under high temporal constraints the arm was more responsible for endpoint motion than the trunk, whereas in the unconstrained condition the trunk was more involved. In addition, the arm exhibited a decline in spatial variability toward the end of the movement in all conditions, whereas the trunk did not. The present study is the first to show that when temporal demand is increased for a trunk-assisted prehensile task, the arm plays a larger role than the trunk in the transport of the hand to the object. The data also suggest that the arm participates in the fine accuracy control of the reach, whereas the trunk does not.

Adult↗