Biomedical subjects

R D Shankar

Publications and source records attributed to R D Shankar.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Leveraging point-of-care clinician feedback to study barriers to guideline adherence.

Studies of barriers to guideline adherence have generally surveyed clinicians temporally remote from the clinical scenario in which recommendations were delivered, potentially adversely biasing clinician observations. The user interface of ATHENA DSS, a guideline-based decision support system for hypertension, includes a point-of-care feedback window that accepts clinician-user comments during the display of recommendations. Analysis of this feedback has revealed a number of intriguing patient, provider, and technical barriers to adherence collected during real-time system use.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2001

Building an explanation function for a hypertension decision-support system.

ATHENA DSS is a decision-support system that provides recommendations for managing hypertension in primary care. ATHENA DSS is built on a component-based architecture called EON. User acceptance of a system like this one depends partly on how well the system explains its reasoning and justifies its conclusions. We addressed this issue by adapting WOZ, a declarative explanation framework, to build an explanation function for ATHENA DSS. ATHENA DSS is built based on a component-based architecture called EON. The explanation function obtains its information by tapping into EON's components, as well as into other relevant sources such as the guideline document and medical literature. It uses an argument model to identify the pieces of information that constitute an explanation, and employs a set of visual clients to display that explanation. By incorporating varied information sources, by mirroring naturally occurring medical arguments and by utilizing graphic visualizations, ATHENA DSS's explanation function generates rich, evidence-based explanations.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2001

Patient safety in guideline-based decision support for hypertension management: ATHENA DSS.

The Institute of Medicine recently issued a landmark report on medical error.1 In the penumbra of this report, every aspect of health care is subject to new scrutiny regarding patient safety. Informatics technology can support patient safety by correcting problems inherent in older technology; however, new information technology can also contribute to new sources of error. We report here a categorization of possible errors that may arise in deploying a system designed to give guideline-based advice on prescribing drugs, an approach to anticipating these errors in an automated guideline system, and design features to minimize errors and thereby maximize patient safety. Our guideline implementation system, based on the EON architecture, provides a framework for a knowledge base that is sufficiently comprehensive to incorporate safety information, and that is easily reviewed and updated by clinician-experts.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2001

Integration of textual guideline documents with formal guideline knowledge bases.

Numerous approaches have been proposed to integrate the text of guideline documents with guideline-based care systems. Current approaches range from serving marked up guideline text documents to generating advisories using complex guideline knowledge bases. These approaches have integration problems mainly because they tend to rigidly link the knowledge base with text. We are developing a bridge approach that uses an information retrieval technology. The new approach facilitates a versatile decision-support system by using flexible links between the formal structures of the knowledge base and the natural language style of the guideline text.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed1999

Justification of automated decision-making: medical explanations as medical arguments.

People use arguments to justify their claims. Computer systems use explanations to justify their conclusions. We are developing WOZ, an explanation framework that justifies the conclusions of a clinical decision-support system. WOZ's central component is the explanation strategy that decides what information justifies a claim. The strategy uses Toulmin's argument structure to define pieces of information and to orchestrate their presentation. WOZ uses explicit models that abstract the core aspects of the framework such as the explanation strategy. In this paper, we present the use of arguments, the modeling of explanations, and the explanation process used in WOZ. WOZ exploits the wealth of naturally occurring arguments, and thus can generate convincing medical explanations.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed1998

A declarative explanation framework that uses a collection of visualization agents.

User acceptance of a knowledge-based system depends partly on how effective the system is in explaining its reasoning and justifying its conclusions. The WOZ framework provides effective explanations for component-based decision-support systems. It represents explanation using explicit models, and employs a collection of visualization agents. It blends the strong features of existing explanation strategies, component-based systems, graphical visualizations, and explicit models. We illustrate the features of WOZ with the help of a component-based medical therapy system. We describe the explanation strategy, the roles of the visualization agents and components, and the communication structure. The integration of existing and new visualization applications, the domain-independent framework, and the incorporation of varied knowledge sources for explanation can result in a flexible explanation facility.

Artificial Intelligence↗