Evolutionary chemistry. Life in a test tube.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Dawkins.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We studied allotypes of the fourth component of complement (C4) and factor B in 76 patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and in 63 normal subjects. C4A-null (C4AQ0) was found in 10 of 28 patients who had primary SS, compared with 1 of 63 control subjects (P less than 0.005). In contrast, no significant difference in the frequency of any C4 allotype was observed between patients with secondary SS and control subjects. An association of HLA-DRw53 with primary SS in Japanese patients has been reported. Since there is no linkage disequilibrium between DRw53 and C4AQ0, it is possible that at least 2 genes in the major histocompatibility complex may determine susceptibility to the development of primary SS in the Japanese population.
A common and revised nomenclature of the allotypes of the fourth component (C4) of human complement has been proposed. It is based on the results of the C4 Reference Typing of the VIth Complement Genetics Workshop and Conference, Mainz, FRG, 1989, the previous C4 nomenclature and the guidelines for human gene nomenclature (ISGN). The designation of allotypes derives from their relative electrophoretic mobility, the distinction between C4A and C4B proteins from their relative hemolytic activity. Common alleles retain their single digit numeric designation, intermediate variants their two- or three-digit designations; newly discovered alleles should not interfere with already described variants. At least 13 C4A alleles, 16 C4B alleles as well as non-expressed genes at each C4 locus are presently known. There are also duplicated loci of each C4 gene; they should be designated by repetition of the locus symbol at the haplotype or genotype level. As a phenotype they will be placed in parenthesis without repetition of the locus symbol. Aberrant allotypes or hybrid genes should be explained by a special suffix. No special nomenclature is recommended for restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Their designation should follow the general rules of the ISGN.
An adaptation in one lineage (e.g. predators) may change the selection pressure on another lineage (e.g. prey), giving rise to a counter-adaptation. If this occurs reciprocally, an unstable runaway escalation or 'arms race' may result. We discuss various factors which might give one side an advantage in an arms race. For example, a lineage under strong selection may out-evolve a weakly selected one (' the life-dinner principle'). We then classify arms races in two independent ways. They may be symmetric or asymmetric, and they may be interspecific or intraspecific. Our example of an asymmetric interspecific arms race is that between brood parasites and their hosts. The arms race concept may help to reduce the mystery of why cuckoo hosts are so good at detecting cuckoo eggs, but so bad at detecting cuckoo nestlings. The evolutionary contest between queen and worker ants over relative parental investment is a good example of an intraspecific asymmetric arms race. Such cases raise special problems because the participants share the same gene pool. Interspecific symmetric arms races are unlikely to be important, because competitors tend to diverge rather than escalate competitive adaptations. Intraspecific symmetric arms races, exemplified by adaptations for male-male competition, may underlie Cope's Rule and even the extinction of lineages. Finally we consider ways in which arms races can end. One lineage may drive the other to extinction; one may reach an optimum, thereby preventing the other from doing so; a particularly interesting possibility, exemplified by flower-bee coevolution, is that both sides may reach a mutual local optimum; lastly, arms races may have no stable and but may cycle continuously. We do not wish necessarily to suggest that all, or even most, evolutionary change results from arms races, but we do suggest that the arms race concept may help to resolve three long-standing questions in evolutionary theory.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.