PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Deghenghi

Publications and source records attributed to R Deghenghi.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Replacement of surgical castration by GnRH-inhibition or Leydig cell ablation in the male rat Hershberger antiandrogen assay.

An obstacle to the widespread adoption of the Hershberger antiandrogen assay is the surgical castration procedure required to produce androgen deficiency in the test animals. Here we describe two chemical treatments that produce similar effects to surgical castration. The first is use of ethane dimethane sulphonate (EDS), a specific toxin to the testosterone-producing Leydig cells of the mature testes. The second class of compound is the decapeptide inhibitors of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), compounds such as Antarelix and Antide. Administration of either EDS or the GnRH inhibitors results in loss of weight of the testes, epididymides, and sex-associated tissues. Co-administration of testosterone to these animals leads to reversal of the induced effects. The basic test protocol for both of these assay modifications is described. Flutamide was used as a representative potent antiandrogen, and DDE as an example of a weakly active antiandrogen. The 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride was used to inhibit the transformation of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. It is shown that the EDS assay is sensitive to the antiandrogen flutamide, but that it fails to detect the weaker antiandrogen DDE. In contrast, the Antarelix assay performs as well as does the classical castration assay, leading to the detection as antiandrogens of flutamide, DDE, and finasteride. It is concluded that the GnRH inhibition Hershberger assay is more convenient to conduct than the original surgical castration assay, and it involves less stress to the test animals.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗

Cortistatin, but not somatostatin, binds to growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptors of human pituitary gland.

Antagonism between GH secretagogues (GHS) and somatostatin (SRIH) has been postulated and demonstrated, but SRIH does not bind to GHS receptors (GHS-R) and potent synthetic peptidyl GHS (GHRP6, hexarelin) do not displace radiolabeled SRIH from its receptors. However, non-natural SRIH octapeptide agonists (mainly lanreotide and vapreotide) displace 125I-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin from pituitary binding sites suggesting that an endogenous factor related to SRIH might exist and interact with GHS-R. Our aims were to investigate the ability of different SRIH-like peptides such as various SRIH fragments (SRIH 3-14, SRIH 7-14, SRIH 3-10, SRIH 7-10, SRIH 2-9) and a natural neuropeptide that shows a high structural homology with SRIH such as cortistatin-14 (CST) to compete with 125I-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin for human pituitary binding sites and to compare their binding affinity with that of hexarelin and ghrelin, a gastric-derived peptidyl GHS that has been proposed as a natural ligand of GHS-R. While the binding of 125I-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin to pituitary membranes was completely displaced by unlabelled hexarelin, ghrelin and CST, none of the SRIH fragments tested inhibited this binding. Ghrelin and CST exhibited a similar affinity (4.6-5.4 x 10(-7) mol/l) for the binding while hexarelin was more effective by about four orders of magnitude in displacing 125I-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin. Our data demonstrate for the first time that cortistatin, a natural peptide related to SRIH, binds to GHS-R and suggest that this factor may play a role in modulating the activity of these receptors.

Adult↗

Binding of 125I-labeled ghrelin to membranes from human hypothalamus and pituitary gland.

Ghrelin has been proposed as a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor(s) (GHS-R), which was an orphan receptor activated by synthetic peptidyl (hexarelin) and non-peptidyl (MK-0677) GHS to strongly release GH in animals and humans. Herein we studied: 1) the binding of 125I-labeled human ghrelin to membranes from human hypothalamus and pituitary gland; 2) the ability of human ghrelin (either octanoylated or desoctanoylated), as well as of some GHS and neuropeptides to compete with the radioligand. The saturation binding analysis showed, in both tissues, the existence of a single class of high-affinity binding sites with limited binding capacity. The Bmax (maximal number of binding sites) values of ghrelin receptors in the hypothalamus were significantly greater (p<0.001) than those detected in the pituitary, whereas the Kd (dissociation constant) values in the two tissues were similar. 125I-ghrelin bound to hypothalamic membranes was displaced by ghrelin, hexarelin, MK-0677, various GHS antagonists (EP-80317, [D-Arg1-D-Phe5-D-Trp7,9-Leu11]-substance P) and some natural (cortistatin-14) and synthetic (vapreotide) SRIH-14 agonists. In contrast, no competition was seen in the presence of GHRH-44, SRIH-14 or desoctanoylated ghrelin, a ghrelin precursor that is devoid of GH-releasing properties. In conclusion, this preliminary study firstly demonstrates that ghrelin needs octanoylation to bind its hypothalamo-pituitary receptors. These receptors are the specific binding sites for GHS and their antagonists, as well as for SRIH analogs (vapreotide and cortistatin- 14), but not for native SRIH.

Binding, Competitive↗

Growth hormone-inhibiting activity of cortistatin in the rat.

Cortistatin-14 (CST-14) is an endogenous neuropeptide with notable structural similarities to native somatostatin-14 (SS-14), but different physiological functions. Differences in the physiology of the two peptides do not provide conclusive evidence for a specific receptor for CST. To date, the effects of CST-14 on anterior pituitary hormones have never been reported. Aim of this study was to investigate the in vivo effects of CST-14 on GH secretion in comparison to SS-14. Our results demonstrate that CST-14 was very effective in reducing GH secretion in normal male anaesthetized rats. Its activity was similar to that of SS-14 and had a rapid onset and a slightly longer duration of action. In conclusion, we have reported for the first time that CST is a potent and effective inhibitor of GH release in rats and that its action may be mediated by the interaction with one or different SS receptor subtypes.

Animals↗

EP 91073 prevents EP 80661-induced penile erection: new evidence for the existence of specific EP peptide receptors mediating penile erection.

The effect of EP 91073, EP 51389, EP 70555 and EP 51216, peptide analogues of the growth hormone releasing peptide hexarelin, on penile erection induced by EP 80661 or EP 60761 injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, was studied in male rats. Of the above peptides only EP 91073 (0.2-1 microg) was found capable of reducing penile erection induced by EP 80661 or EP 60761, when given into the paraventricular nucleus. Despite its ability to prevent EP peptide-induced penile erection, EP 91073 (1 microg) was unable to prevent penile erection induced by the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (50 ng), oxytocin (30 ng) and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (50 ng), when given into the paraventricular nucleus 10 min prior to the above substances. The EP 91073-induced prevention of penile erection occurred with a reduction in the increase in nitric oxide production that occurs in the paraventricular nucleus concomitant to penile erection induced by EP 80661 and EP 60761, as measured by intracerebral vertical microdialysis. The present results are in line with the hypothesis that EP 80661 and EP 60761 induce penile erection by activating specific receptors in the paraventricular nucleus, located possibly in oxytocinergic neurons mediating penile erection, and show that EP 91073 acts as an antagonist of these EP peptide receptors mediating penile erection.

Animals↗

Permeability of the peptidic GH secretagogues hexarelin and EP 51389, across rat jejunum.

The intestinal permeability of hexarelin and EP 51389, two growth hormone releasing hexa- and tri- peptide analogues, was assessed in vitro with side-by-side diffusion chambers in the apical-to-basolateral (AP-to-BL) and in the basolateral-to-apical (BL-to-AP) direction using excised rat jejunal segments. The effect of EP 51389 on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was evaluated by rhodamine 123 accumulation on monolayers of CH(R)C5 cells with increasing concentrations of EP 51389. Hexarelin and EP 51389 permeability were found to be < 1%. Permeability coefficients (P(app)) were 18.87 +/- 2.86 (x10(-7) cm/s) and 5.87 +/- 0.45 (x10(-7) cm/s) for hexarelin and EP 51389, respectively. Bidirectional studies revealed that hexarelin transport was similar in both directions. EDTA did not influence hexarelin permeability. Permeability was predominantly secretory for EP 51389 as P(app) in the BL-to-AP direction [32.56 +/- 6.11 (x10(-7) cm/s)] was greater than AP-to-BL. Confirming involvement of a secretory transport system, chlorpromazine inhibited EP 51389 transport across the jejunum. EP 51389 inhibited P-gp in a dose dependent manner resulting in the intracellular accumulation of rhodamine in CH(R)C5 cells. These results suggest that: 1) the intestinal permeability of hexarelin and EP 51389 is poor; 2) the passage of hexarelin is mainly via a transcellular passive pathway since the contribution of paracellular permeability to the overall permeability is rather low; 3) P-gp may act as a potential barrier for the intestinal absorption of EP 51389.

Animals↗

Effect of rodent diets on the sexual development of the rat.

Five rodent diets have been evaluated for their possible effect on the sexual development of the rat. Groups of 12 pregnant Alpk rats were fed one of the following combinations of diets during pregnancy and postnatally: RM3/RM1, AIN-76A/AIN-76A, RM3/AIN-76A, Teklad Global 2016 (Global)/Global and Purina 5001/Purina 5001. AIN-76A is phytoestrogen-free while the other diets contained varying amounts of phytoestrogens. The phytoestrogens genistein and daidzein were determined in the diets studied, and the concentrations found agreed with earlier estimates. RM3/RM1 was selected as the control group, as this has been used routinely in this laboratory for the past decade. Determinations were made in offspring of the times of vaginal opening and first estrus among the females, and of prepuce separation and testes descent among the males. At postnatal day (PND) 26 the females from 6 of the 12 litters were terminated and tissue weights measured. Males from 6 of the 12 litters were similarly studied at PND 68. Animals from the remaining litters were transferred to RM1 diet at PND 70. Termination of the study was at PND 128 (males) and PND 140 (females) when body weights and tissue weights were determined. Marked differences in body weight, sexual development, and reproductive tissue weights were observed for rats maintained on AIN-76A or Purina 5001, with only minimal effects among rats maintained on the Global diet. These comparisons were against RM3/RM1 as the reference diet. However, using Purina 5001 as the reference diet reversed the direction of the differences seen when using RM3/RM1 as the reference diet. The differences observed when using RM3/RM1 as reference diet occurred mainly postnatally. In addition, the fact that similar differences were seen for the phytoestrogen-free diet, AIN-76A, and the phytoestrogen-rich diet, Purina 5001, indicate that these effects are more likely to be caused by nutritional differences between the diets that then have centrally mediated effects on rodent sexual development, rather than individual dietary components affecting peripheral estrogen receptors (ER). This proposal is supported by abolition of the uterotrophic activity of AIN-76A and Purina 5001 (relative to RM3/RM1) in the immature rat by coadministration of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ANTARELIX: The present data indicate that choice of diet may influence the timing of sexual development in the rat, and consequently, that when evaluating the potential endocrine toxicity of chemicals, the components of rodent diets used should be known, and as far as is possible, controlled.

Age Factors↗

Ghrelin-producing endocrine tumors of the stomach and intestine.

Ghrelin is a novel gastrointestinal hormone produced by about 20% of the rat and human gastric neuroendocrine cell population, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity, but also plays other central and peripheral roles, including influence on food intake, gastric motility, and acid secretion. The aim of the present study was to determine whether gastrointestinal endocrine hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions produce ghrelin, at both protein (immunohistochemistry) and mRNA (in situ hybridization and/or RT-PCR) levels, and express the GH secretagogue receptor mRNA by RT-PCR. Sixteen gastric and 20 intestinal carcinoids as well as normal gastrointestinal mucosa and atrophic gastritis-associated neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia were studied. The majority (12 of 16, 75%) of gastric carcinoids and only 5 of 18 (27%) of intestinal endocrine tumors were immunoreactive for ghrelin. In situ hybridization confirmed the immunohistochemical data, but also showed ghrelin mRNA in 1 gastric and 8 intestinal additional tumors. RT-PCR showed ghrelin mRNA in 14 of 14 cases, indicating a low level of ghrelin gene expression in all gastrointestinal endocrine tumors tested. Gastric neuroendocrine hyperplastic cells were also strongly positive for ghrelin. GH secretagogue receptor mRNA was absent in 3 gastric, but present in 7 of 11 intestinal carcinoids studied by RT-PCR. These findings demonstrate that most gastric carcinoids (and related neuroendocrine cell hyperplasias) and some intestinal carcinoids produce ghrelin. These hyperplastic/neoplastic conditions could represent the clinical model to clarify the existence and impact of ghrelin hypersecretion on endocrine and nonendocrine functions.

Adult↗

Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue produced by the stomach, induces hyperglycemia and reduces insulin secretion in humans.

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid gastric hormone is a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion though, like synthetic GHS, it shows other endocrine and non-endocrine activities. Aim of the present study was to clarify whether ghrelin administration influences insulin and glucose levels in humans. To this goal, we compared the effects of ghrelin, hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, or placebo on insulin and glucose as well as on GH levels in 11 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SEM]: 28.5 +/- 3.1 yr; BMI: 22.2 +/- 0.9 Kg/m(2)). Ghrelin induced very marked increase in GH secretion (DeltaAUC(0-180): 5777.1 +/- 812.6 microg/l/h; p < 0.01) which was not modified by placebo. Placebo administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels. On the other hand, ghrelin administration induced a prompt increase in glucose levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): 1343.1 +/- 443.5 mg/dl/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline). Absolute glucose levels at +15' were already higher than those at baseline (93.9 +/- 7.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and persisted elevated up to 165' (90.3 +/- 5.8 mg/dl; p < 0.01 vs. 0'). Ghrelin administration was also followed by a decrease in serum insulin levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): -207.1 +/- 70.5 mU/l/h; p < 0.05 vs. saline). Absolute insulin levels were significantly reduced from 30' (11.4 +/- 0.9 mU/l, p < 0.1 vs. 0'), showed the nadir at +45' (10.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l, p < 0.01 vs. 0') and then persisted lower (p < 0.01) than baseline up to +105'. Hexarelin administration did not modify glucose and insulin levels despite its marked GH-releasing effect (DeltaAUC(0-180): 4156.8 +/- 1180.3 microg/l/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline) that was slightly lower (p < 0.05) than that of ghrelin. In conclusion, these findings show that, besides stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin is a gastric hormone possessing metabolic actions such as hyperglycemic effect and lowering effect on insulin secretion in humans, at least after acute administration.

Adult↗

Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone.

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Identification, characterization, and biological activity of specific receptors for natural (ghrelin) and synthetic growth hormone secretagogues and analogs in human breast carcinomas and cell lines.

The family of GH secretagogues (GHS) includes synthetic peptidyl (hexarelin) and nonpeptidyl (MK-0677) molecules possessing specific receptors in the pituitary and central nervous system as well as in peripheral tissues, including the heart and some endocrine organs. A gastric-derived peptide, named ghrelin, has recently been proposed as the natural ligand of the GHS receptors (GHS-Rs). The presence of specific GHS-Rs has now been investigated in nontumoral and neoplastic human breast tissue using a radioiodinated peptidyl GHS ([(125)I]-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin) as ligand. Specific binding sites for GHS were detected in membranes from several types of breast carcinomas, whereas a negligible binding was found in fibroadenomas and mammary parenchyma. The highest binding activity was found in well-differentiated (G1) invasive breast carcinomas and was progressively reduced in moderately (G2) to poorly (G3) differentiated tumors. [(125)I]-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin bound to tumor membranes was displaced by different unlabeled GHS such as hexarelin, Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, human ghrelin, and MK-0677 as well as by desoctanoyl-ghrelin and hexarelin derivative EP-80317, which are devoid of GH-releasing properties in vivo. In contrast, no competition was seen between radiolabeled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin and some peptides (CRF and insulin-like growth factor I) structurally and functionally unrelated to hexarelin or when GHRH and SRIF were tested in the displacement studies. The presence of specific GHS binding sites was also demonstrated in three different human breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB231), in which, surprisingly, no messenger RNA for GHS-R1a was demonstrated by RT-PCR. In these cell lines, ghrelin (as well as hexarelin, MK-0677, EP-80317, and even desoctanoyl ghrelin) caused a significant inhibition of cell proliferation at concentrations close to their binding affinity. In conclusion, this study provides the first demonstration of specific GHS binding sites, other than GHS-R1, in breast cancer. These receptors probably mediate growth inhibitory effects on breast carcinoma cells in vitro.

Breast↗

Somatostatin octapeptides (lanreotide, octreotide, vapreotide, and their analogs) share the growth hormone-releasing peptide receptor in the human pituitary gland.

The binding affinity of somatostatin-14 (SRIF), various SRIF derivatives, and some peptides belonging to the growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP) family to specific receptors for SRIF and GHRP in the human pituitary gland has been measured. GHRP receptors have been identified using [125I]Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, a peptide that thas been demonstrated to be a potent growth hormone (GH) releaser in humans. Tyr-Ala-hexarelin binding was displaced in a dose-dependent manner by different GHRPs (hexarelin, GHRP-2, and EP-51216). Surprisingly, some SRIF octapeptide derivatives such as vapreotide, lanreotide, octreotide, and their analogs were also able to displace the GHRP ligand. By contrast, no inhibition of Tyr-Ala-hexarelin binding was observed in the presence of SRIF or SRIF derivatives (SRIF H-2186, H-2485, and H-3382) that are known to have a weak SRIF-like activity. When [125I]Tyr1-SRIF-14 was used as a ligand, we observed displacement with SRIF and the octapeptide SRIF analogs but not with GHRPs and other SRIF derivatives. The results point to a sharing of the GHRP receptor with the octapeptide SRIF analogs, but not SRIF. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that the putative natural GH secretagogue ligand may be a growth hormone release inhibiting factor that is different from SRIF and that is antagonized by GHRP.

Aged↗

Growth hormone-releasing hormone and growth hormone secretagogue-receptor ligands: focus on reproductive system.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin are the most important hypothalamic neurohormones controlling growth hormone (GH) secretion. Several neurotransmitters and neuropeptides also play an important role in the control of GH secretion, mainly acting via modulation of GHRH and somatostatin. In the past two decades, particular attention has been given to a new family of substances showing a strong GH-releasing effect: GH secretagogues (GHSs). GHSs increase GH secretion in a dose- and age-related manner after iv and even oral administration. The endocrine effects of GHSs, are not fully specific for GH; they show, in fact, prolactin- (PRL), adenocorticotropic hormone- and cortisol-releasing effects. Specific GHS receptors are present in both the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, where they mediate several extraendocrine effects of GHSs. The isolation of these "orphan" receptors suggested the existence of an endogenous GHS-like ligand that could be represented by a recently discovered gastric peptide, named ghrelin. The interaction between GHSs and GHRH at the central level and in the pituitary gland, but not at peripheral level, has clearly been shown. Because GHRH and GHS receptors share the same localization in some peripheral tissues, they may have some interactions even at this level.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Biologic activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans.

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulate food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.

Age Factors↗

Hexarelin protects H9c2 cardiomyocytes from doxorubicin-induced cell death.

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules that possess strong growth hormone-releasing activity acting on specific pituitary and hypothalamic receptor subtypes. Differently from nonpeptidyl GHSs, peptidyl molecules such as hexarelin, a hexapeptide, possess specific high-affinity binding sites in animal and human heart and, after prolonged treatment, protect rats in vivo from ischemia-induced myocardial damage. To verify the hypothesis that peptidyl GHSs protect heart cells from cell death, we have investigated the cellular effects of hexarelin on H9c2 cardiomyocytes, a fetal cardiomyocyte-derived cell line, and on Hend, an endothelial cell line derived from transformed murine heart endothelium. We show that (i)H9c2 cardiomyocytes show specific binding for 125I-Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, which is inhibited by peptidyl GHSs such as Tyr-Ala-hexarelin and hexarelin but not by the nonpeptidyl GHS MK-0677, (ii) hexarelin promotes survival of H9c2 cardiomyocytes induced to die by doxorubicin, and (iii) that hexarelin inhibits apoptosis, as measured by DNA fragmentation, induced in both H9c2 myocytes and endothelial cells. In conclusion, our findings show that peptidyl GHSs such as hexarelin act as survival factors for cardiomyocytes and endothelium-derived cells in culture. These findings suggest that the inhibitory activity of hexarelin on cardiomyocytes and endothelial cell death could explain, at least partially, its cardioprotective effect against ischemia recorded in rats in vivo.

Animals↗

Contrasting effects of nitric oxide on food intake and GH secretion stimulated by a GH-releasing peptide.

OBJECTIVE: Among the many actions of nitric oxide (NO) are those on endocrine and feeding behaviour. Based on NO involvement in the GH-releasing effect of the GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) and the reported orexigenic activity of these compounds, we sought to evaluate the effect of the combined administration of a long-acting NO donor, molsidomine, and the newly synthesized GHRP EP92632 on food intake and GH secretion in rats. Moreover, to verify the specificity of a potential NO involvement, we evaluated whether or not the effects of GHRPs were abolished by a pre-treatment with an inhibitor of NO synthase, N-nitro-arginine-methyl-ester (NAME). METHODS: In the food intake experiments, adult Sprague-Dawley male rats underwent acute administration of: (1) EP92632 (160 microg/kg, s.c.); (2) molsidomine (100 mg/kg, i.p.); (3) EP92632+molsidomine; (4) l-NAME (40 and 60 mg/kg, i.p.); (5) EP92632+l-NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.); (6) EP92632+molsidomine+l-NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.); and (7) 0.9% saline (0.1 ml/kg, i.p.). After treatments, the cumulative food intake in the 6 post-treatment hours was carefully evaluated. In the neuroendocrine experiments, rats were given the same compounds according to the above reported schedule, except for the use of one dose of NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.) and a lower EP92632 dose (80 microg/kg, s.c.), and were sampled via atrial cannula. RESULTS: EP92632 significantly stimulated food intake, an effect which was further enhanced by molsidomine, though the latter did not elicit per se any orexigenic effect. l-NAME given alone significantly decreased food intake and abolished the orexigenic effect of the GHRP and the enhancing effect of molsidomine. Plasma GH levels increased significantly following administration of EP92632 but, in contrast to the food intake experiments, molsidomine significantly inhibited both basal and EP92632-stimulated GH secretion; moreover, NAME had a biphasic effect on the EP92632-stimulated GH release: initially inhibitory and then, from 45 min on, stimulatory. NAME did not affect basal GH levels but, surprisingly, combined administration of molsidomine and NAME induced a striking inhibition of both basal and the peptide-stimulated GH release. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data indicate that NO in the rat is physiologically involved in a stimulatory way in the GHRP-mediated effect on food intake, but exerts a dual action, probably stimulatory at hypothalamic and inhibitory at pituitary levels, on basal and GHRP-stimulated GH secretion.

Animals↗

Growth hormone (GH) rebound rise following somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in dogs with the use of GH-releasing hormone and a GH-releasing peptide.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence has been presented that in both animals and humans the rebound secretion of growth hormone (GH) following withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (SS) is due to the functional activation of the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons of the recipient organism. Based on this premise, this study has sought to assess the existence of functional interactions between endogenous GHRH released by a SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) and growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs), a class of compounds allegedly acting via GHRH. METHODS: Five young dogs (3 to 4 years old, 2 male and 3 female) were administered, on different occasions, three consecutive intravenous boli of physiological saline (0.1 ml/kg), or GHRH (2 microg/kg), or EP92632 (125 microg/kg), a GHRP compound, or GHRH plus EP92632 at the end of three cycles of 1-h SS infusions (8 microg/(kg x h)) or during a 6-h infusion of saline. RESULTS: Under saline infusion (SALI), plasma GH levels were unaltered, whereas each SSIW cycle was followed by similar GH secretory episodes. Administration of the first GHRH bolus under SALI induced a rise in plasma GH concentrations slightly higher than that induced by the first cycle of SSIW, but the GH response to the second and third GHRH boli was similar to that after SSIW. Following SSIW, the response to the first bolus of GHRH was higher than that during SALI, but the second and third cycles of SSIW induced GH responses similar to those evoked by the GHRH bolus. During SALI, administration of the first bolus of EP92632 induced a rise in plasma GH which was higher than that induced by the first GHRH bolus, the second bolus elicited a GH peak of lesser amplitude and there was a partial restoration of the GH response to the third peptide bolus. SSIW strikingly enhanced the GH release to the first EP92632 bolus, a pattern also present, although to a lesser extent, with the second and third cycles of SSIW. Under SALI, combined administration of GHRH and EP92632 had a synergistic effect on GH release, but a progressive reduction was present in the GH response to the second and third GHRH plus EP92632 boli. SSIW increased only weakly the GH response to the first co-administration of the peptides over that present after administration of EP92632 alone, and did not induce a GH response higher than that present during SALI when the second bolus of the peptides was administered; after the third SSIW a GH rise higher than that present during SALI was elicited by the combined administration of the peptides. CONCLUSIONS: (i) the uniformity of the GH rebound responses to multiple cycles of SSIW may indicate that the latter activate a physiological mechanism which mimics that normally controlling GH pulse generation; (ii) EP92632 elicits, under our experimental conditions, a plasma GH rise higher than that induced by GHRH; (iii) SSIW enhances the GH response to EP92639 alone, to an extent reminiscent of that following combined administration of GHRH and EP92632. This pattern reinforces the view that SSIW elicits release of endogenous GHRH, and infers that the GHRP challenge after SSIW may be exploited in humans to distinguish between healthy and GH-deficient adults.

Animals↗

EP 60761 and EP 50885, two hexarelin analogues, induce penile erection in rats.

The effect of hexarelin and four related peptide analogues, EP 40904, EP 40737, EP 50885 and EP 60761, injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male rats in doses between 2 and 2000 ng on spontaneous penile erection was studied. Of these peptides, EP 60761 and EP 50885, but not hexarelin, EP 40904 or EP 40737, increased dose-dependently the number of spontaneous penile erections. EP 60761 was active already at the dose of 20 ng, which induced the sexual response in 70% of the treated rats. The maximal response was induced by 200 ng of the peptide. EP 50885 was less potent than EP 60761, with 1000 ng being the minimal effective dose and 2000 ng as the dose required to induce the maximal response. At the doses used, both peptides also increased slightly the number of spontaneous yawning episodes. EP 60761- and EP 50885-induced penile erection was prevented by the oxytocin receptor antagonist [d(CH(2))(5)Tyr(Me)(2)-Orn(8)]vasotocin (0.1-1 microg) given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.), but not into the paraventricular nucleus (0.1-1 microg), by the competitive nitric oxide (NO) inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) given either into the paraventricular nucleus (10-20 microg) or i.c.v. (75-150 microg), by the N-type Ca(2+) channel blocker omega-conotoxin-GVIA (2-5 ng) or by the opiate morphine (1-10 microg), but not by the dopamine receptor antagonist (Z)-4-[3-[2-(trifluoromethyl)-9H-thioxanthen-9-ylidene]propyl]-1-p ipe razine-ethanol (cis-flupenthixol) (10 microg) or by the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist (5R, 10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5, 10-imine ((+)-MK-801) (1 microg), all given into the paraventricular nucleus before either peptide. The present results show that EP 60761 and EP 50885 induced penile erection by increasing central oxytocin transmission, possibly by activating NO synthase in the cell bodies of oxytocinergic neurons located in the paraventricular nucleus that control penile erection.

Animals↗