PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

R E Karcher

Publications and source records attributed to R E Karcher.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

A comparison of chromogen test strip (Chemstrip bG) and serum glucose values in newborns.

Although glucose oxidase-peroxidase chromogen test strips are frequently used to estimate serum glucose values in newborns, previous studies have not evaluated multiobserver variability of test strip readings and have included few infants with hypoglycemia. We compared values of 272 samples of serum glucose with values simultaneously obtained by chromogen test strips (Chemstrip bG) in newborns. The diagnostic sensitivity of a chromogen test strip less than 2.2 mmol/L for predicting a serum glucose level less than 1.9 mmol/L was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75% to 94%), with 78% specificity (95% CI, 73% to 84%). The positive predictive value in our specimens, with a 21% prevalence of serum glucose levels less than 1.9 mmol/L, was 52% (95% CI, 41% to 62%), with a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 91% to 100%). Fifty-eight of our serum glucose values were less than 1.9 mmol/L and the levels obtained by chromogen test strip were greater than or equal to 2.2 mmol/L in 8 of these cases. Review of these 8 cases showed that a delay in performing the laboratory glucose oxidase serum glucose could account for the discrepancy in 2 cases. Chromogen test strips are readily available and easy to use, but more sensitive, specific, accurate, and precise methods of serum glucose screening in newborns are needed.

Blood Glucose

Electrophoresis and the isomune-LD and LD-1 immuno methods compared for measurement of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme-1.

We evaluated three different methods for measuring lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) isoenzyme LD-1 activity--agarose gel electrophoresis and two immunoassays, Isomune-LD (Roche) and LD-1 Immuno (Seragen)--in patients' samples for which measurement of creatine kinase-MB was ordered. Regression analyses of the comparisons gave the following results: LD-1 (%) from Isomune-LD (y) vs electrophoresis (x) (n = 51), y = 1.05x + 1.99, r = 0.92; LD-1 (%) from LD-1 Immuno (y) vs electrophoresis (n = 27), y = 1.05x + 3.94, r = 0.88; LD-1 (%) from LD-1 Immuno (y) vs Isomune-LD (x) (n = 41), y = 1.06x + 0.48, r = 0.95. Comparison by Student's paired t-test yielded significant differences between the mean values by electrophoresis and both Isomune-LD (P less than 0.005) and LD-1 Immuno (P less than 0.001), but no significant difference between the two immunoassays (P greater than 0.2). Analyzing these results by the overlap index, we conclude that electrophoresis shows the best clinical correlation followed, in order, by the Isomune-LD and the LD-1 Immuno methods. Both immunoassays are simpler and more rapid than electrophoresis, but in our hands the Isomune-LD method demonstrated greater precision and better correlation with electrophoretic values.

Electrophoresis

Alkaline phosphatase in the assessment of choledocholithiasis before surgery.

The pre-operative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, or common bile-duct stones, is important in patients with cholelithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography or choledochoscopy followed by exploration of the common bile duct could be limited to those patients with stones, if an adequate pre-operative diagnosis could be made. Many clinicians use pre-operative total alkaline phosphatase level alone or in combination with bilirubin level to determine the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis. Predictive value theory was used to analyze data reported by others to assess the value of alkaline phosphatase level alone or in combination with bilirubin level in identifying patients with choledocholithiasis. The authors conclude that alkaline phosphatase level is not useful either alone or in combination with bilirubin level in determining the presence of common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis.

Alkaline Phosphatase

Comparative sensitivities of flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) and molecular absorption spectrophotometry (MAS).

A sensitivity comparison was made between conventional atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) and conventional molecular absorption spectrophotometry (MAS) for the serum trace metals, copper, iron, and zinc. The sensitivity aspect considered was absorbances was obtained for concentrations in the solutions analyzed using unit lightpaths of 1 cm and 10 cm for MAS and AAS, respectively. A distinction was made between procedural sensitivity and measurement sensitivity where the latter represents molar absorptivity. Some was given to the concepts of procedural sensitization by concentration of the analyte through the use of lyophilization, extraction or ashing. The misuse of data obtained with scale expanders is described as a commonly occurring phenomenon of both AAS and MAS and a source of confusion in the understanding of measurement sensitivity.

Copper