Biomedical subjects

R E Richardson

Publications and source records attributed to R E Richardson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1979

Folates of rat tissue. Bioassay of tissue folylpolyglutamates and a relationship of liver folypolyglutamates to nutritional folate sufficiency.

The folate content of young rat tissues extracted into boiling ascorbate was assayed by Lactobactillus casei both without and after treatment by a folate-free preparation of conjugase. The total folate content of various tissues was: liver, 8.9 microgram/g; kidney, 2.6; adrenal, 2.6; bone marrow, 2.4; spleen, 0.9; erythrocytes, 0.8; small intestinal mucosa, 0.7; small intestinal smooth muscle, 0.8; heart, 0.6; brain, 0.4, and skeletal muscle, 0.1 microgram/g tissue. For most tissues, with the exception of muscle and kidney, approximately 80% of the total folates assayed as longer chain length folylpolyglutamates. When liver folates were analyzed from rats fed folate-supplemented, control and folate-deficient diets, a relationship was found between folate nutrition and distribution of folylpolyglutamates. The proportion of total folates in the form of longer chain length folylpolyglutamates was greatest in the livers of folate-deficient rats and least in the livers of folate-supplemented rats.

Animals↗

PubMed1979

Dynamic fetal cephalometry.

An iterative method of fetal cephalometry for use with real time scanners is described using a flow chart. The method is shown to be capable of yielding measurements having a standard deivation of less than 1 mm and we have found it to be superior to the combined A and B scan technique from which it is derived.

Cephalometry↗

PubMed1976

Fetal cephalometry. An improved method and an evaluation.

A method of fetal cephalometry is described which is an advance on the combined A and B scan technique previously used. A flow chart has been prepared which clearly specifies the procedure to be followed. The criteria used when making an estimation are reported. The method is applicable to various types of machine and it can be taught to a good degree of accuracy in a short time to people with limited obstetric knowledge. There may be a significant difference between operators but this difference is roughly the same from patient to patient and decreases with training. It is considered that the chief source of variation is the failure to measure the same diameter on each occasion.

Analysis of Variance↗