PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Epperson

Publications and source records attributed to R Epperson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Improved treatment planning for the Syed-Neblett template using endorectal-coil magnetic resonance and intraoperative (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guidance: a new integrated technique for hysterectomized women with vaginal tumors.

The Syed template (Alpha-Omega Services, Bellflower, CA) represents an advance in interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy; however, its appeal is diminished by inaccuracies in target definition secondary to suboptimal imaging of gynecologic tumors and the risk of viscus perforation during a "blind" procedure. Magnetic resonance (MR) scanning with an endorectal coil and computed tomography were studied as a possible tool to improve target definition and maximize treatment planning with Syed templates. Abdominopelvic contents could be visualized directly through a laparotomy incision or indirectly with a laparoscopic video display to allow further target definition and minimize complications associated with blind procedures after hysterectomy. The synthesis of these techniques with Syed template applications was attempted to potentiate the utility of this brachytherapy system. Five patients with apical vaginal tumors which arose after previous hysterectomies (two endometrial cancer recurrences, one recurrent uterine sarcoma, two primary vaginal cancers) were referred for radiotherapy. In three cases, external beam pelvic radiotherapy (median dose, 45 Gy; range, 45-50.4 Gy) was delivered initially. In all cases, the Syed applicator was used for the brachytherapy component of the treatment. In two cases, high-resolution MR images (400 x 400 microns) of the vaginal apex were obtained after insertion of an endorectal surface coil. The images defined the relationships between the template, target volume, bladder, rectum, and intestine. The other three cases were planned with computerized tomography (CT). In all cases, intraoperative examination of the abdominopelvic contents was provided when laparotomy and/or laparoscopy was performed by the surgical team. The median brachytherapy dose prescribed to the isodose envelope covering the target volume was 40 Gy (range, 31-50 Gy). In all cases, the target volumes could be encompassed by the 60 cGy/hr isodose line. Tumor volume estimation was better with MR than CT. Procedure time was shorter with laparoscopy than with laparotomy. In two cases, bowel displacement was performed (one tissue expander, one omental sling) to prevent viscus perforation by interstitial needles. Four of five patients responded completely to the treatment. In three cases, local control was maintained at a median follow-up of 11 months. In conclusion, endorectal coil MRI may be advantageous to CT of the pelvis in that it allows preplanning to be achieved with greater precision and with less planning time. Major intraoperative complications (i.e., perforation of hollow viscus organs) can be avoided when the course of interstitial catheters is visualized from above by the surgical team.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Brachytherapy↗

Contouring structures for 3-dimensional treatment planning.

Three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning is a labor-intensive process with contouring of the target volume and critical normal tissues being a significant time-consuming component. The use of 3-D treatment planning on a routine basis may be limited by the time required to complete treatment plans. Despite the need to increase the efficiency of the process, there is little literature addressing the speed and accuracy of contouring systems. In an attempt to initiate systematic analysis of the contouring process, data sets consisting of 10 CT images each were developed on two patients with esophageal carcinoma. Nine different operators manually contoured structures (target volume, spinal canal, lungs) on the data sets using four different contouring systems present in our department. These included both commercially available systems and those developed by the authors. There was a wide variation in the hardware and software characteristics of these systems. The time required to contour the CT data sets was recorded and analyzed. The contouring accuracy was assessed by comparison with a standard template derived from the CT data set for each image. The contouring time was found to be dependent on the system design, previous contouring experience, and the type of drawing instrument (lightpen vs mouse). The mean contouring time ranged from 26 minutes per patient for the fastest system to 41 minutes for the slowest. Potential clinically significant errors in contouring were rare for the spinal canal and lungs but present at a greater rate for the target volume (30.3%). The implications of this finding are discussed.

Adenocarcinoma↗