PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R F Hess

Publications and source records attributed to R F Hess.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Is the visual field temporally homogeneous?

We asked the question "is the visual field temporally homogeneous when the well known spatial inhomogeneity is taken into account?" Our results show that the visual field exhibits inhomogeneity for stimuli of low spatial frequency for which the spatial inhomogeneity is minimal. This inhomogeneity takes the form of a reduction in sensitivity for stimuli of low temporal frequency in the periphery and an enhancement of sensitivity for stimuli of high temporal frequency in the periphery. The low temporal frequency loss in the periphery is post-receptoral and must involve a selective loss of sensitivity of the low pass filter. The enhanced high frequency sensitivity may be post-receptoral or purely receptoral. The consequence of such an inhomogeneity for subsequent stages of visual processing is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and contrast.

In this study we investigate the nature of the computations that underlie the encoding of spatial position by the human visual system. Specifically, we explore the relationship between alignment accuracy and spatial scale on the one hand, and between alignment accuracy and contrast on the other. We do this for stimuli where local luminance, local contrast, and orientation cues do not underlie performance. The results suggest that spatial localisation is independent of spatial scale and weakly dependent on contrast. We present subsequent models based on the properties of some classes of visual cortical neurones, namely multiplicative noise and contrast energy detection of complex cells, which describe the form of these relationships.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia.

We asked whether suppression in amblyopia could be accounted for by dichoptic masking as described in normals, operating in the presence of a contrast threshold difference between the two eyes. A dichoptic masking paradigm was employed to investigate binocular interaction in a mixed group of amblyopic subjects. Normal dichoptic masking was not seen after threshold differences between the two eyes were accounted for in the majority of subjects studied. We found that the binocular dysfunction did not merely follow as a consequence of the known monocular loss and that it depended upon the aetiology of the amblyopia and the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation.

The temporal properties of the foveal visual filters were revealed using a method which is a variant on previously used noise masking paradigms. This enables the temporal properties of the mechanisms underlying threshold detection of a spatio-temporal probe to be measured. In accord with recent suggestions these results support the existence of three temporal mechanisms. The evidence for the third, higher temporal mechanism is only persuasive at low spatial frequencies. Furthermore, the results suggest that although there is some degree of spatio-temporal covariation in the filtering properties either of individual filters or across the filter population, the well known spatio-temporal covariation in human detection sensitivity is adequately explained by a sensitivity scaling of individual temporal filters with approximately invariant temporal properties.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

Temporal frequency filters in the human peripheral visual field.

The temporal filtering properties of the human peripheral field were investigated by means of measuring: (1) modulation transfer functions for a range of spatial frequencies at four visual field locations (0, 10, 30 and 50 degrees), (2) the contrast of a masking stimulus required to extinguish the visibility of just suprathreshold probes. Results suggest that the number of temporal filters governing detection threshold is dependent upon both eccentricity and spatial frequency. For near-foveal viewing three temporal filters were found (one low-pass and two band-pass), whereas at far eccentricities only one was found (band-pass). A similar result was obtained by modeling the modulation transfer function by simply scaling the sensitivities of three independently derived filters. Our data suggest that (1) changes in the modulation transfer function with respect to spatial frequency and eccentricity can be adequately explained by the changes in sensitivity of a small number of spatio-temporal separable filters; (2) the peripheral field is not merely a coarser version of the fovea but has qualitative differences which may be thought to emphasize the transient properties of the stimulus.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia.

There have now been numerous reports of a spatial localization deficit in amblyopia but none so far have tackled (1) the relationship between the contrast sensitivity and spatial localization deficits and (2) whether the spatial localization deficit is best described in units of visual angle or in terms of the underlying filter size. These issues are germane because they lie at the very heart of our understanding of the underlying deficit in amblyopia. To answer these questions we use spatially bandpass stimuli so that we can readily compare detection and localization for the same stimuli at each of a number of spatial scales. For some amblyopes (all strabismics and a minority of anisometropes) the contrast sensitivity defect neither underlies nor covaries with the spatial localization deficit. In the majority of anisometropic amblyopes, the contrast sensitivity loss is a complete description. The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia is of two independent kinds; positional inaccuracy and positional distortion. The positional inaccuracy deficit which can occur in varying degrees in both strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia, affects all spatial scales equally and therefore is best thought of in terms of a constant fraction of the underlying filter size in the space-frequency plane. The positional distortion deficit which can also occur to varying degrees in both strabismic and anisometropic forms can not be easily understood within this metric at least for strabismics.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1992

Mutual rod-cone suppression within the central visual field.

Under mesopic conditions the contrast sensitivity of the central visual field is reduced as the result of a non-linear interaction between rod- and cone-mediated signals, each of which is capable of higher sensitivity in isolation. The interaction is produced only when the rod-mediated system is driven at flicker rates above 6 Hz. This finding bears upon how rod and cone signals are combined and therefore affects our interpretation of the significance of the relationship between retinal illuminance and both contrast sensitivity and temporal resolution.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1991

The site and nature of suppression in squint amblyopia.

A significant percentage of humans have a misaligned eye (squint) due to a disruption of early visual development. In later adult life these people do not experience double vision because the visual information from their misaligned eye is actively suppressed within their visual system. Here I utilize a phenomenon called spatial adaptation which is known to have its site in the striate cortex to answer the question "is the site of suppression before, at, or after the site of adaptation?" Strabismic amblyopes who display spatial adaptation when viewing monocularly with their amblyopic eye fail to display adaptation through their amblyopic eyes under binocular viewing conditions. The lack of adaptation depends on the orientational difference between the adapting stimuli seen by each eye under binocular viewing conditions. These results suggest that suppression occurs at rather than before or after the first site of adaptation.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1991

Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors.

1. The aim of this study was to determine whether optical, receptoral or higher-order neural properties limit spatial resolution (acuity) in human vision, especially in the peripheral regions of the visual field. 2. Both achromatic and chromatic stimuli were used, and measures were taken to ensure that the resolution estimates were not contaminated by the detection of spatial sampling artifacts. Spatial contrast sensitivity functions were measured at retinal locations from 0 to 55 deg along the naso-temporal meridian for: (i) discriminating the direction of drift of luminance-modulated (black-white) sinusoidal stimuli drifting at 8 Hz (achromatic task); and (ii) for detecting isoluminant red-green sinusoidal stimuli drifting at 0.4 Hz (chromatic task). Achromatic contrast sensitivity functions were also measured along the vertical meridian for eccentricities of 8 and 40 deg. Each achromatic function was extrapolated to a contrast sensitivity of one (100% contrast) to estimate achromatic acuity. Chromatic acuities were obtained by expressing chromatic contrast in terms of cone contrasts and using the same method of extrapolation. We compared the results with recent data on human optical properties and retinal anatomy. 3. Both achromatic and chromatic acuity decline with distance from the fovea, but at a faster rate than that dictated by the known optical and/or receptoral properties of the human eye. We conclude that, for stimuli of either achromatic or chromatic contrast, peripheral spatial resolution is limited by post-receptoral mechanisms. Also, chromatic acuity declines more steeply than luminance acuity with eccentricity suggesting that there are additional post-receptoral limitations on colour resolution in the periphery. 4. A clear naso-temporal asymmetry is seen in the resolution whose dependence is qualitatively, but not quantitatively, similar to the Nyquist limits imposed by the asymmetric density of human retinal ganglion cells. We discuss the possibility that in peripheral vision (beyond the optic nerve head) the spacing of ganglion cells may pose a fundamental limit on the resolution of achromatic stimuli, but not chromatic stimuli.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1991

Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli.

A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was studied using random dot "limited-lifetime" stimuli with a direction discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988), the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered. When all "signal" dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and varying percentages of "noise" dots were added, the patient showed a profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988). Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise ratio; the most commonly encountered form of "noise" would presumably be contamination by irrelevant directional spatio-temporal frequency components.

Humans↗
PubMed1979

Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans.

Contrast threshold measurements have extended our perspective of human amblyopia by focusing our attention on the perception of objects larger than the resolution limit. This approach has shown that there are two categories of spatial loss in amblyopia, that anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia have a different neural basis, and that suprathreshold anomalies can occur independent of threshold defects.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1979

Vision through an abnormal cornea: a pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied corneal pathology.

Visual function was assessed by classic acuity measures as well as contrast thresholds over a wide spatial frequency range for subjects with experimentally induced corneal distortion and induced corneal edema. These results were compared with similar results for patients with uniocular keratoconus, bilateral keratoconus, and allied corneal pathology. Distortion and edema were found to produce characteristically different types of contrast attenuation at threshold (amplitude) and have quite different suprathreshold abnormalities (phase) for objects within the resolution limit and therefore could form the basis of a useful functional classification of the visual degradation from corneal pathology.

Cornea↗
PubMed1978

On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss.

In this investigation contrast threshold measurements are compared with supra-threshold perception for a group of human amblyopes. The results indicate that human amblyopia involves, in some cases, not only loss of sensitivity but spatial distortion. Thus a new group of amblyopes can now be identified in which only distortion occurs. These results have important physiological implications for both the normal and abnormal visual systems. Neurophysiologists investigating visual loss from deprivation should assess whether similar distortions occur in animals. This question may hold the answer to whether the present animal models are relevant to the human condition.

Amblyopia↗