PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R F Storey

Publications and source records attributed to R F Storey.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PAR-1 genotype influences platelet aggregation and procoagulant responses in patients with coronary artery disease prior to and during clopidogrel therapy.

Genetic variations of the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) have been associated with platelet receptor density and linked to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-induced phenotypes of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression. We investigated whether the PAR-1 intervening sequence-14 A>T dimorphism influences platelet procoagulant activity. We also determined whether the P2Y12 antagonist clopidogrel could offset any observed functional polymorphism of the PAR-1 receptor by inhibiting P2Y12-mediated amplification of TRAP-induced responses. We studied 54 patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention assessing TRAP-induced platelet aggregation and markers of procoagulant activity. Platelet responses were measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and 10 and 28 days following clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Each patient was genotyped for the PAR-1 intervening sequence-14 A/T dimorphism. Increased platelet aggregation and procoagulant responses were observed with PAR-1 A allele homozygotes. Clopidogrel significantly inhibited these platelet responses regardless of PAR-1 genotype, but did not offset the hyper-reactivity associated with the A/A homozygotes. We conclude that a common sequence variation within the PAR-1 gene influences TRAP-induced platelet procoagulant activity as well as aggregation. Higher platelet reactivity associated with PAR-1 IVSn-14 A allele homozygotes persists despite clopidogrel therapy. These individuals may be at higher risk of thromboembolic events and may require additional anti-platelet medication.

Alleles↗

Antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Platelet activation and aggregation are considered to be central to arterial thrombus formation. Antiplatelet therapy is therefore important for both the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Aspirin, the most widely used antiplatelet agent, inhibits platelet cyclo-oxygenase and the conversion of arachidonic acid to the potent platelet agonist thromboxane A(2) but does not prevent platelet activation occurring via various signalling pathways that are independent of thromboxane A(2) release. Therefore a number of other compounds have been developed to complement aspirin's beneficial effect. These include the thienopyridines (clopidogrel and ticlopidine), dipyridamole, and the alpha(IIb)beta(3) (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) receptor inhibitors.

Aspirin↗

The P2Y12 receptor as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease.

Coronary thrombosis complicating rupture of atherosclerotic plaque is the predominant cause of acute coronary syndromes and platelets play a crucial role in this thrombus formation. Whilst aspirin has been successful in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, appreciation of its limited antiplatelet effects has stimulated the search for more effective antiplatelet agents. The thienopyridines, ticlopidine and clopidogrel, act, via metabolites, on the platelet ADP receptor subtype now designated P2Y(12 )(formerly P(2T), P2T (AC), P2Y (ADP) or P2Y(cyc)) and these agents have proven clinical efficacy. Analogues of the natural P2Y(12) receptor antagonist ATP have been developed that act directly on the receptor and have a rapid onset of action. One such antagonist, AR-C69931MX, is being developed for clinical use. AR-C69931MX is a potent antagonist of ADPinduced platelet activation, aggregation and secretion and also antagonises platelet responses, including procoagulant activity, induced by all other agonists in view of the central role of the P2Y(12) receptor in amplifying platelet responses. Phase II studies of intravenous AR-C69931MX in patients with acute coronary syndromes show that this agent has a rapid onset of action, rapidly achieving steady-state inhibition of platelet aggregation, with a half-life of only a few minutes. AR-C69931MX appears to be safe and well tolerated as adjunctive therapy in these patients, and more effective inhibition of platelet function is achieved than with clopidogrel. Orally active ATP analogues are also being developed that may be more effective than clopidogrel. Limitations of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists leave scope for development of alternative antiplatelet agents.

Animals↗

Effects of P2Y(1) and P2Y(12) receptor antagonists on platelet aggregation induced by different agonists in human whole blood.

ADP plays a major role in the amplification of platelet aggregation induced by other platelet agonists. ADP initiates platelet activation via the P2Y(1) receptor and amplifies platelet activation via the P2Y(12) receptor. Using the selective P2Y(1) receptor antagonist A2P5P and the selective P2Y(12) receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX, we assessed the relative contributions of P2Y(1) receptor and P2Y(12) receptor activation to platelet aggregation in hirudin-anticoagulated whole blood induced by PAF, 5HT, epinephrine, TRAP, streptokinase, U46619 and collagen. The effects of aspirin were assessed concurrently. A2P5P and AR-C69931MX variably inhibited aggregation induced by most of the agonists studied, whereas aspirin only inhibited aggregation induced by streptokinase and collagen. In some experiments, A2P5P and AR-C69931MX yielded additive inhibition of aggregation. All three antagonists interacted synergistically to inhibit collagen-induced aggregation. These studies demonstrate that P2Y(1) receptor activation plays a significant role in amplifying aggregation induced by agonists other than ADP, in addition to the established roles of P2Y(12) receptor activation and thromboxane A(2) synthesis.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗

Open multicentre study of the P2T receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX assessing safety, tolerability and activity in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Platelet aggregation is the central process in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes. ADP contributes to thrombosis by activating platelets, and AR-C69931MX is a specific antagonist of this process acting at the P2T receptor. At 5 hospitals, 39 patients with unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction, who were receiving aspirin and heparin, were administered intravenous AR-C69931MX with stepped dose increments over 3 h to a plateau of either 2 microg/kg/min for 21 h (Part 1; n = 12) or up to 69 h (Part 2; n = 13) or 4 microg/kg/min for up to 69 h (Part 3: n = 14). Safety parameters, platelet aggregation (PA) induced by ADP 3 micromol/L (impedance aggregometry), bleeding time (BT) and plasma concentrations of AR-C69931XX were assessed. AR-C69931MX was well tolerated. 33 patients completed the study. There were no deaths at 30 days and no serious adverse events attributed to AR-C69931MX. Trivial bleeding (56%) was common. At 24 h, mean inhibition of PA was 96.0 +/- 8.6, 94.9 +/- 14.4 and 98.7 +/- 2.1% and BT was 9.5 +/- 8.4, 14.0 +/- 9.7 and 16.0 +/- 11.1 min for Parts 1, 2 and 3 respectively. At 1 h post-infusion, mean inhibition of PA was 36.2 +/- 39.2, 20.7 +/- 25.9 and 40.7 +/- 36.7% respectively. 90% patients had a plasma half-life for AR-C69931XX of <9 min. In conclusion, AR-C69931MX is a potent, short-acting platelet ADP receptor antagonist suitable for further studies as an antithrombotic agent.

Acute Disease↗

The central role of the P(2T) receptor in amplification of human platelet activation, aggregation, secretion and procoagulant activity.

Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) is an important platelet agonist and ADP released from platelet dense granules amplifies responses to other agonists. There are three known subtypes of ADP receptor on platelets: P2X(1), P2Y(1) and P(2T) receptors. Sustained ADP-induced aggregation requires co-activation of P2Y(1) and P(2T) receptors. AR-C69931MX, a selective P(2T) receptor antagonist and novel antithrombotic agent, was studied to characterize further the function of the P(2T) receptor. The roles of the P2Y(1) receptor and thromboxane A(2) were assessed using the selective P2Y(1) antagonist A2P5P and aspirin respectively. Aggregation was measured by whole blood single-platelet counting and platelet-rich plasma turbidimetry, using hirudin anticoagulation. Dense granule release was estimated using ([14)C]-5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)-labelled platelets. Ca(2+) mobilization, P-selectin expression, Annexin V binding and microparticle formation were determined by flow cytometry. P(2T) receptor activation amplified ADP-induced aggregation initiated by the P2Y(1) receptor, as well as amplifying aggregation, secretion and procoagulant responses induced by other agonists, including U46619, thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) and collagen, independent of thromboxane A(2) synthesis, which played a more peripheral role. P(2T) receptor activation sustained elevated cytosolic Ca(2+) induced by other pathways. These studies indicate that the P(2T) receptor plays a central role in amplifying platelet responses and demonstrate the clinical potential of P(2T) receptor antagonists.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗

Laboratory investigation of platelet function.

Advancement in the understanding of the mechanisms of platelet activation and the development of new techniques for studying platelet function have created the challenge of a wide range of options for investigating patients with suspected platelet disorders and for studying the effects of anti-platelet drugs. Novel classes of anti-platelet drug, such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, are being developed and introduced into routine clinical practice. This review presents an overview of current techniques for laboratory investigation of platelet function in the light of these recent advances.

Blood Coagulation Disorders↗

A whole blood assay of inhibition of platelet aggregation by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists: comparison with other aggregation methodologies.

We have used a whole blood single-platelet counting assay (WB-SPC) that is sensitive to microaggregation for monitoring GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and have compared this with other methodologies. In vitro effects of the GPIIb/IIIa antagonist fradafiban on ADP-induced platelet aggregation were determined using WBSPC and PRP turbidimetry, comparing citrate and hirudin anticoagulation. Fradafiban was a more potent inhibitor of aggregation assessed by PRP turbidimetry compared to WBSPC. Citrate showed only a trend towards enhancing fradafiban potency (p = 0.087). Citrated blood from 8 patients with unstable angina, randomised to receive oral lefradafiban (the oral prodrug of fradafiban) or placebo, was studied before and during treatment using WBSPC, PRP turbidimetry, impedance aggregometry and Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA, Accumetrics). RPFA, PRP turbidimetry and WBSPC measurements correlated well. Impedance aggregometry responses were oversensitive to GPIIb/IIIa blockade. WBSPC was most discriminating at high levels of inhibition and offered a rapid means of monitoring GPIIb/IIIa antagonist effect within the therapeutic range of inhibition.

Adolescent↗

Differential effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists on platelet microaggregate and macroaggregate formation and effect of anticoagulant on antagonist potency. Implications for assay methodology and comparison of different antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) turbidimetry is used for assessing pharmacodynamic effects of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists in clinical trials. However, citrate can enhance the potency of at least eptifibatide (Integrilin), and turbidimetry is insensitive to microaggregate formation. We compared PRP turbidimetry, as a measure of macroaggregate formation, with single-platelet counting in both whole blood and PRP as a measure of microaggregate formation, using both citrate and hirudin anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, eptifibatide, MK-0852, and GR144053, were compared in PRP (turbidimetry) and whole blood (platelet counting with an Ultra-Flo 100 Platelet Counter), with ADP and collagen used as agonists. Compared with hirudin, citrate enhanced the potency of eptifibatide by up to 4-fold in both PRP and whole blood (P<0.0005), modestly enhanced MK-0852 potency (P=0.001), and had no effect on GR144053. Potency measured in PRP was 2- to 3-fold greater compared with whole blood for MK-0852 and GR144053 but 3- to 4-fold greater for eptifibatide. Simultaneous turbidimetry and platelet counting performed in PRP indicated that this is because GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are more potent inhibitors of in vitro macroaggregation than microaggregation, this effect being greater for eptifibatide in hirudinized PRP compared with GR144053 (P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: GP IIb/IIIa antagonist potency is variably enhanced by citrate. Macroaggregation is inhibited more effectively than microaggregation, most markedly in the case of eptifibatide in hirudinized blood. These observations have implications for the interpretation and comparison of pharmacodynamic assays and possibly for the risk/benefit ratio of different agents.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗

Electrocardiogram interpretation as a basis for thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the skills and opinions of different grades of doctors and cardiac-trained nurses in interpreting electrocardiographic changes when deciding upon administration of thrombolysis to patients with chest pain. DESIGN: A questionnaire was distributed to staff in several local hospitals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants were asked to assess 30 electrocardiograms (ECGs) and determine whether they would prescribe thrombolytic therapy on the basis of each one, assuming an associated typical history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and no contra-indications to treatment. They were asked to return the questionnaire anonymously, stating only their position. RESULTS: Of the 88 questionnaires, 61 were returned by 15 senior nurses, 10 house officers, 12 senior house officers, 10 medical registrars, eight consultant physicians and six consultant cardiologists. When electrocardiograms showed unequivocal evidence of acute myocardial infarction, all consultant cardiologists gave the correct answer, but only 75.5% of house officers diagnosed AMI. Cardiologists were most in favour of thrombolysis when left bundle branch block was present. Cardiac-trained nurses showed good decision-making skills. CONCLUSIONS: Staff involved in assessment of patients with chest pain should have specific training in electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in order to minimise in-hospital delay when thrombolysis is indicated. The management of patients with left bundle branch block remains uncertain; cardiologists are more likely to recommend thrombolytic therapy than any of the other participants in the study.

Cardiology↗