PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R F van Vollenhoven

Publications and source records attributed to R F van Vollenhoven.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Longitudinal analysis of citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during 5 year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti-CP status predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression.

OBJECTIVE: To study serum levels of citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during up to 5 years' follow up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to relate serum levels to disease course and to treatments in clinical practice. METHODS: 279 patients with early RA were followed up with clinical investigations, radiographs, and measurement of anti-CP at baseline and after 3 months, 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. RESULTS: 160/279 (57.3%) patients were anti-CP positive at the first visit (mean 5 months after first symptoms). During follow up only 11/279 (3.9%) of the patients changed their anti-CP status. Anti-CP levels fell significantly during the first year, and this drop correlated with the extent of sulfasalazine treatment but not with other drugs or clinical indices. Anti-CP positive and negative patients had similar disease activities at baseline, but during follow up the anti-CP positive patients had worse clinical disease and greater radiological progression, despite at least equally intensive antirheumatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CP are stable during the first 5 years of RA, suggesting that events before rather than after onset of clinical manifestations of disease determine this phenotype. The presence of anti-CP at diagnosis predicts a less favourable disease course and greater radiological progression despite antirheumatic treatment, but subsequent changes in antibody levels do not reflect changes in disease activity. Taken together, these observations suggest that anti-CP positive RA is a distinct clinical and pathophysiological entity.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Estimated prediagnosis radiological progression: an important tool for studying the effects of early disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if intrapatient comparisons between prediagnosis and subsequent radiological progression could be used to assess effects of DMARDs in an RA inception cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 149 non-randomised patients with newly diagnosed RA in four groups were analysed: patients treated with (a) methotrexate (n = 56); (b) sulfasalazine (n = 55); (c) auranofin (n = 19); and (d) controls who were poor treatment responders (n = 19). Radiographs were quantified using the Larsen erosion score. The prediagnosis radiological progression from the onset of RA symptoms to diagnosis was calculated and compared with the observed progression rate during the first year after diagnosis while receiving DMARD treatment. RESULTS: Mean (SD) disease duration from onset of symptoms until diagnosis was 6.7 (4.0) months. Mean (SD) baseline Larsen score was 13.2 (9.3), giving a mean (SD) estimated prediagnosis progression rate of 23.6 (12.4) Larsen score units/year. Control and auranofin groups showed radiological progression after diagnosis similar to the progression predicted by prediagnosis progression rates. Patients receiving methotrexate or sulfasalazine showed a marked reduction (71% and 73%, respectively; p<0.001) in radiographic progression compared with prediagnosis progression. CONCLUSIONS: Prediagnosis rates of radiological progression can be used quantitatively to obtain information on the potential efficacy of DMARDs, and indicate that methotrexate and sulfasalazine, but not auranofin, significantly retard radiographic damage in the first year after diagnosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis induces anticardiolipin antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and clinical impact of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and etanercept. METHODS: 121 patients from the Stockholm tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) follow up registry (STURE) treated with infliximab or etanercept were studied. RESULTS: At baseline 9/65 (14%) infliximab and 10/56 (18%) etanercept treated patients had positive aCL. After 3 months the frequencies of aCL positivity were 29% (p<0.05 compared with baseline) and 27%, respectively, and after 6 months 28% and 25%. Increases were seen for both IgG and IgM aCL. Increasing age, a higher number of prior DMARDs, and higher DAS28 were predictors for the development of aCL. In the infliximab treated patients, 26/30 (87%) aCL(-) but only 7/14 (50%) aCL(+) patients met the ACR20 criteria (p<0.05), and the frequency of treatment limiting infusion reactions in the aCL(+) patients was higher than expected (17%). aCL positivity in the etanercept treated patients did not show such a clinical correlate. Four patients had thromboembolic events, of whom two were aCL(+) and two aCL(-). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of both IgM and IgG aCL positivity increase in patients treated with these TNFalpha antagonists for 3 months or longer. Increasing age, a greater number of prior DMARDs and a greater disease activity at baseline are predictors for the development of aCL. The development of aCL during treatment with infliximab, but not etanercept, is associated with worse clinical results and more frequent serious infusion reactions. aCL are an important class of autoantibodies associated with TNFalpha blocking therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Clinical and radiological disease-course in a Swedish DMARD-treated early RA-inception cohort: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) decrease clinical signs and symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, radiographic changes sometimes continue to accrue despite effective suppression of clinical symptoms by therapy. The objective of this study was to identify whether successful clinical disease-control in a Swedish early RA-inception cohort of patients led to an attenuation of radiological progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed clinical data and radiographs of 95 patients who were on a stable treatment regimen [methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), oral gold (AUR)] or who had changed between different DMARDs during the 2-year observation period [multiple therapy failures (mTF)]. Radiographs were quantified using the modified Larsen score and 'X-Ray RheumaCoach' software. RESULTS: Clinical measures improved markedly (p <0.001) from baseline to year 2 under AUR, MTX, and SSZ therapy but not in the mTF group. Similar levels of disease control were seen for each DMARD. During this period, patients treated with AUR had a deltaLarsen score (+ 14.5+/-1.3) similar to mTF patients (+ 15.8+/-1.1) but greater than patients on MTX (+8.6+/-0.8) or SSZ (+9.1+/-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that radiological progression occurs despite a clinically acceptable disease control, but also shows that, given the same degree of clinical disease control, radiological progression can be different for different DMARDs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Biopsy-verified response of severe lupus nephritis to treatment with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) plus cyclophosphamide after biopsy-documented failure to respond to cyclophosphamide alone.

BACKGROUND: The monoclonal anti-B cell antibody rituximab (Rituxin, Mabthera) may be of benefit in antibody-driven diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Two female patients with biopsy-confirmed severe and active SLE nephritis despite treatment with cyclophosphamide (CyX) were given four rituximab infusions plus two additional CyX infusions. RESULTS: Both patients tolerated the treatment well and SLE activity improved. On repeat kidney biopsy after the combined treatment, Patient 1 showed a profound reduction of nephritis activity, and she was maintained on low-dose prednisolone only. A repeat biopsy after 1 year confirmed the sustained reduction of lupus nephritis activity. In Patient 2, rebiopsy after combined treatment also showed a significant reduction in disease activity. CONCLUSION: These cases provide histopathological documentation of a significant treatment benefit from rituximab plus CyX in two patients refractory to CyX alone. This combination is being explored further as salvage therapy for such CyX-resistant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Dose escalation of infliximab in clinical practice: improvements seen may be explained by a regression-like effect.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increased infliximab doses result in better clinical outcome in rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Subjects were 124 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological agents at a single institute. Index cases were 44 patients whose infliximab doses had been increased. Controls were patients treated with infliximab without dose increase (n = 44), and patients treated with etanercept (n = 36). Disease activity score (DAS28), ACR28 swollen joint counts, and numerical ACR responses were compared before and after dose increases. For the controls, the point at which the DAS28 value showed any increase (despite infliximab/etanercept treatment) was used as the reference time point. Comparisons were made between three sets of outcomes: best outcome achieved before the dose increase (cases) or before the reference time point (controls); outcomes at this point; and best outcomes after this point. RESULTS: Following dose increase, disease activity showed modest but statistically significant improvements. The improvement achieved after dosage escalation was equal to, but not better than, the best values before dose escalation. While this finding could be interpreted as "recapturing" the previous response, similar improvements were seen in both control groups. Thus the same pattern of worsening and subsequent improvement was seen with or without the infliximab dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical improvement with increased infliximab dose, and the impression that a previous response can be "recaptured" with higher doses, cannot be taken at face value, as similar improvements occurred in two control groups. The use of infliximab at doses higher than 3 mg/kg needs to be evaluated further.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2000

Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus.

DHEA has shown promise for the treatment of SLE in three controlled and several uncontrolled clinical trials, including one large multicenter study comprising nearly 200 patients. The main benefits of DHEA seem to be a decrease in corticosteroid requirements and improved overall symptomatology. Intriguing aspects of DHEA treatment in SLE that require further study are a possible bone protective effect and improvements in cognitive function. The most frequent side effect is mild acneiform dermatitis, and long-term concerns include lowered HDL cholesterol.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1999

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dehydroepiandrosterone in severe systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is beneficial in severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 21 patients with severe and active SLE, manifestated primarily by nephritis, serositis or hematological abnormalities. In addition to conventional treatment with corticosteroids +/- immunosuppressives, patients received DHEA 200 mg/d vs. placebo for 6 months, followed by a 6-month open label period. The primary outcome was a prospectively defined responder analysis, based on a quantitatively specified improvement of the principal severe lupus manifestation at 6 months. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were available for evaluation at 6 months. Baseline imbalance between the groups was noted, with the DHEA group having greater disease activity at baseline (P<0.05 by physician's global assessment). Eleven patients were responders: 7/9 patients on DHEA vs. 4/10 patients on placebo (P<0.10). Of the secondary outcomes, mean improvement in SLE disease activity index (SLE-DAI) score was greater in the DHEA group (-10.3+/-3.1 vs. -3.9+/-1.4. P<0.07). Bone mineral density at the lumbo-sacral spine showed significant reduction in the placebo group, but was maintained in the DHEA group. CONCLUSION: DHEA therapy, when added to conventional treatment for severe SLE, may at most have a small added benefit with respect to lupus outcomes, but baseline imbalances in the study population limit the generalizability of the results. DHEA appears to have a protective effect with respect to corticosteroid-induced osteopenia in such patients.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed1999

VH4-34 encoded antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a specific diagnostic marker that correlates with clinical disease characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical significance of elevated serum levels of VH4-34 encoded antibodies (VH4-34 Ab) with respect to the diagnosis and clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Ninety-five patients with SLE and 344 controls were studied. The controls included 34 healthy individuals, 282 patients with nonautoimmune diseases, and 28 patients with autoimmune diseases other than SLE. VH4-34 Ab levels were measured by inhibition ELISA using anti-idiotope monoclonal antibody (9G4). SLE disease activity, severity, and damage were assessed by visual analog scales, Systemic Lupus Activity Measure, Lupus Severity of Disease Index, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 95 patients with SLE had elevated levels of VH4-34 Ab compared to 18 of 344 controls (5%), giving a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 95% for elevated VH4-34 Ab as a serologic test for SLE. The positive predictive value of elevated VH4-34 under these conditions was 74-85%. In this study, anti-dsDNA was not VH4-34 encoded. Significant correlations between VH4-34 and disease activity and severity indices were observed (r = 0.29-0.50). The relative risk for severe disease in SLE patients with VH4-34 antibody level in the highest tertile compared to the lowest tertile was 5.25. Twenty-five of 29 patients with lupus nephritis and 6 of 6 patients with central nervous system (CNS) lupus had elevated VH4-34 Ab. CONCLUSION: With a specificity of 94-95%, the VH4-34 antibody assay may prove valuable as a confirmatory diagnostic test for SLE. In patients with known SLE, serum VH4-34 Ab levels correlate with overall disease severity and activity, but not damage, and with nephritis and CNS lupus.

Antibodies, Antinuclear↗
PubMed1998

Rheumatoid arthritis. Designing and implementing a treatment plan.

Treating rheumatoid arthritis can be very satisfying when patients participate fully in designing and implementing their therapeutic strategy. However, the strategy's success depends on early intervention and disease modification. Many patients do well when education, rest, diet, exercise, and drug therapy are incorporated into an individualized regimen.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1998

Corticosteroids in rheumatic disease. Understanding their effects is key to their use.

Corticosteroids can have tremendous therapeutic benefits but can also cause severe side effects and toxicities. Judicious use of these agents plays an important role in many rheumatic diseases. Careful selection of the initial dose, aggressive attempts to taper doses, prescription of supplemental calcium and vitamin D, and consideration of steroid-sparing agents in patients who remain dependent on corticosteroids for disease control are the foundation of proper use. The roles of corticosteroids in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are complex and remain, to some extent, controversial.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed1998

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with dehydroepiandrosterone: 50 patients treated up to 12 months.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether longterm therapy (up to 1 year) with the weakly androgenic adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is feasible and beneficial in patients with mild to moderate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: In a prospective, open label, uncontrolled longitudinal study 50 female patients (37 premenopausal, 13 postmenopausal) with mild to moderate SLE were treated with oral DHEA 50-200 mg/day. RESULTS: DHEA therapy was associated with increases in the serum levels of DHEA, DHEA sulfate, and testosterone and, for those patients who continued DHEA, with decreasing disease activity measured by SLE Disease Activity Index score (p < 0.01), patient global assessment (p < 0.01), and physician global assessment (p < 0.05), compared to baseline. Concurrent prednisone doses were reduced (p < 0.05). These improvements were sustained over the entire treatment period. Thirty-four patients (68%) completed 6 months of treatment and 21 patients (42%) completed 12 months. Mild acneiform dermatitis was the most common adverse event (54%). Pre and postmenopausal women experienced similar efficacy and adverse effects from DHEA. CONCLUSION: DHEA was well tolerated and appeared clinically beneficial, with the benefits sustained for at least one year in those patients who maintained therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship between dosage, serum levels, and clinical response.

OBJECTIVE: To examine in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who participated in a clinical trial the relationship between daily dose of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), serum levels of DHEA and DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), clinical effectiveness, and side effects. METHODS: Twenty-three women with mild to moderate SLE were treated with DHEA for a 6 month period. The starting dose was 50 mg/day, and monthly stepwise increases were allowed. Subjects were assessed monthly by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), Health Assessment Questionnaire, and other outcomes. Serum testosterone, DHEA, and DHEAS levels were obtained and side effects noted monthly. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were found in all lupus outcomes over 6 months. Serum DHEA and DHEAS levels correlated with the dose of DHEA. Serum DHEA and DHEAS correlated negatively with SLAM score. A second order regression analysis of serum DHEAS level versus SLAM score suggested that the optimal serum level of DHEAS was 1000 microg/dl. The most common side effect was acne. CONCLUSION: The clinical response to DHEA was not clearly dose dependent. Serum levels of DHEA and DHEAS correlated only weakly with lupus outcomes, but suggested an optimum serum DHEAS of 1000 microg/dl. Monitoring these serum levels appears to have limited clinical utility.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1997

Skeletal status of men with early and late ankylosing spondylitis.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of extent of disease on the skeletal status of men with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen men with AS were studied at entry and again after 15 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by single photon absorptiometry (SPA), dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Calciotropic hormones and bone turnover were also assessed, and biopsies of iliac crest and skin were taken after tetracycline double-labeling from 10 subjects. Clinical evaluation and Health Assessment Questionnaires were used to assess functional status. RESULTS: Of the 14 participants, 7 had sacroiliitis alone without radiologic evidence of spinal involvement (early disease) and 7 had sacroiliitis with extensive vertebral calcifications and immobilization (late disease). QCT baseline lumbar spine BMD was very low in both groups compared with normative standards (Z score = -3.08 +/- 1.83, P < 0.0001) and did not change significantly over 15 months. This low BMD was more marked in late disease than in early disease subjects (P < 0.01). DXA BMD at the lumbar spine was lower than predicted in early disease subjects (Z score = -1.08 +/- 0.67, P = 0.005) but not in the late disease group. DXA BMD was also low at the all three hip sites (Z score = -0.96 +/- 0.86, P < 0.01). Significant differences between late disease group and normative values were apparent at all hip sites. Values in early disease subjects, however, did not differ from age-predicted norms. Bone mineral status did not change significantly over the 15-month period of observation. Circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) and vitamin D metabolites were normal in both groups as were creatinine clearance and urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline. Osteocalcin levels were normal in all but the two youngest subjects in the early disease group. Histomorphometry of the iliac crest showed no consistent change in bone turnover. Bone volume and trabecular width were low in many cases. Cancellous bone volume correlated with lumbar spine BMD by QCT (r = 0.69, P = 0.026) but not with DXA. Although beneficial changes occurred in exercise tolerance and pain over time, anthropometric measurements did not improve. CONCLUSION: BMD is low in both the axial and peripheral skeleton in men with AS and is independent of spinal immobilization. Anterioposterior lumbar spine DXA in late AS is less useful than QCT in determining the degree of osteopenia in late AS. Bone mineral deficits in AS do not reflect measurable metabolic derangement or hypogonadism. Although bone histomorphometry suggests both trabecular thinning and loss of structural elements as mechanisms involved in low bone volume, the exact cause of osteopenia in AS remains to be determined.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗