PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Fogari

Publications and source records attributed to R Fogari.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Associations between plasma fibrinogen levels and cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive men.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen levels are reported to be elevated in hypertensive patients and tend to cluster with nearly all other established cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between plasma fibrinogen and a number of other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: We studied 118 men with essential hypertension, aged 18-65 years. The clinical evaluation included measurements of blood pressure (mercury sphygmomanometer, Korotkoff I and V), levels of plasma fibrinogen, total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and blood glucose and the ratio of total-cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol levels; a detailed history of medical and personal habits was also recorded. RESULTS: As expected, plasma fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers, with the number of cigarettes smoked correlating positively with the fibrinogen level. Patients with a total-cholesterol level in excess of 220 mg/dl had significantly higher fibrinogen levels, and both univariate and multivariate analyses showed total-cholesterol and fibrinogen levels to be positively correlated. A weaker but significant relationship was noted between the fibrinogen level and triglyceride levels (P = 0.0017) and between the fibrinogen level and the ratio of total-cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol levels (P = 0.0006). Fibrinogen levels were not significantly associated with either systolic or diastolic blood pressures. CONCLUSION: A family history of hypertension appears to potentiate the tendency of fibrinogen to cluster with other cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive patients.

Adolescent↗

Urapidil in hypercholesterolemic hypertensive patients.

The association of arterial hypertension and hyperlipidemia strikingly enhances prevalence, incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease. In the light of recent evidence that some antihypertensive drugs with alpha-1 blocking properties reduce blood pressure (BP) and total cholesterol (chol), increasing chol content in the non-atherogenic high density lipoproteins (HDL-chol), the effects of urapidil, a peripheral alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist, with a central action component on BP and plasma lipids were evaluated in 49 mild, hypertensive patients with mild to moderately severe hypercholesterolemia (serum chol 220-320 mg/dl) for a 6 month period in a double-blind randomized study versus placebo. Five out of the 49 patients (3 on urapidil, 2 on placebo) discontinued treatment due to adverse side effects. Five patients on placebo did not meet protocol requirement of serum triglycerides < 350 mg/dl (3.95 mmol/L) and were only included in the BP efficacy assessment. The groups of urapidil and placebo were comparable for age (50 +/- 10 vs 49 +/- 7 years), body weight (72 +/- 9 vs 73 +/- 10 kg), sex (18M, 8F vs 14M, 9F) and mean arterial pressure (119.4 +/- 4 vs 119.7 +/- 4 mmHg). The actively treated group significantly decrease BP values from 159/99 +/- 13/2 to 152/90 +/- 23/8 mmHg, whilst no change was observed in the placebo group. Between group analysis showed a significant difference at the end of treatment (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antihypertensive Agents↗

Endothelin in mild to moderate essential hypertension: relationship between ambulatory and clinic blood pressure values.

We investigated in a post hoc analysis the relationship between plasma endothelin (ET-1) levels (immunoreactive ET-1-like material: ir-ET-1) with both casual and noninvasive 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h ABPM) values in EH. Fifteen uncomplicated EH patients (casual supine DBP > or = 100 mmHg), 10 males, age 54 +/- 6 years, 13 previously treated, enrolled in an antihypertensive drug trial (casual DBP > or = 100 mmHg), were evaluated. After a four week single-blind placebo wash-out period, measurements of supine casual SBP and DBP (three consecutive readings) and a 24h ABPM (Spacelabs 90207; automatic reading every 15 minutes) were carried out. Plasma ir-ET-1 was measured by radioimmunoassay kit (Amersham, UK). Pearson correlation coefficient tests were used for statistical evaluations. Mean (SD) casual SBP/DBP values were 166(5)/104(2) mmHg. The 24h ABPM mean values were 148(7)/87(3) mmHg. Daytime (07.00-23.00h) and nighttime (23.00-07.00h) SBP/DBP were 153(7)/91(3) and 137(10)/78(5) mmHg, respectively. Plasma ir-ET-1 levels were 0.9(0.5) pmol/l (range 0.3-2.1 pmol/l). Plasma ir-ET-1 was not correlated with casual SBP and DBP, age, serum creatinine and duration of EH. Positive and significant correlations were observed with 24h SBP (r = 0.59), daytime SBP (r = 0.58), nighttime SBP (r = 0.53) and DBP (r = 0.60). Unlike casual BP, ABPM mean values correlate positively with plasma ir-ET-1 in mild to moderate EH.

Blood Pressure↗

Fixed combination of benazepril and very low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour non invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

A double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study was undertaken in order to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of a fixed combination of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide in two different dosages by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). After a three-week placebo wash-out period, 18 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, all males, aged 41-60 years, were randomized to receive benazepril 5 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg, benazepril 10 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo, all given once daily for 4 weeks, according to a 3 crossover period, arranged in a 3 x 3 latin square design. Patients were checked after the wash-out period and every 4 weeks thereafter. At each visit, 24-hour ABPM was performed by a non-invasive device (Spacelabs 90202); causal BP (by mercury sphygmomanometer) and HR were also measured. Both dosages of the fixed combination were equally effective in reducing systolic and diastolic BP values throughout the 24-hour period as compared to the placebo. The antihypertensive effect of the drug could be observed to a similar extent both during the day and night and was still significant 24-hour post-dosing. In addition, the fixed combination did not affect the normal BP circadian variability.

Adult↗

Occupational noise exposure and blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between occupational noise exposure and blood pressure. METHODS: We studied 8811 workers at a metallurgical factory, who were exposed to different levels of noise at the worksite: < or = 80 dB for 8078 workers and > 80 dB for 733 workers. A clinical examination, including measurements of blood pressure (by mercury sphygmomanometer, Korotkoff phases I and V), heart rate (by pulse palpation), body weight and height, was performed. The subjects were stratified into four age groups (18-30, 31-40, 41-50 and > 50 years) and into two body mass index groups: normal weight (< or = 25 kg/m2) and overweight (> 25 kg/m2). In order to eliminate possible confounding factors and statistical bias, a retrospective case versus control analysis was also carried out. RESULTS: The epidemiologic approach showed that the systolic blood pressure (SBP) but neither the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) nor the heart rate values were statistically higher in the group who were exposed to noise levels of > 80 dB, although the difference could be considered clinically relevant only in the older age group. The prevalence of hypertension (according to World Health Organization criteria) was higher among the workers who were exposed to the higher levels of noise. Stratification for body mass index confirmed the existence of a higher prevalence of hypertension in the exposed group. The results from the case versus control analysis indicated that both the SBP and the DBP levels in the exposed group were significantly higher than those in the reference group, and confirmed the existence of a higher prevalence of hypertension in the exposed group. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that occupational exposure to noise levels exceeding 80 dB may lead to a higher prevalence of hypertension and to increased blood pressure values, although the results appear quantitatively different according to the approach that is taken to the problem (i.e. the epidemiologic or the case versus control approach).

Adolescent↗

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in normotensive and hypertensive type 2 diabetes. Prevalence of impaired diurnal blood pressure patterns.

To assess the prevalence of an impaired diurnal blood pressure (BP) pattern in a population of both normotensive and hypertensive diabetics, noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring (SpaceLabs 5200, Redmond, WA) was performed in 96 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (47 normotensives and 48 hypertensives) and in 103 control subjects without diabetes (50 normotensives and 53 hypertensives). Mean 24 h and daytime (06:00 to 22:00) BP and heart rate (HR) were not statistically different in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic ones. Nighttime (22:00 to 06:00) BP and HR tended to be higher in both normotensive and hypertensive diabetics, although not significantly. Heart rate, diastolic BP (DBP), and especially the nocturnal systolic BP (SBP) decrease, were less marked in both normotensive and hypertensive diabetics, with a consequent increase in rate-pressure. A significant correlation was found between the percent decrease in nighttime SBP and the decrease in orthostatic SBP in casual BP measurements. The analysis of individual recordings allowed us to detect an impaired circadian pattern (the disappearance of the nocturnal BP decrease or a paradoxical BP increase) in 30% of the normotensive and 31% of the hypertensive diabetics (v 6% of the normotensive and 6.4% of the hypertensive nondiabetic subjects). As the absence of a nocturnal BP fall has been associated with the increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, its detection by ambulatory monitoring might be of prognostic and therapeutic importance.

Aged↗

Evening vs morning isradipine sustained release in essential hypertension: a double-blind study with 24 h ambulatory monitoring.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study evaluated the effects on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) of isradipine sustained release (I-SRO) administered once daily, in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM). Eighteen uncomplicated essential hypertensives (10 men, mean age 55 +/- 6 years) with casual sitting DBP 96-110 mm Hg received, according to a triple-way crossover design, I-SRO 5 mg AM, or 5 mg PM, or placebo for 4 weeks. A 24 h ABP monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was carried out at the end of each treatment. Twenty-four hour BP was 145.3/89.8 mm Hg after randomized placebo. AM and PM I-SRO significantly reduced 24 h BP, by 13.7/8.7 and 12.9/8.2 mm Hg respectively. Daytime (07.00 h-23.00 h) BP significantly decreased by 15.0/9.7 mm Hg with AM and 13.2/8.7 mm Hg with PM regimen; night-time BP (23.00 h-07.00 h) significantly decreased by 11.6/7.1 and 12.3/7.4 mm Hg, respectively. Nocturnal nadir BP values were 132.6/78.1 after randomized placebo, 120.9/71.4 after AM I-SRO and 121.0/72.4 mm Hg after PM I-SRO. Morning peak BP values were 154.6/96.9, 139.5/87.6 and 137.5/85.5 mm Hg, respectively. Mean BP values in the early morning hours (i.e. between 03.00 h and 08.00 h) were significantly decreased by 12.1/7.3 mm Hg after AM and 14.3/7.9 mm Hg after PM intake. No significant differences were detected in the BP lowering effect of the two I-SRO regimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

[Is sympathetic hyperactivity a coronary risk factor?].

Clinical and experimental data have suggested a role of enhanced sympathetic nervous activity in the pathogenesis and evolution of coronary heart disease. A significant relationship was observed between the circadian pattern of plasma catecholamine levels and the onset of coronary events, which occur most frequently in the early morning, concomitance with sympathetic activation. An enhanced sympathetic tone is frequently observed in both the acute phase of myocardial infarction and in the postinfarction period, potentiating myocardial damage and increasing the risk of arrhythmias. An indirect demonstration of the importance of sympathetic activation arises from the results of several trials on the effects of beta-blocker treatment during and after myocardial infarction, showing a significant reduction in total mortality, sudden deaths and reinfarction. There is accumulating evidence that repeated activation of sympathetic nervous system may contribute to atheroma development and progression. Enhanced sympathetic activity seems to be involved in the pathogenesis and maintenance of essential hypertension as well as in its natural history, contributing to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy and vascular hypertrophy. The problems in measuring and defining the various levels of autonomic activity in human beings and the complexity of the relationship between nervous and non nervous factors in cardiovascular diseases make difficult to establish whether sympathetic hyperactivity represents an independent cardiovascular risk factor.

Coronary Disease↗

[Effectiveness of ketanserin in the treatment of light-to-moderate arterial hypertension].

The above study was undertaken in order to demonstrate the efficacy of ketanserin in mild to moderate essential arterial hypertension. Twenty-two patients, mean age 49.7 yrs., were studied during 36 months. After a 15-day washout period with clinical and instrumental assessment of basal conditions, treatment with 40 mg ketanserin every 12 hrs. was started. Pressure, blood chemistry and instrumental investigation were carried out systematically and showed the hypotensive action of ketanserin as well as a significant (about 12%) rise in HDL-cholesterol.

Adult↗

Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The Italian Trandolapril Study Group.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of trandolapril on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, 42 patients were randomized to receive 2 mg of trandolapril once daily and 20 to receive placebo in a double-blind fashion for 6 weeks. This was followed by a second washout period of 4 weeks. At the end of each period, clinic blood pressure was assessed at 24 hours after the last dose and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was measured noninvasively, taking blood pressure readings every 15 minutes during the day and every 20 minutes during the night. Two patients were dropped out before any blood pressure evaluation under treatment. Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure was performed in 48 patients who met the criteria for the minimal number of ambulatory blood pressure data (2 values per hour during the day and 1 value per hour in the night). In the trandolapril-treated group (n = 41) clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 159.8 +/- 2.0/102.4 +/- 0.8, 146.8 +/- 2.3/94.8 +/- 1.1, and 155.7 +/- 2.0/99.2 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the pretreatment, treatment, and post-treatment periods, respectively. The corresponding values for 24-hour mean blood pressure (n = 31) were 139.5 +/- 1.9/91.2 +/- 1.5, 131.0 +/- 2.0/84.3 +/- 1.2, and 139.7 +/- 1.8/90.9 +/- 1.1 mmHg. The differences between the lower treatment, versus the higher pre- and post-treatment, values were all statistically significant (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Comparison of bisoprolol and diazepam in the treatment of cardiac neurosis.

In order to compare the beta blockers bisoprolol and diazepam in the treatment of cardiac neurosis, 40 patients (16 males and 24 females, mean age: 39 +/- 11 years) were examined in a double-blind, crossover study. Following a 4-week placebo period, patients were randomized to receive either bisoprolol 10 mg daily or diazepam 5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. After a second 4-week washout period on placebo, patients were switched to the alternative regimen for a further 4 weeks. At the end of the placebo periods and during each phase of treatment, the following parameters were evaluated: somatic symptoms by self-assessment questionnaire, anxiety state by Hamilton rating scale, reaction time to both acoustic and visual stimuli, blood pressure, and heart rate. Both treatments were effective in reducing somatic symptoms of cardiac neurosis, but bisoprolol was significantly more effective than diazepam (p less than 0.01). On the contrary, diazepam was superior to bisoprolol in improving the Hamilton scale related to psychic symptoms. Only diazepam prolonged reaction times. Both treatments were well tolerated; however, 12 patients complained of drowsiness and nine of sedation under diazepam. In conclusion, bisoprolol appeared to be as effective as diazepam in the treatment of cardiac neurosis, but with better effects on somatic symptoms and without affecting patients' psychomotor performance.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Nitrendipine 20 mg once daily versus nicardipine slow release 40 mg twice daily in mild essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

The extent and duration of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of 20 mg nitrendipine (NIT) once daily and 40 mg nicardipine slow release (NIC) twice daily were compared in 12 men (aged 39-55 years) with mild essential hypertension according to a randomized, cross over study. Twenty-four-hour non invasive ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs 5200) was performed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in and after 4 weeks of each active treatment; automatic BP measurements were programmed at 15-min intervals. Both treatments significantly (p less than .01) reduced mean 24-hour and daytime systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, but had different effects on daytime BP profiles. NIT decreased SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 5 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.), followed by a loss of effect; NIC reduced SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 7 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.). During the night-time, NIT reduced mean SBP (p less than .05) and NIC both mean SBP and DBP values (p less than .05; p less than .05 vs NIT for SBP). Heart rate was not affected by either treatment. Thus, after short-term treatment in mild essential hypertensives nitrendipine once daily was not as effective as nicardipine slow release twice daily in reducing blood pressure throughout the 24 hours.

Adult↗

Effects of nifedipine and indomethacin on cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study.

Prostaglandins (PG) have been suggested to play a role in the genesis of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and that inhibition of PG synthesis can reduce or abolish the incidence of this side effect. Moreover, experimental and clinical data suggest that nifedipine, a dihydropyridine Ca antagonist, can inhibit PG synthesis. Therefore, we wished to determine whether nifedipine can reduce cough induced by ACE-I as compared with indomethacin, a known inhibitor of PG synthesis. Fourteen hypertensive patients who developed cough during captopril chronic therapy randomly received slow-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), indomethacin 50 mg b.i.d., and placebo b.i.d. for 1 week in a double-blind, cross-over design. At the end of each treatment phase, cough was evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire containing an ordinal scale for daily cough intensity and frequency. Indomethacin abolished or markedly reduced cough induced by ACE-I, whereas nifedipine reduced it but to a lesser degree. These findings suggest that PG can play a role in cough caused by ACE-I, and a dihydropyridine Ca antagonist can reduce the occurrence of this side effect.

Adult↗

Effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiovascular responses to smoking in normotensive and hypertensive smokers.

To evaluate the effects of short- and long-term administration of calcium (Ca) entry blockers on cardiovascular responses to cigarette smoking, 28 normotensive and 26 hypertensive smokers were studied. According to a double-blind, cross-over design, normotensive smokers were given a single dose (10 mg) of isradipine or a placebo and were checked before and after dosing. After a four-week period on a placebo, hypertensive smokers were treated with slow-release nicardipine 40 mg twice daily for six months and were checked at the end of the placebo period, after the first dose of nicardipine and at the end of six months of therapy. In both groups, blood pressure and heart rate were monitored by a Takeda TM 2420 non-invasive device every 3 min for 2 h. During the first hour patients were not allowed to smoke, during the second hour they were asked to smoke one cigarette every 15 min. In both normotensive and hypertensive smokers, calcium entry blockers produced a significant attenuation of the rise in blood pressure induced by cigarette smoking. Such effect was more evident after long-term therapy. Acceleration of the heart rate due to smoking was not significantly affected by the administration of Ca-antagonists, although a tendency towards a lesser heart rate increase was observed, particularly after long-term treatment. It was concluded that calcium entry blockers, reducing blood pressure variability, which bears a positive relationship with target organ damage, might be useful in the treatment of hypertensive smokers who were unwilling or unable to stop smoking.

Adult↗

[The Study Group of Quinapril in Arterial Hypertension. The Steering Committee].

The efficacy and safety of the treatment of arterial hypertension with the ACE-inhibitor quinapril, were evaluated in a multicentre study conducted in Italy. The study, lasting 14 weeks, after a preliminary wash-out period, allowed response-based titration of quinapril dose from 10 mg to 40 mg once a day, with provision to combine additional hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg), in case of persistently high diastolic pressure levels. The efficacy sample included 1267 patients: at therapy week 14, 78.6% of patients were treated with quinapril alone. Global response rate (intent-to-treat) was 83.3%, with a mean reduction of diastolic pressure of 15.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval from 15.5 to 16.2 mmHg). 91 patients reported 126 associated adverse events (7.0%); the most frequently reported event was cough (2.7%). First-dose hypotension was rarely reported (1.3%), even in elderly and diabetic patients.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗