PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R G Gill

Publications and source records attributed to R G Gill.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Initial results of screening of nondiabetic organ donors for expression of islet autoantibodies.

CONTEXT: Type 1A diabetes is characterized by a long prodromal phase during which autoantibodies to islet antigens are present. Nevertheless, we lack data on the pancreatic pathology of subjects who are positive for islet autoantibodies (to islet autoantigens GAD65, insulin, and ICA512). OBJECTIVE: In this manuscript, we describe a novel strategy in obtaining pancreata and pancreatic lymph nodes from islet autoantibody-positive organ donors that involves careful coordination among the laboratory and the organ donor provider organization. DESIGN: We developed a rapid screening protocol for islet autoantibodies measurement of organ donors to allow identification of positive subjects before organ harvesting. In this way we were able to obtain pancreata and pancreatic lymph nodes from subjects with and without islet autoimmunity. SETTING: The organ donors used in this study were obtained from the general community. SUBJECTS: The population studied consisted of 112 organ donors (age range 1 month to 86 yr, mean age 39 yr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure of this study consisted of evaluating the pancreatic histology and identify T cells autoreactive for islet antigens in the pancreatic lymph nodes. RESULTS: To date we have identified three positive subjects and obtained the pancreas for histological evaluation from one of the autoantibody-positive donors who expressed ICA512 autoantibodies. Although this subject did not exhibit insulitis, lymphocytes derived from pancreatic lymph nodes reacted to the islet antigen phogrin. CONCLUSION: In summary, these results indicate that it is possible to screen organ donors in real time for antiislet antibodies, characterize pancreatic histology, and obtain viable T cells for immunological studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

LFA-1 (CD11a) as a therapeutic target.

Leukocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) was one of the earliest of cell-surface molecules identified by monoclonal antibodies generated against leukocyte immunogens. This integrin heterodimer is perhaps best known as a classic adhesion molecule facilitating the interaction between T cells and antigen-presenting cells. However, varied studies indicate that LFA-1 has multi-faceted roles in the immune response including adhesion, activation and trafficking of leukocyte populations. While there has been long-standing interest in LFA-1 as a therapeutic target for regulating immunity, anti-LFA-1 therapy is still not a first-line indication for any clinical condition. Antagonism of LFA-1 with monoclonal antibodies, either alone or in combination with other agents, can result in regulatory tolerance in vivo. Furthermore, new generation humanized anti-LFA-1 monoclonal antibodies (Efalizumab) show at least modest promise for continued application in clinical trials. Thus, anti-LFA-1 forms a potential, but still largely unexploited, immunotherapy which may find its greatest application as an agent which augments other therapies.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2004

Distinct requirements for host CD80/CD86 costimulatory molecules in cardiac versus islet rejection.

The role of B7 family members CD80 and CD86 in providing costimulatory signals to T cells is well established. Interestingly, previous studies show that host CD80/CD86 expression is required for cardiac allograft rejection. However, the role for host costimulation by CD80/CD86 molecules for the rejection of neovascularized islet allografts and xenografts is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether islet allografts and/or rat islet xenografts required host CD80/CD86 molecules for acute rejection. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57Bl/6 (B6, H-2(b)) or B6 CD80/CD86 double-deficient mice were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islet allografts or with WF (RT1(u)) islet xenografts. Nondiabetic B6 mice were grafted with BALB/c heterotopic cardiac allografts. Consistent with previous reports, BALB/c islet allografts were acutely rejected in wild-type B6 mice could survive long-term (>100 days) in B6 CD80/CD86-deficient animals. In stark contrast, both islet allografts and WF rat islet xenografts demonstrated acute rejection in both control B6 and in B6 CD80/CD86 deficient hosts. In conclusion, varied studies imply that the inherent pathways for rejecting primarily vascularized versus cellular allografts or xenografts may be distinct. The present study illustrates this concept by showing a marked difference in the role of host-derived CD80/CD86 costimulatory molecules for cardiac allograft versus islet allograft/xenograft rejection in vivo. Although such costimulation is rate limiting for cardiac allograft rejection, these same molecules are not necessary for acute rejection of either islet allografts or xenografts.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

A major role for host MHC class I antigen presentation for promoting islet allograft survival.

The purpose of this study was to determine the role for CD8 T cells versus generalized MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation in islet allograft rejection and tolerance. Diabetic C57BI/6 (B6, H-2(b)) controls, C57BI/6 CD8-deficient (CD8 KO), or MHC class I-deficient C57BI/6 (beta 2m KO) recipients were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islets. Islet allografts were acutely rejected in untreated B6, CD8 KO, and in beta 2m KO mice, indicating that neither CD8 T cells nor host MHC class I is required for allograft rejection. We then determined the efficacy of costimulation blockade in these same strains. Costimulation blockade with anti-CD154 therapy facilitated long-term islet allograft survival in both B6 and in CD8 KO recipients. However, anti-CD154 treated beta 2m KO recipients were completely refractory to anti-CD154 therapy; all treated animals acutely rejected islet allografts with or without therapy. Also, anti-NK1.1 treatment of wild-type B6 mice abrogated graft prolongation following anti-CD154 therapy. Taken together, results show a dramatic distinction between two forms of MHC class I-restricted pathways in allograft prolongation. Although anti-CD154-induced allograft survival was CD8 T-cell independent, an intact host MHC class I-restricted (beta 2m-dependent) pathway is nevertheless necessary for allograft survival. This pathway required NK1.1+ cells, implicating NK and/or NKT cells in promoting allograft prolongation in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Donor IFN-gamma receptors are critical for acute CD4(+) T cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection.

Recent studies using mouse models demonstrate that CD4(+) T cells are sufficient to mediate acute cardiac allograft rejection in the absence of CD8(+) T cells and B cells. However, the mechanistic basis of CD4-mediated rejection is unclear. One potential mechanism of CD4-mediated rejection is via elaboration of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-gamma. To determine whether IFN-gamma is a critical cytokine in CD4-mediated acute cardiac allograft rejection, we studied whether the expression of IFN-gamma receptors on the donor heart was required for CD4-mediated rejection. To investigate this possibility, purified CD4(+) T cells were transferred into immune-deficient mice bearing heterotopic cardiac allografts from IFN-gamma receptor-deficient (GRKO) donors. While CD4(+) T cells triggered acute rejection of wild-type heart allografts, they failed to trigger rejection of GRKO heart allografts. The impairment in CD4-mediated rejection of GRKO hearts appeared to primarily involve the efferent phase of the immune response. This conclusion was based on the findings that GRKO stimulator cells provoked normal CD4 proliferation in vitro and that intentional in vivo challenge of CD4 cells with wild-type donor APC or the adoptive transfer of in vitro primed CD4 T cells failed to provoke acute rejection of GRKO allografts. In contrast, unseparated lymph node cells acutely rejected both GRKO and wild-type hearts with similar time courses, illustrating the existence of both IFN-gamma-dependent and IFN-gamma-independent mechanisms of acute allograft rejection.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

alpha4 integrin in islet allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion molecules are involved in multiple steps of the continuum of allograft rejection. We studied the effects of blockade of the interactions between alpha4 integrin and its ligands, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and fibronectin, on allograft survival. METHODS: Streptozotocin-induced diabetic CBA (H-2k) mice received islet transplants from BALB/c (H-2d) donors. Recipient mice were treated with antibodies against alpha4 integrin (PS/2), VCAM-1 (MK 2.7), and a peptide corresponding to the binding site of alpha4 integrin on fibronectin (connecting segment 1 peptide, CS1-peptide). Graft function was measured by daily tail vein blood glucose levels, with rejection defined as the return of hyperglycemia. Graft-bearing kidneys were removed for immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: Treatment with anti-alpha4 integrin antibody, anti-VCAM-1 antibody, or with CS1-peptide led to long-term survival of islet allografts. Recipients with long-surviving islet grafts did not show tolerance, in that they rejected a second donor-type islet allograft. Although both anti-alpha4 integrin antibody and CS1-peptide completely abolished cellular infiltration of the islet graft 7 days after transplantation, anti-VCAM-1-treated recipients showed a dense peri-islet infiltrate of activated, alpha4 integrin+, cytotoxic T cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that alpha4 integrin is critically important to allograft rejection. Anti-VCAM-1 antibody appears to prevent rejection without qualitatively affecting either T cell activation or migration to the graft. Conversely, anti-alpha4 integrin antibody and CS1-peptide may prevent islet allograft rejection by altering either T cell activation or lymphocyte trafficking. Blocking interactions between alpha4 integrin and its ligands may provide novel forms of immunosuppression.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Use of small animal models for screening immunoisolation approaches to cellular transplantation.

It has been recognized for many years that immunoisolation strategies form an attractive approach to preventing the rejection of cellular allografts and xenografts. Although immunoisolation has proven dramatically successful in some cases, the results have tended to be somewhat variable. Although many advances have been made in the development of biocompatible materials for separating host immune cells from the transplanted tissues, much of the experimentation in this area has been outcome driven. That is, the nature of host reactivity and/or biomaterial design resulting in the failure of some immunoisolation strategies has mostly been undefined. A first premise of this discussion is that immunoisolation is primarily cell isolation and not antigen isolation, per se. That is, although varied membrane barriers are designed to prevent cell-cell contact between host and donor cells, soluble antigens derived from the transplant are likely to gain access to the host immune system. A key question centers on the degree and consequence of this type of antigen presentation in the host to the immunoisolated transplant. To address this and related concerns, this overview presents a simple paradigm for using defined rodent (mouse) models for systematically screening the efficacy of immunoisolated cellular transplants. The proposition is made that understanding the basis of graft failure will aid in the design of future immunoisolation technologies.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Immunobiology of cardiac allograft and xenograft transplantation.

Heart transplantation has been performed clinically for four decades, and has become the standard of care for end-stage heart disease. Our understanding of the immunobiology of transplantation has made tremendous strides, but our knowledge still lags behind the clinical use. As a result, nonspecific immunosuppression remains the standard therapy. This chapter is a review of our present knowledge of the immunobiology of allotransplantation and xenotransplantation with emphasis on antigen presentation, costimulation, and T-cell activation in the context of transplantation. The molecular events of T-cell activation, with some emphasis on the sites of action of present day immunosuppression, are reviewed. Basic aspects of immunosuppression are reviewed elsewhere in this edition. Given the paucity of allografts, xenografts are being considered as an alternative donor source. This being the case, cellular and humoral response to xenografts is considered and contrasted with our understanding of allograft immunity. Basic mechanisms of tolerance are discussed, with examples of experimental tolerance induction in small and large animals. A brief description of special considerations for the immunology in human neonate/infant recipients is mentioned. Understanding the immunobiology of transplantation is key to making decisions regarding heart transplant recipients today, in addition to developing better protocols and the induction of tolerance in the future.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The basis of immunogenicity of endocrine allografts.

Two signals are required for optimal T-cell activation: the engagement of the antigen-specific receptor and the provision of a second non-antigen-specific inductive signal, or costimulator (CoS). Regarding allograft immunity, two primary pathways of donor antigen presentation can fulfill this two-signal requirement, resulting in cellular immunity to a transplant: (1) "direct" (donor MHC-restricted) presentation in which the antigen-presenting cells (APCs) resident within the transplant directly activate host T lymphocytes and (2) "indirect" (host MHC-restricted) presentation in which host-derived APCs acquire donor antigens that are then presented to host T lymphocytes. It appears that endocrine allografts, such as pancreatic islets and thyroid, are highly dependent on donor-derived APCs, or "passenger leukocytes," to trigger acute graft rejection. Tissue pretreatment aimed at selectively eliminating APCs within endocrine tissues can result in indefinite allograft survival in immune-competent recipients. Although such results implicate the "direct" pathway as the predominant route of host sensitization, the role of donor APCs in rejection appears to be more complex. Recently, we have found that indirect, CD4 T-cell-dependent reactivity can contribute to islet allograft rejection. However, such indirect recognition nevertheless requires donor-derived APCs as a source of antigen. Thus, whereas the donor-type APC is a critical limiting step for initiating islet allograft rejection, such cells can trigger both direct and indirect forms of immune responses that can result in graft rejection. That is, donor hematopoietic cells, rather than tissue parenchymal cells, probably play a major role in providing antigens that stimulate cellular immunity.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

An essential contribution by IFN-gamma to CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet allografts.

CD8+ T cells have long been considered to be the prototypical cytotoxic lymphocyte subpopulation. However, whether alloreactive CD8+ T cells require traditional cytolytic pathways such as perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) to mediate graft rejection has been a controversial issue. In the present studies, we examined the role of varied effector pathways in CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet allografts. Our goal was to systematically determine the relative requirements, if any, of perforin and FasL as well as the proinflammatory cytokine IFN-gamma in triggering graft destruction. To study CD8+ T cell effector pathways independently of other lymphocyte populations, purified alloreactive CD8+ T cells were adoptively transferred into severe combined immune-deficient (SCID) recipients bearing established islet allografts. Results indicate that to reject established islet allografts, primed CD8+ T cells do not require the individual action of the conventional cytotoxic effectors perforin and Fas ligand. In contrast, the ability to produce IFN-gamma is critical for efficient CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of established islet allografts. Furthermore, alloreactive CD8+ TCR transgenic T cells (2C) also show IFN-gamma dependence for mediating islet allograft rejection in vivo. We speculate from these results that the production of IFN-gamma by alloreactive CD8+ T cells is a rate-limiting step in the process of islet allograft rejection.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Anti-LFA-1 therapy induces long-term islet allograft acceptance in the absence of IFN-gamma or IL-4.

mAb therapy directed against a variety of cell surface accessory molecules has been effectively utilized to prolong allograft acceptance in various models of tissue and organ transplantation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether transient therapy directed against the adhesion molecule LFA-1 (CD11a) was sufficient to induce donor-specific tolerance to pancreatic islet allografts. Anti-LFA-1 monotherapy was found to be efficacious in inducing long-term islet allograft acceptance in multiple donor-recipient strain combinations. Graft acceptance following anti-LFA-1 therapy was not simply due to clonal ignorance of donor Ags in that the majority of recipients bearing established islet allografts resisted rejection induced by immunization with donor-type APCs. Furthermore, donor-specific tolerance from anti-LFA-1-treated animals could be transferred to secondary immune-deficient animals. Taken together, these results indicated that transient anti-LFA-1 monotherapy resulted in donor-specific tolerance. In vitro, functionally tolerant animals retained normal anti-donor reactivity as assessed by proliferative, cytotoxic, and cytokine release assays that demonstrated that tolerance was not secondary to general clonal deletion or anergy of donor-reactive T cells. Finally, anti-LFA-1 treatment was effective in both IL-4-deficient and IFN-gamma-deficient recipients, indicating that neither of these cytokines are universally required for allograft acceptance. These results suggest that anti-adhesion-based therapy can induce a nondeletional form of tolerance that is not overtly dependent on the prototypic Th1 and Th2 cytokines, IFN-gamma and IL-4, respectively, in contrast to results in other transplantation models.

Adoptive Transfer↗
PubMed2000

CD4 T cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection requires donor but not host MHC class II.

Numerous studies indicate that CD4 T cells are required for acute cardiac allograft rejection. However, the precise role for CD4 T cells in this response has remained ambiguous owing to the multipotential properties of this T-cell subpopulation. In the current study, we demonstrate the capacity of CD4 T cells to serve as direct effector cells of cardiac allograft rejection. We show that CD4 T cells are both necessary and sufficient for acute graft rejection, as indicated by adoptive transfer experiments in immune-deficient SCID and rag1(-/-) recipients. We have analyzed the contribution of direct (donor MHC class II restricted) and indirect (host MHC class II restricted) antigen recognition in CD4-mediated rejection. Acute CD4 T cell-mediated rejection required MHC class II expression by the allograft, indicating the importance of direct graft recognition. In contrast, reciprocal experiments indicate that CD4 T cells can acutely reject allogeneic cardiac allografts established in rag1(-/-) hosts that were also MHC class II deficient. This latter result indicates that indirect presentation of donor antigens by host MHC class II is not required for acute CD4-mediated rejection. Taken together, these results indicate that CD4 T cells can serve as effector cells for primary acute cardiac allograft rejection, predominantly via direct donor antigen recognition and independent of indirect reactivity.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Antigen presentation pathways for immunity to islet transplants. Relevance to immunoisolation.

Tremendous advances have been made over the past several years in the development of diverse biocompatible materials and structural designs for the implantation of immunoisolated cells and tissues. This area of bioengineering has clear application to insulin-dependent diabetes for which the implantation of micro- or macroencapsulated pancreatic islets or surrogate beta cells has great potential therapeutic benefit. This discussion concentrates on three antigen-specific immunologic processes that impede the application of islet transplantation as a therapy for insulin-dependent diabetes: (1) Allograft immunity, (2) Xenograft immunity, and (3) Autoimmune pathogenesis of Type I diabetes. Special emphasis is placed on the potential impact of these immune pathways on immunoisolated tissues.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Tolerance to antigen-presenting cell-depleted islet allografts is CD4 T cell dependent.

Pretreatment of pancreatic islets in 95% oxygen culture depletes graft-associated APCs and leads to indefinite allograft acceptance in immunocompetent recipients. As such, the APC-depleted allograft represents a model of peripheral alloantigen presentation in the absence of donor-derived costimulation. Over time, a state of donor-specific tolerance develops in which recipients are resistant to donor APC-induced graft rejection. Thus, persistence of the graft is sufficient to induce tolerance independent of other immune interventions. Donor-specific tolerance could be adoptively transferred to immune-deficient SCID recipient mice transplanted with fresh immunogenic islet allografts, indicating that the original recipient was not simply "ignorant" of donor antigens. Interestingly, despite the fact that the original islet allograft presented only MHC class I alloantigens, CD8+ T cells obtained from tolerant animals readily collaborated with naive CD4+ T cells to reject donor-type islet grafts. Conversely, tolerant CD4+ T cells failed to collaborate effectively with naive CD8+ T cells for the rejection of donor-type grafts. In conclusion, the MHC class I+, II- islet allograft paradoxically leads to a change in the donor-reactive CD4 T cell subset and not in the CD8 subset. We hypothesize that the tolerant state is not due to direct class I alloantigen presentation to CD8 T cells but, rather, occurs via the indirect pathway of donor Ag presentation to CD4 T cells in the context of host MHC class II molecules.

Adoptive Transfer↗
PubMed1999

Cellular immune response to phogrin in the NOD mouse: cloned T-cells cause destruction of islet transplants.

The ability of nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice to mount a cellular immune response to the secretory granule protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), phogrin was evaluated by immunization of 8- to 12-week-old animals with recombinant phogrin in complete Freund's adjuvant. Draining lymph nodes displayed a robust proliferative response to the protein, as did derived T-cell lines and clones. Ten clones obtained by limiting dilution were all CD4+ and of a T-helper-1-like phenotype, but showed variation in their Vbeta usage. Of the 10 clones, 3 responded to endogenous antigens in rat islets. Two of these caused the destruction of rat islets that had been transplanted under the kidney capsule of streptozotocin-treated NOD scid mice without affecting adjacent thyroid implants. The results demonstrate the feasibility of generating antigen-specific diabetes-inducing CD4+ cells by direct immunization of NOD mice and their potential use for further studies of the antigenic epitopes in the PTP family members. The conclusion, based on serological studies, that PTP members do not play a role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes in rodent models needs reevaluation in light of these findings.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Tissue immunogenicity: the role of MHC antigen and the lymphocyte costimulator B7-1.

Pancreatic islet transplantation represents a potential treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. One approach to circumvent the requirement for recipient immune suppression is to reduce or eliminate the immunogenicity of the donor graft prior to transplantation. In this study, we have examined the relative contributions of graft MHC Ag expression and donor-derived costimulatory (CoS) activity to the rejection of islet allografts. Depletion of donor hemopoietic APCs from islet tissue facilitated long-term allograft survival even when donor class I MHC Ag expression was greatly increased by IFN-gamma treatment prior to grafting. Conversely, islet allografts from transgenic mice expressing the CoS molecule B7-1 (CD80) on islet beta cells were acutely rejected even when hemopoietic APCs were eliminated. Thus, B7-1 is sufficient to confer the capacity of islet parenchymal cells to stimulate allorejection. Taken together, these results point towards donor-derived CoS activity as a primary target of intervention therapy to modulate tissue immunogenicity.

Animals↗