PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R G Hiss

Publications and source records attributed to R G Hiss.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Report of the health care delivery work group: behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care.

As one of four work groups for the November 1999 conference on Behavioral Science Research in Diabetes, sponsored by the National Institute on Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the health care delivery work group evaluated the status of research on quality of care, patient-provider interactions, and health care systems' innovations related to improved diabetes outcomes. In addition, we made recommendations for future research. In this article, which was developed and modified at the November conference by experts in health care delivery, diabetes and behavioral science, we summarize the literature on patient-provider interactions, diabetes care and self-management support among underserved and minority populations, and implementation of chronic care management systems for diabetes. We conclude that, although the quality of care provided to the vast majority of diabetic patients is problematic, this is principally not the fault of either individual patients or health care professionals. Rather, it is a systems issue emanating from the acute illness model of care, which still predominates. Examples of proactive population-based chronic care management programs incorporating behavioral principles are discussed. The article concludes by identifying barriers to the establishment of a chronic care model (e.g., lack of supportive policies, understanding of population-based management, and information systems) and priorities for future research in this area needed to overcome these barriers.

Behavioral Medicine↗
PubMed2001

Comprehensive evaluation of community-based diabetic patients: effect of feedback to patients and their physicians: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate improvements in diabetes care stimulated by comprehensive evaluation of community-based diabetic patients with feedback to the patients and their physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A comprehensive evaluation of community-based diabetic patients with annotated reporting of results to both patients and their physicians (universal intervention) was followed by random assignment of 50% of patients to individual counseling (randomized intervention). In four communities, two large and two small, 55 type 1 and 376 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited, evaluated, and reassessed at 1 year. Outcome measures were HbA1c, serum cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in all outcome measures for type 2 diabetic patients randomized to individual counseling (P = 0.03; follow-up rate 84%) and significant improvements in all outcome measures for all high-risk type 2 patients (highest P value = 0.004; follow-up rate 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive evaluation of diabetic patients at the community level with annotated reporting of results to the patients and their physicians was associated with improvement of mean HbA1c, cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, particularly in patients in high-risk status for these outcome variables. Individual counseling of 50% of patients, randomly selected, enhanced these results.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1998

The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. The diabetes knowledge test has two components: a 14-item general test and a 9-item insulin-use subscale. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two populations completed the test. In one population, patients received diabetes care in their community from a variety of providers, while the other population received care from local health departments. Cronbach's coefficient alpha was used to calculate scale reliability for each sample. To determine validity, patient group differences were examined. It was hypothesized that test scores would be higher for patients with type 1 diabetes, for patients with more education, and for patients who had received diabetes education. RESULTS: The coefficient alpha s for the general test and the insulin-use subscale indicate that both are reliable, alpha > or = 0.70. In the community sample, patients with type 1 diabetes scored higher than patients with type 2 diabetes on the general test and the insulin-use subscale. In the health department sample, patients with type 1 scored higher than patients with type 2 on the insulin-use subscale. For both samples, scores increased as the years of formal education completed increased, and patients who received diabetes education scored higher than patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Although the samples differed demographically, the reliability and validity of the test were supported in both the community and the health department samples. This suggests that the test is appropriate for a variety of settings and patient populations.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Characteristics related to poor glycemic control in NIDDM patients in community practice.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical characteristics related to poor glycemic control in patients with NIDDM cared for by Michigan primary care physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from 393 NIDDM patients (mean age, 63 +/- 11 years; 54% female; 92% white) in the 1990-1991 Michigan Diabetes in Communities II Study. We evaluated patient demographic, clinical, and physiological characteristics, attitudes toward diabetes, and self-care ability. Logistic regression was used for multivariate evaluation of the characteristics of those patients whose glycosylated hemoglobin (normal GHb 4-8%) was in the upper 25% of the study sample (GHb > 11.6%). RESULTS: A high meal-stimulated plasma C-peptide was associated with a lower likelihood of poor control (odds ratio [OR] for highest quartile vs. all others = 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.58). Longer time since diagnosis (OR for each 5 years duration = 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.53), poor self-care ability (OR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.27-2.71), and perceived absence of dietary recommendations (OR = 2.37; 95% CI 1.11-5.08) were also independently associated with presence in the highest GHb quartile. Characteristics that were not significantly related to poor glycemic control included sex, age, obesity, educational level, exercise, self-rated health status, and pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Poor glycemic control may reflect progressive failure of islet function, although the independent relationships of C-peptide level and time since diagnosis are consistent with concepts of heterogeneous mechanisms underlying NIDDM. 2) Despite the important relationships of biological characteristics of NIDDM to glycemic control, patient attitudes and self-care ability may be useful targets for designing management strategies for certain poorly controlled patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

A comparison of global versus disease-specific quality-of-life measures in patients with NIDDM.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the Short Form 36 (SF-36) (a global measure of health-related quality of life) and the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) (a diabetes-specific measure of self-care and diabetes-related quality of life) in patients with NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was conducted as part of a larger study initiated in 1991 using a randomly selected sample of communities, physicians, and patients with diabetes located throughout Michigan. A total of 255 patients with NIDDM participated. The study examined the relationship between the two measures and diabetes variables, such as glycosylated hemoglobin level and number of complications. RESULTS: The SF-36 and the DCP have both common and discrete measurement domains. Both instruments have acceptable subscale reliability. The DCP has predictive validity regarding glycemic control, whereas the SF-36 does not. Both measures correlate with the number of complications for patients who have NIDDM treated with insulin. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that for examining relationships within diabetes, e.g., the impact of acute complications and/or regimen on quality of life, the DCP is the appropriate measure. Conversely, when examining relationships between the patient's experience of living with diabetes and quality of life and other chronic diseases, the SF-36 would be an appropriate measure. Both instruments can be used to illuminate the experience and behavior of patients living with and caring for NIDDM.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Barriers to care in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Michigan experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the barriers to optimal care at the community level for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). DESIGN: Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical, psychosocial, and educational status of community-based patients with NIDDM, with subsequent review by local diabetes advisory councils of this status and the care those patients have received. The frequency with which patients visited their physician for diabetes management, received patient education, received diet counseling, and were examined by an ophthalmologist-four services universally recognized to be components of optimal diabetes care-was determined for all patients. SETTING: Eight Michigan communities, four large and four small. PATIENTS: From 1988 to 1994, 1056 patients with NIDDM defined by stimulated C-peptide criteria) were studied. RESULTS: The frequency with which all patients with NIDDM visited their community primary care physician in 1994 was 3.7 times per year (4.6 times for patients taking insulin and 3.2 times for those not taking insulin). Thirty-three percent of all patients with NIDDM (48% of those taking insulin and 24% of those not taking insulin) had received all three other essential services, whereas 15% (6% taking insulin and 20% not taking insulin) had never received any of these services. Factors contributing to this level of care and barriers preventing more intensive management of community-based patients with NIDDM were identified by the diabetes advisory councils as they analyzed data from their own communities. The councils determined that the main barriers to optimal care of community-based patients with NIDDM are that 1) NIDDM is not considered or managed as a serious problem by most physicians and their patients; 2) the genetic basis for and refractory nature of obesity are not generally appreciated; and 3) as a complex, multisystemic chronic illness, diabetes fits poorly in a health care delivery system designed to deal with acute and episodic illnesses. CONCLUSION: Most community-based patients with NIDDM are not aggressively managed because of attitudinal, educational, and systemic factors that act as barriers to optimal health care delivery.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1996

Forum Three: Changes in the U.S. health care system that would facilitate improved care for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

At the conclusion of the conference detailed in this supplement, conference attendees participated in one of three fora to discuss an assigned topic and incorporate conference presentations into the discussion. Forum Three, the results of which are reported here, addressed the challenging question of what changes in the U.S. health care system would facilitate improved care for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Using the nominal group process-a discussion technique designed to obtain a rank-ordered list of responses to the challenge question from a group of informed persons-Forum Three made the following priority recommendations: 1) Establish universal access to the comprehensive preventive services necessary to optimally manage the estimated 16 million Americans with NIDDM; 2) create a system of co-management between primary and specialty care services; and 3) modify the current health care system to include a program for increased patient and public awareness of the seriousness of NIDDM, special training for primary care residents and practicing physicians in this area, development of standards of care, creation of a central coordinating agency for all aspects of diabetes care, and development of outcome-based goals for patients and providers.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed1996

Development and validation of the Diabetes Care Profile.

To determine the reliability and the validity of the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP), an instrument that assesses the social and psychological factors related to diabetes and its treatment, two studies with separate populations and methodologies were conducted. In the first study, the DCP was administered to, and physiologic measures collected from, individuals with diabetes being cared for in a community setting (n = 440). In the second study, the DCP and several previously validated scales were administered to individuals with diabetes receiving care at a university medical center (n = 352). Cronbach's alphas of individual DCP scales ranged from .60 to .95 (Study 1) and from .66 to .94 (Study 2). Glycohemoglobin levels correlated with three DCP scales (Study 1). Several DCP scales discriminated among patients with different levels of disease severity. The results of the studies indicate that the DCP is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the psychosocial factors related to diabetes and its treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Community diabetes care. A 10-year perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare diabetes care and education at the community level in 1981 and 1991 in order to record progress achieved in the decade of the 1980s, determine if there is a gap that must be closed to reach diabetes-related objectives for 2000, and establish a baseline to which changes stimulated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial can be compared. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In eight Michigan communities, representative primary-care physicians (61 in 1981; 68 in 1991) and their diabetic patients (428 and 440) were identified. Communities, physicians, and patients were randomly selected. Participating patients were interviewed and examined in their community or home to assess the kind and extent of diabetes care they had been receiving; their metabolic, nutritional, educational, and psychosocial status; their diabetic history and current status; and other related factors. The diabetic status, care, and education of the 1981 community patients were compared with those of patients studied in 1991. RESULTS: Positive changes in diabetes care and education at the community level from 1981 to 1991 were seen in the areas of patient glucose monitoring, insulin administration practices, hypertension control, exercise recommendations in diabetic management; and smoking rates. Negative changes occurred in the percentage of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients receiving diabetes education and frequency of office visits to the patient's primary-care physician. Changes of indeterminate value included a sharp decline in primary diabetes admissions to the hospital and a decrease in the proportion of NIDDM patients managed with insulin. Many other hoped-for changes from 1981 status, such as screening for retinopathy, foot-care practices, and overall metabolic control of diabetes, did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The decade of the 1980s produced modest, but not impressive, improvements in diabetes care and education at the community level. Progress must be accelerated if the diabetes-related objectives included in the national targets for health promotion and disease prevention for 2000 are to be met.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Guidelines vs practice in the delivery of diabetes nutrition care.

The American Dietetic Association and the American Diabetes Association have published recommendations for the nutrition care of people with diabetes. However, the frequency of this care is rarely documented. As part of a study of diabetes care and education practices, the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center collected extensive data from 440 randomly selected adults who receive diabetes care from community physicians. These data provided a basis for comparison between diabetes nutrition care as recommended and as delivered in typical American communities. In this population (mean age = 61 years; 54% women), 89% (393) had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Of these, 152 were managed with insulin (NIDDM/I) and 241 were not managed with insulin (NIDDM/NI). Most of the NIDDM/NI group was overweight (71%) and had elevated levels of glycated hemoglobin (62%) and serum cholesterol (53%). Yet they were significantly less likely than those with NIDDM/I to see a dietitian. The most frequently reported reason for not seeing a dietitian was that a physician had not referred them (53%). More than 90% of those with NIDDM/I or NIDDM/NI who were referred to a dietitian saw one. Because this population was from randomly selected communities, physicians, and patients, the results are probably generalizable to other regions of the United States. This study shows that in community practice, insulin use is the primary marker of the need for nutrition intervention, and the lack of physician referral to a dietitian is an important barrier to people receiving recommended diabetes nutrition care.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Characteristics of medical schools and their affiliated institutions.

Survey data from a sample of 58 U.S. and six Canadian medical schools were used to describe the current network of medical schools and their affiliates. Results showed that each medical school in the study averaged over 11 affiliates. The largest percentages of affiliates reported were in the categories of "community" hospitals (that is, the nongovernmental, not-for-profit hospitals), Veterans Administration hospitals, and city hospitals. Characteristics of the medical schools, such as class size, ownership, year established, and the presence of a university hospital, were not related to either the number or the kind of affiliates. However, the sizes of the affiliated institutions were associated with the year the medical school was established, the presence of a university hospital, and the class size of the medical school.

Canada↗
PubMed1987

Psychosocial adjustment to and control of diabetes mellitus: differences by disease type and treatment.

The relationship of diabetic patients' psychosocial adjustment to disease type, treatment mode, and indexes of control was examined in a representative community population. The psychometric properties of the Diabetes Educational Profile (DEP) and its application to psychosocial research in diabetes were also investigated. Findings support the reliability and validity of the DEP. Various measures of psychosocial adjustment were related to diabetes control but the specific relationships depended on the particular aspect of adjustment, the specific measure of diabetes control, and the type of disease and treatment. The findings suggest that analyses that aggregate dissimilar patient groups are subject to misinterpretation due to ecological masking and supressor effects. The results indicate that clinicians and researchers must recognize that patients with different disease types and treatment modes have different norms for psychological adjustment and diabetes control. Further, the particular aspects of psychosocial adjustment associated with diabetes control differ across patient groups.

Adaptation, Psychological↗