Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R G Neves.
We describe a case of subcutaneous zygomycosis caused by Conidiobolus coronatus of six years' duration. Following treatment failure using potassium iodide, the patient responded with ketoconazole therapy. She remained well three years following therapy. Brazilian cases of subcutaneous infections caused by C coronatus and Basidiobolus ranarum are reviewed.
A comparative study of the Ridley-Jopling's (RJ) and of the Congress of Madrid's (CM) pathological criteria was made in the different clinical types and groups of hanseniasis. A concordance between both criteria was found in the Indeterminate group and in the regressive phases of the Virchowian (V), Tuberculoid (T) and Reactional tuberculoid (RT) types. Clinical RT was confirmed by pathology in 81.2% of the cases according to CM, whereas 46.2% were considered "Borderline" according to RJ. Out of the 48 clinically V patients, 17 (35.4%) were "Borderline" (BL-2, BL-1 and BB), but practically all were also pathologically V according to CM. It is concluded that there is no practical convenience in the establishment of histopathological sub-groups that do not perfectly agree with clinical criteria. The Authors stress the importance of the study of the plasmocytes in the V infiltrates, of the lymphocytes in all granulomas and of the differences in the involvement of the neural ends, specially between the T and V poles. The dyeing of lipids by the Sudan III is useful to perfectly characterize the V pole, recognize residual V structures, separate the sub-groups BT, BB and BL, help in the early diagnosis of V infiltrations and differentiate the edematous, diffuse, non-granular cytoplasmatic vacuolization of RT.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Eighty-six patients of leprosy have been examined by three leprologists; they have been classified according to the Madrid classification and their lesions biopsied and sent to two pathologists for independent histopathological examination. The pathologists have not received any information regarding the cases. Firstly the "senior" pathologist (A) utilized the Madrid classification and the "junior" pathologist (B) the Ridley-Jopling classification. In a second phase, the "senior" pathologist utilized the Ridley-Jopling classification and the "junior" pathologist the Madrid classification. Both pathologists did not know their own previous histopathological diagnosis at the second phase. The analysis of concordance and discordance between the histopathological diagnosis of the two pathologists and for the same pathologist, on utilizing the two classifications, have elicited the following conclusions: 1. There has been more concordance between the two pathologists on utilizing the Madrid classification than the Ridley-Jopling classification for the lepromatous, borderline and tuberculoïd in reaction patients. 2. The comparison of the two classifications for each pathologist on "blindly" examination of the material, has shown more concordance for the "senior" pathologist than for the "junior" pathologist. 3. These observations have convoyed to the final conclusion that the Ridley-Jopling classification brings some difficulties to the pathologists with limited experience in leprology and therefore it should be utilized only by experienced pathologists. 4. This preliminary study shows the necessity of performing another one with larger number of patients, in the active phase, with larger number of pathologists, preferably from different countries, and by utilizing the same methodology of "blind" examination of the material.