Erythropoietin in the pathogenesis and treatment of neonatal anemia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R G Strauss.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Premature neonates require multiple red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Single-donor programs have been proposed as a means to limit donor exposures, but methods must be developed to collect, store long-term and issue multiple aliquots of RBCs from a single donor. We evaluated a method by which RBCs could be collected, leukocyte depleted, repeatedly centrifuged for issuance as multiple small aliquots of high-hematocrit cells and then resuspended for continued storage throughout 42 days. The quality of RBCs handled by the method were compared to cells stored in standard fashion. Leakage of intracellular potassium, hemoglobin and lactic dehydrogenase into the extracellular fluid from RBCs processed by either method was comparable-indicating maintenance of RBC integrity. Multiple cultures, taken throughout the period of storage, were sterile to document that extensive handling did not introduce contamination. This new method appears promising as a means to provide RBCs for neonates.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs relative to the benefits of using recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy as an alternative to red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in infants with anemia of prematurity. DESIGN: A cost-benefit analysis of rHuEPO therapy was performed based on its use in very-low-birth-weight premature infants. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Data were drawn from published studies or were provided by the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs and benefits were analyzed as a comparison of incurred costs to averted costs. Incurred and averted costs of rHuEPO therapy and RBC transfusions included direct product costs and estimates of costs of adverse events. The analysis was viewed in terms of net savings. Sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: The base case analysis yielded a net loss of $299.48 per infant. A 54% reduction in the direct product costs of rHuEPO therapy yielded a break-even point. No other variations in the sensitivity analysis resulted in a net savings. CONCLUSION: Using assumptions based on the current state of clinical research, it appears that routine use of rHuEPO with supplemental RBC transfusions would not generate any cost savings as an alternative to RBC transfusions alone. As further evidence is compiled on the efficacy of rHuEPO therapy in very-low-birth-weight premature infants, the true costs may be better established.
All blood components collected by automated cytapheresis contain donor leukocytes. The possibility that repeated cytapheresis donation might lead to clinically important leukocyte losses and immunodeficiency has been a long-standing concern. Although convincing data do not exist to substantiate this concern, it is common practice to limit the number of annual cytapheresis donations per donor and to monitor donors for developing lymphocytopenia. Clinically significant immunodeficiency is unlikely to occur unless donors lose > 1 x 10(11) lymphocytes within a few weeks period of time or unless donor lymphocyte counts fall persistently to < 0.5 x 10(9)/L. Each plateletpheresis procedure, when performed using modern cell separators that are designed to produce a relatively "pure" platelet concentrate, leads to the loss of 1.0 x 10(6) to 5.0 x 10(7) leukocytes. Thus, automated plateletpheresis as performed in 1994 is extremely unlikely to cause clinically significant lymphocyte depletion and consequent immunodeficiency.
Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) is both under- and overused. Although the decision to order PABD lies with the surgeon, it is quite likely that other surgery clinic personnel influence patient acceptance and enrollment into PABD programs. Accordingly, we measured knowledge, attitudes, and the referral practice of clinic personnel pertaining to PABD. We administered a questionnaire to 102 nurses and 33 clerks working in surgery clinics at three university medical centers--one center in an area with a high incidence of AIDS and two centers in areas of low incidence of AIDS. Knowledge of PABD was poor when assessed by six questions. Only 6% each of nurses and clerks answered all questions correctly; 55% of nurses and 54% clerks missed three or more of the six questions. Surprisingly, no differences (P > .05) in knowledge deficits were noted when personnel from high and low AIDS areas were compared--indicating an overall need for education about PABD. In general, attitudes about PABD were positive, as most respondents (63%) gave favorable answers. Clinic personnel from the high AIDS area had even more favorable attitudes (P = .02). Because of these favorable attitudes, it seems likely that educational programs dealing with PABD would be readily accepted by clinic personnel. Greater knowledge should enhance the effectiveness of clinic staff in identifying, counseling, and referring eligible patients for this service.
Two patients were treated with photopheresis for marked cardiac allograft rejection with hemodynamic compromise that had become unresponsive to standard therapy. Multiple episodes of rejection had occurred, and initial response to standard therapy was favorable. However, progressive deterioration was documented by serial endomyocardial biopsies, fever, congestive heart failure, and abnormal cardiac catheterization findings. In the absence of retransplantation, death seemed imminent. Photopheresis was begun. Both patients received oral 8-methoxypsoralen and > or = 5 x 10(9) mononuclear cells were collected, treated with ultraviolet light A for 1.5 hours, and were reinfused. One procedure was performed weekly x4 and then monthly x5. Responses were striking with rapid loss of fever, improvement in exercise tolerance, normalization of cardiac hemodynamics, and improvement in endomyocardial biopsies. Although our experience with these two patients is anecdotal, photopheresis merits further study as treatment for severe cardiac allograft rejection.
To determine whether the physician or patient had initiated the discussion regarding preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) and to assess the relative importance of the physician's recommendation in patients' decision to donate, responses were obtained from 254 of 409 patients (62%) who had donated preoperatively during the 3 study months. Nearly all (96%) strongly agreed they would donate again for themselves and nearly all (94%) strongly agreed they would recommend PABD to others. Patients initiated the discussion about PABD 23% of the time, while 71% indicated strong surgeon input. The remaining respondents said their surgeon had "mentioned it, but said it was up to me." The importance of avoiding transfusion reactions was rated significantly greater among those whose surgeons had initiated the discussion, as was the relative weight of the surgeon's recommendation. The desire to alleviate the blood shortage was rated much less important among patients who had initiated the discussion themselves.
BACKGROUND: To avoid the need, in serial apheresis donors, either to delay plateletpheresis until a predonation platelet count is completed or to obtain a postdonation count after each procedure, a statistical model has been developed to predict the postdonation platelet count from the donor predonation platelet count, weight, and hematocrit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Predonation and postdonation platelet counts were measured in two groups of approximately 100 consecutive donors (Group A to test the model and Group B to validate it), and the postdonation counts were calculated with the model. Using stepwise multiple linear regression from donor data, estimated postdonation platelet counts were found to be comparable to the postdonation platelet counts actually measured. RESULTS: Estimated postdonation platelet counts x 10(9) per L (mean +/- SD) for each group, respectively, were Group A, 195 +/- 35, versus actual platelet counts of 195 +/- 39 (p = 0.43), and Group B, 183 +/- 36, versus actual platelet counts of 189 +/- 34 (p = 0.14). Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were Group A, 57 and 99 percent and Group B, 62 and 99 percent. CONCLUSION: For most serial apheresis donors, application of this predictor model should preclude the need to obtain an extra postdonation platelet count.
BACKGROUND: Historically, paid blood donors were found to transmit hepatitis at higher rates than volunteers. In those older studies, paid donors frequently were recruited from prisons or slum areas--a finding consistent with the belief that monetary payment in itself did not necessarily lead to the high-risk status of commercial blood. Instead, it was the population base from which the donors were recruited that was important. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Today, cytapheresis donors are in great demand. Because payment is one incentive that might entice donors to undertake the increased commitment of repeated cytapheresis donation, the results were studied of infectious disease history and laboratory testing performed concurrently in 917 volunteer whole-blood donors and 1240 paid cytapheresis donors, who were enrolled in distinct programs at the DeGowin Blood Center from October 7, 1987, through November 30, 1990. RESULTS: When first, repeat, and overall donations made by these donors were evaluated separately, paid cytapheresis donors were found to exhibit no increase in infectious disease history or test results beyond those of volunteer whole-blood donors. CONCLUSION: Thus, paid cytapheresis donors, when managed within a formal program, should not necessarily be presumed to be more dangerous than volunteers, from an infectious disease aspect. However, definitive proof of safety (comparison of transfusion-transmitted infection rates in two groups of patients receiving blood components exclusively from either paid cytapheresis or volunteer donors) was not pursued by long-term follow-up studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although the efficacy of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions as treatment for progressive infections in severely neutropenic patients is supported by the medical literature, this form of therapy is not widely accepted because it has been extremely difficult to transfuse an adequate dose of compatible granulocytes. Recently, the possibility has been raised to greatly increase the number of granulocytes collected by stimulating normal donors with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Accordingly, it is reasonable to reassess the possible role for granulocyte transfusions as therapy for progressive bacterial, yeast, and fungal infections.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.