PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Gary Rozier

Publications and source records attributed to R Gary Rozier.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for Medicaid-enrolled children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4%) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14%), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2% at 9 months to 19% at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters. SETTING: Well-child visits during primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 9 to 42 months. INTERVENTION: Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective. RESULTS: Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.

Cariostatic Agents↗

The effect of two publicly funded insurance programs on use of dental services for young children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the use of dental services for preschool aged children enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid, a traditional program based on a fee-for-service schedule, and North Carolina Health Choice (NCHC), an State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) dental insurance program structured similarly to private insurance. STUDY POPULATION: All children (165,858) 1-5 years of age enrolled in Medicaid and S-CHIP (NCHC) at some time during one study year (October 1, 1999-September 30, 2000). DATA SOURCES/EXTRACTION METHODS: Medicaid and NCHC enrollment and dental claims files were obtained for individual children. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study with a retrospective cohort design. Use of dental services for each child was measured as having at least one dental claim during the outcome period (October 1, 1999-September 30, 2000). Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to compare the effect of two differently administered insurance programs on the use of dental services, controlling for demographic, enrollment, and county characteristics. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Children enrolled solely in S-CHIP (NCHC) were 1.6 times more likely (95 percent confidence intervals (CI)=1.50-1.79) to have a dental visit than those enrolled solely in Medicaid. Prediction models for children enrolled for 12 months indicated that those enrolled in S-CHIP (NCHC) had a significantly higher probability of having a dental visit (50 percent) than those enrolled in both plans (44 percent) or Medicaid only (39 percent), a trend found in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The S-CHIP (NCHC) program appears to provide children with increased access to dental care compared to children in the Medicaid program.

Child, Preschool↗

Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Many dental studies have assessed the effectiveness of community- or group-based interventions such as community water fluoridation. These cluster trials, of which group-randomized trials (GRTs) are one type, have design and analysis considerations not found in studies with randomization of treatments to individuals (randomized controlled trials, RCTs). The purpose of this paper is to review analytic methods used for the analysis of binary outcomes from cluster trials and to illustrate these concepts and analytical methods using a school-based GRT. METHODS: We examine characteristics of GRTs including intra-class correlation (ICC), their most distinctive feature, and review analytical methods for GRTs including group-level analysis, adjusted chi-square test and multivariable analysis (mixed effect models and generalized estimating equations) for correlated binary data. We consider two- and three-level modeling of data from a cross-sectional cluster design. We apply the concepts reviewed using a GRT designed to determine the effect of incentives on response rates in a school-based dental study. We compare the results of analyses using methods for correlated binary data with those from traditional methods that do not account for ICC. RESULTS: Application of traditional analytic methods to the dental GRT used as an example for this paper led to a substantial overstatement of the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring the ICC among members of the same group in the analysis of public health intervention studies can lead to erroneous conclusions where groups are the unit of assignment. Special consideration is needed in the analysis of data from these cluster trials. Randomization of treatments to groups also should receive more consideration in the design of cluster trials in dental public health.

Algorithms↗

Continuity of care and early diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

This study investigated whether receiving continuous regular care with the same primary care provider had an independent association with stage at diagnosis for head and neck cancers (HNCA) in a Medicare population. The study database (N = 10,662) linked files from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 1991-2000 for patients with cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx with their files from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Program. Continuity of care displayed a statistically significant independent association and dose-response pattern with stage at diagnosis when the provider was an internist but not a general or family physician. An independent statistically significant association between continuity of care with an internist and stage at diagnosis was found for oral cavity tumors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.73-0.99), but not pharyngeal tumors (AOR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.74-1.41). Laryngeal tumors were borderline statistically significant at p-value = 0.07 (AOR = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.69-1.02). Regular continuous care from the same primary care provider displayed an independent association with early diagnosis of HNCA when the anatomic site was the oral cavity and the provider was an internist, but not when the provider was a general or family physician. Primary care physicians including general/family physicians may represent a relevant group for encouraging increased opportunistic HNCA screening efforts among their patients.

Aged↗

Determinants of dental referral practices among WIC nutritionists in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of knowledge and confidence on dental referral practices among WIC nutritionists in North Carolina. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 118 Likert scale-type questions was administered to 92% of all WIC nutritionists in North Carolina (n = 324). The relationship of knowledge and confidence with frequent dental referrals was tested using logistic regression. RESULTS: Regression results found that confidence in performing oral health risk assessments (OR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.13, 3.96), confidence in making dental referrals (OR = 3.02; 95% CI = 1.45-6.29), and confidence in expected outcomes that parents would seek dental care when advised to do so (OR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.62, 5.97) were associated with more frequent dental referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The more confident WIC nutritionists feel about oral health, the more likely they are to make dental referrals. Screening and referral by WIC workers may benefit children by improving access to dental care, as the WIC clinic is frequently the first point of contact with a health professional.

Adult↗

Parental perceptions of their preschool-aged children's oral health.

BACKGROUND: Parents have an important role in making decisions about their children's oral health. The purpose of the authors' study was to determine parental perceptions of their children's oral health status and factors correlated with these perceptions of health. METHODS: The authors analyzed data for 3,424 children (2-5 years of age) from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. They based the dependent variable on a question asked of primary caregivers: "How would you describe the condition of [child's name]'s natural teeth?" Explanatory variables included demographic variables, dental visits, perception of child's general health, need for dental care and presence of tooth caries. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of parents rated their child's oral health as excellent, very good or good, and 11 percent rated it as fair or poor (mean = 2.7 on a five-point scale, with 1 being excellent and 5 being poor). Tooth caries, perceived need for dental cleaning and treatment, lower income and poorer general health perceptions were associated with poorer parental ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Actual disease and perceived need are associated significantly with parents' perceptions of their children's oral health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding parents' perceptions of their children's oral health and factors that motivate these perceptions can help dentistry overcome barriers that parents encounter in accessing dental care for their children.

Child, Preschool↗

Physicians' roles in preventing dental caries in preschool children: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

CONTEXT: Almost 20% of children aged 2 to 5 years have untreated dental caries. Physician interventions to prevent and manage dental caries in preschool children could help address this common problem. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for effectiveness of five possible physician interventions- (1) screening and risk assessment, (2) referral, (3) provision of dietary supplemental fluoride, (4) application of fluoride varnish, and (5) counseling-for the prevention of dental caries for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: Articles from 1966 to 2001 addressing the effectiveness of primary care clinicians' interventions to prevent or manage dental caries were identified in MEDLINE. The evidence for effectiveness of supplemental fluorides, fluoride varnish, and counseling for caries prevention performed by dental personnel was also examined through existing and new systematic reviews. DATA SYNTHESIS: For most key questions related to the five interventions, the evidence for primary care clinician effectiveness was rated as poor owing to the scarcity of studies. Ten surveys of physicians' knowledge and behavior about fluoride supplementation provided fair evidence, suggesting that supplementation decisions were often made without consideration of other fluoride exposures. Reviews of the dental literature identified fair evidence supporting the effectiveness of both fluoride supplements and varnish, although information describing effectiveness and adverse outcomes of supplementation with the most recent dosage schedule is not available. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the effectiveness of traditionally recommended primary care clinician interventions (screening, referral, counseling) to prevent dental caries in preschool children is lacking. There is fair evidence for the effectiveness of two fluoride-based interventions (fluoride supplementation and varnish) applicable in primary care practice. However, there is also fair evidence indicating that physicians' consideration of fluoride exposure is incomplete, thus increasing the risk for fluorosis among those prescribed supplements.

Child, Preschool↗

The effects of the Women, Infants, and Children's Supplemental Food Program on dentally related Medicaid expenditures.

OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the effects of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on dentally related Medicaid expenditures for young children. METHODS: We used a five-year cohort study design to compare dentally related Medicaid expenditures for children enrolled in WIC versus those not enrolled for each year of life up to age 5 years. There were 49,795 children born in North Carolina in 1992 who met the inclusion criteria for the study. Their birth records were linked to Medicaid enrollment and claims files, WIC master files, and the Area Resource File. Our analysis strategy included a logit and OLS two-part model with CPI dollar adjustments. RESULTS: Children who participated in WIC at ages 1 and 2 years had significantly less dentally related expenditures than those who did not participate. WIC participation at age 3 years did not have a significant effect. Fewer WIC children received dental care under general anesthesia than non-WIC children. CONCLUSIONS: The WIC program has the potential for decreasing dentally related costs to the Medicaid program, while increasing use of dental services.

Adult↗

Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.

OBJECTIVE: Several health care organizations recommend that physicians provide preventive dentistry services, including dental screening and referral. This study is the first to investigate characteristics of medical providers that influence their referral to a dentist of children who are at risk for dental disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken of primary care clinicians in 69 pediatric practices and 49 family medicine practices who were enrolled in a study to evaluate a pediatric preventive dentistry program targeted toward Medicaid-eligible children in North Carolina. A 100-item, self-administered questionnaire with 23 items on some aspect of dental referral elicited providers' knowledge and opinions toward oral health, their provision of dental services, and their confidence in providing these services. We hypothesized that providers' dental knowledge, opinions about the importance of oral health, and confidence in providing oral health services would be associated with their propensity to refer children who are younger than 3 years and are suspected of having risk factors for future dental disease or a few teeth in the beginning stages of decay. We also hypothesized that providers' perceived referral difficulty would affect their referral activities. Patient characteristics (tooth decay status, insurance status, immigrant status, English speaking), practice characteristics (setting, number of providers, patient volume, busyness), practice environment (perceived and actual availability of dentists), and other provider characteristics (gender, type, practice experience, board certification, training in oral health during or after professional education, hours worked, teaching of residents, preventive behaviors) were assessed and used as control variables. Preliminary bivariate analysis (analysis of variance, chi2) identified characteristics associated with referral activity. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using backward stepwise logistic regression tested the posed hypotheses, with provider, practice, and patient characteristics included as potential control variables. RESULTS: Nearly 78% of 169 primary care clinicians who participated in the survey reported that they were likely to refer children who had signs of early decay or high risk for future disease. Approximately half (54%) call a dental office sometimes or more frequently to make an appointment for a child whom they refer, but the most common method is to give the caregiver the name of a dentist without additional assistance (96%). Bivariate analysis revealed that providers who had high confidence in their ability to perform screenings and reported low overall referral difficulty were more likely to refer children. Bivariate analyses also found that providers who were not in group practices, were board certified, graduated 20 years ago or more, saw 80 or more patients per week, had >60% of their total patients who were infants and toddlers, and saw >3.5 patients per hour were significantly less likely to refer at-risk children for dental care. No patient characteristics were associated with referral. The regression model revealed that an increase in odds of referral was significantly associated with confidence in screening abilities (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-15.1), low referral difficulty (OR: 6.0; 95% CI: 1.0-34.5), and group practice (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4-12.1). Having a patient population of >60% infants or toddlers was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of referral (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7). Oral health knowledge and opinions did not help to explain referral practices. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth decay remains a substantial problem in young children and is made worse by existing barriers that prevent them from obtaining dental care. Because most children are exposed to medical care but not dental care at an early age, primary care medical providers have the opportunity to play an important role in helping children and their families gain access to dental care. This study has identified several factors that need consideration in the further exploration and development of primary care physicians' role in providing for the oral health of their young patients. First, instructional efforts to increase providers' dental knowledge or opinions of the importance of oral diseases are unlikely to be effective in increasing dental referral unless they include methods to increase confidence in providers' ability to identify and appropriately refer children with disease. Medical education in oral health may need to be designed to include components that address self-efficacy in providing risk assessment, early detection, and referral services. Traditional, didactic instruction does not fulfill these requirements, but because the effectiveness of instructional methods for teaching medical providers oral health care, particularly confidence-building aspects, is untested, controlled evaluations are necessary. A second conclusion from this study is that the referral environment is more important than provider knowledge, experience, opinions, or patient characteristics in determining whether medical practitioners refer at-risk children for dental care. Most providers in this study held positive opinions about providing dental services in their practices, had relatively high levels of knowledge, screened for dental disease, accessed risk factors in their patients, and referred; they can be instrumental in helping young children get dental care, yet most providers face difficulties in making dental referrals, and changes in the availability of dental care will be necessary to decrease these barriers before referral can be most effective. The longer-term approach of increasing the number of dental graduates can be complemented in the shorter term by other approaches to increase dentists' participation in Medicaid, such as increases in reimbursement rates; training general dentists to treat young children; and community organization activities to link families, physicians, dentists, and public programs such as Early Head Start. Finally, pediatric primary health care providers can provide oral health promotion and disease prevention activities, thereby eliminating or delaying dental disease and the need for treatment at a very young age. However, effective and appropriate involvement of pediatric primary care clinicians can be expected only after they receive the appropriate training and encouragement and problems with the dental referral environment are addressed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Effects of WIC participation on children's use of oral health services.

OBJECTIVES: We estimated the effects of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on dental services use by Medicaid children in North Carolina. METHODS: We used linked Medicaid claims and enrollment files, WIC files, and the area resource file to compare dental services use for children enrolled in WIC with those not enrolled. We used multivariate models that controlled for child clustering and employed 2-step methodology to control for selection bias. RESULTS: Children who participated in WIC had an increased probability of having a dental visit, were more likely to use preventive and restorative services, and were less likely to use emergency services. CONCLUSIONS: Children's WIC participation improved access to dental care services that should lead to improved oral health.

Aid to Families with Dependent Children↗

Oral health surveillance: past, present, and future challenges.

We reviewed and summarized the efforts in the United States to collect data on oral diseases, conditions, and behaviors implemented at the national and state level. The main characteristics of these efforts were: (1) systematic collection of data from representative samples, mostly at the national level; (2) one-time or sporadic experiences when data are collected at state and local levels; (3) use of visual-tactile protocols implemented at the tooth-surface or tooth-site level for data collection; (4) focus mainly on dental caries and periodontal diseases; and (5) leap-time from data collection to publication of results. Using the definition of surveillance in public health (the ongoing and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of outcome-specific data for use in planning, implementing, and evaluating public health practice), we show there is an impending need to develop new techniques to build up surveillance systems for oral diseases, conditions, and behaviors at the national, state, and local levels. In the second part of this review, we presented a number of alternative techniques developed in the last 10 years to collect timely data for oral health. The main characteristics of these efforts include: (1) focusing on data collection at state and local level; (2) integration into existing and ongoing surveillance systems; (3) using visual-only protocols to collect data on oral disease status; (4) focusing on a variety of diseases, conditions, and behaviors; and (5) analyzing the data in a timely matter. Many of these efforts have been integrated into the National Oral Health Surveillance System, which has developed eight indicators in response to national health objectives. Finally, we envision the future of visual-tactile protocols in data collection of representative samples to monitor oral health status at the national level and as a research tool. At the state and local level, however, we envision an integrated system of data collection as a constantly evolving process as new techniques are developed in response to new demands.

Data Collection↗

Prevention of early childhood caries in North Carolina medical practices: implications for research and practice.

Early childhood caries is a significant public health problem in low-income children, with important negative consequences for the child and the family. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development, implementation, and preliminary outcomes of preventive dentistry programs in North Carolina that target low-income children from birth to thirty-five months of age. The focus is on Into the Mouths of Babes, a statewide program in which pediatricians, family physicians, and providers in community health clinics are reimbursed by Medicaid to provide preventive dental services for children (risk assessment, screening, referral, fluoride varnish application) and caregivers (counseling). The provider intervention includes continuing medical education lectures and interactive sessions, practice guidelines for the patient interventions, case-based problems, practical strategies for implementation, a toolkit with resource materials, and follow-up training. In the first two years of the statewide program, 1,595 medical providers have been trained. The number of providers billing for these services has steadily increased, and by the last quarter of 2002, the number of visits in which preventive dental services were provided in medical offices reached 10,875. A total of 38,056 preventive dental visits occurred in medical offices in 2002. By the end of 2002, only sixteen of the state's one hundred counties had no pediatrician, family physician, or local health department participating. The preliminary results from this program demonstrate that nondental professionals can integrate preventive dental services into their practices. The program has increased access to preventive dental services for young Medicaid children whose access to dentists is restricted. Assessments of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both the provider and patient interventions are under way.

Cariostatic Agents↗

A comparison of three comorbidity indexes in a head and neck cancer population.

We explored differences in prognostic ability for mortality of the established and validated Charlson comorbidity index with two other comorbidity indexes developed for this study. Our study was limited to persons diagnosed with HNCA between 1985 and 1993 in a database formed by a linkage of files from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program with Health Care Finance Administration Medicare files (n=9386). Adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for comorbidity index scores of 1 or more compared to 0 were (RR=1.50, 95% CI 1.43-1.68) Charlson index, (RR=1.53 95% CI 1.42-1.66) HNCA index, and (RR=1.49, 95% CI 1.32-1.68) ATC index, respectively. The Charlson and HNCA indexes displayed dose-response patterns (P-value for trend <0.0001). Although the ATC index appears promising, the HNCA and Charlson indexes had similar adjusted RR's, dose-response patterns, P-values, and chi-square scores and appear particularly well-suited to the measurement of comorbidity.

Aged↗

Accuracy of pediatric primary care providers' screening and referral for early childhood caries.

PURPOSE: Tooth decay is one of the more common diseases of childhood. Slightly >40% of US children are already affected by the time they reach kindergarten. Primary care physicians can play an important role in prevention and control of this disease because of their ready access to this population. Unlike dentists, they see a large percentage of children during their infant and toddler years. However, few studies have been conducted on oral screenings and referrals by primary care physicians or the effectiveness of their oral health preventive activities. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of pediatric primary care providers' screening and referral for Early Childhood Caries. METHODS: We sought to compare independent, blinded oral screening results and referral recommendations made by primary care providers with those of a pediatric dentist, considered for purposes of the study to be the reference gold standard. The study was conducted at a private pediatric group practice in North Carolina. The practice was selected because it serves a large volume of Medicaid patients and includes a large number of pediatric primary care providers (11 pediatricians and 1 nurse practitioner). Study participants included Medicaid-eligible children younger than 36 months of age with erupted teeth. The pediatric primary care providers in this practice received 2 hours of training in infant oral health. The training consisted of a review of the study methods and clinical slides illustrating dental caries in various stages of progression. Specific instructions were given to the providers on how to recognize a cavitated carious lesion and how to determine when a dental referral is needed. Providers were instructed to refer any child with 1 or more cavitated carious lesions, soft tissue pathology, or evidence of trauma to the teeth or mouth. Before commencing the study, calibration and a comparative analysis were performed to establish reliability and validity of the examinations performed by the pediatric dentist. Both a pediatric dentist and a pediatric primary care provider conducted a dental screening on each child and recorded carious teeth and whether a dental referral was needed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare the pediatric primary care providers' screenings to the gold standard (pediatric dentist) in 3 categories: caries at the tooth level, caries at the patient level (1 or more affected teeth), and need for referral. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 258 preschool-aged children (122 males and 136 females) with a mean age of 21.2 months (standard deviation [SD]: 9.13). One hundred eighty-four (71.3%) of the participants were white, 58 (22.5%) were black, and 16 (6.2%) were Hispanic. Tooth-Level Analysis: The pediatric dentist reported an average of 0.30 (SD: 0.005) cavitated teeth per child, whereas the pediatric primary care providers reported a mean of 0.25 (SD: 0.004). This difference was not statistically significant (t test). The pediatric dentist identified 80 (2.4%) teeth with cavitated carious lesions, whereas the pediatric primary care providers identified 64 (1.9%), 25 of which were false-positives. Their screening results include 41 false-negative teeth. Thus, the primary care providers tended to under-count the number of teeth with carious lesions. They achieved a sensitivity of 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.51) and a specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.0) when their screening results for individual teeth were compared with the gold standard. Patient-Level Analysis: At the patient level, the pediatric dentist identified 25 (9.7%) children with 1 or more teeth affected by cavitated lesions. The pediatric primary care providers collectively identified 30 (11.6%) children who had cavitated lesions. They achieved a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98) in identifying those children with cavitated carious lesions. There were 6 false-negatives and 11 false-positives when the pediatric primary care providers' findings were compared with the gold standard. At the patient-level, the positive predictive value of the dental screening was 0.63 and the negative predictive value was 0.97. Dental Referral: The pediatric dentist referred a total of 27 (10.5%) children to a dentist. Two of these children were referred for trauma and the other 25 were referred for cavities. The pediatric primary care providers referred a total of 23 (8.9%) children to a dentist. Two referrals were made because the provider was concerned about stains on the teeth, whereas the remaining 21 were referred for cavities. The pediatric primary care providers achieved a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) when their recommendations for referral were compared with the gold standard. The number of children receiving a referral from a pediatric primary care provider for cavities (N = 21) was less than the number of children they identified as having cavities (N = 30). The providers as a whole tended to under-refer, and only 70% of children with evidence of dental disease received a referral. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 hours of training in infant oral health, the pediatric primary care providers in this study achieved an adequate level of accuracy in identifying children with cavitated carious lesions. Additional training and research would be needed to optimize pediatric primary care providers' identification of carious teeth if that were the goal of screening. However, the purpose of screening by nondental personnel generally is to accurately identify those in need of referral, which does not require a tooth-by-tooth identification of cavities. Additional research is also needed to determine how to improve dental referrals by pediatric primary care providers. Results of our study suggest that dental screenings can easily be incorporated into a busy pediatrics practice and that pediatric primary care providers can significantly contribute to the overall oral health of young children by the identification of those children who need to be seen by a dentist.

Age Factors↗

Problems with access to dental care for Medicaid-insured children: what caregivers think.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to gain insight into the experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of a racially and ethnically diverse group of caregivers regarding barriers to dental care for their Medicaid-insured children. METHODS: Criterion-purposive sampling was used to select participants for 11 focus groups, which were conducted in North Carolina. Seventy-seven caregivers of diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds participated. Full recordings of sessions were obtained and transcribed. A comprehensive content review of all data, including line-by-line analysis, was conducted. RESULTS: Negative experiences with the dental care system discouraged many caregivers in the focus groups from obtaining dental services for their Medicaid-insured children. Searching for providers, arranging an appointment where choices were severely limited, and finding transportation left caregivers describing themselves as discouraged and exhausted. Caregivers who successfully negotiated these barriers felt that they encountered additional barriers in the dental care setting, including long waiting times and judgmental, disrespectful, and discriminatory behavior from staff and providers because of their race and public assistance status. CONCLUSIONS: Current proposals to solve the dental access problem probably will be insufficient until barriers identified by caregivers are addressed.

Caregivers↗

Effectiveness of an educational intervention in oral health for pediatric residents.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an oral health educational intervention designed to increase proficiency of pediatric residents in oral health. METHODS: Pediatric residents at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) participated in oral health education that included didactic sessions, hands-on instruction by pediatric dentists and residents, preventive dentistry prompts, and change strategies to introduce oral health into practice. Pediatric residents at East Carolina University (ECU), who had a short practicum in oral health, and Wake Forest University (WFU), who had no specific oral health instruction, served as comparison groups. All residents completed questionnaires before and 12 months after instruction began at UNC. Effects were tested for each school separately by repeated-measure analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean percentage of UNC residents who answered 18 knowledge questions correctly and reported frequently performing 10 preventive dental practices increased by 17.7% and 65.1%, respectively, from baseline levels. Residents' confidence in performing 10 counseling and oral health screening activities improved by 17.9%. Opinions about including oral health in their clinical care improved only slightly. Changes at ECU and WFU were small, but low response rates in those schools preclude substantive conclusions from between schools comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted instruction in oral health was effective in improving pediatric residents' knowledge about oral health, their confidence in providing oral health services, and the delivery of these services in their ambulatory care practices. Residents also adopted the use of fluoride varnish, an innovation in pediatrics. More studies are needed to define the most efficient and effective residency-based instruction.

Clinical Competence↗

Parents' satisfaction with preventive dental care for young children provided by nondental primary care providers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess parents' satisfaction with the preventive dental care their children received in medical offices. METHODS: Caregivers accompanying Medicaid children for their medical visits at 30 practices, with at least 1 physician providing dental services, completed questionnaires just before and 12 months after initial dental care visits. Information at follow-up was obtained on the type of dental services received and parents' satisfaction with this care using questions adapted from the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey. Child, parent, and practice characteristics were used in logistic regression to predict categories representing the least satisfaction. RESULTS: About 92% of 342 parents who recalled at least 1 medical visit with dental care reported that the provider usually or always explained things in a way they could understand, and 84% reported that the provider spent enough time with their child. Seventy-seven percent rated overall dental care greater than 7 on an 11-point scale with 10 indicating the best care. Parents reporting race other than Caucasian or African American, mostly Hispanic or Asian, were the least satisfied with interpersonal aspects of care. Poor child oral health and lack of follow-up preventive dental care were associated with low ratings for communication, time, and overall care. CONCLUSIONS: Most parents rated highly their children's preventive dental care. Because it usually is attached to medical visits for other reasons, improvements in dental care quality may require process and systems initiatives that address the delivery of all pediatric care in a patient centered and culturally appropriate manner.

Adult↗