PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Grohmann

Publications and source records attributed to R Grohmann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Pseudohallucinations associated with moclobemide: a case report.

The goal of the multicenter drug surveillance project AMSP ("Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie") is the monitoring, assessment and analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADR) of psychopharmalogical drugs. We report about a 23 year-old patient with a depressive episode. He developed severe pseudohallucinations under a treatment with moclobemide. The symptoms occur 6 days after starting the medication and decline within two days after stopping moclobemide. The term "pseudohallucinations" is discussed controversially but still of high interest.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacotherapy of personality disorders in German speaking countries: state and changes in the last decade.

BACKGROUND: In many cases, patients with personality disorders currently receive psychopharmacological treatment as well as psychotherapy. Empirically oriented studies of outcome and efficacy are still rare, and clinical practice is still dominated by a symptomatic and rather pragmatic approach. AIM: This study provides empirical insight into the reality of psychopharmacological practice in psychiatric institutions in German speaking countries. METHOD: The use of psychotropic drugs in patients with personality disorders is demonstrated using the data base of the AMSP drug safety program. Recent changes are shown by comparing results from 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Our data show a symptom-driven, polypragmatic, and often off-label use of psychotropic drugs in personality disorders.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
PubMed2004

[Considerations in the combination of clozapine and benzodiazepines].

Serious adverse events and even sudden death have been reported during administration of the combination of clozapine and benzodiazepines. However, this combination does not necessarily result in increased frequency of serious adverse events. Thus it is not regarded as an absolute contraindication and might be useful in distinct clinical situations, e.g., during the occurrence of a malignant neuroleptic syndrome, "catatonic dilemma," or severe agitation during clozapine treatment. In the following report, certain suggestions on how to deal with this combination therapy are provided which may provide a basis for discussion that ultimately may lead to the formulation of guidelines for this combination therapy. Such guidelines may help psychiatrists in dealing with this combination in clinical situations. Moreover, the formulation of such guidelines would help with forensic issues in case of serious adverse events occurring during this combination therapy.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2004

The AMSP drug safety program: methods and global results.

The AMSP (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatry) study is a drug safety program that ensures the continuous assessment of severe adverse drug reactions (ADR) in psychiatric inpatients under the natural conditions of routine clinical treatment. It developed out of the preceding drug surveillance study AMUP (Arzneimittelüberwachung in der Psychiatrie). Currently 35 hospitals participate in the study. This paper describes the methods of the AMSP, gives detailed definitions of ADRs assessed to be "severe," and discusses the implications of these definitions and the methodological approach for evaluating the AMSP data. In addition, some overall data compiled on ADR rates from 1993 to 2000 are given.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2004

Research methods in drug surveillance.

Adverse drug reactions must be monitored, beginning with the development of a new drug, and continuing throughout its complete life cycle. During these various stages, different methods are necessary. This paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of common methods of collecting data on adverse drug reactions after a drug has been approved. We then concentrate on two drug surveillance projects, the Prescription Event Monitoring (PEM) of the Drug Surveillance Research Unit and the AMSP Project ("Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie", Drug Safety in Psychiatry). AMSP is compared to cohort studies and spontaneous reporting systems on the one hand, and the specialised PEM project, on the other. The possible influence of various sources of bias is critically analysed.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2004

The AMUP study for drug surveillance in psychiatry - a summary of inpatient data.

From 1979 to 1989 the AMUP study (AMUP = Arzneimittelüberwachung in der Psychiatrie) was conducted in two psychiatric hospitals in Germany with the aim to provide a systematic and standardized assessment of all adverse reactions to psychotropic drugs under conditions of routine practice. A total of 60.7 % of patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) with probable or definite causality during their stay in the hospital; 37.1 % of patients exhibited ADRs that had some therapeutic impact on further treatment. ADRs that led to drug discontinuation were observed in 8.6 %. This rate ranged from 9.5 to 5.1 % for haloperidol and perazine, the most common neuroleptics at that time; sedating antidepressants (AD) rated lower than non-sedating (amitriptyline 5.1 %, clomipramine 10.4 %). Lithium salts, antiparkinson drugs, and benzodiazepines were associated with considerably lower rates of ADRs than neuroleptics or antidepressants. Severe ADRs occurred in 1.4 % of exposed patients (e. g., toxic delirium, grand mal seizures, malignant neuroleptic syndrome, or agranulocytosis). The AMUP data suggest that administration of psychotropic drugs in psychiatric hospitals at that time was a safe, but also inconvenient treatment for many patients due to a wide range of bothersome side effects that compromised patient compliance. The data can serve as a reference base for comparisons with newer compounds introduced to the market over the last decade such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other new AD, atypical neuroleptics, or other new generation psychotropic drugs.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2004

Psychotropic drug use in psychiatric inpatients: recent trends and changes over time-data from the AMSP study.

A considerable number of new drugs were introduced over the last few years. In this report we analyze to what extent they have come to be used in clinical practice and what changes in drug use have resulted from the availability of the new compounds. For this purpose, data on drug use in 1995 and 2001 assessed at two reference days per year and per hospital within the drug safety program AMSP were compared for 10 hospitals that had been participating in both years. Atypical neuroleptics (NL) were used in 59.9 % of patients on NLs in 2001 (16.7 % in 1995), most frequently olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine, and quetiapine, in this order. Thirty-nine percent of patients still received typical NLs in antipsychotic indication (77.1 % in 1995), and 30.8 % received typical hypnosedative NLs (38.1 % in 1995). SSRIs, other new ADs, and TCAs were used in similar rates in 2001, i. e., in 40.5 %, 37.9 %, and 34.8 % of AD patients, respectively (1995 : 24.2 %, 6.2 %, and 72.3 %, respectively). Mirtazapine was the most common AD in 2001, followed by citalopram, sertraline, and doxepin. Hypnotics were prescribed more frequently in 2001 (17.6 % vs. 11.7 %), mostly BZD agonists at that time, whereas overall anxiolytic use (in approximately 30 %) hardly changed over time. Mood stabilizers and anti-dementia drugs were given comparatively rarely, even in pertinent diagnoses. Polypharmacy was observed in about three-quarters of patients on psychotropic drugs, with a trend towards increasing use over time. Combinations of two NLs, of NL + AD, and of NLs + anxiolytic were most common in both years. Twenty percent of patients on atypical NLs received typical antipsychotic NLs additionally; typical hypnosedative NLs were used along with typical antipsychotics and atypical NLs in 20 % and 22 % of patients, respectively. TCAs and either SSRIs or other new ADs were still the most common AD combinations in 2001. Data were also analyzed according to the main diagnostic categories.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Severe adverse drug reactions of antidepressants: results of the German multicenter drug surveillance program AMSP.

The goal of the German drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie) is the assessment of severe or new adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Here we report on 53,042 of 122,562 patients treated with antidepressants who were monitored from 1993 to 2000 in 35 psychiatric hospitals in German-speaking countries. The overall incidence of severe ADRs of antidepressants was 1.4 % of exposed patients; when only ADRs rated as probable or definite were considered, a rate of 0.9 % in patients treated with antidepressants was observed. ADR rates were higher for TCAs (imputed in 1.0 % of patients overall, respectively in 0.6 % of patients when only ADs were imputed) and lower for MAO inhibitors and SSRIs (0.7 % for both, respectively 0.3 % and 0.4 %). Within the TCA group there was a difference among clomipramine (2.1 %, respectively 1.0 %), amitriptyline (1.0 %, respectively 0.6 %), and doxepin or trimipramine (both 0.6 %, respectively 0.3 %). With regard to single SSRI, similar rates were observed for paroxetine (0.8 %, respectively 0.5 %) and for citalopram (0.7 %, respectively 0.4 %). Of the new dual-acting antidepressants, venlafaxine ranged at 0.9 %, (respectively 0.5 %) and mirtazapine at 0.6 % (respectively 0.5 %). In particular, TCAs were associated with known risks, such as toxic delirium, grand mal seizures, and hepatic (i. e., increased liver enzymes), urologic (i. e., urinary retention), allergic (i. e., exanthema), or cardiovascular (i. e., mainly orthostatic collapse) reactions. In SSRI-treated patients (non-delirious) psychic and neurological ADRs were most prominent, followed by gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and endocrinological/electrolyte reactions, with agitation, hyponatremia (probably as part of the SIADH syndrome and associated with severe neurologic or psychiatric symptoms in 64 % of all cases), increased liver enzymes, nausea, and the serotonin syndrome as leading unwanted symptoms. Venlafaxine (in the immediate-release formulation) was associated with adverse CNS and somatic symptoms such as severe agitation, diarrhea, increased liver enzymes, hypertension, and hyponatremia. Mirtazapine was mostly connected with increased liver enzymes, cutaneous edema, and collapse, but with no case of significant hyponatremia. For drugs that potently inhibit serotonin uptake, serum sodium concentration should be controlled when applied in high-dose therapy or in vulnerable patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Severe adverse drug reactions in psychiatric inpatients treated with neuroleptics.

Numerous studies compare side effects or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of the various typical and newer atypical neuroleptics in patients with schizophrenia. However, these studies, as controlled randomized trials, represent an artificial setting of drug administration and do not easily relate to the "real-life" setting of psychiatric treatment. In contrast, the AMSP drug safety program allows the monitoring of ADRs of all types of psychopharmacological agents in the naturalistic setting of routine clinical practice. In the present study, the data on neuroleptics acquired in the AMSP program from 1993 to 2000 are analyzed. In this period, 86,439 patients treated with at least one neuroleptic agent were monitored. In 1.1 % of the patients severe ADRs occurred. In contrast to the results from controlled trials, atypical neuroleptics caused more severe ADRs than did typical neuroleptics. This result was mainly caused by the high number of severe ADRs in patients treated with clozapine and concerned delirium and non-EPS neurological, gastrointestinal, hepatic, dermatological, hematological, and endocrinological ADRs. Atypical neuroleptics were found to be superior in EPS and urological ADRs. Excluding the data on clozapine, we found typical and atypical neuroleptics to be similar in the occurrence of severe ADRs, although the profiles differ between these two groups as well as between the single substances. Our findings provide valuable information on the type and frequency of ADRs in psychiatric practice, thus enabling differential indication of neuroleptics based not only on the efficacy and tolerability data of controlled trials but also on their differential ADR profile occurring in the "real-life" setting of routine clinical treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Severe and uncommon involuntary movement disorders due to psychotropic drugs.

Disorders of involuntary movement due to psychotropic drugs pose a major problem when treating mentally ill patients. These adverse drug reactions (ADR) frequently undermine the patients' compliance and may have serious consequences as well. The drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie) surveyed a population of 122,562 patients between 1993 and 2000, and documented 129 especially severe or uncommon involuntary movement disorders (IMD): 9 episodes of severe acute dyskinesia, 32 of severe Parkinsonism, 5 of especially severe akathisia, 16 of 'atypical dyskinesia', 38 of Pisa syndrome, 6 of catatonic neuroleptic syndrome, 15 of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and 8 of tardive dyskinesia. The epidemiological data for this population were systematically analyzed as regards the patient's history of medication, comedication, and clinical course. In those cases, in which a certain drug was imputed to cause an ADR alone and the causal relationship was rated as definite or probable, typical neuroleptics with mainly antipsychotic effects showed a relatively high incidence of 0.1047 %, those with hypnotic-sedative effect a lower incidence of 0.0198 %, and the atypical neuroleptics an incidence of 0.0567 %. This difference was highly significant in an chi (2)-analysis (chi (2) = 18.81, df = 2, p < 0.0001). Our data provide important information on the frequency, severity, and the consequences of ARD for the patients' compliance, and thus are of clinical interest.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Cardiac adverse effects associated with psychotropic drugs.

Within the drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP ( Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie), severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in psychiatric inpatients are assessed in the naturalistic setting of routine treatment. Currently, 35 psychiatric hospitals and departments are participating. This paper focuses on severe cardiovascular ADRs due to psychotropic medications. Related to the number of patients surveyed (122,562 from 1993 to 2000), these are rare events (68 cases or 0.055 %). Imputed drug classes for probable cases were antidepressants in 0.03 % and neuroleptics in 0.019 %, but other drugs were also involved. Within the group of antidepressants, the risk for a cardiac ADR depends much on the class: SSRIs were never imputed alone, but tricyclic antidepressants were imputed alone in 0.05 %. In the group of antipsychotics, the lowest rate of cardiac ADRs was found for the group of phenothiazines (0.003 %). Cardiovascular risk factors elevated the risk for a cardiac ADR from 0.04 % to 0.14 %. Age as an independent factor did not contribute substantially to the risk for a cardiac ADR. The data of the drug safety program in psychiatry allow some estimate of differential risk rates for cardiac ADRs with different psychotropic drug groups. The results of the project can help clinicians select the appropriate drug for patients at risk to develop cardiac ADRs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Blood dyscrasias induced by psychotropic drugs.

Drugs can cause a variety of blood dyscrasias, e. g., by interfering with hematopoiesis in the bone marrow or damaging mature blood cells by antibodies. Although numerous reports on the risks of adverse hematological effects associated with psychotropic drugs have led to stringent monitoring requirements for some compounds, particularly neuroleptics, it is still difficult to estimate the true prevalence of such risks. Sixteen episodes of thrombocytopenia, 63 of neutropenia, 22 of agranulocytosis, 4 episodes of severe neutro- and thrombocytopenia, and 2 of pancytopenia were documented by the drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie) in a population of 122,562 patients between 1993 and 2000. All cases were related to the epidemiological data provided for this population and systematically analyzed as regards history of medication, co-medication, and the clinical course. Putative risk rates for the main groups of medications and a number of drugs could be estimated with this database. Most changes in the white blood cell counts, which were rated as probably or definitely drug-induced, were attributed to clozapine (0.18 % of patients exposed), carbamazepine (0.14 %) and perazine (0.09 %). In patients on newer atypical neuroleptics, we documented neutropenia assumed to be probably or definitely drug-related in five patients during treatment with olanzapine and in one case with risperidone. In all five olanzapine-related cases, the drugs were the sole cause of the adverse drug reactions. All surveyed patients who received clozapine showed no difference in age and gender distribution from those who developed hematological changes. Incidences of hematological changes for antidepressants were much lower (about 0.01 %). Although the methodological accuracy of these findings has to be critically discussed these data could be of considerable clinical relevance and should be helpful in making clinical treatment decisions.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Hyperglycemia associated with antipsychotic treatment in a multicenter drug safety project.

The introduction of new antipsychotics has resulted in the availability of drugs with improved safety and tolerability as well as proven efficacy compared to the older antipsychotics. New compounds might show new or different adverse effects that arise in the post-marketing phase when a greater number of patients are treated. One goal of the drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP ( Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie) is the detection and description of severe, new, or rare adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Between 1993 and 2000, 122,562 patients were monitored in 35 psychiatric institutions, 86,349 patients of which received antipsychotics. Hyperglycemia related to antipsychotics was observed in association with only two compounds so far: clozapine and olanzapine (clozapine 2 cases, olanzapine 7 cases). In 6 of 9 patients, weight gain preceded hyperglycemia. The relative frequency of these adverse drug related events was 0.013 % for clozapine and 0.075 % for olanzapine. The symptomatology included reversible hyperglycemia, worsening of existing diabetes, and new-onset diabetes. Control for glycemic dysregulation should be maintained in clinical practice with these drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Galactorrhea due to psychotropic drugs.

Within the drug safety program in psychiatry AMSP ( Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie), severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are assessed. Currently 35 psychiatric hospitals and departments are participating in detecting severe ADRs. This paper focuses on prolactin-dependent ADRs such as gynecomastia and galactorrhea due to psychotropic medications. Related to the number of patients surveyed (122,562 from 1993 to 2000), these are rare events (0.03 % or 35 cases). Imputed drugs were mostly antipsychotics, but antidepressants were also imputed in single cases. In the group of antipsychotics, relative frequencies of galactorrhea were highest for amisulpride and risperidone and corresponded to the degree of D2 binding. Galactorrhea assessed as "severe" was accompanied by distressing symptoms such as pain, tension, enlargement of breasts, or soaked clothing. The AMSP data contribute to the knowledge on endocrine ADRs by the large number of patients examined and help clinicians select the appropriate drug if their patients have been prone to for these ADRs in the past.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Rivastigmin and impaired motor function.

In this case study, we describe the case of an 88-year-old female patient diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease who developed a severe motor dysfunction as a side effect of rivastigmin treatment. There have been reports on motor dysfunctions caused by other choline esterase inhibitors.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[Incompatibility of olanzapine and amisulpride in multisystemic myotonic myopathy].

There is evidence for the occurrence of psychopathological symptoms in the adult form of myotonic dystrophy such as disturbance of concentration and memory, chronic depression, disturbed social behaviour, mental retardation, and hypersomnia. In this report we present a patient suffering from multisystemic myotonic myopathy without a cytosine-thymine-guanine [corrected] repeat expansion on chromosome 19q13.3 and schizophrenia. In this patient, a severe increase of creatine kinase (CK) occurred during treatment with olanzapine and amisulpride. The following risperidone medication was well tolerated without side effects. Susceptibility for malignant hyperthermia was detected by a positive in vitro contracture test. The occurrence of elevated muscle enzymes during treatment with atypical neuroleptics is suspicious as a possible side effect of neuroleptic medication and muscle disease.

Adult↗