Biomedical subjects

R Grundstein-Amado

Publications and source records attributed to R Grundstein-Amado.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Family and physicians' views of surrogate decision-making: the roles and how to choose.

Physicians and family members were compared on the roles played in surrogate decision-making and their views as to how choices should be made by surrogate decision-makers. Thirty-six family members of patients with Alzheimer's disease, 35 family members of patients with schizophrenia, and 34 physicians from a diversity of specialties were the respondents. There was general agreement that shared decision-making was preferred. Physicians seem to make surrogate decisions in accordance with contemporary views about their roles. Families believed they had a strong subjective appreciation of the patient's overall good. The burden of decision-making was greater for families, but that depended to some degree on the diagnosis of the patient.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1995

Values education: a new direction for medical education.

This paper suggests that medical education should redirect resources to values education, specifically developing new strategies to improve the process of clarification of values. The author suggests using the values journal method which is based on a systematic record of students' personal value systems reflected in their stories and life experience; and on their responses to case presentation. Generating a personal values journal helps students define who they are, what their social and professional roles are, what their expectations are and where they are going. Keeping values journals promotes students' decision-making capacity, and equips them with the necessary skills to teach their future patients how to generate their own value systems. The development of a well defined values journal is a preparatory stage for active participation in clinical conferences or group discussion, and for effective communal dialogue among the group's members.

Autobiographies as Topic↗

PubMed1993

Ethical decision-making processes used by health care providers.

This paper reports the results of a study conducted with 18 health care providers (HCPs) in two Toronto hospitals. The study examined and assessed how these HCPs make clinical-ethical decisions in the light of a theoretical model of clinical-ethical decision making. Nine nurses and nine doctors were interviewed through two-phased, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The results suggest that, in relation to the two major elements of the model, namely the ethical component and the decision theory component, the HCPs did not follow a consistent and systematic pattern of ethical decision making. Differences emerged between their actual self-reported behaviour and their potential more capability (i.e. their abstract thought process). The general picture that emerged was that decisions were made in a narrow, habitual manner, through the elimination of the most significant and demanding elements of the process. HCPs' ethical approaches affected the entire process of the decision making: their perception of the problem, their search for and selection of information and evidence, and their development of alternatives and resultant consequences. It is suggested to (a) further investigate and understand the subjective realities of the individuals involved in the decision making processes, their values and the meaning they ascribe to their choices, and (b) to establish extensive educational programmes to enhance HCPs' decision-making capacity and subsequently promote an effective and responsible professional practice.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Differences in ethical decision-making processes among nurses and doctors.

The study reports results of an inquiry into the different patterns of ethical decision making used by doctors and nurses. The findings of the study are that nurses and doctors act out of different values, motivations and expectations and that there is a communication gap between them. Nurses place the highest value on the 'caring' perspective, which entails responsiveness and sensitivity to the patients' wishes. In contrast, the doctors value above all the patients' rights and the scientific approach that implies a major concern with disease and its cure. The study suggests that there is a need for the development of a new foundation, based on common professional attributes of the two groups, to which both groups are committed. This would provide a joint point of reference from which the two professions can solve shared ethical problems and would remove communication barriers.

Beneficence↗

PubMed1991

An integrative model of clinical-ethical decision making.

The purpose of this paper is to propose a model of clinical-ethical decision making which will assist the health care professional to arrive at an ethically defensible judgment. The model highlights the integration between ethics and decision making, whereby ethics as a systematic analytic tool bring to bear the positive aspects of the decision making process. The model is composed of three major elements. The ethical component, the decision making component and the contextual component. The latter incorporates the relational aspects between the provider and the patient and the organizational structure. The model suggests that in order to arrive at an ethically, justifiable sound decision one make reference to those three elements.

Beneficence↗