PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R H Burton

Publications and source records attributed to R H Burton.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1987

Control of hypertension in elderly patients with felodipine and metoprolol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

1. Forty-nine patients aged 65-80 years, whose Phase V diastolic blood pressure (dBP) was above 95 mmHg after 4 weeks open treatment with metoprolol 50 mg twice daily were randomized to receive, double-blind, the calcium antagonist felodipine (n = 32) 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo (n = 17) in addition to metoprolol for 2 weeks. If the dBP remained greater than 95 mmHg, the dose of felodipine or placebo was doubled for a further 2 weeks; if the dBP was still greater than 95 mmHg, the dose of felodipine was doubled again to 10 mg twice daily or the corresponding placebo dose given. The duration of the double-blind period was 6 weeks, all patients receiving metoprolol 50 mg twice daily throughout. 2. At the end of the double-blind period, the seated dBP was reduced from 103 +/- 5 (mean +/- s.d.) to 88 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than 0.001) by felodipine and from 105 +/- 100 +/- 11 mmHg (NS) by placebo. The differences between these reductions (P less than 0.01) and between the final dBPs (P less than 0.001) were significant. Eighty-nine per cent of patients receiving felodipine and 33% of those receiving placebo (P less than 0.001) had controlled (dBP less than or equal to 95 mmHg) BPs. Half (14/27 completing) of the patients receiving felodipine required 2.5 mg throughout; 9/27 needed 5 mg and 4/27 10 mg twice daily. Adverse events occurred with equal frequency in the two groups, but the profile was different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1985

Unrecognised depression in general practice.

Patients attending their general practitioner were screened and a group with unrecognised major depressive disorder identified. This group was interviewed and the findings compared with those in a group of patients recognised correctly as depressed by their general practitioners. Half of the patients with severe depression screened in their doctors' waiting rooms went unrecognised, and they differed in few ways from those who were recognised. The differences found were that the patients with unrecognised depression were less obviously depressed and their illness had lasted longer. Physical illness was present in nearly 30% of patients in the unrecognised group, and the depression seemed related to it. Patients with unrecognised depression were more likely to have feelings other than those of normal sadness and more likely to respond with change of mood to intercurrent events. These data suggest that patients might benefit if general practitioners were better trained to recognise depression, although it is not known whether treatment would be effective.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1982

General practitioners and learning by audit.

The ways in which ;medical audit' can be used in the continuing education of general practitioners are examined, and certain rules for the conduct of such education in small groups of peers are put forward. However, it proved impossible to evaluate the outcome of the educational exercise because those taking part refused to audit twice any single aspect of their daily work.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed1982

How general practitioners manage depressive illness: developing a method of audit.

A model of process is necessary if it is to be audited. A model derived by a group of general practitioners for an audit of their management of depressive illness is described, together with the recording form used and the results of the audit. It is suggested that other general practitioners could test the validity of the model by using the recording form to audit their own management of depressive illness.

Depression↗