PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R H Penner

Publications and source records attributed to R H Penner.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Matching-to-sample by an echolocating dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).

An adult male dolphin was trained to perform a three-alternative delayed matching-to-sample task while wearing eyecups to occlude its vision. Sample and comparison stimuli consisted of a small and a large PVC plastic tube, a water-filled stainless steel sphere, and a solid aluminum cone. Stimuli were presented under water and the dolphin was allowed to identify the stimuli through echolocation. The echolocation clicks emitted by the dolphin to each sample and each comparison stimulus were recorded and analyzed. Over 48 sessions of testing, choice accuracy averaged 94.5% correct. This high level of accuracy was apparently achieved by varying the number of echolocation clicks emitted to various stimuli. Performance appeared to reflect a preexperimental stereotyped search pattern that dictated the order in which comparison items were examined and a complex sequential-sampling decision process. A model for the dolphin's decision-making processes is described.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Comparison of target detection capabilities of the beluga and bottlenose dolphin.

The echolocation detection capabilities of a beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) were directly compared in a target detection experiment. Both animals were trained to detect targets in the presence of masking noise. Targets were stainless-steel, water-filled spheres 7.62 and 22.86 cm in diameter. Target ranges of 16.5 and 40 m were used with the 7.62-cm sphere and 80 m with the 22.86-cm sphere. Masking noise with a flat spectrum from 40-160 kHz was projected from a spherical transducer placed 4 or 5 m, depending on the target distance, from the animal hoop station in line with the target. Target detection performance was determined as a function of masking noise level at each target range. The echo-to-noise ratio (Ee/No)max for the beluga at the 75% correct response threshold was approximately 1.0 dB compared to about 10 dB for the dolphin. The differences of each animal's detection performance across the three ranges were consistent with target strength and transmission loss differences. It is speculated that the difference in performance between the two species may be due to differences in critical bandwidth, signal processing capability, or echolocation strategy.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1987

Propagation of beluga echolocation signals.

The propagation characteristics of high-frequency echolocation signals (peak energies above 100 kHz) of the beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) were measured while the animal performed a target detection task. The whale was trained to station on a bite plate so that its transmission beam could be measured in the vertical and horizontal planes using hydrophone arrays. The transitional region between the acoustic near- and farfields was also located using an array of hydrophones that extended directly in front of the animal in the horizontal plane. Three distinct modes of signals were observed. Mode 1 signals had click intervals greater than the time required for the signals to travel to the target and back (two-way transit time). Mode 2 signals had click intervals shorter than the two-way transit time, and mode 3 signals had high repetition rates with an average click interval of 1.7 ms, approximately 2% of the two-way transit time. The average click intervals for the modes 1 and 2 signals were 193 and 44 ms, respectively. The vertical and horizontal beam patterns of the mode 1 signals had similar 3-dB beamwidths of approximately 6.5 degrees. The major axis of the vertical beam was directed approximately 5 degrees above the plane defined by the animal's teeth. The near- to farfield transition region was approximately 0.64-0.75 m from the tip of the animal's mouth.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Target detection by the beluga using a surface-reflected path.

During an echolocation-in-noise experiment we suspected that a beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) was using a surface-reflected path to maximize detection performance. We tested and confirmed this suspicion by acoustically and mechanically denying access to surface path information. The whale's performance varied as the surface-reflected path was denied.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Demonstration of adaptation in beluga whale echolocation signals.

The echolocation signals of the same beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) were measured first in San Diego Bay, and later in Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. The ambient noise level in Kaneohe Bay is typically 12-17 dB greater than in San Diego Bay. The whale demonstrated the adaptiveness of its biosonar by shifting to higher frequencies and intensities after it was moved to Kaneohe. In San Diego, the animal emitted echolocation signals with peak frequencies between 40 and 60 kHz, and bandwidths between 15 and 25 kHz. In Kaneohe, the whale shifted its signals approximately an octave higher in frequencies with peak frequencies between 100 and 120 kHz, and bandwidths between 20 and 40 kHz. Signal intensities measured in Kaneohe were up to 18 dB higher than in San Diego. The data collected represent the first quantitative evidence of the adaptive capability of a cetacean biosonar system.

Adaptation, Physiological↗